Coloring Criminalized in a California School, 6-Year-Old Suffers Punishment for Drawing
When a six-year-old draws a picture with the words “Black Lives Mater,” [sic] all is well in the world. When she adds “any life” below those words, she is criminalized. This makes sense, right?
For reference, here’s the picture she drew:
An elementary student at Capistrano Unified School District in Southern California, “B.B,” had just learned about Martin Luther King Jr. in class when she decided to draw a picture showing different racial backgrounds, and label it with the phrases above. She then gave it to her black classmate, whose mother saw it when she arrived home and called the school concerned that their daughter was being targeted.
According to the Pacific Legal Foundation, “The principal confronted B.B. and explained that including the phrase ‘any life’ in the drawing was ‘inappropriate’ and ‘racist,’ and he forced B.B. to apologize to her classmate. B.B. would also no longer be allowed to draw pictures in school. Worse still, the [now] 7-year-old was not allowed to go to recess for two weeks. Instead, she had to sit and watch her friends play without her.”
What started as an “innocent effort to be nice to her friend,” turned into an unlawful punishment in which a child’s First Amendment rights are in jeopardy. Not only was coloring criminalized, but a child was also traumatized because she was criminalized by her school for giving a gift to a friend.
As a result of the incident, B.B.’s mother – who was told about the incident over a year later – filed a lawsuit against the school district with the help of the Pacific Legal Foundation. The U.S. District Court for the Central District of California then ruled that the public school had a right to punish B.B.
But the Pacific Legal Foundation brought an appeal on July 15 on behalf of B.B.’s mother.
The Free Speech Center states the reality: “This matter should have been resolved long ago with an apology by the school district. That didn’t happen so litigation was filed.”
Pacific Legal Attorney Caleb Trotter explained on the Daily Signal podcast, “You can see in their just gross overreaction to the innocent, inclusive use of ‘any life’ that they were teaching this through only one viewpoint, which is the progressive-accepted racial ideology viewpoint, and that’s deeply troubling.”
Schools, specifically in California, frequently undermine parental rights, but they also conveniently hide information from parents when their child’s rights are being taken away.
Related articles and resources:
Virginia School District Ignore Parents Opposition, Implements ‘Gender Identity’ Lessons
Image from Shutterstock.
’Tis the season for holiday reading!
Check out Daily Citizen’s cheery winter reads.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Emma Schultz serves as the News and Policy Intern for Daily Citizen and Focus on the Family. She is currently a Senior at Colorado Christian University studying communications and double minoring in politics and public relations. She is active in her student community at CCU, and in her local church. Emma is passionate about sharing Truth, and uses writing as an avenue to so; she is passionate about freedom of speech, gender ideology and the importance of life.
Related Posts
Here’s How to Respond to the Trans Speech Police
November 11, 2024
NFL’s Jake Bates: ‘I Hope People Can See Jesus Through My Story’
November 11, 2024
Black Newborn Mortality is Not About Race
November 11, 2024
We Were all Lied to and We Responded
November 8, 2024