• Skip to main content
Daily Citizen
  • Subscribe
  • Categories
    • Culture
    • Life
    • Religious Freedom
    • Sexuality
  • Parenting Resources
    • LGBT Pride
    • Homosexuality
    • Sexuality/Marriage
    • Transgender
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Contact
  • Donate

Paul Random

Oct 02 2025

Creating Babies Without Mothers Must Remain Frankensteinian Fiction

Scientists are calling it a pioneering DNA breakthrough – a Frankensteinian development where material from skin cells are transformed into human eggs capable of being fertilized and turned into human embryos.

What this means is scientists creating a baby without the need of a mother.

Sadly, it’s not merely theoretical. It’s already taken place at a laboratory inside the Oregon Health and Science University.

“It is very preliminary work at this stage,” explained Dr. Paul Amato, a reproductive endocrinologist and professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the school.

However early in the process, the frightening turn is yet one more evil and wicked manifestation of what happens when you try and detach God’s perfect institution of one-man, one-woman marriage from procreation.

Scientists are trying to put a positive spin on the news, especially appealing to the sympathies of those struggling to conceive a child.

“If it were to be successful, it would offer hope for couples and people suffering from infertility, particularly older women who have run out of eggs,” observed Dr. Amato.

“In theory, the technique could result in a limitless number of eggs,” she stated. “The skin cell DNA however can come from anyone, even if they personally don’t have any eggs or remaining eggs – older women, women after cancer treatment, people born without eggs, men.”

And there you have it – the true motivation and energy behind the emerging technology.

Dr. Amato claims, “A same-sex male couple could potentially have a child genetically related to both partners.”

If the prospect of enslaving a child to growing up in life without a biological mother doesn’t sadden or burden you, then you’re obviously not paying attention to facts.

In addition to the countless frightening aspects of lab engineered human beings, the absence of a mother in a young person’s life are significant and consequential. The social science shows growing up without a mother leads to a greater risk of emotional problems, increased risk of drug abuse, compromised emotional self-regulation, lower self-esteem and lower educational attainment.

Mothers are more than egg donors – they’re everything in the life of a child.

The unparalleled selfishness driving this craze is what’s behind Katy Faust’s organization, Them Before Us. The non-profit “strives to put children before adults in every conversation about marriage and family.”

In other words, it’s not about what the “parent” wants but rather what’s in the best interest of the child.

On a recent podcast, Katy wisely noted, “The baby-making industry and the baby-taking industry are two sides of the same child-commodifying coin.”

The lab process in question is called “mitomeiosis” and is a version of cloning. The team in Oregon produced 82 functional eggs, seven of which were developed into embryos. All of them had chromosomal abnormalities.

Sadly, scientists are now back in the lab and trying to modify and make adjustments in an effort to create healthy babies without the need of biological mothers.

Even Mary Shelly, the famed novelist best known for writing Frankenstein, might well find this current narrative both horrifying, mortifying and moral sense-defying, especially for non-fiction.

Image from Getty.

Written by Paul Batura · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: IVF, Paul Random

Oct 01 2025

Pay Tribute to Charlie Kirk: Bring Your Bible to School

Back in September while speaking at the Museum of the Bible as part of a Religious Liberty Commission meeting, President Donald Trump pledged to protect the rights of all students to express and live out their faith on or off campus.

“For most of our country’s history, the Bible was found in every classroom in the nation,” Trump reflected. “Yet in many schools today, students are instead indoctrinated with anti-religious propaganda, and some are punished for their religious beliefs. Very, very strongly punished. It is ridiculous.”

Tragically, just a few days later, Charlie Kirk, another strong proponent of the Bible in public schools, was assassinated in Utah.

Charlie has long championed the idea of the Bible as not only an evangelistic book, but also an historical document for teaching about civilizations and human nature.

“It is inarguable the impact that the Bible has had on the world even in the capacity for solving human problems and analyzing human behavior,” Kirk stated. “The problem is that teachers and professors, mostly high school teachers, feel like they can’t teach the Bible because they can only teach it through a religious lens.”

He continued:

“There’s actually some really, really strong historical stories, but there’s also the archetypical stories to tell. The stories of strong women like Esther, the stories of betrayal and greed with Joseph in Genesis 40 though 52. There’s amazing stories to tell young people how to properly act, and how to properly interact in society.”

It’s in this spirit of boldness and conviction that Focus on the Family is once again spearheading Thursday’s Bring Your Bible to School Day – a nationwide celebration designed to empower and encourage young people to live out their faith in the classroom.

Last year, over 1.2 million students across 70,000 schools participated in the annual observance. We received inspiring testimonials of children not only bringing their bibles – but also opening and reading them at their desks and in the cafeteria. There were spontaneous prayer gatherings and candid and heartfelt conversations between believers and non-believers.

Students who participate are respectful and inclusive. They see the Bible as a gift to share. Its timeless contents tell miraculous stories. In this era of cultural confusion, it provides clarity. For those struggling with anxiety, it brings peace.

The late Dr. Adrian Rogers, a longtime Focus board member, famously observed, “The Bible is shallow enough for a babe to come and drink without fear of drowning, and deep enough for a theologian to swim in forever without touching bottom.”

In the wake of Charlie Kirk’s assassination, there have been hopeful reports of Americans who previously didn’t attend weekly services, going to church. Charlie bravely and courageously shared his faith in hostile environments – especially public schools. There is no better way for students to honor his memory and pay tribute to his witness than to bring their bibles to school on Thursday October 2.

It was Kirk who urged students, “If you believe in something, you need to have the courage to fight for those ideas.” 

You don’t have to fight to bring your bible to school, but the act may require a degree of courage given some of the hostile actors in today’s public-school systems. On Bring Your Bible to School Day 2025, honor and witness to the power and saving nature of the Lord by bringing your bible into the classroom.

Written by Paul Batura · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: Bring Your Bible, Charlie Kirk, Paul Random

Sep 29 2025

Right Again, Justice Thomas: The Constitution, not Precedent Should Decide Cases

Justice Clarence Thomas, who is about to celebrate his 34th anniversary serving on the United States Supreme Court, made news last week for stating what many of us see as foundationally obvious:

“I don’t think that any of these cases that have been decided are the gospel,” declared the justice. “And I do give perspective to the precedent. But … the precedent should be respectful of our legal tradition, and our country and our laws, and be based on something – not just something somebody dreamt up and others went along with.”

Speaking at Catholic University of America’s Columbus School of Law in Washington, D.C., Justice Thomas was referring the legal principle of “stare decisis” – the policy of courts following past decisions. The term is Latin for “to stand by things decided” and is rooted in 18th century English common law.

Abortion advocates, especially, love stare decisis only after a majority of Supreme Court justices concoct constitutional rights out of whole cloth – as was done in 1973 when the High Court created a so-called right to kill preborn children in the womb.

Justice Thomas noted this hypocrisy, joking “You apply it (stare decisis) rigorously when you want to overrule a prior precedent that you don’t like, but loosely when it’s one of yours. I can’t remember which book that’s in. I don’t think that is acceptable, right?”

In issuing a concurring opinion in the Dobbs case back in 2022, the historic decision that reversed Roe, Justice Thomas rightly pointed out that previous courts had made up the concept of “substantive due process” in the 14th Amendment to justify and enact all kinds of social shenanigans.

In fact, the now longest-serving justice even went so far as to call it “legal fiction” driven by a “liberal ‘rights revolution’” all with the intent of institutionalizing a “culture of permissiveness.”

Justice Thomas’ legal analysis triggered alarm bells in radical circles as they considered the constitutional fragility of recent cases involving such key issues as marriage and other matters of moral concern.

Assuming a refreshingly commonsense posture, the justice told law students and those gathered that logic and the Constitution should drive the analysis of what they look at on the Supreme Court.

“I think we should demand that, no matter what the case is, that it has more than just a simple theoretical basis. If it’s totally stupid, and that’s what they’ve decided, you don’t go along with it just because it’s decided.”

During his presentation, Justice Thomas likened his fellow justices to train passengers.

“We never go to the front to see who’s driving the train, where is it going. And you could go up there in the engine room, find it’s an orangutan driving the train, but you want to follow that just because it’s a train.”

The 2025-2026 Supreme Court train departs for a new term on October 6. How grateful we are to have Justice Clarence Thomas and his fellow level-headed judges onboard who look to the United States Constitution when deciding the cases before them.

Image from Getty.

Written by Paul Batura · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: Paul Random

Sep 29 2025

There is a Difference Between Retribution and Justice

You’d be forgiven for thinking that journalists and media personalities receive a daily talking points sheet filled with coordinated messaging from some secret source.

After all, peruse your typical news site and themes and trends start to emerge – not so much the stories themselves, but also the language used in telling or framing the story itself.

Today, the Term du jour is “retribution” – a word stemming from the Latin verb “retribuere,” which means “to pay back” or “give in return.” Merriam Webster defines it as “dispensing or receiving of reward or punishment” and “something given or exacted in recompense.”

As Christians, we know from Jesus’ teaching that we’re to leave that type of punishment to the Lord. From Matthew’s Gospel, we read Jesus’ own words, “You have heard that it was said, ‘An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.’ But I say to you not to resist an evildoer. But whoever slaps you on your right cheek, turn the other also.”

The apostle Paul echoed that sentiment when he wrote to Christians in Rome, “Beloved, do not avenge yourselves, but rather give place to wrath, for it is written, ‘Vengeance is Mine, I will repay,’ says the Lord.”

But does that mean we’re to simply fold our hands in prayer or throw them up altogether and simply wait for punishment to be applied supernaturally? No.

Justice is a core characteristic of God and He calls on us to do our part to enact it in this world. There is nothing inherently out of bounds in seeking to right a wrong, especially when those wrongs inflict harm on His people. We read in Micah 6:8, “He has told you, O man, what is good; and what does the Lord require of you, but to do justice, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with your God?”

The prophet Isaiah similarly warns and counsels, “Learn to do good; seek justice, correct oppression; bring justice to the fatherless, plead the widow’s cause (1:17).”

While the goal of justice is to restore what sin has stolen, the aim or intent of retribution is generally self-focused, i.e., “an eye for an eye.”

What’s telling is that when reporters often write about retribution, they’re generally focused on the response to the offense rather than getting into the details or even the validity of the problematic or illegal activity that started the whole process. Instead, they should be investigating the merits of the core concern and addressing what can and should be done about it to make sure it doesn’t happen again.

One could be left with the impression that those calling out so-called “payback” are hoping that our attention won’t go back to the beginning or root cause of the offense.

Christians can rest in God’s ultimate authority and final word. In just these last few weeks, Erika Kirk, the widow of slain Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, has provided us with a powerful example of how best to balance the distinctions of justice and retribution.

In announcing that she had forgiven her husband’s assassin, Erika is doing her personal part in navigating a gross injustice. At the same time, she is leaving the prosecution of the individual to Utah prosecutors, even up to the possibility of the death penalty.

We pray that justice will be served.

Image from Shutterstock.

Written by Paul Batura · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: Charlie Kirk, Justice, Paul Random

Sep 26 2025

Dr. Voddie Baucham: ‘[I Want to be Remembered] That I Made Much of Christ’

Dr. Voddie Baucham, Jr., a pastor, apologist, evangelist and fierce advocate for home education, died suddenly on Thursday. He was 56.

The beloved teacher and preacher had previously undergone quadruple bypass surgery in 2021 after suffering from heart failure. Although in fragile health, he’s maintained a full ministry schedule, including serving as founding president of Founders Seminary in Florida. 

Throughout his four-decade ministry, Dr. Baucham stressed the importance of the family, especially the value of a happy marriage and the critical role fathers play in the home. He once observed:

“The greatest source of security our children have in this world is a God-honoring, Christ-centered marriage between their parents.”

Although his ministry focus was broad, Voddie was a mentor to many men, challenging males to lean into the calling God has placed on their lives. Over the years he often pointed out that the top prayer request of Christian mothers was to have fathers step up and spiritually lead the family.

“I boil it down to the four Ps,” he once told Warren Smith. “Priest, prophet, provider, protector. [He should be] the spiritual leader, the one who is the priest or intercessor for his family; the one who’s the prophet, the one who’s the instructor in his family; the provider, the one who sees that his family has what they need; and the protector, the one who puts himself between his family and anyone or anything that would do them harm.”

As dad to nine children and married to Bridgett for 36 years, Baucham was sometimes criticized for his unapologetic bluntness. But it was this clarity that made him effective, drawing large and receptive crowds full of men hungry for guidance.

“It has been said that as goes the family, so goes the world,” he preached. “It can also be said that as goes the father, so goes the family.”

It was while serving as a pastor in Texas that Dr. Baucham began to appreciate the value and importance of home education. Although their two oldest children were enrolled in the church’s Christian school, his thinking and convictions regarding it began to evolve.

“The idea of being able to tailor education to the needs of our children and to the specific desires of our family just became more appealing to me,” he observed. “The idea of not being sort of burdened down by someone else’s schedule and agenda and even curriculum, those things just became more and more appealing to me. Those are the things that began to lead us in that direction.”

Even more so, though, Dr. Baucham was drawn to home education because of a personal conviction to disciple their children and not leave the task up to other people.

“Education is discipleship. Whomever is educating our children is discipling our children. Jesus said, “A pupil is not above his teacher, but everyone, when he is fully trained, will be like his teacher.”

Dr. Baucham was principled and bold, never worried about speaking up in the midst of cultural confusion. As a black man, he sometimes surprised people by not going along with those who emphasized or stressed concerns regarding racial division. “I think there are people who have a vested interest in things not being better, or at least a vested interest in not allowing people to acknowledge the fact that things are getting better,” he once said. “The racial-grievance industry is a multi-billion-dollar industry.”

He always had a keen ability to synthesize a situation and interpret things thru a biblical lens.

Following the death of Charlie Kirk earlier this month, Dr. Baucham quoted Soren Kierkegaard: “The tyrant dies, and his rule is over. The martyr dies, and his rule begins.”

World Magazine once asked Voddie how he wanted to be remembered. His reply?

“That I made much of Christ. That’s what I want the judgment to be, that I made much of Christ.”

He certainly accomplished that goal.

Image credit: Voddie Baucham Ministries

Written by Paul Batura · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: Paul Random

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 40
  • Go to Next Page »

Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | © 2025 Focus on the Family. All rights reserved.

  • Cookie Policy