• Skip to main content
Daily Citizen
  • Subscribe
  • Categories
    • Culture
    • Life
    • Religious Freedom
    • Sexuality
  • Parenting Resources
    • LGBT Pride
    • Homosexuality
    • Sexuality/Marriage
    • Transgender
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Contact
  • Donate

pornography

Mar 14 2025

‘Only Fans’ is a Social Toxin Destroying Lives

You can tell a lot about a culture by how its people spend their free time and disposable income.

OnlyFans, an X-rated internet content site based in England, generated over seven billion dollars last year. With over 300 million users, more than 40% of which are believed to be based here in the United States, the company strives to provide its subscribers with all kinds of tawdry and pornographic content.

The site boasts 4.1 million “creators,” 84% of whom are female. Not surprisingly, 70% of the paying customers are male.

Last week, one “creator” filmed herself having sex with 1,000 men in a single day. The site eventually removed the video because they said they couldn’t prove if everyone involved was over the age of 18.

That same woman claims to be making over one million dollars a month on the site.

Friday’s Wall Street Journal features the sad tale of “celebrity women” cashing in on the perverted interest of voyeuristic men:

Today, the most lucrative way for many female celebrities to sell sex is OnlyFans. In theory, it is a content-neutral platform that enables any individual to sell subscriptions of any kind to fans, promising “creative ownership,” “inclusivity” and “freedom” to would-be “creators.”

Lily Allen, a British singer who had two platinum-selling albums in the 2000s, posted on X last year that she earned more money selling pictures of her feet on OnlyFans than from streams of her music on Spotify. Drea de Matteo, who won an Emmy for her role on The Sopranos in 2004, has said that she joined OnlyFans after acting work dried up and she faced foreclosure on her mortgage.

It could be argued that pornography is not new. The first publications of lewd material and images are said to date to Rome in the 1500s. The advent of photography in the early 1800s and then film in the early 1900s provided more opportunity to exploit and commodify human sexuality. The internet is yet one more, albeit supercharged, medium to make a mockery of God’s gift of sexuality .

It would be easy to chastise the women who are voluntarily exploiting themselves on OnlyFans or other similar sites. To be sure, a number of them are being exploited by others. But the main reason the women are engaging in this industry and forum is because there’s a market for it. Men are willing to pay, so women are willing to perform.

Focus on the Family founder Dr. James Dobson was invited by President Ronald Reagan back in the 1980s to serve on the Attorney General’s Commission on Pornography. It was a grueling and difficult assignment. He and his co-laborers spent several years identifying the wickedness of the industry and made substantive recommendations. They contended it was a “winnable war.” Congress enacted many of their proposals, but sadly, time and culture have erased many of the gains.

I’ll always remember what Dr. Dobson said to me once about pornography’s scourge. He once said, “You go into the house of every serial killer, and you’ll always find pornography. Always.” He wasn’t suggesting everyone who looks at porn becomes a mass murderer, but he was warning about the insidious and incremental nature of the sin.

Friday’s Wall Street Journal article concludes by quoting an Only Fans “creator” who recently told a documentary filmmaker that navigating the escalating, sometimes unnervingly depraved requests of “fans” is “like doing a deal with the Devil.” Another woman said, “I felt objectified by creepy men.”

Tragically, that’s the evil nature of the pornography industry. If you or someone you know is caught in its grasp, please know Focus on the Family has resources available to help you break free and be liberated from it.

Image from Shutterstock.

Written by Paul Batura · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: Paul Random, pornography, Problematic

Mar 05 2025

First Lady Supports Bill Targeting Deepfakes, Sextortion and Revenge Porn

The House of Representatives is preparing to pass a bill targeting revenge porn, online sextortion and pornographic deepfakes, multiple sources report, following exhortations from America’s first family.

The bipartisan Take It Down Act (H.R. 633) makes it illegal to share, or threaten to share, nude images and videos without consent. It passed the Senate on February 13 in a rare unanimous vote.

First lady Melania Trump joined Speaker of the House Mike Johnson at a Congressional roundtable Monday to support the bill.

“I am here with you today with a common goal — to protect our youth from online harm,” Mrs. Trump began, continuing:

In today’s AI-driven world, the threat of privacy breaches is alarmingly high. As organizations harness the power of our data, the risk of unauthorized access and misuse of a person’s information escalates.
We must prioritize robust security measures and uphold strict ethical standards to protect individual privacy.

Johnson echoed the first lady, acknowledging “laws need to keep up” with the “unspeakable evils” spawned by the “dark side of tech.”

“We are anxious to put it on the floor in the House, to get it to President Trump’s desk for his signature, because we’ve got to do what we can to stop [nonconsensual sharing of explicit images],” he said.

The president highlighted Melania’s support for the bill in last night’s wide-ranging joint address to congress, calling it “so important.”

“Once it passes the house, I look forward to signing it into law,” he said, thanking Senate Majority Leader John Thune for shepherding it through the Senate.

The House Committee on Energy and Commerce must approve the Take It Down Act before the House can vote on it. Chairman Brett Guthrie said Monday a committee hearing on the bill will occur “very, very soon.”

How It Works

The Take It Down Act addresses three of the most common ways bad actors weaponize nude images online.

Revenge Porn

The first, and perhaps most familiar, way people exploit nude photos is “revenge porn” — when explicit images are shared to harm someone mentally, financially or reputationally. It is most closely associated with aggrieved ex-boyfriends leaking once-private, sexual images of former girlfriends.

The Act makes it illegal to publish sexual images that were:

  • Created or shared with a reasonable expectation of privacy, like those sent to a romantic partner.
  • Shared to cause harm.

Violators would face up to two years in prison for sharing images of an adult, and up to three years for sharing a minor’s.

Deepfakes

The same penalties apply to what the Act calls “digital forgeries” —  images and videos edited to make it appear as though a person is performing a sexual act. They are more commonly known as deepfakes.

Elliston Berry (15), who attended the joint address to congress with the first lady, is one of the many victims of pornographic deepfakes. When she was just 14 years old, Berry discovered a peer edited one of her Instagram posts to make it look like she was posing nude.

Berry told Monday’s congressional roundtable how the violation affected her life:

Fear, shock, and disgust were just some of the many emotions I felt.
I felt responsible and began to blame myself. I was ashamed to tell my parents, despite doing nothing wrong.
As I attended school, I was scared of the reactions of [people] or [that] someone could recreate those photos.

The Take It Down Act imposes the same penalties on people who share deepfakes as on those who share real photos, consistent with the real damage doctored images do to victims like Berry.

Online Sextortion

Threatening to leak explicit photos can be just as harmful as actually exposing them. Since 2021, at least 20 teenage boys have reportedly committed suicide after falling victim to sextortion.

Online sextortionists create fake social media accounts to convince users to strike up a romantic exchange of nude images. Once they get their hands on a someone’s explicit photos, the scammers ask for money in exchange for keeping the images quiet.

In 2022, Gavin Guffey, a 17-year-old from South Carolina, ended his life less than two hours after being contacted by a sextortionist. His dad, Representative Brandon Guffy (SC), is one of the bill’s biggest supporters. He described his experience in an article for The Hill.

As a father, I believe it is my job to protect our kids. Since Gavin took his life, I have been focused on continuing to use my voice to advocate, help victims, fight child online sexual abuse and focus on teen mental health. Our children’s safety is an issue that transcends party lines.

Under the Take It Down Act, sextortionists would face up to 18 months in prison for targeting an adult, and up to 30 months for targeting minors like Gavin.

A Pathway to Take It Down

H.R. 633 would also require websites and social media companies to remove explicit images within 48 hours of a victim’s request.

Representative Maria Salazar (FL), who sponsored the bill in the House, said of this provision:

The act, finally, is sending a very big message to Big Tech that they have to bring down these images within 48 hours. No more time than that. No more excuses. If not, Big Tech will be just as guilty as the aggressor.
Why It Matters

The internet is not a safe place for kids. At the very least, the Take It Down Act demonstrates Congress’ desire to help parents protect their kids from exploitation.

That’s something to celebrate.

Additional Articles and Resources

Teen Boys Falling Prey to Financial Sextortion — Here’s What Parents Can Do

Meta Takes Steps to Prevent Kids From Sexting

Instagram’s Sextortion Safety Measures — Too Little, Too Late?

Zuckerberg Implicated in Meta’s Failures to Protect Children

Instagram Content Restrictions Don’t Work, Tests Show

‘The Dirty Dozen List’ — Corporations Enable and Profit from Sexual Exploitation

Taylor Swift Deepfakes Should Inspire Outrage — But X Isn’t to Blame

Written by Emily Washburn · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: pornography, social media, Trump

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3

Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | © 2026 Focus on the Family. All rights reserved.

  • Cookie Policy