80% of Americans Want Voter ID Laws, While H.R. 1 Tries to Do Away With Them
A new Monmouth University Poll shows that Americans are clearly concerned with the integrity of elections. They want to expand early in-person voting, but even larger numbers want to see voter ID laws enforced.
In a survey of 810 adults from June 9 to 14, 80% of respondents supported requirements that voters show a photo ID in order to vote. Those results are bipartisan, with large majorities of Republicans, Democrats and Independents in agreement on the issue.
The poll covers other election issues besides voter ID, and it shows deep partisan divides on certain questions. However, the near unanimity concerning the need for voter ID laws prompts the question: Why is that?
“The poll contains some seemingly conflicting information on voter access,” said Patrick Murray, director of the independent Monmouth University Polling Institute. “The bottom line seems to be that most Democrats and Republicans want to take the potential for election results to be questioned off the table. The problem, though, is they aren’t likely to agree on how to get there.”
That appears to explain the popularity of voter ID laws among those polled. Nearly everyone has a government-issued ID, and in states that require them for voting, the government typically provides them free of charge. The usual argument against them is that they disenfranchise minority voters at higher levels than whites – a concern that does have historical justification in this country. But Monmouth’s poll indicates that such concerns may no longer predominate in minority communities. When broken down between whites and nonwhites, nonwhites support voter ID laws at an even higher rate (84%) than whites (77%).
Another study conducted by the National Bureau of Economic Research in 2019, and just recently revised, concludes, “We find that [voter ID] laws have no negative effect on registration or turnout, overall or for any group defined by race, gender, age, or party affiliation.”
What kind of things must Americans already show a picture ID for? How about purchasing alcohol and cigarettes, opening a bank account, or applying for food stamps, welfare, Medicaid or unemployment. You’ll need one for renting or buying a house, driving/buying/renting a car, getting on an airplane, and even getting married. States require them to obtain a hunting or fishing license, or to adopt a pet. The list is almost endless. Nobody questions the need for those requirements, either.
So why, given the obvious public support for voter ID laws, is the U.S. Congress considering a bill, H.R. 1, entitled “For the People Act of 2021,” which eliminates all state laws requiring voter ID and replaces them with just a signature requirement?
Hans A. von Spakovsky, an election law expert, wrote an op-ed in which he explained what the net effect of H.R. 1 would be, “When combined with the mandate that states implement same-day voter registration, it means I could walk into any polling place on Election Day, register under the name John Smith, sign a form claiming I really am John Smith, cast a ballot, and walk out. Not only would election officials have no way of preventing that or verifying that I am not really John Smith, I could repeat this in as many polling places as I can get to.”
H.R. 1 passed in the U.S. House on March 3 but failed in a procedural vote in the Senate on Tuesday, putting its future in doubt. The question of voter IDs, however, will likely not go away any time soon.
From its very beginning, Focus on the Family has emphasized the importance of social responsibility. In fact, it’s one of our six pillars, along with values like the preeminence of evangelism, the permanence of marriage and the sanctity of human life. So we’ve always encouraged Christians to participate in government through voting and other forms of engagement. State voter ID laws are part of ensuring that elections are secure and trustworthy.
Photo from Rob Crandall / Shutterstock.com
’Tis the season for holiday reading!
Check out Daily Citizen’s cheery winter reads.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Bruce Hausknecht, J.D., is an attorney who serves as Focus on the Family’s judicial analyst. He is responsible for research and analysis of legal and judicial issues related to Christians and the institution of the family, including First Amendment freedom of religion and free speech issues, judicial activism, marriage, homosexuality and pro-life matters. He also tracks legislation and laws affecting these issues. Prior to joining Focus in 2004, Hausknecht practiced law for 17 years in construction litigation and as an associate general counsel for a large ministry in Virginia. He was also an associate pastor at a church in Colorado Springs for seven years, primarily in worship music ministry. Hausknecht has provided legal analysis and commentary for top media outlets including CNN, ABC News, NBC News, CBS Radio, The New York Times, the Chicago Tribune, The Washington Post, The Washington Times, the Associated Press, the Los Angeles Times, The Wall Street Journal, the Boston Globe and BBC radio. He’s also a regular contributor to The Daily Citizen. He earned a bachelor’s degree in history from the University of Illinois and his J.D. from Northwestern University School of Law. Hausknecht has been married since 1981 and has three adult children, as well as three adorable grandkids. In his free time, Hausknecht loves getting creative with his camera and capturing stunning photographs of his adopted state of Colorado.