Federal Appeals Court Blocks OSHA Vaccine Mandate, Cites ‘Grave’ Constitutional Issues
The Biden Administration’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate issued this week by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) hit a major roadblock almost immediately at the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans, which has stayed (stopped) the effect of the mandate pending a further hearing.
Responding to a petition from the states of Texas, Mississippi, Utah, South Carolina and Louisiana, joined by dozens of private and faith-based businesses, a three-judge panel from the 5th Circuit issued a brief order on Saturday, November 6, stopping the mandate in its tracks, while scheduling an expedited hearing within the next few days.
“Before the court is the petitioners’ emergency motion to stay enforcement of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s November 5, 2021 Emergency Temporary Standard (the “Mandate”) pending expedited judicial review,” the order states. “Because the petitions give cause to believe there are grave statutory and constitutional issues with the Mandate, the Mandate is hereby STAYED pending further action by this court.”
The court then sets a schedule for an expedited hearing.
“The Government shall respond to the petitioners’ motion for a permanent injunction by 5:00 PM on Monday, November 8. The petitioners shall file any reply by 5:00 PM on Tuesday, November 9.”
The mandate, which requires employers with 100 or more workers to require vaccinations or weekly testing and mask-wearing by unvaccinated employees, has also been challenged in three other federal circuits – the 6th, 8th and 11th.
The 490-page OSHA mandate constitutes a “dubious reach of federal power,” according to The Wall Street Journal.
“As 24 GOP state Attorneys General explained in a September letter to Mr. Biden, OSHA is stretching its authority under the law because ‘emergency temporary standards’ are supposed to be limited to ‘grave danger from exposure to substances or agents determined to be toxic or physically harmful or from new hazards,’” The WSJ reports. “The law ‘deals with work-related hazards, not all hazards one might encounter anywhere in the world,’ they note.”
The mandate will impact 84 million American workers if it becomes effective.
Photo from Shutterstock.
’Tis the season for holiday reading!
Check out Daily Citizen’s cheery winter reads.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Bruce Hausknecht, J.D., is an attorney who serves as Focus on the Family’s judicial analyst. He is responsible for research and analysis of legal and judicial issues related to Christians and the institution of the family, including First Amendment freedom of religion and free speech issues, judicial activism, marriage, homosexuality and pro-life matters. He also tracks legislation and laws affecting these issues. Prior to joining Focus in 2004, Hausknecht practiced law for 17 years in construction litigation and as an associate general counsel for a large ministry in Virginia. He was also an associate pastor at a church in Colorado Springs for seven years, primarily in worship music ministry. Hausknecht has provided legal analysis and commentary for top media outlets including CNN, ABC News, NBC News, CBS Radio, The New York Times, the Chicago Tribune, The Washington Post, The Washington Times, the Associated Press, the Los Angeles Times, The Wall Street Journal, the Boston Globe and BBC radio. He’s also a regular contributor to The Daily Citizen. He earned a bachelor’s degree in history from the University of Illinois and his J.D. from Northwestern University School of Law. Hausknecht has been married since 1981 and has three adult children, as well as three adorable grandkids. In his free time, Hausknecht loves getting creative with his camera and capturing stunning photographs of his adopted state of Colorado.
Related Posts
Colorado Counselor Asks U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Free Speech Case
November 12, 2024