Federal Judge Temporarily Blocks Kentucky’s New Abortion Law Over Lack of Forms

There’s good news and bad news from Kentucky on the subject of saving preborn lives. The good news is that on March 29 the state legislature overwhelmingly passed an omnibus abortion bill that establishes, among other things, a 15-week ban on abortions, adds a requirement that doctors must see a patient before she can receive abortion pills, and establishes numerous reporting requirements on abortion sellers so the state can keep better track of the abortion industry.
Even though Governor Andy Beshear vetoed the bill on April 8, the legislature successfully voted on April 13 to override that veto, and the law took effect the same day. The two remaining Planned Parenthood abortion outlets in the state announced they would stop performing any abortions because they were unable to comply with forms the state now required.
Planned Parenthood and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) also promptly took Kentucky to court.
Now for the bad news.
On April 21, U.S. District Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings issued a temporary restraining order blocking the enforcement of the new law until further court proceedings could be scheduled. And Planned Parenthood has resumed ending preborn life.
Planned Parenthood argued the new law contains eight subsections that require it to report on various aspects of the abortions it performs, and compliance is impossible because the forms have yet to be created by the state. The state of Kentucky is being defended by Attorney General Daniel Cameron, who argued that it was reasonable to interpret the law to conclude the state could not and would not require Planned Parenthood to comply with the reporting requirements until the forms were created and available.
Judge Jennings stated in her order that she didn’t have enough information to decide whether the law could be complied with at this time.
“For the reasons below, Plaintiff’s Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order is GRANTED to the extent that Defendants are restrained from enforcing HB 3 related to reporting and registration based on forms and programs not yet created or promulgated by the Cabinet for Health and Family Services (‘Cabinet’),” Judge Jennings wrote.
“The Court does not consider at this stage the constitutionality of the substance of the requirements in HB 3, but merely the enforceability of the provisions based on the impossibility of compliance.”
Most disappointingly, however, the judge blocked even the substantive provisions of the law, including the 15-week abortion ban and the abortion pill in-person examination requirement.
“The Court restrains enforcement of the entirety of HB 3 at this time, as it lacks information to specifically determine which individual provisions and subsections are capable of compliance,” Jennings wrote. “The Court will consider additional proof on this issue at the preliminary injunction hearing which will be scheduled prior to the expiration of this restraining order.”
The ACLU celebrated the judge’s ruling in a press release.
“We’re grateful for the temporary restraining order (TRO) restricting this egregious abortion ban from continuing to block a constitutionally protected right to basic care,” said Rebecca Gibron, CEO of Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawaii, Alaska, Indiana, Kentucky. “This is a win, but it is only the first step. We’re prepared to fight for our patients’ right to basic health in court and to continue doing everything in our power in ensure abortion access is permanently secured in Kentucky.”
The Family Foundation (TFF), a Kentucky family policy council and ally of Focus on the Family, reacted with disappointment upon news of the court’s ruling.
“This activist ruling is about putting pro-abortion politics above the law,” said David Walls, Executive Director of TFF. “By refusing to comply with HB 3’s commonsense protections and immediately running to court, abortion advocates have once again revealed they do not really care about women and only desire to further profit off the slaughter of babies in the womb. I am thankful that Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron will continue to strongly defend HB 3’s pro-life protections as this case moves forward.
“Kentuckians, and all Americans, are earnestly looking towards a time, very soon, where states can protect their most vulnerable citizens, preborn babies in the womb, without interference from activist courts,” Walls concluded.
The temporary restraining order lasts 14 days, which can be extended, and it is expected that another hearing will be held in the near future. In the interim, the judge anticipated in her ruling that either the forms necessary to comply with the law will be created by Kentucky, or the parties could agree on what enforcement of the law would look like until those forms are created, implying that the legal issues would be thereby simplified in time for the next hearing in the case.
The Daily Citizen will bring you more on this important case as events transpire. Kentucky’s 15-week ban is similar to the Mississippi law whose constitutionality is currently being considered by the U.S. Supreme Court in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. A decision in that case is expected before the end of June.
The Kentucky case is Planned Parenthood v. Cameron
Photo from Shutterstock.
’Tis the season for holiday reading!
Check out Daily Citizen’s cheery winter reads.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Bruce Hausknecht, J.D., is an attorney who serves as Focus on the Family’s judicial analyst. He is responsible for research and analysis of legal and judicial issues related to Christians and the institution of the family, including First Amendment freedom of religion and free speech issues, judicial activism, marriage, homosexuality and pro-life matters. He also tracks legislation and laws affecting these issues. Prior to joining Focus in 2004, Hausknecht practiced law for 17 years in construction litigation and as an associate general counsel for a large ministry in Virginia. He was also an associate pastor at a church in Colorado Springs for seven years, primarily in worship music ministry. Hausknecht has provided legal analysis and commentary for top media outlets including CNN, ABC News, NBC News, CBS Radio, The New York Times, the Chicago Tribune, The Washington Post, The Washington Times, the Associated Press, the Los Angeles Times, The Wall Street Journal, the Boston Globe and BBC radio. He’s also a regular contributor to The Daily Citizen. He earned a bachelor’s degree in history from the University of Illinois and his J.D. from Northwestern University School of Law. Hausknecht has been married since 1981 and has three adult children, as well as three adorable grandkids. In his free time, Hausknecht loves getting creative with his camera and capturing stunning photographs of his adopted state of Colorado.
Related Posts

Pentagon Ends Paid Travel Expenses and Time Off for Abortions
February 5, 2025

‘Mass Exodus’: Dr. Jay Richards on the Demise of Gender Ideology and What It Means for the Pro-Life Movement
February 5, 2025

Young People on Pro-Life Movement’s Future
January 30, 2025

Young Person Talks to Young People at National March for Life
January 28, 2025