• Skip to main content
Daily Citizen
  • Subscribe
  • Categories
    • Culture
    • Life
    • Religious Freedom
    • Sexuality
  • Parenting Resources
    • LGBT Pride
    • Homosexuality
    • Sexuality/Marriage
    • Transgender
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Contact
  • Donate

feminism

Oct 07 2026

Fixing Feminism with a Christian Worldview: Is it Possible?

Feminism has long been an absolute disaster. 

You know the movement is bankrupt when it is unwilling to simply define what a woman is. As bad as that is, feminism’s problems run far beyond this. As Chesterton rightly observed a century ago, feminism came to despise the truly feminine. Feminism worships abortion and contraception. It abhors domesticity. It is set against motherhood.

It’s almost like feminists don’t actually like women.

But it was not always this way. Early feminism fully celebrated important aspects of being a woman, particularly the gift of motherhood. In fact, the temperance movement – wives and mothers working to protect their husbands and sons from the dangers of alcohol – was much more numerous and powerful than the suffragette movement. Matrons of the feminist movement were strongly pro-life and pro-motherhood. It was second and the third wave feminism that made such a mess of things.

But an important new effort by some brilliant women seeks to build a new women’s movement centered upon the full beauty and mystery of what it genuinely means to be a woman, a wife and mother, while also accentuating how men and women need each other in society and in marriage.

This effort held its first national convention on September 17-19 in Rochester, New York at the historic Academy of Medicine. The gathering was entitled “2026 Women’s Convention: A Declaration of Interdependence,” operating under a conference theme of “A better way forward for women.” Champions of the family and those who care about culture should know about this development. This movement stems from the work of the ground-breaking online journal Fairer Disputations, which features the work of leading thinkers trying to forge a better understanding of why family, fidelity, marriage, and natural fertility and family are so important.

Approximately 200 women attended this inaugural event with one journalist noting the conspicuous prevalence of babies happily being toted around by their mothers. That is an obvious quality that sets this gathering apart. Katelyn Walls Shelton, a visiting fellow studying concerns around reproductive biotechnology at the conservative Ethics and Public Policy Center,participated in the convention. She told the Daily Citizen, “The Women’s Convention really felt like history in the making.”

This convention also launched an important public declaration, its Declaration of Interdependence, a document that’s the brainchild of pro-life legal scholar and mother of seven children at home, Erika Bachiochi and was drafted in cooperation with other convention organizers. The statement celebrates the necessity of men and women for each other in marriage, parenthood and family as well as the larger society. Thus, the key word in the title: Interdependence. Cecelia Lester, President of Feminists Choosing Life of New York, called the convention to order and thanked her husband for his influence and support in her community life in her remarks.

Bachiochi told Commonplace magazine, “A lot of the people associated with the convention are doing the best thinking on this, they want marriage and family to work.” She said they also have a different motivation. “They are tired of … the gender wars because many of us have men in our lives who we care deeply about, who care deeply about us.” These women are trying to build a women’s movement that is true to the motions of what it means to be a woman and live in a life-giving way in the reality that men and women are different and cannot exist without each other. 

The declaration bemoans the development that “Radical autonomy has come to be regarded by many as life’s highest good, as though our obligations to one another ought not order our lives.” They observe, “This has left women and children vulnerable to new forms of exploitation.” Predominately, the exploitation of current feminism itself which teaches us that women should try to be more like men.

 “A lifetime on contraceptive pills, abortion at the ready, the availability of egg freezing and other reproductive technologies, all to ensure that she can engage in the bedroom and the marketplace along the normative patterns of a man,” Bachiochi explained. 

Shelton told the Daily Citizen, “This new women’s movement is anti-pornography, anti-prostitution and anti-abortion,” adding, “But it’s not just contrarian; we are anti- these things because we are pro-human — pro-man, pro-woman, pro-children, pro-family and pro-life.” She concluded, “Our ideals are rooted in reality and in the timeless truths of Scripture” which is why, “I’m excited to be a part of a new movement that promotes true human flourishing for both men and women.”

But some women of faith are communicating doubt that such values can be established under “feminism” as a category. Nora Kenney Mittiga, who also attended the conference, noted in her reflections at Word on Fire that she was encouraged by the speakers at the conference and the topics addressed, “But I was skeptical of other framing elements, including whether feminism itself, even reconstructed with Catholic bioethics, is the right framework for the task at all.”

But a new women’s movement crafted largely by conservative women of deep faith and rigorous theological and intellectual training deserves a chance to prove itself. That is because current feminism is such a destructive disaster. That is demonstrated nowhere better than in the fact thatGloria Steinem told a 2020 gathering at Carnegie Hall in New York City, “We have this thing called a womb. If we didn’t have wombs, we’d be fine.”

The old feminism has real problems indeed. A genuine celebration of natural feminine power and beauty along with respect for life, marriage, motherhood and fatherhood, and natural marital procreation should be given a solid chance to replace it.

The Daily Citizen will be keeping our eye on this movement with great interest.

Related Articles and Resources:

Breakpoint: A Declaration for a New Women’s Movement

Protecting Our Sons: Navigating a Radical Feminist Culture

Marriage: A Feminist Institution

Why Men and Women Are Different

Written by Glenn T. Stanton · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: feminism, Motherhood

Nov 18 2024

The 4B Movement: Anti-Women, Accidentally Pro-Life

No dating. No marriage. No sex. No kids.

These are the four tenets of the 4B movement, a South Korean feminist initiative gaining traction among American women.

Originating almost a decade ago, 4B translates to no marriage (bi-hon), no childbirth (bi-chulsan), no dating (bi-yeonae) and no sex with men (bi-seksue). American women resurrected the movement after the election, accusing men of waging a war on women.

Or, more accurately, refusing to elect a pro-abortion candidate for president.

The American 4B movement collectively believes pro-life policies and candidates encroach upon women’s “right” to unlimited abortion access. Adherents blame these violations on men, whom it claims are inherent oppressors of women.  

Some converts see 4B as a way to punish their male overlords. Others hope decreasing birth rates will convince men to “protect women” — i.e. support abortion access — in future elections.  

Happily, by reducing extramarital sex, 4B followers are reducing abortions — and supporting the pro-life cause. 

The vast majority of abortions (95%) aren’t medically necessary. They occur because the baby is “unwanted or mistimed,” meaning the feels she mother cannot, or is unwilling to, care for her child.

These pregnancies primarily occur outside the confines of marriage, which provides critical economic and social infrastructure for raising children. This is evidenced, in part, by the advantages children raised in two-parent households experience over children from single-parent or cohabiting households.

Research compiled by sociologist Brad Wilcox and family studies scholar Alan J. Hawkins found children with married parents were far less likely to experience social and emotional problems like depression and far more likely to pursue higher education. According to Wilcox and Hawkins, these social disparities are only increasing.

Married families also experience more economic stability than single-parent or cohabiting homes. Wilcox and Hawkins found children with married parents four times less likely to experience poverty than those with single or unmarried parents. The findings echo those of economist Melissa Kearney, who writes,

On average, stable, married families enjoy markedly higher levels of financial security and resources than non-intact families.

Marriage socially and financially equips couples to have children. Outside this support system, pregnancy becomes a daunting obstacle many women choose to abort rather than face. If the 4B movement truly decreases extramarital sex, pro-lifers should be thrilled.

That being said, the 4B movement’s accidental protection of preborn babies doesn’t erase its ideological opposition to life and women.

That’s right — for all its feminist aspirations, the 4B movement is not pro-women. All available historical and sociological evidence suggest women thrive in partnership with men, not isolation from them.

Feminists have made this mistake before. In the 1960s and 70s, many predicted affordable birth control and abortion access, combined with better access to education and jobs, would increase women’s economic welfare.

Instead, many fell into poverty.

In 1978, Professor Diana Pearce, the director of the Center for Women’s Welfare at the University of Washington, wrote, “Poverty is rapidly becoming a female problem.”

Pearce noted this so-called “feminization of poverty” coincided with a 40%, single-generation jump in single mothers. But it wasn’t until the 1990s that Nobel Prize-winning economist George Akerlof connected the increase in women’s poverty to the disconnection of men from their reproductive responsibilities. Birth control and abortion, he posited, gave men no incentive to marry or support women they impregnated. The resulting decrease in “shotgun weddings” meant more single mothers and fewer economic prospects for women.

The “feminization of poverty” illustrated what would come to be a well-tested sociological phenomenon. Maggie Gallagher, a Yale-educated single mother turned pro-family researcher and activist, puts it this way:

Marriage is a powerful creator and sustainer of human and social capital for adults as well as children, about as important as education when it comes to promoting the health, wealth, and well-being of adults and communities.

Gallagher came to this conclusion in 2000. More than two decades later, Wilcox and Hawkins’ report confirms married men and women are economically, socially, mentally and even physically better off than their unmarried or divorced peers.

These benefits held up during one of the most economically and socially stressful periods in recent history — the pandemic.

According to the 2020 American Family Survey measuring women’s life satisfaction, married mothers were fare more likely to report being somewhat or completely satisfied with their life (83.55%) than childless women (60.75%), mothers (68.48%) and unmarried mothers (49.34%).

Married mothers also exceeded their peers in complete life satisfaction, with 38.52% reporting being completely satisfied compared to only 12.93% of childless women, 25.93% of mothers and 19.39% of unmarried mothers.

Gallagher says it best:

In virtually every way that social scientists can measure, married people do better than the unmarried or divorced: they live longer, healthier, happier, sexier and more affluent lives.

These benefits only accrue in partnership with men. By categorically ostracizing men as oppressive, the American 4B movement and its adherents reveal one of two things: either they don’t care about bettering women’s lives, or they have not seriously researched ways to do so.

Happily, 4B’s deeply misguided ideology doesn’t negate its pro-life benefits. If fewer women engage in premarital sex, fewer preborn children will be killed. And that’s always something to celebrate.

Additional Articles and Resources

Important New Research on How Married Parents Improve Child Well-Being

Family Scholars Explain the Current Marriage Paradox in America

Brad Willcox Exhorts Young People to ‘Get Married’

Cohabitation Still Harmful – Even as Stigma Disappears

Don’t Believe the Modern Myth. Marriage Remains Good for Women

Don’t Believe the Modern Myth. Marriage Remains Good for Men.

Myths Persist: Pop Culture Wrongly Steers Women Away From Marriage

Yes, Married Mothers Really Are Happier Than Unmarried and Childless Women

Married Fatherhood Makes Men Better

Marriage and the Public Good: A New Manifesto of Policy Proposals

Written by Emily Washburn · Categorized: Culture, Life · Tagged: feminism, marriage

Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | © 2026 Focus on the Family. All rights reserved.

  • Cookie Policy