Closing USAID Isn’t Crazy — Here’s Why

The Trump administration pulled the plug on the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), America’s largest distributor of humanitarian aid, this week following an audit of its billion-dollar books.

“For decades, USAID has been unaccountable to taxpayers as it funnels massive sums of money to the ridiculous — and, in many cases, malicious — pet projects of entrenched bureaucrats,” Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters Monday.

She referenced some of the agency’s most unconscionable expenditures of taxpayer dollars, including:

• $1.5 million to “advance diversity, equity and inclusion in Serbia’s workplaces and business communities.”
• $6 million to Egyptian tourism.
• Hundreds of millions to cultivate the poppy in Afghanistan (the main ingredient in heroin, the Taliban’s biggest money-maker).
• More than $149,000 to fund foreign art projects celebrating DEI and LGBT-identified individuals, including a “transgender opera” and a “transgender comic book.”

Legislators, non-profits, activists and the United Nations have pitched an epic fit, claiming people will die without USAID’s aid. Some seemed particularly irate that Elon Musk, co-leader of the newly sanctioned Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), blew the whistle on the agency’s largesse.

“This is a five-alarm fire.” New York Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez wrote on X. “The people elected Donald Trump to be President — not Elon Musk … This should not be a partisan issue.”

But it doesn’t take a wizard to figure out that USAID squandered Americans’ money on stupid and immoral causes.

Let’s walk through a few examples.

USAID is charged with implementing the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), a congressional aid package tackling the HIV/AIDS epidemic. The program will dispense $30 billion in assistance over five years.

But PEPFAR no longer distributes AIDS relief alone. In 2022, the government released a document connecting PEPFAR’s success with “sexual reproductive health, rights and services.” The semantic adjustment allows USAID to funnel PEPFAR money to fund elective abortions under the guise of “reproductive care.”

Between 2021 and 2022, more than 25 explicitly pro-abortion organizations spent a combined $1.34 billion PEPFAR donations.

One of these groups is the International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF). USAID paid it $8.9 million between 2015 and 2025 to execute contracts related to expanding “family planning and sexual and reproductive health.”

IPPF’s current contract with USAID would have paid out $45 million by 2028.

In a statement opposing USAID’s closure and the State Department’s temporary pause on foreign aid spending, IPPF unwittingly revealed exactly what it uses PEPFAR money for:

In short, IPPF resents that money from an AIDS relief program will go only toward people suffering from AIDS.

It’s also concerned about diminished “sexual and reproductive health services,” linking to an Instagram post from a company called Gender DynamiX — “Africa’s first registered public benefit organization to focus solely on issues of trans and gender diverse persons.”

Without US tax dollars, it will have to stop administering opposite-sex hormones.

IPPF is far from the only organization to rely on US assistance. America pays roughly 30% of the United Nation’s $58 billion budget every year. A hefty portion of these donations come from USAID. In 2022, the agency gave $10.9 billion to UN subsidiaries.

You remember the UN? The group behind the UN Relief Agency in Palestine, some employees of whom contributed to Hamas’ devastating attack on Israel in October 2023?

The international body that ignored Hamas’ violence against women for months?

The same body that refused to condemn Hamas, but allowed Iran to lead the Human Rights Council’s Commission on Crime Prevention and Justice just days after it executed two people for criticizing Islam?

Yes, that UN would be devastated without the US’ help. It’s particularly concerned about the impact such cuts could have on the sexual health of women in South Asia — especially those with “unintended pregnancies.”

Given these examples, and USAID’s larger disconnect from taxpayers’ interests, it’s not surprising a complete overhaul has been ordered.

But the mismanagement and misuse of USAID also illuminates crucial failures in how the government distributes taxes.

American families shouldn’t have to wade through manipulative and deceptive language to discern how their hard-earned money is being spent They shouldn’t have to wonder whether their government is bilking them, or pouring cash into corrupt and ineffective organizations in service of causes they don’t believe in.

TLDR: This author isn’t sad to see the back of USAID.

Additional Articles and Resources

The UN’s Palestinian Relief Fund is in Trouble — Here’s Why It’s a Good Thing

United Nations Round-Up: Iran Heads Human Rights Council Assembly, Fails to Condemn Hamas

Women’s Rights Groups Silent on Hamas Sexual Violence, Analysis Shows

Senator Releases Annual ‘Festivus Report’ Chronicling $1 Trillion in Government Waste