Jack Phillips Winning in Early Masterpiece II Legal Skirmishes
Jack Phillips continues to defend the cause of religious liberty, and he’s winning again.
On January 7, senior federal district court judge Wiley Daniel denied the state of Colorado’s request to dismiss Jack Phillips’ lawsuit charging the state with religious discrimination and harassment. Masterpiece II, as it’s being called, is Jack’s attempt to prevent the state from wrongly harassing him a second time for so-called LGBT discrimination.
You’ll recall that Jack was vindicated by the U.S. Supreme Court in June 2018, when the high court reversed a Colorado effort to punish him over a same-sex wedding cake.
Only weeks after the Masterpiece I decision, the Colorado Civil Rights Commission issued Jack yet another “notice of probable cause” that he had violated the state anti-discrimination law, this time for declining to custom create a “gender transition” cake for Autumn Scardina, a self-identified transgender lawyer. Scardina had been making it a point to call Jack’s shop every so often to ask for as many different offensive or obscene cakes as the lawyer could dream up in his quest to set Jack up for another trip to the Civil Rights Commission. And the state played along.
“The same agency that the Supreme Court rebuked as hostile to Jack Phillips has remained committed to treating him unequally and forcing him to express messages that violate his religious beliefs,” said Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Counsel Jim Campbell in a statement. “Colorado is acting in bad faith and with bias toward Jack. We look forward to moving forward with this lawsuit to ensure that Jack isn’t forced to create custom cakes that express messages in conflict with his faith,” he added.
Unless the State of Colorado has an immediate change of heart, it stands to lose again at the U.S. Supreme Court, and lose big. This time around, the state’s obstinate refusal to deal fairly with Jack will leave it very few defenders as the state’s anti-religious sentiments are displayed for the second time on the national stage.
The official name of the Masterpiece II litigation is Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Elenis, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado.
’Tis the season for holiday reading!
Check out Daily Citizen’s cheery winter reads.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Bruce Hausknecht, J.D., is an attorney who serves as Focus on the Family’s judicial analyst. He is responsible for research and analysis of legal and judicial issues related to Christians and the institution of the family, including First Amendment freedom of religion and free speech issues, judicial activism, marriage, homosexuality and pro-life matters. He also tracks legislation and laws affecting these issues. Prior to joining Focus in 2004, Hausknecht practiced law for 17 years in construction litigation and as an associate general counsel for a large ministry in Virginia. He was also an associate pastor at a church in Colorado Springs for seven years, primarily in worship music ministry. Hausknecht has provided legal analysis and commentary for top media outlets including CNN, ABC News, NBC News, CBS Radio, The New York Times, the Chicago Tribune, The Washington Post, The Washington Times, the Associated Press, the Los Angeles Times, The Wall Street Journal, the Boston Globe and BBC radio. He’s also a regular contributor to The Daily Citizen. He earned a bachelor’s degree in history from the University of Illinois and his J.D. from Northwestern University School of Law. Hausknecht has been married since 1981 and has three adult children, as well as three adorable grandkids. In his free time, Hausknecht loves getting creative with his camera and capturing stunning photographs of his adopted state of Colorado.
Related Posts
Appeals Court Favors Louisiana Ten Commandments Law for Now
November 18, 2024
Christian Woman Fired for Refusing COVID Vaccine Wins $12 Million
November 13, 2024
Yakima Union Gospel Mission Wins Religious Freedom Victory
November 5, 2024