Supreme Court Allows Transgender Military Restrictions
In a much-needed check against overreaching lower courts, the Supreme Court has blocked the nationwide injunctions issued by federal district court judges against the Trump Administration’s so-called “Mattis plan,” which restricts military service by those suffering from “gender dysphoria.” The Supreme Court’s action allows the Trump Administration’s policy to stay in effect while the challenges to the policy wind their way through the federal appeals process. Specifically, the Court tied a 9th Circuit appeal in one of those cases to any future actions the Court takes.
The Daily Citizen previously reported on U.S. Solicitor General Noel Francisco’s request to the high court that it hear all of the pending lower court challenges to the “Mattis plan” before they reach the Court through the appellate process because of the importance of the issue and the urgent needs of the military to have this issue resolved. While the Court did not grant Francisco’s request, the action it did take to temporarily block the nationwide injunctions does the next best thing by allowing the policy to operate for the time being.
The “Mattis plan” is not a total ban on transgender-identified individuals serving in the military. The policy permits current, openly-serving transgender-identified personnel to continue serving, as well as any such existing or future service personnel who are willing to serve in their biological sex.
The practice of some federal district judges in issuing nationwide injunctions against the federal government has been controversial. Former Attorney General Jeff Sessions argues, among other things, that the practice encourages “forum shopping,” where litigants look for judges around the country willing to stop a federal policy or law in its tracks. If judges exercised enough restraint to keep their rulings applicable only to the parties before the court, it would end the temptation to forum shop.
The case is titled Trump v. Karnoski.
’Tis the season for holiday reading!
Check out Daily Citizen’s cheery winter reads.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Bruce Hausknecht, J.D., is an attorney who serves as Focus on the Family’s judicial analyst. He is responsible for research and analysis of legal and judicial issues related to Christians and the institution of the family, including First Amendment freedom of religion and free speech issues, judicial activism, marriage, homosexuality and pro-life matters. He also tracks legislation and laws affecting these issues. Prior to joining Focus in 2004, Hausknecht practiced law for 17 years in construction litigation and as an associate general counsel for a large ministry in Virginia. He was also an associate pastor at a church in Colorado Springs for seven years, primarily in worship music ministry. Hausknecht has provided legal analysis and commentary for top media outlets including CNN, ABC News, NBC News, CBS Radio, The New York Times, the Chicago Tribune, The Washington Post, The Washington Times, the Associated Press, the Los Angeles Times, The Wall Street Journal, the Boston Globe and BBC radio. He’s also a regular contributor to The Daily Citizen. He earned a bachelor’s degree in history from the University of Illinois and his J.D. from Northwestern University School of Law. Hausknecht has been married since 1981 and has three adult children, as well as three adorable grandkids. In his free time, Hausknecht loves getting creative with his camera and capturing stunning photographs of his adopted state of Colorado.
Related Posts
Olympic Women’s Boxing Champ is Officially a Man
November 5, 2024
Meta to Decide Whether “Misgendering” Is Hate Speech
October 16, 2024