• Skip to main content
Daily Citizen
  • Subscribe
  • Categories
    • Culture
    • Life
    • Religious Freedom
    • Sexuality
  • Parenting Resources
    • LGBT Pride
    • Homosexuality
    • Sexuality/Marriage
    • Transgender
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Contact
  • Donate

gambling

Sep 16 2026

Gambling Industry Targets Nebraska to Legalize Online Sports Betting

The predatory gambling industry is spending millions of dollars this election season in a deceptive campaign to bring online sports betting to Nebraska.

For Nebraskans, it’s a losing bet.

“This is not a plan to help Nebraskans retain more of their hard-earned money,” Nebraska Family Alliance Executive Director Nate Grasz warns.

“This is gambling corporations running a smoke-and-mirrors campaign to push online sports betting, which has been a massive public policy failure that hurts families and put taxpayers in a worse financial position.”

Four major online sportsbooks — FanDuel, DraftKings, BetMGM and Fanatics — have spent nearly $7 million dollars in support of two ballot measures: The Online Sports Wagering Authorization Amendment and the Online Sports Wagering Regulation Initiative.

The first would amend Nebraska’s Constitution to allow authorized gambling operators to offer online sports betting. The second would amend Nebraska’s state laws to legalize online sports betting.

The four sportsbooks funneled their money through “Tax Relief Nebraska,” the committee which funded the signature gathering campaign to ensure both measures appeared on the ballot.

Nebraska’s Secretary of State on August 21 certified the Authorization Amendment and the Regulation Initiative each received enough voter signatures from Nebraska counties to go on the ballot this November.

But Nebraska Family Alliance, a Focus on the Family-allied Family Policy Council, claims “Tax Relief Nebraska” obtained signatures by unethically indicating their measures had to do with lowering property taxes.

This is a common gambling industry tactic for legalizing new forms of betting: The state taxes whatever the gambling industry earns. It directs a percentage of that money toward some “worthy” cause, like education. The industry, in turn, gets to claim that its legalization supports education.

In Nebraska’s case, “Tax Relief Nebraska” claims online sports betting would generate $87 million for the state over the next five years. An estimated 70% — a little over $60 million —would go toward property tax credits for Nebraskans.

That sounds like a lot of money. But, split over five years, that’s only about $12 million in property tax relief — less than half of one percent of the roughly $5 billion Nebraskans pay in property taxes each year.

And how much will citizens have to pay to receive that paltry tax relief? By Nebraska Family Alliance’s calculations, for the state to make $87 million in taxes off online sports betting in the next half decade, companies like DraftKings and FanDuel would first have to make $435 million off Nebraskans.

In other words, Nebraskans would have to gamble $7 to receive $1 in property tax credits.

“To tell voters [these ballot measures] are about tax relief, when the proposal is actually a major expansion of online gambling finance by out-of-state gambling companies—whose own estimates show less than a quarter of one percent in property tax relief—is a complete sham and raises serious questions about election integrity,” Grasz wrote in an article.

Legal online sports betting wreaks financial and social havoc on states. A recent UCLA and Harvard-based study of more than 5 million people found allowing online sports betting coincided with:

  • A more than 12-point drop in a state’s average credit score;
  • A 25% and 27% increase in a state’s delinquency rate on auto loan and credit card payments, respectively;
  • A 9% increase in the average amount of money in collections in a state.
  • A 25% increase in the average person’s likelihood of filing for bankruptcy.

These financial harms disproportionately impacted those with credit scores already below 600 points.

Several lawsuits accuse online sportsbooks like DraftKings of using unethical business practices to create and target problem gamblers.

Problem gamblers’ addiction, in turn, negatively affects an average of five people close to them, an authoritative Australian study determined in 2017.

One in seven problem gamblers admit to engaging in child abuse, according to the Maryland Center of Excellence on Problem Gambling. Children of problem gamblers are as much as three times more likely to experience abuse than their peers.

As many as one in four problem gamblers report engaging in domestic violence. Intimate partners of problem gamblers are more than 10 times more likely to receive emergency medical treatment for physical violence than those of problem drinkers.

Nearly one in five problem gamblers also report experiencing domestic abuse. Upwards of 30% of problem gamblers experience suicidal ideation, per the American Psychological Association.

“Nebraska’s future will not be built on getting our kids hooked on gambling, enriching billion-dollar out-of-state corporations, and asking Nebraska families to lose hundreds of millions of dollars in exchange for pennies in tax relief,” Grasz concludes.

“We should be strengthening families, protecting children, and building an economy that creates wealth, not one that depends on Nebraska families losing it.”

If you live in Nebraska, please consider voting “No” this November 3 on the Online Sports Wagering Authorization Amendment and the Online Sports Wagering Regulation Initiative.

Readers in other states, please consider the harmful impacts of online sports betting before participating or allowing your children to participate.  

Additional Articles and Resources

Online Sports Betting Significantly Worsens Financial Health, Study Suggests

DraftKings Intentionally Creates Gambling Addicts, New Lawsuit Alleges

Gambling is a Moral Issue

Public Opinion on Legal Sports Betting is Souring, Survey Shows — But Young Americans Are Betting More Than Ever

‘Addictive, Exploitative, Manipulative’: Les Bernal Breaks Down Predatory Gambling Ahead of the Super Bowl

Written by Emily Washburn · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: gambling, sports betting

Sep 14 2026

Advocacy Group Calls Out USTA for Shady Gambling Partnership

A national anti-commercial gambling organization called on the US Tennis Association (USTA) Friday to end its controversial partnership with Kalshi, a legally dubious business that allows people to bet on anything from sports to politics.

Stop Predatory Gambling exposes and advocates against harm caused by the predatory gambling industry. The nonprofit urged USTA CEO Craig Tiley to cut ties with Kalshi in a letter sent September 11.

DID YOU KNOW?
A prediction market is a platform where users buy and sell futures contracts based on the likelihood of the event occurring. Contracts cost between $0.00 and $0.99 —the more expensive a contract, the higher the predicted odds of the event occurring.

The bettor gets to keep the value of the contract if it comes true. If it doesn’t, the contract’s value goes to zero and the loser’s money goes to pay the winner.

Read the Daily Citizen’s explainer on prediction markets to learn more about how they work — and why they’re problematic.

“We are calling on the USTA to immediately end its partnership with the prediction market platform Kalshi during the US Open,” the letter reads, continuing:

National media has spotlighted [Kalshi] for blatantly targeting and preying upon young people to lure them into developing a dangerous gambling habit.

USTA made Kalshi the exclusive prediction market of the US Open on August 30 — the day the main tournament began. The deal reportedly gave Kalshi exclusive advertising rights inside tournament stadiums and on TV stations where matches were broadcast.

USTA also integrated gambling into the US Open app, which began sending users push notifications featuring betting odds and other “predictions,” courtesy of Kalshi.

The advertising push seems to have done its job. Kalshi users bet an average of $192 million on tennis every day of the US Open, which concluded on Sunday. Bets placed on tennis exceeded those placed on other sports on all but four days of the tournament, according to TickerTracker.

Stop Predatory Gambling argues young players, not money, should be USTA’s foremost consideration.

“The USTA serves over 100,000 junior players nationwide,” the nonprofit wrote in its letter to CEO Tiley.

“Yet, by embedding prediction markets directly into the U.S. Open ecosystem, the USTA is actively normalizing extreme forms of gambling within the exact youth demographic it is tasked with protecting.”

The letter references a March report from The Wall Street Journal which found Kalshi and its competitor, Polymarket, intentionally target 18- to 20-year-olds — and younger.

At one point, the Journal reported, Kalshi even hired a 15-year-old videogame streamer as an affiliate. It only cut the connection after the company’s lawyers clarified it could not work with minors.

“Kinda sad tbh,” a Kalshi employee messaged the gamer.

Kalshi’s attitude is perhaps best encapsulated in a since removed X post, which read:

College campuses are the best place to spark new financial movements and will play a key role in bringing the next 100M users to prediction markets.

Nigel Eccles, the co-founder and former CEO of the online sportsbook FanDuel fired back, “You can never start those kids too early on sports betting.”

FanDuel is no less predatory than Kalshi. But, unlike prediction markets, sportsbooks must get permission from individual states to operate. Once licensed, companies like FanDuel and DraftKings must submit to state regulations, which usually include:

  • Keeping users over 21 years old.
  • Giving up some of their revenue to the state.
  • Complying with some safety regulations, like flashing a problem gambling hotline during advertisements or providing a way for bettors to exclude themselves from gambling apps.

It also means sportsbooks cannot operate in states that refuse to license them.

Kalshi claims it does not have to seek state permission to operate because futures trading technically falls under federal authority.

While prediction markets, the gambling industry, states and the feds duke it out over whether predictions contracts on topics including the date of Christ’s return constitute “investing,” rather than gambling, Kalshi and Polymarket are busy making online sports betting available to every adult in every state — even those where sports betting is still illegal.

Stop Predatory Gambling notes that some of USTA’s junior players can legally gamble on Kalshi — a distressing prospect given tennis already struggles with corruption.

As “one of the most bettable sports in the world,” per The Athletic, athletes face daily temptation to make money by throwing a single match, a single set, or by sending a single serve into the net.

This year alone, two players and one official have been fined and suspended for fixing matches or failing to cooperate with anti-corruption investigations.

Athletes don’t have to bet themselves to experience the negative effects of online sports betting. Tales abound of gamblers trying to influence matches by yelling abuse at the person they’ve bet against.

A July report on the 2025 season from the Women’s Tennis Association and World Tennis highlighted “the continued and disproportionate impact of abuse linked to gambling activity.”

The report found angry gamblers responsible for 42% of all verified abuse detected during the 2025 season, up 2% increase from 2024, and 59% of all “serious” abuse.

So why would USTA further embed gambling’s negative influence by partnering with Kalshi? Les Bernal, the national director of Stop Predatory Gambling, was frank in a press release announcing the letter.

“National media has spotlighted how Kalshi is blatantly targeting and exploiting the vulnerabilities of young people,” he wrote.

“USTA executives, driven by greed, chose to willfully ignore these facts and be complicit in this misconduct.”

The USTA did not end its partnership with Kalshi prior to the end of the US Open. It is unclear if the association will continue to partner with the prediction market at further tournaments — but there is no indication it will stop.

Additional Articles and Resources

Kalshi, Prediction Markets Make It Easy for Kids to Gamble Online

Public Opinion on Legal Sports Betting is Souring, Survey Shows — But Young Americans Are Betting More Than Ever

Online Sports Betting Significantly Worsens Financial Health, Study Suggests

Gambling is a Moral Issue

Written by Emily Washburn · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: gambling, Kalshi, prediction markets

Jul 29 2026

No Ballot for Voters Who Bet on Elections With Kalshi, Wisconsin Warns

Wisconsin citizens who bet on elections through prediction markets like Kalshi and Polymarket could lose their ballot, the state election commission warned last week.

“We want voters to understand that they cannot legally make a bet on an election and cast a ballot in that same election,” Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC) Administrator Meagan Wolfe wrote in the press release.

“We are not able to police someone placing a bet on these platforms, but it’s important for voters to understand the consequences if they bet on an election outcome.”

Prediction markets like Kalshi and Polymarket exploit regulatory loopholes to effectively allow users to bet on anything — including election outcomes.

The sticking point comes down to the difference between “betting” and “trading.” Prediction markets allow users to buy and sell a kind of futures contract called event contracts. Futures are legitimate investments, but unlike most, the underlying commodity in an event contract isn’t corn or oil — it’s simply whether an event occurs.

An event contract retains its value if the predicted outcome occurs.

The practical result is that Kalshi and Polymarket are regulated as investment platforms but used for gambling.

Kalshi’s “midterm hub,” for example, allows users to buy contracts on multiple 2026 midterm elections at the same time.

Wisconsin statute 6.03(2), which dates back to 1849, prohibits citizens from voting “in any election in which the person has made or become interested, directly or indirectly, in any bet or wager depending upon the result of the election.”

In a meeting earlier this month, WEC decided the statute applied to betting via prediction markets, regardless of the technical distinctions between “trading” and “gambling.”

“[We] do not see how an elector could … truthfully say that they ‘have not made any bet or wager depending upon the result of this election’ if they have offered money in a prediction market, and would receive money if they are correct and would lose money if they are incorrect,” WEC staff concluded.

Kalshi execs reacted poorly, to say the least.

“THIS IS INSANE,” Benjamin Freeman, the man in charge of “politics growth” at Kalshi, wrote on X.

“The [Washington Election] Commission is implying they will literally disenfranchise voters who use Kalshi to trade elections,” he continued. “This is blatantly unconstitutional and illegal.”

Wisconsin is one of 23 states which prohibit all betting on elections. An additional nine ban betting on elections in certain contexts. But WEC itself admits the laws are difficult to enforce. Skeptics argue the bans wouldn’t stand up under legal challenge.

Supporters of election betting prohibitions argue voters shouldn’t be given a monetary incentive to support candidates and ballot measures. Ann Jacobs, a WEC commissioner, told NPR:

We want people voting for the person they think will do the best job at the position they are being elected to. We don’t want people voting for someone who isn’t the best person for the job simply because it is going to line a voter’s pocket.

We want people voting for the person they think will do the best job at the position they are being elected to. We don’t want people voting for someone who isn’t the best person for the job simply because it is going to line a voter’s pocket.

Betting on elections also introduces opportunities for corruption and manipulation. In the case of prediction markets, for instance, traders could buy up many “yes” contracts affirming a candidate will win office. As the value of the “yes” contracts increase, the candidate could appear to have more support than they actually do, a misleading metric which could affect how people cast their vote.

Kalshi is making money hand over fist by encouraging people to bet on elections. By attacking Wisconsin, Kalshi higher-ups likely hope to prevent other states with election betting bans from issuing similar warnings, which could affect their bottom line.

Parents should see Kalshi’s conduct as a major red flag. Prediction markets care about money more than anything — including their users. Your children could be gambling on everything from elections to sports to whether Jesus will come back on one of these platforms as soon as they turn 18. They might even believe it’s “investing.”

Parents need to get in front of this speeding train. You can start by countering Kalshi’s talking points. Teach your children about good stewardship so they understand that true investing doesn’t simply mean trading investment products. Warn your children gambling can be addictive so they don’t fall hook, line and sinker for Kalshi’s glowing advertisements.

Perhaps most importantly, be aware of what your child is doing and viewing online. The internet is rife with pro-gambling content children shouldn’t absorb.

Additional Articles and Resources

Kalshi, Prediction Markets Make It Easy for Kids to Gamble Online

Online Super Bowl Betting Mushrooms, Fueled By Prediction Markets

Gambling is a Moral Issue

Online Sports Betting Significantly Worsens Financial Health, Study Suggests

Written by Emily Washburn · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: gambling, Kalshi, prediction markets

Jul 10 2026

DraftKings Intentionally Creates Gambling Addicts, New Lawsuit Alleges

An Illinois man is suing DraftKings for negligently releasing a defective product which he claims ignited, enabled and encouraged his gambling addiction.

Attorneys filed the suit in federal court late last month on behalf of Dane Miller, a 32-year-old husband and father.

Miller did not have a gambling problem when he opened a DraftKings account in October 2020. By the time he excluded himself from gambling apps in December 2024, he had placed more than $2 million in bets on the platform.

The suit alleges:

[DraftKings] defectively designed [its] product to addict young adults and vulnerable gamblers, who were particularly unable to appreciate the risks posed by the product, and particularly susceptible to harms from the product.

Miller’s experience adds to the growing heap of evidence showing DraftKings and other online sportsbooks use exploitative business practices to target problem gamblers.

Miller reportedly joined DraftKings to take advantage of the company’s infamous “no sweat bets” and other sign-on bonuses. The city of Baltimore called these promotions “deceptive” when it sued DraftKings last year for violating consumer protection laws, writing:

These tactics prompt users to place larger and more frequent wagers than they might have initially intended when considering their personal limits on reasonable betting, by implanting the false idea that users are obtaining “free bets” or otherwise taking on substantially less financial risk than they actually are.

Once enrolled in DraftKings, Miller’s sports betting activity increased exponentially. His lawsuit reads:

The constant prompts, access and live feeds, along with the rapid-fire pace of bets and the personalized attention direct to Miller fueled an addiction that eventually consumed all aspects of Miller’s life.

These are just some of the addictive features Miller argues DraftKings deployed to increase his gambling activity.

DraftKings offers particularly addictive kinds of betting. Users can not only wager on a wide-variety of games but an endless number of “micro-bets” — from the length of the national anthem to whether the next pitch is a ball or a strike.

Betting on sports from a smartphone makes it much easier to gamble to excess. It also allows DraftKings to collect and analyze huge quantities of user data. The company uses this data, per the suit, to create personalized offers and push-notifications designed to get users to place another wager.

Baltimore found evidence of the same practice, revealing DraftKings and another major online sportsbook, FanDuel, evaluate every bettor’s “lifetime value” based on metrics like:

  • The frequency and size of their bets.
  • The time they spend betting.
  • Chasing your losses — betting exponentially higher amounts to recoup money lost.
  • The amount of money they deposit and when.

DraftKings also allegedly uses this data to identify problem gamblers, or “high-value users.” as the suit calls them. Vulnerable users like these might:

  • Chase their losses.
  • Click on self-exclusion pages multiple times but never self-exclude.
  • Frequently request to withdraw their winnings, then cancel.
  • Increase the amount of time they spend on the platform over several weeks.

DraftKings and its compatriots could use their data analytics to impose limits on vulnerable users, Miller’s lawsuit points out. Instead, it makes them members of its VIP program.

The company assigns VIP members special VIP hosts, who ply them with exclusive credits, deals and perks like tickets to sports games.

DraftKings crowned Miller a VIP in May 2021. The filing reads:

After gambling away the money he had saved for his wedding, one of [Miller’s] DraftKings VIP hosts offered Miller two tickets to a suite at Soldier Field in recognition to his continued loyalty to DraftKings.

Miller lost more than his wedding money during his destructive spiral. He also took out personal loans and credit cards. He withdrew money from his 401k. In September 2024, he was fired for his “constant sports betting.”

On October 29, 2024, Northwest Community Hospital admitted Miller for suicidal ideation after he wrote a suicide note. He was diagnosed with “severe gambling disorder,” anxiety and depression.

Less than two weeks earlier, DraftKings had given Miller $1,000 in gambling credits.

In 2025, Baltimore’s lawsuit remarked:

Access and robust user data, coupled with the hosts’ and managers’ directive to keep these players betting as much as possible, creates an extremely potent mechanism to break down the defenses of individuals struggling with a gambling disorder.

If Miller’s lawsuit is to be believed, DraftKings, indeed, broke down his defenses.

Miller’s suit argues DraftKings acted with negligence: It created an addictive product designed to keep people on the platform, then it released it to the public without adequate protection for vulnerable gamblers.

The company could have implemented several cost-effective safety measures, the filing notes, including:

  • Limits on deposits and wagers based on a user’s income.
  • Limits on particularly addictive forms of betting, like micro-betting.
  • Ceasing to generate personalized promotions with user data.
  • Shutting down VIP programs.
  • Ceasing to market during live games.

DraftKings implemented none of these features. Instead, it allegedly targets problem gamblers to extract their “lifetime value.”

Miller also accuses DraftKings of failure to warn, arguing the platform’s boilerplate cautions against problem gambling do not adequately inform users about the platform’s intentionally addictive design.

“Young consumers do not expect [DraftKings’] product to be psychologically and neurologically addictive when the product is used in its intended manner by its intended audience,” the lawsuit emphasizes, continuing:

They do not expect [DraftKings’] revenues and profits to be directly tied to the strength of this addictive mechanism and dependent on young consumers spending several hours a day using their product and continuing to gamble.

Civil suits like Miller buttress convincing evidence that DraftKings, and the online sports betting industry, exploit vulnerable consumers. Governments have consumer protection laws for a reason. Authorities should start enforcing them against gambling companies.

In the meantime, parents should take Dane Miller’s story to heart. Online sports betting is not a harmless pastime. It is a dangerous and addictive product which can devastate families and communities.

The Daily Citizen encourages you to caution your children against gambling the same way you do other addictive products, like drugs, alcohol and pornography.

Additional Articles and Resources

Counseling Consultation & Referrals

Online Sports Betting Significantly Worsens Financial Health, Study Suggests

Baltimore Sues FanDuel, DraftKings for Targeting Problem Gamblers

The NBA and MLB Investigate Gambling Corruption While Taking Money from the Gambling Industry

Online Super Bowl Betting Mushrooms, Fueled by Prediction Markets

Kalshi, Prediction Markets Make It Easy for Kids to Gamble Online

Public Opinion on Legal Sports Betting is Souring, Survey Shows—But Young Americans Are Betting More Than Ever

March Madness Sends Gambling Industry Profits Sky High

‘Addictive, Exploitative, Manipulative’: Les Bernal Breaks Down Predatory Gambling Ahead of the Super Bowl

Online Sports Betting Hooking Young Men on Gambling, Research Suggests

Online Super Bowl Betting Breaks Records

Written by Emily Washburn · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: gambling

May 11 2026

Sports Betting Harms Kids and Communities — What Parents Need to Know

Online sports betting has exploded in popularity over the past half decade. Where professional and college sports once strictly banned gambling, ads for sports betting companies now appear on stadium walls, sports casters debate the “smartest” bets, and professional athletes sell their “picks” for winning wagers on sports they don’t play.

Children are growing up in a world which makes betting a mandatory part of the fan experience. Sports books like DraftKings and FanDuel spend millions of dollars each year portraying their product as harmless and fun.

This is a lie. Parents can’t afford to fall for it.

Online sports betting combines the addictive elements of traditional gambling and social media into one attention-monopolizing invention. For the first time, bettors can wager on everything from the length of the national anthem to whether the next pitch will be a ball or a strike — all without leaving their couch.

There’s always another game to bet on. Recovering problem gambler Jason found himself betting on European basketball.

“I was just trapped in my phone watching the gambling lines or watching this European basketball game,” the 26-year-old told NPR in February.

Jason attends gamblers anonymous meetings now but, before he quit, he recalled feeling “suffocated” by advertisements encouraging him to gamble.

“Sportsbooks’ whole goal is to load you with [advertising] so you feel kind of suffocated and you’re constantly thinking about [gambling],” he told the outlet.

Jason’s story supports evidence showing sports books use the detailed metrics they collect on their customers to identify problem gamblers like Jason and send them special advertisements and promotions designed to keep them betting.

The city of Baltimore sued DraftKings and FanDuel in April 2025 for unfair business practices like these, writing:

Access to robust user data, coupled with [sportsbooks’ VIP] hosts’ and managers’ directive to keep these players betting as much as possible, creates an extremely potent mechanism to break down the defenses of individuals struggling with a gambling disorder.

It’s bad enough that sports betting companies target vulnerable consumers like Jason. But children and minors regularly find themselves in the betting industry’s crosshairs, too.

More than 10% of the more than one thousand, 11- to 17-year-old American boys surveyed by Common Sense media self-reported engaging in sports-related gambling. Nearly six in 10 reported seeing gambling ads during sports games on TV.

An earlier report from the Lancet’s Public Health Commission on Problem Gambling estimated just over 10% of adolescents gambled online in 2023 worldwide. Of those who engaged in sports betting, the commission estimated as many as 16% could be problem gamblers.

Problem gamblers’ addiction, in turn, negatively affects an average of five people close to them, an authoritative Australian study determined in 2017.

The financial impact of online sports betting shows up in large, state-level data sets. A recent Harvard and UCLA-based study of more than 5 million people in 33 states found the introduction of online sports coincided with:

  • A more than 12-point drop in the average credit score.
  • A 25% increase in the delinquency rate on auto loan payments.
  • A 27% increase in the delinquency rate on credit card payments.
  • A 9% increase in the average amount of money in collections — not due to the same or fewer people having more money in collections, but because more people owed money than before the introduction of online sports betting.

The consequences of problem gambling extend far beyond the financial.

One in seven problem gamblers admit to engaging in child abuse, according to the Maryland Center of Excellence on Problem Gambling. Children of problem gamblers are as many as three times more likely to experience abuse than their peers.

As many as one in four problem gamblers report engaging in domestic violence. Intimate partners of problem gamblers are more than 10 times more likely to receive emergency medical treatment for physical violence than those of problem drinkers.

Nearly one in five problem gamblers also report experiencing domestic abuse. Upwards of 30% of problem gamblers experience suicidal ideation, per the American Psychological Association.

Parents can protect their kids from online sports gambling in three ways.

First, refrain from betting on sports yourself. Use your example to disciple your children against potentially dangerous choices.

Second, warn your kids against gambling like you would warn them against addictive products like drugs, alcohol and pornography.

Don’t allow them to believe the lie that online sports betting is completely harmless. For many, what starts as a harmless pastime leads to years of struggle and pain.

Third, support reform at the ballot box. Sports betting companies should:

  • Be required to repeatedly verify the ages of their consumers.
  • Comply with regulations preventing them from targeting problem gamblers.
  • Be prevented from advertising during times, on programs or on games watched by children.

Protect your children from gambling! It’s your only safe bet.

Additional Articles and Resources

Counseling Consultation & Referrals

Online Sports Betting Significantly Worsens Financial Health, Study Suggests

Gambling is a Moral Issue

Online Super Bowl Betting Mushrooms, Fueled by Prediction Markets

Kalshi, Prediction Markets Make It Easy for Kids to Gamble Online

The NBA and MLB Investigate Gambling Corruption While Taking Money from the Gambling Industry

Online Sports Betting Spawns Rampant Fraud in MLB, NBA

Public Opinion on Legal Sports Betting is Souring, Survey Shows—But Young Americans Are Betting More Than Ever

Baltimore Sues FanDuel, DraftKings for Targeting Problem Gamblers

March Madness Sends Gambling Industry Profits Sky High

‘Addictive, Exploitative, Manipulative’: Les Bernal Breaks Down Predatory Gambling Ahead of the Super Bowl

Online Sports Betting Hooking Young Men on Gambling, Research Suggests

Online Super Bowl Betting Breaks Records

Written by Emily Washburn · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: gambling

  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Go to Next Page »

Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | © 2026 Focus on the Family. All rights reserved.

  • Cookie Policy