Michigan Teams With ACLU to Punish Faith-Based Adoption Agencies, Gets Sued
Back in 2015, long before the changing of the political guard in Michigan in 2019, the state legislature passed, and a Republican governor signed into law a statute protecting the rights of faith-based foster care and adoption agencies from government discrimination for operating on faith-based principles. If agencies like Catholic Charities and others sought to place children with a married mother and father, the state could not cancel their contracts (they operate through contracts with, and also with a certain amount of funding, from the state) or otherwise force them to operate contrary to their religious principles.
The ACLU sued the state in 2017 alleging that the law was unconstitutional because it somehow denied opportunities for same-sex couples to adopt. That of course is not true, since there were, at the time the law was passed, 105 licensed adoption and foster care agencies in the state, many of which are not faith-based.
Fast forward to the 2018 elections, where Democrat Dana Nessel was elected Attorney General. She is a lesbian, and promisednot to enforce the 2015 law. In March, Nessel agreed to settlewith the ACLU case by giving the ACLU everything it demanded, including making it impossible for a faith-based agency to live according to its deeply held religious beliefs about a child’s need for a married mother and father.
Becket Law, a public interest law firm dedicated to defending religious liberty, recently filed a lawsuitagainst the state of Michigan on behalf of a Catholic foster care and adoption agency, a couple who have adopted five special-needs children through that agency, and a former foster child who was adopted by a family that worked with that agency. The lawsuit alleges that the “deal” between Michigan and the ACLU violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. In other words, the deal allows Michigan to discriminate on the basis of religion; treat faith-based agencies differently than secular agencies; and force faith-based agencies to speak a government-approved message about marriage and children that is contrary to their religious beliefs.
The lawsuit has been filed in the federal courts of Michigan and is entitled Buck v. Gordon.
’Tis the season for holiday reading!
Check out Daily Citizen’s cheery winter reads.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Bruce Hausknecht, J.D., is an attorney who serves as Focus on the Family’s judicial analyst. He is responsible for research and analysis of legal and judicial issues related to Christians and the institution of the family, including First Amendment freedom of religion and free speech issues, judicial activism, marriage, homosexuality and pro-life matters. He also tracks legislation and laws affecting these issues. Prior to joining Focus in 2004, Hausknecht practiced law for 17 years in construction litigation and as an associate general counsel for a large ministry in Virginia. He was also an associate pastor at a church in Colorado Springs for seven years, primarily in worship music ministry. Hausknecht has provided legal analysis and commentary for top media outlets including CNN, ABC News, NBC News, CBS Radio, The New York Times, the Chicago Tribune, The Washington Post, The Washington Times, the Associated Press, the Los Angeles Times, The Wall Street Journal, the Boston Globe and BBC radio. He’s also a regular contributor to The Daily Citizen. He earned a bachelor’s degree in history from the University of Illinois and his J.D. from Northwestern University School of Law. Hausknecht has been married since 1981 and has three adult children, as well as three adorable grandkids. In his free time, Hausknecht loves getting creative with his camera and capturing stunning photographs of his adopted state of Colorado.
Related Posts
House Passes Bill Protecting Women and Girls in Sports
January 15, 2025