Senate Judiciary Committee Deadlocks on Judge Jackson Nomination to Supreme Court

A delayed plane flight led to a brief delay in a Senate Judiciary Committee vote on the nomination of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to the United States Supreme Court on Monday, April 4. Because Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Calif., a member of the committee, was late arriving in Washington, D.C., from his home state, Judiciary Chairman Richard Durbin, D-Ill., recessed a business meeting of the committee meant for a vote on the nomination until Sen. Padilla arrived.
When Padilla arrived, the committee reconvened and voted 11 to 11 on a motion to report Jackson’s nomination favorably to the full Senate. Chairman Durbin stated he would inform the Senate of the tie vote but took no further action as the committee proceeded to vote on other lower court nominations.
A tie vote ordinarily fails to advance a nomination. Following the committee vote, The Associated Press reported that Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., will call for a vote of the full Senate to pull the nomination out of the committee and advance it to the floor of the Senate.
The unusual recess can be explained by the 11 to 11 split on the committee between Republicans and Democrats. The committee members are divided along party lines in their support for, or opposition to, Judge Jackson’s nomination. Democrats needed Sen. Padilla in the room to achieve at least a tie vote.
How did we get an 11 to 11 split on the committee?
Because the Senate is deadlocked 50-50 between Republicans and Democrats, including a couple Independents who caucus with the Democrats, the makeup of the Judiciary committee reflects it as well, which results in the evenly split committee. That particular Senate power-sharing arrangement was arrived at between Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., in February 2021.
Even though Senate moderates such as Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., and Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, have announced their intention to vote for Jackson when her nomination reaches the floor of the Senate, all but sealing her confirmation, what happens in the Judiciary committee before then still carries a lot of political significance.
Democrats on the committee wanted to avoid a negative recommendation to the full Senate, which is what would have happened if Durbin had not delayed the vote.
Judge Jackson has a polished resume with two Harvard degrees and many years as a federal judge. However, conservatives see enough in her history to reveal a judge who “subscribes to an expansive and progressive view of the Constitution,” according to Focus on the Family President Jim Daly.
“In other words, she believes it’s acceptable to make the law say whatever you want the law to say,” Daly wrote following Jackson’s testimony to the Judiciary Committee in March. “She has made clear she supports unfettered access to abortion, referring to Roe [v. Wade] as ‘settled law.’ She refused to say when she believes life begins. Previously, Judge Jackson co-wrote an amicus brief on behalf of an abortion-rights group and ruled against a teen pregnancy prevention group. Finally, she even told Senator Blackburn she was unable to define what a “woman” was – because she wasn’t a biologist.”
If Jackson is confirmed to replace the retiring Justice Stephen Breyer, she will be the first female African American justice to serve on the Supreme Court, and the third African American justice overall.
Related:
President Biden Nominates Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson as Next Justice of the Supreme Court
Senator Joe Manchin Announces He Supports Judge Jackson for the Supreme Court
U.S. Senate Schedules Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings for Judge Jackson
Why Judge Jackson’s Non-Answer About Women Was “Transphobic”
Photo from Reuters.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Bruce Hausknecht, J.D., is an attorney who serves as Focus on the Family’s judicial analyst. He is responsible for research and analysis of legal and judicial issues related to Christians and the institution of the family, including First Amendment freedom of religion and free speech issues, judicial activism, marriage, homosexuality and pro-life matters. He also tracks legislation and laws affecting these issues. Prior to joining Focus in 2004, Hausknecht practiced law for 17 years in construction litigation and as an associate general counsel for a large ministry in Virginia. He was also an associate pastor at a church in Colorado Springs for seven years, primarily in worship music ministry. Hausknecht has provided legal analysis and commentary for top media outlets including CNN, ABC News, NBC News, CBS Radio, The New York Times, the Chicago Tribune, The Washington Post, The Washington Times, the Associated Press, the Los Angeles Times, The Wall Street Journal, the Boston Globe and BBC radio. He’s also a regular contributor to The Daily Citizen. He earned a bachelor’s degree in history from the University of Illinois and his J.D. from Northwestern University School of Law. Hausknecht has been married since 1981 and has three adult children, as well as three adorable grandkids. In his free time, Hausknecht loves getting creative with his camera and capturing stunning photographs of his adopted state of Colorado.
Related Posts

Attacks on Tesla Escalate
March 21, 2025

DEI Disappoints At Morgan Stanley — Here’s Why
March 21, 2025

Planned Parenthood Leaves Manhattan. Good Riddance.
March 20, 2025