• Skip to main content
Daily Citizen
  • Subscribe
  • Categories
    • Culture
    • Life
    • Religious Freedom
    • Sexuality
  • Parenting Resources
    • LGBT Pride
    • Homosexuality
    • Sexuality/Marriage
    • Transgender
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Contact
  • Donate

Newsom

Oct 15 2025

Governor Newsom Endangers Children, Signs ‘License to Kidnap’ Act 

Governor Gavin Newsom signed AB 495 this week, legislation allowing any adult to sign an affidavit claiming to be a child’s relative and make medical and educational decisions for that child.

Parental rights activists dubbed the bill the “License to Kidnap Act” and “The California Trafficking Bill,” as it allows any individual to fill out a “Caregiver’s Authorization Affidavit” and claim to be a child’s relative. The affidavit offers no safeguards such as a background check, finger printing, notarization or parent signature.

California Family Council (CFC), a Focus on the Family ally, said the bill “fundamentally undermines parental rights and opens the door for abuse, kidnapping and government interference in family life.”

In a press release, Governor Newsom announced he had signed the bill “to protect parents’ rights and children,” adding, “Our children deserve to feel safe at home, in school and in the community. We are putting on record that we stand by our families and their right to keep their private information safe, maintain parental rights and help families prepare in case of emergencies.”

CFC President Jonathan Keller vehemently disagreed with that assessment, saying the bill betrayed parents and endangered children.

Governor Newsom is deliberately trying to deceive parents by claiming this bill protects them, when in fact it does the opposite. AB 495 strips parents of their constitutional rights and hands them over to unverified strangers.

It is unconstitutional, it is illegal, and no school or medical facility should recognize or accept the authority of a Caregiver’s Authorization Affidavit without a verified signature from a parent or legal guardian. Newsom knows exactly what this bill does, but he’s hoping the press and the public won’t read it for themselves.

Proponents of the bill said it was needed to protect children of illegal immigrants by allowing another family member to step in and make decisions for them if their parents were deported.

Dean Broyles, president and chief counsel of the National Center for Law & Policy, told CFC the affected all children – not just those whose parents entered the country illegally. He said the bill violated parents’ rights, lacked basic safeguards needed to protect children and was unconstitutional:

Governor Newsom deceptively describes AB 495 as a caregiver planning tool for undocumented immigrant parents. It’s more accurately described as a child trafficker’s and child predator’s dream bill.

Broyles added,

Its sweeping application is not limited to immigrant families, does not require any parental notice or consent, and lacks even the most basic safeguards to protect children. Anyone falsely claiming kinship can easily sign the affidavit, access a child, obtain medical care, and enroll them in another school. Even the most basic safeguard of a notary is not required to confirm the true identity of the person accessing your child.

AB 495 violates fundamentally constitutionally protected parental rights, endangers California’s children, and will be appropriately legally challenged and struck down.

CFC, a Focus on the Family ally, encouraged parents to take immediate action to protect their children:

  • Update emergency contact lists at schools and medical offices to include only those adults you trust to make educational and medical decisions for your child.
  • Submit written directives stating that no one outside your listed contacts is authorized to pick up or make decisions for your child.
  • Support efforts to legally challenge AB 495 and restore parental rights in California law.

Keller added CFC would challenge the act, saying, “We will work with our partners, our attorneys, and thousands of California parents to overturn this unconstitutional law. Parents, not politicians, are the rightful guardians of their children.”

Related Articles and Resources

Pastor Jack Hibbs: Horrific Bill Allows Adults to Take Custody of Children Without Consent

California Interscholastic Federation ‘Gender Diversity Toolkit’ Reveals Extent of Radical ‘Transgender’ Participation Policies

California Legislation Lets Courts Take Custody from Parents of Minors Who Seek ‘Transgender’ Treatments

California Legislation Would Decriminalize Killing Newborns

California Legislature Passes ‘License to Kidnap’ Act, Other Horrible Legislation

Feds Sue California Department of Education, Interscholastic Federation For ‘Illegal Sex Discrimination’

Gavin Newsom and the Dead-End Politics of the Sexual Revolution

Pastor Jack Hibbs: Horrific Bill Allows Adults to Take Custody of Children Without Consent

Image from Shutterstock.

Written by Jeff Johnston · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: California, License to Kidnap, Newsom

Jul 17 2025

Gavin Newsom and the Dead-End Politics of the Sexual Revolution

California Governor Gavin Newsom is languishing in a political purgatory of his own making.

An ambitious and astute politician, the governor embarked on a media tour this month to position himself as the reigning “moderate” in a leaderless and increasingly radical Democrat party.

But the governor is struggling to reconcile his new, “common sense” platform with the progressive ideology that propelled him to prominence. The disconnect is nowhere more evident than in his shifting position on “transgenderism.”

Newsom began distancing himself from his more radical colleagues in March, when he called publicly called forcing girls to compete against boys in sex-segregated sports “deeply unfair.”

His comments effectively launched his centrist rebrand. But they also landed him in hot water with some of his most powerful supporters.

“My party was [angry], the LGBTQ caucus [was angry],” Newsom told podcaster Shawn Ryan in an interview released this week.

“I’ll never forget that meeting with my friends, furious with me because I don’t think it’s fair [to allow boys to compete in girls sports].”

Of course the LGBT caucus was angry; Newsom, a self-described “champion” of LGBT rights, has been a staunch supporter of the caucus’ agenda for more than two decades. In 2004, as mayor of San Francisco, he issued marriage licenses to same-sex couples — before it was legal to do so.

In his interview with Ryan, Newsom called it one of his “proudest accomplishments.”

The governor reconciles his long-standing support of the LGBT agenda, particularly same-sex marriage, and his new position on sex-segregated sports by treating them as two entirely separate issues.

“When you get to issues [of boys participating in girls sports], that’s no longer about celebrating [someone’s] rights,” Newsom told Ryan. “It’s about denying [other] people theirs.”

But they aren’t two separate issues — far from it. The rise of “transgenderism” is the direct result of the legalization and normalization of same-sex relationships.

Gender ideology, including “transgenderism,” and same-sex marriage both stem from the ideology of the sexual revolution, which Dr. Jay Richards describes as the legal and social “fracturing” of marriage, sex and childbirth.

Richards, who directs the Heritage Foundation’s DeVos Center for Life, describes the sexual revolution as a train traveling toward the end of a track. In this metaphor, each stop represents an increasingly radical manifestation of the sexual revolution’s core ideology.

The legalization and normalization of same-sex marriage is one such stop. At this station, the politics of the sexual revolution effectively fractured marriage and the sexual binary. The government cosigned the lie that all family structures are equally good — for society, for the health of both spouses and for the rearing of children.

The rise of “transgenderism” is just one stop further down the track. Whereas the legalization of same-sex marriage diminished the significance of male and female in a marriage partnership, “transgenderism” erases the distinctions between male and female all together.

This ideology treats men and women as entirely interchangeable. It recognizes nothing significant or unique about the complimentary construction of male and female humans. Thus, boys can compete in girls sports and children can casually flood their bodies with opposite-sex hormones.

In short, Newsom cannot logically support same-sex marriage and simultaneously oppose the participation of boys in girls sports because “transgenderism” is the logical consequence of legalizing alternative family structures.

Perhaps the governor recognizes this logical bind, at least subconsciously. When Ryan asked him point-blank if he believes an 8-year-old should be allowed to “consent” to  irreversible transgender medical interventions, Newsom replied:

Yeah. Look, now that I have a nine-year-old, come on man, I get it. So, those [concerns about age] are legit.

That’s not an answer. He never gives one, other than to say he’s still learning about the issue.

It takes no more than half an hour of reading from unbiased sources to understand the devastating effects opposite-sex hormones and surgical mutilation wreak on children’s physical and mental development. Newsom’s reticence isn’t about knowledge — it’s about ideology.

If he admits kids can’t be born in the wrong body, the ideology he’s fought for for decades will collapse. He’ll lose his voter base while trying to reach Democrats who defected from the party during the 2024 presidential election.

Where does this leave Newsom? Trapped. The politics of the sexual revolution, which made him a powerful Democrat player in California, are keeping him from seizing an unprecedented opportunity to ascend to party leadership on a national scale.  

He can’t convincingly accept the moderate policy positions his colleagues have rejected after years of supporting an ideology that can only become more radical.

Additional Articles and Resources

Legalization of Same-Sex Marriage Harms Children and Society

‘Mass Exodus’: Dr. Jay Richards on the Demise of Gender Ideology and What It Means for the Pro-Life Movement

Here’s What Happens When Good People Don’t Connect Gay and Trans Ideology

Sorry ‘Gays Against Groomers,’ But Gay Activists Helped Start This Transgender Fire

Sorry ‘Gays Against Groomers,’ But Gay Activists Helped Start This Transgender Fire — Part Two

The Two-Parent Privilege: Understanding Contemporary Family Formation

Different Family Forms Lead to Prison or College for Young Men

Important New Research on How Married Parents Improve Child Well-Being

Feds Sue California Department of Education Interscholastic Federation for ‘Illegal Sex Discrimination’

New Paper Details ‘Emerging and Accumulating’ Adverse Effects of ‘Gender Affirming’ Estrogen

INVESTIGATION: Taxpayers Fund Transgender Experiments on Children

HHS Releases Report on Harms of ‘Transgender’ Medical Interventions for Minors

Doctor Refuses to Publish Major Study Finding Puberty-Blocking Drugs Don’t Help Children

England’s NHS Stops Dispensing Puberty Blockers for Children — Not Safe or Effective

Written by Emily Washburn · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: LGBT, Newsom, transgender

Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | © 2025 Focus on the Family. All rights reserved.

  • Cookie Policy