• Skip to main content
Daily Citizen
  • Subscribe
  • Categories
    • Culture
    • Life
    • Religious Freedom
    • Sexuality
  • Parenting Resources
    • LGBT Pride
    • Homosexuality
    • Sexuality/Marriage
    • Transgender
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Contact
  • Donate

transgender

Jun 04 2026

5 Phrases Christians Should Banish From Their Vocabularies

Estimations vary, but there are approximately one million words in the English language, though most dictionaries include between two hundred thousand and five hundred thousand or so of them. The average person has a vocabulary of between 10,000 and 30,000 words. 

Of those in the available lexicon, there are profane and crass words and terms that Christians should never use, of course, but there are also five more that believers should banish from their vocabulary.

Scripture has something important to say about the power of the words we use, specifically noting that how we choose to communicate can be consequential not only in our own lives, but also influence those around us.

“Death and life are in the power of the tongue, and those who love it will eat its fruits,” wrote King Solomon (Proverbs 18:21). He also noted, “The soothing tongue is a tree of life, but a perverse tongue crushes the spirit” (Proverbs 15:4).

Historically, Christians have put a high value on communicating clearly and truthfully. We should say what we mean and mean what we say. Writing to believers in Corinth who were debating the matter of speaking in tongues, the Apostle Paul wisely noted that it’s impossible for anyone to know what you’re saying if you’re not speaking intelligibly. In fact, he likened it to “speaking into the air” (1 Cor. 14:9).

But good communication isn’t simply about being heard audibly, but also about being understood. We can best accomplish that by choosing our words carefully and deliberately. Speaking plainly and truthfully trumps the use of big flowery words that are vague or downright misleading.

Which brings us to five terms Christians should never use:

The first two: “trans man” and/or “trans woman.”

The primary reason we shouldn’t be using these terms is because neither a “trans man” nor a “trans woman” exists. They’re fantastical creations of a delusional ideology. A so-called “trans woman” is a man who thinks he’s a woman. A “trans man” is a woman who thinks she’s a man.

Big media requires their writers to use the terms, so we’re regularly subjected to seeing them in print. Focus on the Family prioritizes God’s truth and the exclusivity of two immutable and unchanging sexes, so you won’t see those terms in any of our publications.

Focus on the Family’s Glenn Stanton has debated this issue on college campuses and has written extensively about it. In a Daily Citizen essay, he noted that many well-meaning folks say the terms should be used to spare the feelings of the sexually confused. But Glenn correctly states, “Compassion doesn’t require saying untrue things.”

He added:

“People do have the right to choose their own identity and live by it the best they can. That is called individual autonomy. However, no one has the right to demand that everyone else agree with that identity.

“Some may choose to use new preferred pronouns and names for the sake of personal relationship. But no one should be forced to say things they know to be untrue. Not even about what it means to be male or female. That is forced speech.”

The other terms Christians should avoid using are an oldie and two emerging new ones – but phrases some believers regularly let slide into their vocabulary: “pro-choice,” “abortion rights,” and “reproductive rights.” 

Prior to the emergence of the “Right to Life” movement following the Supreme Court’s horrific 1973 decision legalizing abortion in all fifty states, advocates for abortion were known as “abortion rights” advocates or “pro-abortion” activists. 

The term “pro-choice” emerged as a public relations ploy to counter the pro-life surge.

In recent years, “abortion rights” and “reproductive rights” are the newest euphemisms used to try and socially soften the reality of what radical activists are defending and championing: the killing of innocent pre-born life.

C.S. Lewis once gave writing advice to a young girl in Florida that applies to Christians as they navigate communication involving both abortion and the sexually confused.

“Always try to use the language so as to make quite clear what you mean, and make sure your sentence couldn’t mean anything else,” Lewis wrote. “Always prefer the plain direct word to the long, vague one.”

In summation, watch and cultivate your words carefully – and avoid these five terms: trans woman, trans man, pro-choice, abortion rights, and reproductive rights.

Written by Paul Batura · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: abortion, transgender

May 26 2026

Gender Madness is Embarrassing Reasonable Aussies

The people in charge in Australia are, as a position of official policy, pretending to not know what it means to be human as male or female. This is shameful.

This is the age in which we live, and of course, this problem is not unique to Australia. Too many countries are playing right along with them. But right now, the lovely Land Down Under is facing that global embarrassment.

It caught fire recently with the ridiculously serious Tickle v. Giggle case the Daily Citizen reported on last week. In a travesty, Sally (Sall) Grover is being fined over $20,000 because she does not, according to sitting federal Australian Judge Bromwich, “accept that a person’s sex can be a matter for self-identification.” Sall Grover got into this trouble for kicking a man out of her women-only social media space she founded called Giggle for Girls.

The man now identifies as “Roxy Tickle” and no one is fooled. The Australian Federal Court sided with the man. As the Daily Citizen explained, “Tickle v. Giggle has gained international attention as it demonstrates the disastrous results when being female is redefined to include men claiming to be women.”

In short, the Australian judicial system has sided with gender ideology over reason, biology and scientific clarity. Sex can no longer be truthfully spoken of by Australia’s leaders.

This fact was colorfully demonstrated again just hours ago in testimony before the Australian Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee as Senator Michaelia Cash keenly questioned Dr. Anna Cody, Australia’s Sex Discrimination Commissioner.

Cody’s official governmental responsibility is, as contradictorily explained by the Australian Human Rights Commission, to protect the rights of women and advocate for “LGBTIQA+ rights.” Of course, doing the latter obliterates the former and Cody demonstrated that fact today.

In official Senate testimony, Senator Cash asked Cody about pregnancy protections for “trans women” – that is men who believe they are women. Cody correctly explained, “Clearly, trans women cannot become pregnant.” This is an important revelation because it is an admission by the governmental official tasked with advocating for “trans rights” that “trans women” are not actually women, because women are humans with the potential for pregnancy.

And this is precisely where things got sticky for Cody.

Cash asks Dr. Cody if she is advocating if “trans women can potentially become pregnant, are you?” Cody says, “No” to which Cash responds, “Yep, because they are biological males, so you can’t obviously become pregnant.”

Then Senator Cash leads Cody into this confusing mess:

A lot of people have struggled to believe me when I say that the Australian Human Rights Commission is giving pregnancy protections in law to men who claim to be woman, because it’s so stupid it’s hard to believe anyone would say it.

Enjoy: pic.twitter.com/IveqVhN9KG

— Sall Grover (@salltweets) May 26, 2026

Senator Cash rightly confesses, “I am very confused,” because Cody expressed concern that a “trans woman” could apply for a job and be asked if he intends to become pregnant and might not get the job if he responds, “Yes.” Cody admits and is concerned this would be “unlawful discrimination on the basis of potential pregnancy.”

The senator brilliantly asks, “If they can’t become pregnant, how can you then become potentially pregnant?”

And it just devolves further from there. We must all note that it does so because Senator Cash is operating in biological reality and refuses to join Cody in the make-believe world of gender ideology, which the Australian government officially enacted on August 1, 2013.

This is what gender ideology does. It creates an alternative reality where male and female, boy and girl, man and woman have no objective meaning but rather become whatever gender ideologists say they are in any given situation.

Never, ever join them in this madness! Not even out of a false sense of kindness. Always live in objective reality, that which both Scripture and science hold.

That is precisely what Senator Michaelia Cash did, and the Daily Citizen salutes her.

Related articles and resources: 

‘Tickle v. Giggle’: Australian ‘Transgender’ Court Case Is No Joke for Women

Activist Erin Friday on Protecting Kids and Fighting ‘Gender’ Ideology

Do Not Fall for the ‘Affirm Them or They Will Die’ Lie

ADF International: 

“Sex is not confined to being a biological concept” rules Australian Court

Australian court dismisses appeal to uphold biological reality in ‘What is a woman?’ case

Family First New Zealand: Interview with Sall Grover

HHS Releases Report on Harms of ‘Transgender’ Medical Interventions for Minors

How the “Trans” and Gender Redefinition Issue Attacks the Family

Medicalizing Gender Confusion Makes Things Worse, New Research Confirms

Stella O’Malley: Sall Grover – The Woman Who Refused to Lie

Transgender Ideology is Inherently Destructive

Transgender Ideology is Inherently Destructive, Part 2

Why Christians Can’t Avoid the “Trans” and Gender Redefinition Issue

Yes, Girls Care When Boys Take Their Trophies

Yes, Transgenderism is a False Belief System

Written by Glenn T. Stanton · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: australia, LGBT, transgender

May 20 2026

‘Tickle v. Giggle’: Australian ‘Transgender’ Court Case Is No Joke for Women

No, it’s not what you get when you poke the Pillsbury Doughboy in the belly. 

Tickle v. Giggle is the actual name of a legal dispute where an Australian Federal Court ruled against women – and in favor of a biological male who goes by the moniker “Roxanne Tickle.”

The court upheld a lower court decision that Tickle was discriminated against when the women-only networking app “Giggle for Girls” denied him access. 

Tickle v. Giggle has gained international attention as it demonstrates the disastrous results when being female is redefined to include men claiming to be women. In their rulings, Australian courts eradicated the scientific categories of male and female, stripped women of their privacy and safety, erased womanhood, and punished those who refuse to accept transgender ideology.

Sall Grover created Giggle in 2020. She explained in her affidavit to the Federal Court why she designed the female-only app: 

The vision was to create a little corner of the Internet where women from all over the world could have a refuge away from men. It could be for serious reasons, very superficial reasons, or very practical reasons. It would be a place without harassment, “mansplaining,” “d*** pics”, stalking, and aggression, and other male patterned online behaviour. 

She added: 

During development, I would often say, “I want to ensure that women can have access to a female support network in the palm of their hand whenever they need it” and that is essentially what we were creating. 

According to court documents, the conflict between Tickle and Giggle began in February 2021, when Tickle downloaded the app and registered as a female user, which included downloading a photograph of his face. In October, he was blocked from using the app after Giggle software and employees determined he was a male masquerading as a woman. 

Tickle claimed that “trans women” “are morally and legally women.” 

He then filed a complaint with the Australian Human Rights Commission, saying Grover and Giggle for Girls had violated the Sex Discrimination Act of 1984 and accusing both of gender identity discrimination. 

The original Act prohibited discrimination based on sex, marital status, and pregnancy or potential pregnancy. But in 2013, the Act was amended to include the artificially fabricatedcategories of sexual orientation and gender identity, putting those social constructs on a collision course with biological sex – being male or female. 

Grover stalwartly refused to participate in any reconciliation process with the Australian Human Rights Commission or Tickle, which would’ve meant allowing him on the app. So he sued her and Giggle. 

In a ruling as ridiculous as the case’s name, Judge Robert Bromwich said that because Tickle had “a labioplasty and vaginoplasty” – removal of his genitals and inverting his penis to create a faux vagina – his sex changed to “that of a woman.”

Of course, it did not.

In his decision, Bromwich assaulted what we know from science, writing ideologically: 

  • “Sex is not confined to being a biological concept referring to whether a person at birth had male or female physical traits.”
  • Sex is not “confined to being a binary concept, limited to the male or female sex, but rather takes a broader ordinary meaning, informed by its use, including in State and Territory legislation.”
  • “Sex can refer to a person being male, female, or another non-binary status.”
  • Sex “also encompasses the idea that a person’s sex can be changed.”

He is deeply mistaken. Sex is not determined by surgery, legislation, or public usage of the word. 

The judge ruled that Giggle and Grover engaged in “indirect gender identity discrimination against the applicant,” ordering them to pay up to $60,000 AUD in damages and legal fees, about $43,000 in U.S. dollars. 

Tickle had also demanded a published written apology, but Bromwich said any apology would be “insincere,” adding: 

It is plain that any apology given by Ms Grover, and any apology given by her on behalf of Giggle, would be through clenched teeth and utterly devoid of sincerity. She would be doing no more than saying she was sorry, but she would not in fact be sorry at all. She adheres to her sincerely held beliefs.

Grover appealed the ruling to the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia, and on May 15, 2026, the judges upheld Bromwich’s ruling. 

The ruling is a slap in the face to Australian women and basic reason, as it means that being a woman has no real meaning. It means that any Aussie male who claims to be female has access to all women-only activities and spaces. 

To add insult to injury, the court ruling doubled the compensation to Tickle for damages and legal costs. In addition, the court upgraded the offense to direct “gender identity” discrimination. 

Grover has said she will appeal the decision. She wrote about the consequences of the ruling in a post on X, “Men who claim to be women have more rights than actual women in Australia.” 

I am absolutely devastated
Men who claim to be women have more rights than actual women in Australia.
It is women who are being discriminated against, not the men who claim to be us.

But in a sense, nothing has changed: we will all wake up tomorrow & men will still not be women.

— Sall Grover (@salltweets) May 15, 2026

She’s right, male transgenderism trumps women’s rights in Australia – and any place where sex is redefined to include “gender identity.” Let’s hope the High Court of Australia has more sense.

The case is Tickle vs. Giggle. 

Related articles and resources: 

Activist Erin Friday on Protecting Kids and Fighting ‘Gender’ Ideology

Do Not Fall for the ‘Affirm Them or They Will Die’ Lie

ADF International: 

“Sex is not confined to being a biological concept” rules Australian Court

Australian court dismisses appeal to uphold biological reality in ‘What is a woman?’ case

Family First New Zealand: Interview with Sall Grover

HHS Releases Report on Harms of ‘Transgender’ Medical Interventions for Minors

How the “Trans” and Gender Redefinition Issue Attacks the Family

Medicalizing Gender Confusion Makes Things Worse, New Research Confirms

Stella O’Malley: Sall Grover – The Woman Who Refused to Lie

Transgender Ideology is Inherently Destructive

Transgender Ideology is Inherently Destructive, Part 2

Why Christians Can’t Avoid the “Trans” and Gender Redefinition Issue

Yes, Girls Care When Boys Take Their Trophies

Yes, Transgenderism is a False Belief System

Photo courtesy of Sky News Australia and ADF International.

Written by Jeff Johnston · Categorized: Culture, Sexuality · Tagged: transgender, women's rights

May 19 2026

Boys Atop Girls’ Podiums: Where Are the Dads?

We have seen it far too often across the country. But especially in California, just like we did this weekend.

AB Hernandez is infamous in California high school sports, a young man who has been allowed by the California Interscholastic Federation to compete against teenage girls in track and field events. He wins championships, of course. This means girls lose. Last Saturday, he swept first place in the high, long and triple jump girls field events in Moorpark, California. This is the new progressive patriarchy.

Officials further mocked this violation when they made the young woman whom Hernandez stole first place from stand next to him on the winner’s podium. School officials assume it is equitable to let the girl who actually won share the top podium spot with the boy who stole her gold medal. That infuriating travesty looks just like this:

If you have to create a shared podium for the boy competing in the girls’ event, you’ve already admitted you know he isn’t a girl and that his participation is unfair.

At that point, you're just seeking a public humiliation ritual for the girls. pic.twitter.com/Ldneg3xPaW

— Riley Gaines (@Riley_Gaines_) May 17, 2026

This shared-podium rule is the state of California admitting that girls and boys are indeed different and boys are stealing girls’ glory. Their shallow virtue signaling is their admission of guilt.

But the big question is this: Where are the fathers here?

In over 19,000 sports events around the world, male athletes have stolen more than 6,250 first place finishes and 10,700 top three prizes from female athletes. 

These thousands of displaced female athletes have fathers, many of them sitting right in the stands, as they watch their daughters’ hard work taken from them by boys.

This is precisely the time fathers should be standing up, with absolute righteous anger. Any man dutifully sitting through such a scandal is not acting like a man. Every father should be telling school and state officials that no one will take away what their hard-working daughters have rightfully earned. Every dad should let everyone know that his daughter will only compete fairly against other girls and that no boy will steal what is hers. This should happen at the events. And loudly, with great conviction and moral clarity. Men should give words to the injustices happening to their daughters and call other men to stand up in the same way.

Just like the child in the Emperor’s New Suit, all fathers must stand up and speak truth to the lie of transgenderism, for trans ideology is the new male patriarchy. Fathers must explain that what’sgoing on in girls sports is a deceptive fiction, a violation to the dignity, worth and hard work of their daughters.

We men have left this battle to bold women like J.K. Rowling, Riley Gaines, Chloe Cole, Erin Friday, Jennifer Sey, Erin Lee and so many others for far too long. That must now end.

It is time all fathers stand up for their daughters and call on other men to make a strong, principled stand for every girl’s rights and protection.

Ron Nocetti is the head of the California Interscholastic Federation which is allowing this travesty in the Golden State. He is the father of four young athletes, three of them daughters. Nocetti should be called out by all fathers for his flagrant passivity.

Protection is what fathers offer and provide, especially to their girls. No man should look back on this era of cultural insanity and ask, “Why did I cower to trans ideology when girls in my community were being cheated out of their victories by boys?”

I Corinthians 16:13 calls us to “act like men, be strong.” This is expected of all fathers, everywhere. Now is the time to act like men.

Related articles and resources: 

‘Save Girls Sports’ on the November Ballot — Here’s How You Can Help

Where Are the Dads Protecting Their Daughters from Dangerous Male Athletes?

Female Athletes Beg California Interscholastic Federation to Keep Boys Out of Girls Sports and Locker Rooms

Feds Pressure California After Boy Wins in Girls Track and Field Championship

Girls Shouldn’t Apologize for Protesting Boys in Girls Sports

Protect Kids Colorado

#SaveGirlsSports – New Campaign Launched by Family Policy Alliance

Top 5 Moments From Supreme Court Arguments Over Girls Sports

Written by Glenn T. Stanton · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: Girls Sports, transgender

May 15 2026

Texas Children’s Hospital Settles with Feds for Performing Sex-Rejecting Procedures on Minors

Texas Children’s Hospital (TCH) will pay millions of dollars in civil penalties and establish America’s first ever “detransition” clinic to avoid federal prosecution for alleged fraud, the Department of Justice (DOJ) revealed today.

The groundbreaking settlement is the first struck since last April, when the department began investigating federal crimes related to hospitals and doctors performing sex-rejecting procedures on children.

“The Justice Department will use every weapon at its disposal to end the destructive and discredited practice of so-called ‘gender-affirming care’ for children,” Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche wrote in a press release.

“Today’s resolution protects vulnerable children, holds providers accountable and ensures those harmed receive the care they need.”

The settlement, which TCH entered with the DOJ and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, requires the hospital to:

  • Stop performing sex-rejecting surgeries and hormone interventions on minors.
  • Fire and de-credential five doctors who performed sex-rejecting procedures on minors.
  • Pay $10 million in damages and civil penalties to “resolve allegations” that it committed insurance fraud to pay for sex-rejecting procedures.
  • Commit to establish a clinic dedicated to “the provision of medical care to detransitioners.”

TCH will cover all costs of the detransition clinic for the first five years, per Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton.

In exchange, the DOJ will not prosecute TCH for allegedly:

  • Stealing taxpayer money to fund sex-rejecting procedures for minors.
  • Misleading minors and their families about the long-term effects of sex-rejecting procedures.

The hospital cooperated fully with the investigation, according to the DOJ’s press release.

Allegations of fraud began dogging TCH in June 2024, when Vanessa Sivadge, a nurse practitioner in the hospital’s endocrinology program, told investigative journalist Christopher Rufo that some TCH patients paid for sex-rejecting treatments using Texas’ Medicaid program.

Sivadge’s testimony prompted state and federal investigations into the hospital. Representatives Pete Sessions (TX) and Lisa McClain (MI), members of the House Oversight Committee, launched a probe into TCH in July 2024, writing:

We are concerned that medical providers at TCH are falsifying diagnosis codes for patients seeking gender transition care to obtain Medicaid payment for noncovered services.

Investigators expressed specific interest in an incident in which a TCH doctor allegedly diagnosed a female patient with testosterone deficiency and hypergonadism so Medicaid would cover her sex-rejecting testosterone treatments.

TCH fired Sivadge in August 2024 for exposing their fraud, she maintains.

No matter how cooperative the hospital may seem in 2026, Sivadge’s story is just one example of how the hospital’s deceptive conduct and radical commitment to gender ideology has left a path of destruction in its wake.

When Dr. Eithan Haim exposed the hospital for continuing to perform sex-rejecting procedures on minors after telling the public it had stopped, he became the target of a rabid DOJ prosecution based on faulty facts.

For nearly a year, until the suit was dismissed in January 2025, Dr. Haim and his growing family wondered if he would spend the next decade in prison.

In January 2026, Dr. Haim sued TCH, Baylor College of Medicine and their representatives for feeding the DOJ the false information which led to his wrongful prosecution.

After so many years of turmoil, the Daily Citizen asked Dr. Haim how today’s settlement feels.

“It is not possible to communicate what it is like when the federal leviathan is weaponized to destroy your life — not because you committed a crime, but because you upheld one of [medicine’s] most sacred virtues,” he told us, continuing:

I’ve seen this evil up close and lived with that terror every second of every day for years. I’ve also witnessed extraordinary courage, honor and dignity from those who sacrificed alongside me.
I always believed [that sacrifice] would one day be worth it.
Today is that day.

Additional Articles and Resources

House Oversight Committee Investigates Texas Children’s Medicaid Fraud

Nurse Whistleblower Lobbies Texas Senate to Investigate Fraud at Texas Children’s Hospital

Texas Children’s Hospital Embroiled in Fraud Scandal as Haim Case Kicks Off

Whistleblower Dr. Eithan Haim Sues Texas Children’s Hospital Over Malicious Prosecution

Haim Vindicated – DOJ Dismisses Case Against Whistleblower

President Trump Signs Order Protecting Children from Transgender Medical Interventions

HHS Releases Report on Harms of ‘Transgender Medical Interventions for Minors

Written by Emily Washburn · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: detransition, gender, transgender

  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 35
  • Go to Next Page »

Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | © 2026 Focus on the Family. All rights reserved.

  • Cookie Policy