• Skip to main content
Daily Citizen
  • Subscribe
  • Categories
    • Culture
    • Life
    • Religious Freedom
    • Sexuality
  • Parenting Resources
    • LGBT Pride
    • Homosexuality
    • Sexuality/Marriage
    • Transgender
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Contact
  • Donate

transgender

Sep 03 2026

Judge Dismisses DOJ’s Lawsuit Against California’s Policy Allowing Boys in Girls Sports

A federal judge has dismissed the U.S. Department of Justice’s lawsuit challenging California’s policy permitting biological males to compete in girls sports.

U.S. District Judge Cynthia Valenzuela threw out the case against California on Monday, as the DOJ is considering an appeal.

“We are disappointed by the Court’s order and remain committed to enforcing President Trump’s agenda of preventing boys from playing in girls’ sports,” the DOJ said after the ruling. A department spokesperson said the DOJ is “evaluating our options for appeal.”

Judge Valenzuela was nominated to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California by former President Joseph R. Biden in 2024.

The California Interscholastic Federation (CIF) allows students to compete in sports and use locker rooms based on their “gender identity” rather than their sex.

AB Hernandez, a boy who attempts to live as a girl, won two state titles at the California girls track and field championships earlier this year, taking first place in the girls high jump and triple jump, and third place in the girls long jump.

Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon filed a complaint in the district court on July 9, 2025, alleging CIF’s policy violates Title IX, which ensures both sexes have an equal opportunity to participate in school athletic programs.

“California’s … discriminatory policies and practices ignore undeniable biological differences between boys and girls, in favor of an amorphous ‘gender identity,’” the lawsuit alleged. “The results of these illegal policies are stark: girls are displaced from podiums, denied awards, and miss out on critical visibility for college scholarships and recognition.”

California’s policy threatens Title IX, the complaint stated, saying, “It erodes the integrity of girls’ sports, diminishes their competitive experience, and undermines the very purpose of Title IX: to provide equal access to education benefits, including interscholastic athletics.”

The DOJ has been attempting to enforce President Trump’s executive order “Keeping Men Out of Women’s Sports,” which he signed in February 2025, directing the secretary of education to “take all appropriate action to affirmatively protect all-female athletic opportunities and all-female locker rooms” and prioritize enforcement against schools that violate the policy.

In April 2025, the U.S. Departments of Justice and Education created a Title IX Special Investigations Team to investigate and prosecute schools, states and athletic conferences that allow boys in girls sports.

The DOJ has also filed lawsuits against Maine and Minnesota for violating Title IX, and the DOJ’s Special Investigations Team has initiated dozens of investigations into school districts for discriminating against girls and women, the Daily Citizen has previously reported.

In this case, you might be wondering why California is still fighting to let boys compete in girls sports after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled earlier this year states can protect girls and women’s sports.

The Court decided in State of West Virginia v. BPJ and Little v. Hecox, in which “transgender”-identified male athletes challenged West Virginia and Idaho laws protecting girls sports, that the 14th Amendment and Title IX permit states to enact such laws.

However, the Court did not decide whether Title IX requires states to do so. The Court could consider that in a future case, perhaps even in this case if it’s eventually appealed to the high Court.

Any appeal filed will next be heard by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, which hears appeals from Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon and Washington.

Once widely seen as the most liberal federal appellate court, the 9th Circuit has become increasingly conservative thanks to 10 appointments by President Donald J. Trump in his first term, and an additional appointment in his second term. President Biden nominated eight judges to the 9th Circuit who were confirmed in his single term.

The court now has 13 judges nominated by Republican presidents and 16 judges nominated by Democrat presidents.

After the judge’s decision, Dhillon intimated the agency would imminently file an appeal.

 “California judge …,” she wrote on X. “Stay tuned.”

The case is United States of America v. California Interscholastic Federation.

Related articles and resources:

California Will Continue to Allow ‘Transgender’-Identified Male Athletes in Girls Sports

Clarence Thomas: There are Only Two, Unchangeable Sexes

Blockbuster Supreme Court Ruling: Girls Sports Are for Girls

Male Athlete Wins Three Girls California Track and Field Titles — Again

Female Athletes Beg California Interscholastic Federation to Keep Boys Out of Girls Sports and Locker Rooms

DOJ Lawsuit Describes California Department of Education’s Infuriating Treatment of Girls

Feds Sue California Department of Education, Interscholastic Federation For ‘Illegal Sex Discrimination’

Photo from Getty Images.

Written by Zachary Mettler · Categorized: Government Updates · Tagged: Girls Sports, transgender

Aug 31 2026

NIH Study: Drugs, Hormones Don’t Help Sexually Confused Youth

The National Institutes of Health funded a multimillion-dollar study where sexually confused children were given puberty blockers and opposite-sex hormones: The experiment showed no improvement in their mental health. 

That’s right, taxpayers financed a Mengele-esque experiment, where children as young as eight were injected with powerful puberty blockers and opposite-sex hormones in order to find out if these “transgender” medical interventions improved their mental health. 

Participants received gift cards for allowing health care workers to damage their bodies. 

The study was first approved under the Obama administration in 2015.

The Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project released the final report to The Daily Signal, which described the study: 

The National Institutes of Health first allocated a nine-year grant of up to $10 million for the study through the Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles. The study was led by Dr. Johanna Olson-Kennedy, who specializes in “gender-affirming care.”

“Gender-affirming care” is a euphemism for social and physical interventions for mentally confused children who reject their God-given bodies and attempt to live as the opposite sex. 

As the Signal reported: 

The study included people as young as 8 years old. The sample receiving puberty blockers included participants up to age 16, while the sample receiving hormone treatments included participants up to age 20.

The results? 

Well, first of all, as reported by The New York Times two years ago, Dr. Olson-Kennedy initially would not even publish the results “because of politics.” In actuality, she already knew the results showed no mental health benefits: 

The leader of the long-running study said that the drugs did not improve mental health in children with gender distress and that the finding might be weaponized by opponents of the care.

Two years later, “Mental and Emotional Health of Youth after 24 months of Gender-Affirming Medical Care Initiated with Pubertal Suppression” was finally published online at medRxiv(med-archive). The study states: 

[T]he mental health of youth as reported by both themselves and their parents/guardians is relatively stable from baseline over 24 months after starting medical intervention with GnRHa [a puberty suppressant].

So the children’s mental health remained the same: There was no benefit from puberty suppression and opposite-sex hormones.

Dr. Olson-Kennedy has long been an activist for transgenderism. As previously reported by the Daily Citizen, she is “married” to Aydin Olson-Kennedy, a woman who attempts to live as a man. She is a licensed clinical social worker who works as a therapist and as a lecturer and consultant “on topics centered around the social and clinical needs of transgender individuals and their families.” 

Dr. Olson-Kennedy also produced a study on the mutilation of young girls, “Chest Reconstruction and Chest Dysphoria in Transmasculine Minors and Young Adults,” which examined a group of 68 gender confused teens and young women – between the ages of 13 and 24 who had their breasts removed within the past five years.

The girls were given a 10-minute survey about “chest dysphoria,” and the results compared with a non-surgical, gender-dysphoric group. 

Dr. Olson-Kennedy, former Medical Director of The Center for Transyouth Health and Development at Children’s Hospital in Los Angeles, gained notoriety when a video of her surfaced teaching that adolescents make big decisions all the time, so breast removal is no big deal: 

And here’s the other thing about chest surgery. If you want breasts at a later point in your life, you can go and get them.

She is now on staff at Prosilio Care’s Gender Confirmation Center, in Pasadena, California. 

The Signal published a second story about the study, reporting: 

A long-suppressed, taxpayer-funded report on transgender youth found that treatments with puberty blockers and hormones could have lasting negative impacts on bone density and heart health, among other health issues.

In May 2025, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released an important evaluation of the evidence for how best to treat children and adolescents with “gender dysphoria.” The report listed other damages to children receiving this “care”: 

The “gender-affirming” model of care includes irreversible endocrine and surgical interventions on minors with no physical pathology.

These interventions carry risk of significant harms including infertility/sterility, sexual dysfunction, impaired bone density accrual, adverse cognitive impacts, cardiovascular disease and metabolic disorders, psychiatric disorders, surgical complications, and regret. 

Thankfully, HHS and the Department of Justice are working to shut down the mutilation of children through these unscientific procedures. We look forward to the day when all health care providers view “gender-affirming care” with the same horror that we view lobotomies and bloodletting with leeches. 

Related articles and resources: 

American Society of Plastic Surgeons Backs Away From Supporting ‘Transgender’ Surgeries

Expert in ‘Transitioning’ Children Admits ‘We Were Wrong’ About Puberty Blockers

Focus on the Family Counseling Consultation and Referrals

Helping Children with Gender Identity Confusion

Hospitals and Doctors “Transition” Hundreds of Children with Drugs, Hormones and Surgery

INVESTIGATION: Taxpayers Fund Transgender Experiments on Children

New Video Equips Parents and Counselors to Help ‘Gender Dysphoric’ Children

Questioning Drugs, Hormones and Surgery for Youth Confused about Their Sexual Identity

Transgender Resources

Transgenderism and Minors: What Does the Research Really Show?

U.K.’s Review of Child Gender Policy Reveals Profound Failures That U.S. Still Defends

The WPATH Files Exposes ‘Surgical and Hormonal Experiments on Children’

The WPATH Files – Transgender Interventions Are ‘Unethical Medical Experiments’

Written by Jeff Johnston · Categorized: Sexuality · Tagged: hormones, puberty blockers, transgender

Aug 28 2026

Female Officer Sues Virginia Police Department After Locker Room Incident With ‘Transgender’ Recruit

A female police officer is suing the city of Norfolk, Virginia and its police chief for $15 million after the police department forced her to unknowingly share a women’s locker room with a male who identifies as a female. 

Army veteran and practicing Catholic Meghan Grabow filed a lawsuit this month claiming the city of Norfolk, through their police department, intentionally inflicted emotional distress on her by forcing her to change in front of a man identifying as a woman. 

Grabow also claims the police department denied her right to exercise her religion by being required to refer to the male recruit with female pronouns.

The former Norfolk Police Officer is seeking $15 million in compensatory damages, according to The Virginian-Pilot. 

The suit describes an incident on August 12, 2024, when Grabow was changing in a women’s locker room at a downtown police station. She alleges on that day, the department’s new “transgender” recruit – a man – walked in on Grabow in her underwear. Although the man claimed to “identify” as a woman, Grabow reported he wore men’s clothing and looked at her “as a man looks at a woman.” 

Multiple sources report when Grabow complained about the incident to police officials, she was told to either “learn to deal with it” or “find another locker room.” Grabow also claims she was advised to “take her gun into the shower” if she felt unsafe. 

The incident sparked significant controversy throughout the police station. One female police officer allegedly objected to the man’s presence in the women’s locker room, but said the department “made no accommodations.”

Another woman reported a separate encounter in the locker room, during which the male recruit used her towel and saw her in her sports bra.

Norfolk Officer Martin Powers reportedly supported Grabow and the other women, stating the department failed to notify female officers that a male identifying as a woman would begin using the female locker room. 

“How is that going to work?” asked Powers. “Where does this person, what shower do they use, what locker room? Are we figuring this out?”

In a meeting a few days after Grabow’s complaint, Norfolk Police Chief Mark Talbot allegedly directed all officers to refer to the male recruit as “she.” Talbot also stated he was not legally required to notify female officers of the male recruit’s presence in the locker room.

Officer Jennifer Baron spoke up in the meeting, saying the lack of notification regarding the “transgender” recruit’s presence “makes us feel dismissed, invisible, and not valued.”

Talbot responded:

For me to announce to the organization that a woman has been hired would have been inappropriate. … This woman will use the restroom that’s appropriate for her gender. … The female facilities are for females. Full stop.

Baron later told Talbot, “We are feeling violated. There’s a lot of pent-up frustration. … I don’t feel safe or protected at my job.”

The Virginian-Pilot cited portions of the lawsuit, which is not yet public: 

[Grabow] will not call a biological man a woman or a biological woman a man regardless of dress or behavior.
She believes that she has a duty in faith to tell the truth according to her conscience and her religious beliefs.

Her suit also describes the Norfolk Police Department’s alleged retaliation against her for speaking up. 

Grabow’s fiancé, a Norfolk police sergeant, was reportedly warned not to talk about the incident and reminded that “his promotion was on the line.” 

Grabow also claims in 2025, Norfolk Police Department indefinitely suspended her without payment due to a minor traffic violation that occurred prior to the locker room incident. She had been a Norfolk Officer since 2017.

Officer Powers was also terminated from the department. He is suing for $5 million on violations of religious freedom and retaliatory firing. 

Five other female officers have willingly left the Norfolk Police Department, “at least in part” due to the transgender recruit issue, The Virginian-Pilot reports. The male recruit who used the women’s locker room has also reportedly left the department. 

Related articles and resources:

Christian Spa Petitions Supreme Court After Man Demands Access to Female-Only Space

Christian Physician Assistant Fired for Religious Beliefs Reaches $410K Settlement

Christian Lifeguard in California Suspended After Refusing to Fly Pride Flag

Addressing Gender Identity with Honesty and Compassion

Faith, Freedom, and the Future of America

DOJ Releases Guidance Strengthening Religious Liberty Protections

Written by Meredith Godwin · Categorized: Sexuality · Tagged: transgender

Aug 25 2026

New Jersey Governor Sherrill Signs Pro-Abortion Bill Into Law

New Jersey Governor Mikie Sherrill targeted pro-life supporters on Thursday by signing legislation that may outlaw prayer and protests at abortion clinics. The law also expands protections for “transgender” medical interventions.

“This law is a deliberate act of defiance against the most basic human right — the right to life of every child in the womb with a beating heart,” said New Jersey Right to Life Executive Director Marie Tasy.

The bill (S. 2260) makes it illegal for individuals to “injure, threaten, intimidate, or physically block patients or providers … to interfere with reproductive healthcare services,” according to the governor’s office.

It allows abortion providers and women seeking abortions to take legal action against individuals who get in their way; and shields healthcare providers from malpractice claims for providing abortions and other “reproductive healthcare.”

Furthermore, the law expands the definition of “reproductive healthcare services” to include transgender medical interventions. This change places sex-rejecting procedures under the umbrella of New Jersey’s shield laws, which protect New Jersey doctors from lawsuits for violating other states’ laws.

According to the governor’s office, these shield-law protections include:

  • Protecting patient information related to “reproductive healthcare” from disclosure without prior authorization, as provided by law;
  • Restricting New Jersey entities from assisting certain out-of-state investigations or legal proceedings that seek to impose liability for providing or receiving protected reproductive healthcare; and
  • Protecting professional licenses by preventing licensing boards from taking action against a provider solely for providing protected reproductive healthcare.

This means New Jersey physicians who provide harmful and damaging transgender drugs, hormones and surgeries to out-of-state minors can’t be prosecuted for violating other states’ laws against mutilating minors.

“Here in New Jersey, we are standing firm in defense of reproductive freedoms – including the right to choose and the right to receive gender-affirming care,” said Governor Sherrill.

“With this legislation, we are making clear that New Jersey will protect patients, providers, and the fundamental freedom to make personal healthcare decisions.”

While the law ostensibly protects abortion clinic workers and women seeking abortions, pro-life leaders warn S. 2260 may open the door to lawsuit against peaceful pro-life supporters. Tasy argues the law threatens citizens’ First Amendment rights.

“Because terms such as ‘threat,’ ‘intimidate,’ and ‘coerce’ are inherently subjective and rest on individual feelings, this language poses a serious danger to free speech,” Tasy warns.

“Peaceful sidewalk counseling, prayer, holding signs, or simply offering help and alternatives outside a facility can easily be labeled ‘intimidation’ by someone who claims to feel threatened, leaving pro-life advocates open to criminal charges that are difficult to disprove and chilling constitutionally protected expression.”

Attorney Erin Mersino, vice president of Advocates for Faith & Freedom, agrees the law may be used to restrict free speech and target pro-life sidewalk counselors who try to counsel women heading into abortion clinics.

“It’s very concerning,” she told NTD Good Morning. “The cases from the Supreme Court on this issue say that the sidewalks since time immemorial have been places where free speech is supposed to be exchanged.”

If New Jersey officials use the new law to target pro-life supporters for selective prosecution, it will be nothing new.

Under the Biden administration, officials brought 22 lawsuits against peaceful pro-life supporters, some of whom spent time in prison before being pardoned by President Donald J. Trump. At the same time, the Biden Department of Justice practically ignored over 400 violent attacks on pregnancy resource centers and churches.

New Jersey’s S. 2260 also makes it illegal to damage, deface or destroy property because the facility provides abortions or transgender interventions.

Given the law-abiding nature of the vast majority of pro-life supporters, and the extremely violent nature of pro-abortion groups and individuals, it’s obvious New Jersey would be better served by a law protecting pregnancy resource centers and churches from anti-life radicals.

The Sherrill administration has also provided over $52 million to subsidize the abortion industry this year alone. Abortion is legal in New Jersey up to the moment of birth.

All told, New Jersey’s S. 2260 is just the latest bad news for the Garden State. Pro-life supporters might be stirred to action as a result.

Consider signing up to pray outside your local abortion clinic with the 40 Days for Life campaign, which has helped save 26,545 babies from abortion.

You can also support Focus on the Family’s Option Ultrasound program, which places ultrasounds in pregnancy resource centers around the country. Focus provides millions of dollars in resources to these centers annually, and has helped save over 500,000 preborn lives, thanks to the generous donor support.

As more states embrace anti-life laws, it’s up to pro-life supporters to respond by building a culture of life nationwide.

If you are experiencing an unexpected pregnancy and want to learn more about your options, you can visit My Choice Network.

Related articles and resources:

My Choice Network

I’m Pregnant, Now What?

Dealing With Unplanned Pregnancy

Become an Option Ultrasound Life Advocate

New Insights on the Dangers of the Abortion Pill

Overcoming Abortion and Becoming a Force for Life

How You Can Join the Pro-Life Movement

Scriptures Advocating For The Pre-Born

The History of Christianity and Abortion

Massachusetts Bishops: Eliminating ‘Any Legal Restraint’ on Abortion ‘Gravely Immoral’

Massachusetts Removes Abortion Restrictions, Allows Abortion Up to Birth

Photo from Getty Images.

Written by Zachary Mettler · Categorized: Government Updates, Life · Tagged: abortion, transgender

Aug 25 2026

Should President Trump Pardon Mother Who Tried to Save Her Son From Sexual Confusion?

California mother Shana Gaviola surrendered on Monday to authorities to begin a three year prison sentence. 

Her crime?

In official legalese, Gaviola was convicted of interstate violation of a protection order, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2262(a)(2), and aiding and abetting that offense under 18 U.S.C. § 2.

But her story is a lot more layered and complex than dry legal language suggests.

In short, Shana Gaviola went to prison because she attempted to rescue her son from the irreversible harm and damage brought about by his sexual confusion.

For the last decade, Shana has been navigating a nightmare. When her son, Blake, was just 13 years old, he announced he was “transgender” and wanted his mother and three younger siblings to call him “Brianna.” They correctly refused to do so.

Shana, a single mother, was shocked to learn that Blake had been seeing a counselor at his public school in Fresno, Calif. It was during those secret sessions that the school official fed his confusion and delusion and even suggested the boy consider mutilating surgery to address and align his physical anatomy with his feelings and emotions.

Shortly thereafter, police records indicate that Blake was arrested and accused of abusing a seven-year-old child in the family’s neighborhood. It’s not clear how those charges were fully addressed and resolved. But overwhelmed by it all, Shana turned to an area “friend” she thought would help. 

To give some breathing room to the tension in the Gaviola home, and to protect her own children from their sexually confused brother, Blake moved in with the other family. Tragically, the individual with whom Shana entrusted her son only fed and affirmed the boy’s confusion and made the situation even worse. 

When Shana tried to bring Blake back home, the teen claimed he was being mistreated and harassed by his mother. 

Translation: His distraught mom was refusing to play along and affirm his claim he was a girl trapped in a boy’s body.

In July of 2021, the boy applied for and received a restraining order against his mother.

Desperate to try and prevent her son from making a destructive, life-altering decision, Shana Gaviola turned to a Christian boarding school in Missouri that she believed had a reputation for helping young people sort out such confusion. Unwilling to voluntarily go, Shana hired a “transport team” composed of former law enforcement officials to move Blake from Fresno to the new facility.

Despite having a restraining order against her, Gaviola’s lawyers have said their client believed she still had legal authority to choose and direct her minor son’s care.

As it turned out, that legally fraught decision only compounded an already troubled and rapidly evolving situation. The team transporting Blake restrained him during the 27-hour drive. The school would later be shut down after officials there were accused of abusing the students.

The family “friend” who Blake had been living with reportedly financially helped his biological father go and retrieve Blake from the Missouri school. 

Shana Gaviola was indicted on the charges in 2022 by the Biden Justice Department, and in December of 2025, after a five-day trial, Shana Gaviola was found guilty and sentenced to three years in prison.

It should be noted that prosecutors successfully prevented many of the troubling details surrounding Blake’s school years from being shared at the trial, including the sexual abuse allegations. 

To be clear, Gaviola has been open that she could have done some things differently and that she trusted and relied on some people who, in hindsight, she was unwise to work with.

“As a mother, I did what I believed was necessary to protect not only my child, but other children as well,” Gaviola has said. With her now in custody, Shana’s remaining minor children will be living with relatives.

“Instead of support, I was handed a prison sentence,” she stated. “I would not be going to prison if I had done nothing. That’s the part I can’t accept – the law was safe for the mother who looks away, and unforgiving to the one who didn’t.”

The one silver lining in this otherwise dark cloud? According to reports, Blake has yet to pursue destructive gender surgery.

At this point, Shana Gaviola’s final legal play is a presidential pardon, which she has officially requested through her attorneys. Various parental rights groups have been encouraging supporters to petition President Trump on Gaviola’s behalf.

President Trump has yet to publicly comment on the request for clemency or the campaign to pardon Shana Gaviola. Please join us praying for this tragic situation.

Written by Paul Batura · Categorized: Sexuality · Tagged: transgender

  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 40
  • Go to Next Page »

Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | © 2026 Focus on the Family. All rights reserved.

  • Cookie Policy