• Skip to main content
Daily Citizen
  • Subscribe
  • Categories
    • Culture
    • Life
    • Religious Freedom
    • Sexuality
  • Parenting Resources
    • LGBT Pride
    • Homosexuality
    • Sexuality/Marriage
    • Transgender
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Contact
  • Donate

technology

May 26 2026

Pope Leo Warns Technology Must Serve Human Dignity

Pope Leo XIV reaffirmed human dignity and cautioned technological advances must serve the human good in his first encyclical letter released Monday, May 25.

The pope’s letter Magnifica Humanitas (Magnificent Humanity): On Safeguarding the Human Person in The Time of Artificial Intelligence reflects upon human beings’ dignity as creatures made in the image and likeness of God – the Imago Dei – and how to safeguard the family, human labor, media communications and peace in our time of rapid technological innovation.

The pope signed and approved the encyclical letter on the 135th anniversary of Pope Leo XIII’s landmark encyclical Rerum Novarum, which defended the rights of the family and human labor, and condemned socialism, during a time of rapid societal change resulting from the Industrial Revolution.

The Family

Pope Leo highlighted the family as “a primary social good” and reiterated the Catholic Church’s teaching that marriage is between one man and one woman.

“Founded on the enduring union between a man and a woman, [the family] is the first environment in which all persons develop their potential, become aware of their dignity and learn the earliest forms of truth and goodness, internalizing the habits that prepare them for life in society,” he wrote.

“As the first natural society, endowed with foundational rights, the family is the fundamental and irreplaceable cell of every community organization.”

He also reiterated the Church’s teaching that each person has a fundamental right to life “from conception to its natural end, without which it is impossible to exercise any other right.”

“When this fundamental right is denied — as in the cases of induced abortion, killing of the innocent and euthanasia — we are faced with choices that the Church considers gravely wrong.”

A Fundamental Choice

Pope Leo XIV likened our time to that found in Genesis 11, when human beings worked to build a Tower of Babel apart from God’s will.

“Humanity, created by God in all its grandeur, is today facing a pivotal choice: either to construct a new Tower of Babel or to build the city in which God and humanity dwell together,” the pope began.

Human beings face a choice to safeguard the “dignity of every person” and build a world where “justice is promoted and fraternity is made possible,” or to create “an inhumane and more unjust world” in which humanity “marr[s] its true identity.”

While technological advancement has “significantly improved the living conditions of humanity,” “each phase of progress has also revealed the ambiguity of tools that can cause harm when not oriented toward the good.”

The Imago Dei

Pope Leo reaffirmed the distinctly Christian teaching upholding the dignity and value of each human being because of their identity as persons made in the Imago Dei.

“At the heart of the Christian understanding of the human person lies the great biblical affirmation that men and women are created in the image and likeness of the Triune God,” the pope wrote.

“Created for relationship, every human person is planned and willed by God to enter into communion with him, with others and with creation.”

Pope Leo added that human dignity “does not depend on a person’s abilities, wealth or position in life, nor on the right or wrong choices made; instead, it is a gift that precedes and transcends each person, endowed by God as an expression of his unfailing love.”

Safeguarding Human Dignity

Having considered humanity’s special dignity as the Imago Dei, Pope Leo focused on several technological challenges facing our world today.

“As technological development rapidly transforms languages, relationships, institutions and forms of power, we believers must and can choose which projects to work on and in what manner, so as to safeguard and value the grandeur of humanity that has been given to us as a gift,” the pope wrote.

Technological Progress

Pope Leo cautioned that while technological innovation – including the expansion of AI, cognitive science, nanotechnology, robots and biotechnology – can serve humanity’s good, it must also be accompanied by social and moral progress so that it is used for good – not evil.

“These innovations can greatly serve integral human development and the care of our common home,” the pope advised. “Yet precisely because of their power, they can also hasten the expansion of the technocratic paradigm and therefore require a new spiritual, ethical and political framework.”

“More power does not necessarily imply something better,” he added. “Technological progress — valuable in itself — requires careful discernment of the anthropological vision that guides it and the ends it pursues.”

Artificial Intelligence

Pope Leo advised that AI can be a “valuable tool” if used well, though it can also cause myriad harms.

While AI can “make life easier” by rapidly providing complex analysis, media content and information, it can also “encourage excessive reliance and the search for ready-made answers, and weaken personal creativity and judgment.”

AI can provide the “artificial imitation of human connection – words of advice, empathy, friendship and even love.” But it can also “be misleading, creating the illusion of a relationship with a real personal subject.”

“When words are simulated, they do not build genuine relationships, but only their appearance,” the pope cautioned.

Transhumanism

Pope Leo also addressed transhumanism, in which human beings are “enhanced” through technologies to increase performance and capabilities.

“If the human being is treated as something to be perfected or surpassed, it becomes easier to accept that some lives are less useful, less desirable or less worthy,” the pope forewarned.

“It is one thing to integrate technology within a human-centered, relational vision; it is quite another to be guided by an outlook that devalues human limits and promises a purely technical form of ‘salvation.’”

Social Media

Furthermore, Pope Leo cautioned against providing digital devices to children at a young age.

“Early and unsupervised exposure to digital devices and social media can negatively impact sleep, attention span, control of emotions and relationships, especially during the most vulnerable stages of life, at times with tragic consequences,” Pope Leo wrote.

“Having a personal mobile device at too early an age and using it without adult supervision can exacerbate young people’s vulnerabilities, foster addiction and expose them to isolation, bullying and cyberbullying, as well as to pressures to share intimate images or sensitive information.”

Pope Leo said it is very difficult for parents to “resist the influence of business models that monetize attention and time.” Therefore, public policy is needed for “setting age limits, holding service providers accountable … and providing protections against all forms of online sexual exploitation and violence.”

Conclusion

When Robert Prevost was elected pope on May 8, 2025, he chose the papal name Leo XIV primarily because he wanted to continue Leo XIII’s work responding to the Industrial Revolution. Pope Leo XIV said he would respond to “another industrial revolution and … developments in the field of artificial intelligence.”

Now that the pope’s long-awaited encyclical on AI has been issued, it remains to be seen how many of his warnings will be heeded or ignored by the wider world.

To speak with a family help specialist or request resources, please call us at 1-800-A-FAMILY (232-6459).

Related articles and resources:

Cell Phone Guidelines for Kids

Tech Trends: Protecting Kids from Social Media Harm

How AI is Shaping Our View of Reality

Screen Time: Less is More

Reconnect in Real Life: Tips to Reduce Screen Time

Getting a Handle on Your Screen Time

How Your Family Can Manage Technology Well

Helping Our Kids Manage Technology Well

A Parent’s Guide to Today’s Technology

Photo from Getty Images.

Written by Zachary Mettler · Categorized: Culture, Family · Tagged: Catholicism, technology

May 22 2026

New AI Tool Helps Parents Keep Kids Safe Online

The National Center on Sexual Exploitation (NCOSE) last week launched an AI resource referral tool to help parents protect their kids online.

In the digital age, even the most fastidious parents may struggle to protect their kids from online addiction and predation. On May 14, NCOSE unveiled a new AI chatbot designed to help overwhelmed parents find the resources and information they need, when they need it.

Unlike other chatbots, which can cause kids irreparable harm, NCOSE says its special tool is designed to direct parents to vetted resources from trusted partners — including the Daily Citizen and Focus on the Family.

The bot offers step by step assistance and resources to parents in all kinds of situations, from those seeking to put boundaries on personal tech to those who discover their child is caught in a sextortion scam.

The new AI tool powers NCOSE’s Parent Center, which Director Layne Shill describes as a place for parents to grow more informed about raising kids in the digital age.  

“Current tech solutions like parental controls are hard to keep up with, inconsistent and often hard to understand,” Shill wrote in a press release.

“The Parent Center is designed to give parents simple, practical and helpful information to meet parents where they are and guide them toward trusted resources.”

“Trusted” being the key word. With NCOSE’s tools, Shill noted, parents don’t have to rely on resources provided by tech companies with no incentive to protect children.

“While Big Tech offers AI assistance tools, they are unregulated and can provide misleading information,” she wrote.  

“NCOSE’s Parent Center AI tool draws on reliable sources and was created by parents, for parents.”

The Parent Center also offers practical ways moms and dads can support legislative changes enabling them to better protect their kids online.

“We believe parents and caregivers can change the world,” the platform reads. “Together, we’re building a movement to make children’s online safety a national priority.”

The Daily Citizen and Focus on the Family believe parents should prioritize their children’s online safety. We are proud to contribute resources to NCOSE’s new AI tool for parents.

The Daily Citizen team works hard to cover social and political issues affecting families, including those affecting children’s safety online.

To keep up with our work, you can sign up to get our daily or weekly newsletters sent to your inbox for free.

Additional Articles and Resources

Feds Convict First Person for Crimes Under ‘Take It Down’ Act

Juries in California, New Mexico Rule Against Meta

New Mexico Accuses Meta of Egregious Harm to Children in Court Case

Zuckerberg, Grok, Messaging Platforms Dominate 2026 Dirty Dozen List

National Center on Sexual Exploitation Turns Down Big Tech Payday

Senate Introduces 3 Bills Targeting Sextortion

Child Safety Advocates Push Congress to Pass the Kids Online Safety Act

Written by Emily Washburn · Categorized: Family · Tagged: technology

Feb 23 2026

‘Toy Story 5’ Trailer Tackles Treacherous Tech

Sheriff Woody, Buzz Lightyear and the rest of the Toy Story cast will return to movie theaters this summer to confront their most powerful antagonist yet — “tech.”

The trailer for Toy Story 5, which premiered last week, finds our favorite toys sidelined by Lily Pad, a tablet which captures their young owner, Bonnie’s, attention in a vice grip.

The clip, though short, illustrates technology’s effects on children with uncomfortable accuracy.  

Before Lily Pad’s arrival, Bonnie uses her toys to act out a dramatic whodunnit.

Bonnie’s wild tale ends when she receives Lily Pad. The endlessly entertaining device monopolizes the young girl’s play time, prompting Rex, a franchise-favorite, to exclaim, “Extinction! Not again!”

Lily Pad’s disruption of Bonnie’s play reflects real concerns about personal technology’s effect on child development. Imaginative play is crucial to children’s early brain development. When tablets and smartphones eradicate boredom from kids’ lives, they lose essential opportunities to create, reflect and make sense of the world around them.

In the trailer, the toys confront Lily Pad for ruining their efforts to help Bonnie make friends.

Technology’s effect on friendship is a real concern, too. Many early friendships form around playing pretend, where children learn to communicate, work together and consider one another’s preferences — the building blocks of empathy, connection and social awareness.

Importantly, studies show children do not learn the same skills from observing people on a screen.

Technology also changes the way children communicate. Toy Story 5’s trailer features a short scene showing a group of kids sitting on a stoop, all focused on their own Lily Pads.

Personal technology infiltrates real world friendships in the same way. Though children may be physically present with one another, their communication often occurs online.

In his book, The Anxious Generation, social psychologist Jonathan Haidt cites data from the American Time Use Study showing people ages 15 to 24 hung out with friends more than an hour and 20 minutes less in 2020 than they did in 2013, when smartphones went mainstream.

Haidt warns virtual relationships and communication are not adequate replacements for good, old-fashioned face time. Virtual relationships deprive kids of opportunities to develop critical life skills like making eye contact, resolving conflict, setting boundaries and absorbing exclusion and rejection.

One of the most interesting parts of the Toy Story 5 trailer is that Bonnie’s parents do not allow her unlimited access to Lily Pad. In one scene, Bonnie’s dad tells her “screen time” is over.

But their efforts to use Lily Pad in moderation don’t limit the device’s hold on Bonnie. Her mind remains fixed on the boredom-defying device.

Many parents work hard to ensure screens don’t take over their kids’ lives. In her book, The Tech Exit, however, the Ethics and Public Policy Center’s Clare Morell argues any time spent on screens damages children’s brains.

While the tech industry often compares tech to sugar, an addictive chemical that can nevertheless be consumed in small doses, Morell says tech is more like fentanyl for impressionable kids. Smartphones and tablets begin changing kids’ brains immediately, giving them intense dopamine highs which make everyday pleasures seem boring in comparison.

Toy Story 5 sets up an epic battle between two versions of childhood — one in which, we hope, the toys will win. But it’s unclear how the movie will resolve a problem so many parents struggle to tackle themselves.

Will the toys eradicate technology all together?

Will they learn to peacefully coexist with Lily Pad?

As relevant as the movie’s trailer may be, the story’s resolution will determine its lasting impact.

In today’s culture, all parents must consider how best to protect their children from technology’s negative effects. Check out the free articles and resources linked below for essential advice on raising kids in a technological age.

Additional Articles and Resources

Counseling Consultation & Referrals

Introducing Our Parents’ Guide to Technology 2026

Parenting Tips for Guiding Your Kids in the Digital Age

‘The Tech Exit’ Helps Families Ditch Addictive Tech — For Good.

Parent-Run Groups Help Stop Childhood Smartphone Use

The Harmful Effects of Screen-Filled Culture on Kids

Social Psychologist Finds Smartphones and Social Media Harm Kids in These Four Ways

Four Ways to Protect Your Kids from Bad Tech, From Social Psychologist Jonathan Haidt

Australia Bans Kids Under 16 Years Old From Social Media

Written by Emily Washburn · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: technology

Nov 26 2025

Child Safety Advocates Push Congress to Pass the Kids Online Safety Act

JUMP TO…
  • The Act
  • First Amendment Concerns
  • Supporters

Congress must pass the bipartisan Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA), child safety advocates say, so parents can better protect their children from sexual exploitation, addiction and myriad other online harms.

The bill, which Senators Marsha Blackburn (TN) and Richard Blumenthal (CT) reintroduced in May, would hold social media companies legally responsible for harming minors. Platforms governed by the bill would fulfill their legal obligations by instituting child safeguards, creating parental controls and increasing transparency.

A similar version of KOSA passed the Senate last year in a near-unanimous, 91-3 vote. It stalled in the House amid First Amendment concerns.

“[KOSA] will compel covered social media companies to center online safety and wellbeing rather than profit alone,” a group of more than 400 organizations representing parents, children, researchers, advocates and healthcare professionals wrote in an October letter encouraging legislators to pass the bill.

Though Senate Majority Leader John Thune (SD) and Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (NY) both endorse the bill, the Senate has not voted on KOSA this year.

The Act

KOSA would apply to any interactive website that primarily allows users to post and share content, including social media platforms, video posting sites like YouTube and some interactive video games.

It would require covered platforms to place automatic safeguards on minors’ accounts, like:

  • Limiting who can communicate with minors or view their profiles.
  • Prohibiting other companies from viewing or collecting minors’ data.
  • Limiting addictive features like infinite scrolling, auto-play, algorithmic content recommendations and rewards for spending time on the platform.
  • Restricting location sharing and notifying minors when location-tracking turns on.

It would also force covered platforms to offer parents tools to:

  • Manage their child’s privacy and account settings.
  • Restrict their child’s ability to make purchases or engage in financial transactions.
  • View and limit how much time their child spends on a platform.

KOSA further addresses Big Tech’s lack of transparency. Covered platforms would have to:

  • Warn parents and minors about a platform’s potential dangers.
  • Clearly disclose marketing and advertising content.
  • Explain how they create personal content recommendation algorithms — and how users can opt out.

Companies with more than 10 million users a month, on average, would additionally undergo annual, third-party audits investigating whether their platforms harm children. Parents could read auditors’ findings in mandatory safety reports.

State attorneys general and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) could sue covered platforms for failing to uphold their legal responsibilities under KOSA. The FTC could investigate KOSA violations as “unfair or deceptive business practices.”

First Amendment Concerns

Senators Blackburn and Blumenthal adjusted this year’s version of KOSA to alleviate concerns about government censorship, which contributed to the bill’s failure last year.

Senator Mike Lee (UT), one of just three senators who voted against KOSA in 2024, explained on X:

The legislation empowers the FTC to censor any content it deems to cause “harm,” “anxiety,” or “depression,” in a way that could (and most likely would) be used to censor the expression of political, religious and other viewpoints disfavored by the FTC.

The House Committee on Energy and Commerce tried to alleviate concerns like Lee’s in September 2024 by limiting KOSA’s application to companies making more than $2.5 billion in annual revenue or hosting at least 150 million monthly users.

Though the committee’s revisions eventually passed, many legislators argued the changes gutted KOSA. It never received a vote on the House floor.

This year’s version of the bill specifically prohibits the FTC or state attorneys general from using KOSA suits to illegally censor content. A press release announcing KOSA’s reintroduction reads, in part:

The bill text … further makes clear that KOSA would not censor, limit or remove any content from the internet, and it does not give the FTC or state Attorneys General the power to bring lawsuits over content or speech.
Supporters

Several influential advocates for children’s digital safety support KOSA, including many who regularly appear in the Daily Citizen.

“The Kids Online Safety Act is a powerful tool in parents’ defense of their children,” Tim Goeglein, Vice President of External and Government Relations for Focus on the Family, told the Daily Citizen.

Clare Morrell, fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center and author of The Tech Exit, writes:

Parents have been left on their own to try to fend off a massive tech-induced crisis in American childhood from online platforms that are engineered to be maximally addictive. KOSA offers a needed solution by making social media platforms responsible for preventing and mitigating certain objective harms to minors, like sexual exploitation.

Morrell’s The Tech Exit offers parents a blueprint to break their children free of addictive technologies.

Jonathan Haidt, social psychologist and author of The Anxious Generation, argues KOSA “would begin to address the [indisputable harm occurring to children at an industrial scale].”

Haidt’s The Anxious Generation raises alarm bells about the effects of ubiquitous internet access on children’ physical, mental and social wellbeing.

Both houses of Congress must pass KOSA by the end of December. If they do not, parents will have to wait yet another year for the bill’s critical protections.

The Daily Citizen will continue covering this important story.

Additional Articles and Resources

Counseling Consultation & Referrals

Parenting Tips for Guiding Your Kids in the Digital Age

‘The Tech Exit’ Helps Families Ditch Addictive Tech — For Good

Louisiana Sues Roblox for Exposing Children to Predators, Explicit Content

Social Psychologist Finds Smartphones and Social Media Harm Kids in These Four Ways

Four Ways to Protect Your Kids from Bad Tech, From Social Psychologist Jonathan Haidt

Parent-Run Groups Help Stop Childhood Smartphone Use

The Harmful Effects of Screen-Filled Culture on Kids

‘Big Tech’ Device Designs Dangerous for Kids, Research Finds

National Center on Sexual Exploitation Targets Law Allowing Tech Companies to Profit from Online Sex Abuse

Danger in Their Pockets

Teen Boys Fall Prey to Financial Sextortion — Here’s What Parents Can Do

Proposed SCREEN Act Could Protect Kids from Porn

Proposed ‘App Store Accountability’ Act Would Force Apps and App Stores to Uphold Basic Child Safety Protections

Written by Emily Washburn · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: social media, technology

Nov 17 2025

Many Parents Still Fail to Monitor Their Kids’ Online Activity, Survey Shows

Most Americans support restricting kids’ access to social media and pornography, this year’s American Family Survey shows. But many parents remain hesitant to monitor their children’s online activity.

Brigham Young University’s annual American Family Survey asks a representative group of 3,000 American adults about economic, cultural and social concerns affecting the family. This year, participants identified “social media, video games [and] other electronic resources” as one of the top five issues families must confront.

Respondents expressed the most concern about porn and social media’s effects on young people. American adults overwhelmingly support government regulations limiting minors’ access to these products.

Per the survey:

  • More than 75% of participants support requiring pornography websites to verify the ages of their consumers.
  • Nearly 80% support requiring social media companies to obtain parents’ consent before allowing a minor to create a social media account.
  • Three in four support holding social media companies legally liable for harm caused by content marketed to minors.

Parents with children under 18 years old living at home also support making technology restrictions part of parenting norms. More than 60% of respondents in this demographic wish other families would implement rules about technology, and half said it would make setting and enforcing their own restrictions easier.  

But the survey also shows many parents don’t limit their children’s access to technology at all — let alone discuss strategies with other parents.

Surveyors asked participants with children under 18 years old in the home whether they implement any of five common technological boundaries: limiting their children’s screen time, restricting the kinds of content they consume, requiring them to keep their online accounts private, restricting who they contact and limiting who they exchange private messages with.

One in five respondents (20%) implement none of these restrictions. Two in five respondents (40%) don’t limit their kids’ screen time. Another 40% don’t police the content their children consume.

Though most participants in this demographic claimed other parents’ rules about technology would help them create and enforce their own rules, only 17% said another parent had influenced them to change a screen time restriction.

One third of respondents said they never talk about managing kids and technology with another parent. Only 13% claim to discuss it frequently.

Ubiquitous technology and internet access make parenting harder. Enforcing technological boundaries can be confusing, thankless and overwhelming — particularly when tech companies frequently undermine parental controls with few consequences.

But these obstacles do not change parents’ duty to protect their children from harmful content and technologies.

Parents, you do not have to allow your children access to smartphones or the internet. If you choose to do so, you must be prepared to:

  • Police your child’s online activity.
  • Educate yourself about parental controls and implement them to the best of your ability.
  • Warn your child about online predation and other pitfalls.
  • Model healthy relationships with technology.

Joining forces with other parents to limit children’s access to social media and smartphones can help families create and maintain healthy boundaries with technology. Take it upon yourself to initiate these partnerships. Odds are, you will not be rebuffed.

For more tips and tricks, check out Plugged In’s Parent’s Guide to Today’s Technology. For more information about technology restrictions — or ditching smartphones altogether — read the articles below.

Additional Articles and Resources

Counseling Consultation & Referrals

More than Twenty States Limit Smartphone Use in Schools

Parent-Run Groups Help Stop Childhood Smartphone Use

‘The Tech Exit’ Helps Families Ditch Addictive Tech — For Good

Four Ways to Protect Your Kids from Bad Tech, from Social Psychologist Jonathan Haidt

Social Psychologist Finds Smartphones and Social Media Harm Kids in These Four Ways

‘Big Tech’ Device Designs Dangerous for Kids, Research Finds

Survey Finds Teens Use Social Media More Than Four Hours Per Day — Here’s What Parents Can Do

Video: Seven-Year-Old’s Confidence Soars After Ordering Chick-Fil-A By Himself

5 Most Important Things OpenAI Lawsuits Reveal About ChatGPT-4o

Louisiana Sues Roblox for Exposing Children to Predators, Explicit Content

Proposed ‘App Store Accountability’ Act Would Force Apps and App Stores to Uphold Basic Child Safety Protections

Teen Boys Fall Prey to Financial Sextortion — Here’s What Parents Can Do

Proposed SCREEN Act Could Protect Kids from Porn

Written by Emily Washburn · Categorized: Culture, Family · Tagged: parenting, social media, technology

  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Go to Next Page »

Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | © 2026 Focus on the Family. All rights reserved.

  • Cookie Policy