Church-Owned School Fights Government Religious Hostility in Massachusetts
It is basic First Amendment law that the government may not discriminate against religious belief without a compelling reason. So, when government officials stonewall a new Christian school’s application for recognition to operate, and openly express hostility over the religious content of the school’s curriculum, as in the case of Vida Real Church in Somerville, Massachusetts, the evidence is persuasive that the government has crossed a constitutional line.
In September 2021 the church applied to the Somerville Public School Committee, the government entity with authority to approve the operation of schools in Somerville, to open a private school called the Real Life Learning Center (RLLC) to serve the church’s families, comprised of mostly Hispanic immigrants in the local community.
Over five months later, the church has gotten nowhere with its application.
Vida Real is now being represented by attorneys with First Liberty Institute, who along with the Massachusetts Family Institute, a Focus on the Family-allied public policy organization, sent a letter to the Committee on March 30 demanding prompt approval of the church’s application.
The letter describes the “troubling conduct” of the Committee since the church’s application was submitted last September.
“Despite Vida Real’s expressed desire to open RLLC as quickly as possible, the Committee has repeatedly stonewalled Vida Real’s efforts to provide private, religious education for its community for over five months now,” the letter reads. “Even more concerning, the Committee has expressed hostility towards Vida Real’s religious beliefs, and multiple Committee members have stated that RLLC’s desire to create a curriculum consistent with its religious beliefs is grounds for denying its private school application.”
The Committee’s hostility toward the Christian school was conveyed in numerous ways, according to the letter.
“These expressed hostilities included: (1) questioning whether RLLC could adequately provide health education because of its decision to teach on matters of human sexuality in accordance with its religious beliefs; (2) expressing skepticism regarding Vida Real’s religious views on mental health; (3) challenging whether RLLC should be allowed to teach creationism; and (4) objecting to RLLC’s reliance on Christian authors for its curriculum.”
The Committee also engaged in protracted delay tactics and repeatedly asked the church to re-submit materials and had still not reached a decision by the time First Liberty’s letter was delivered to the Committee.
“It is illegal and unconstitutional for city officials to question the religious beliefs of Vida Real, let alone use those beliefs to stop the church from opening a school,” said Andrew Beckwith, president of the Massachusetts Family Institute, in a press release. “This is blatant religious discrimination. It’s time for Somerville officials to stop treating Vida Real unfairly and allow it to pursue the opening of a school.”
Justin Butterfield, Deputy General Counsel at First Liberty, added:
“The hostility displayed by the Somerville Public School Committee is outrageous. The government cannot ban a religious school because they disagree with its religious beliefs. Doing so violates federal constitutional and statutory law.”
The demand letter offers a face-saving “out” for the Committee if its members realize their error:
“We write to you now in hopes that the Committee’s recent conduct stems from a misunderstanding of the law and the Committee’s role in evaluating private school applications from religious schools like RLLC.”
But the letter concludes with a sobering warning that the Committee’s members could end up being personally liable for violating the constitutional rights of Vida Real:
“Please be aware that government officials who violate clearly established laws – as is occurring here – may be held individually liable for their violations.”
The demand letter requests a response within 10 business days.
Photo from Shutterstock.
’Tis the season for holiday reading!
Check out Daily Citizen’s cheery winter reads.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Bruce Hausknecht, J.D., is an attorney who serves as Focus on the Family’s judicial analyst. He is responsible for research and analysis of legal and judicial issues related to Christians and the institution of the family, including First Amendment freedom of religion and free speech issues, judicial activism, marriage, homosexuality and pro-life matters. He also tracks legislation and laws affecting these issues. Prior to joining Focus in 2004, Hausknecht practiced law for 17 years in construction litigation and as an associate general counsel for a large ministry in Virginia. He was also an associate pastor at a church in Colorado Springs for seven years, primarily in worship music ministry. Hausknecht has provided legal analysis and commentary for top media outlets including CNN, ABC News, NBC News, CBS Radio, The New York Times, the Chicago Tribune, The Washington Post, The Washington Times, the Associated Press, the Los Angeles Times, The Wall Street Journal, the Boston Globe and BBC radio. He’s also a regular contributor to The Daily Citizen. He earned a bachelor’s degree in history from the University of Illinois and his J.D. from Northwestern University School of Law. Hausknecht has been married since 1981 and has three adult children, as well as three adorable grandkids. In his free time, Hausknecht loves getting creative with his camera and capturing stunning photographs of his adopted state of Colorado.
Related Posts
Appeals Court Favors Louisiana Ten Commandments Law for Now
November 18, 2024
Christian Woman Fired for Refusing COVID Vaccine Wins $12 Million
November 13, 2024