• Skip to main content
Daily Citizen
  • Subscribe
  • Categories
    • Culture
    • Life
    • Religious Freedom
    • Sexuality
  • Parenting Resources
    • LGBT Pride
    • Homosexuality
    • Sexuality/Marriage
    • Transgender
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Contact
  • Donate

censorship

Dec 05 2025

Why Self-Censorship is a Real Problem

A trusted colleague recently said to me, playfully, at our morning Daily Citizen editorial meeting, “Glenn, that’s an inside-your-head thought, not a say-it-out-loud thought.” She was right. Not saying everything that passes through our mind is a part of being an adult and good community member.

But things are getting very much out of hand in this regard in American and other countries. Self-censorship – the practice of holding back speaking certain reasonable thoughts and convictions because we fear people’s reactions – is on the rise in concerning ways.

A new Harvard Kennedy School poll of young adults (aged 18-29) demonstrates this.

A dramatic 47% of young Americans say they “avoid talking about politics because I worry about how others might react.” Interestingly, young Republicans are markedly more likely at 54% to say this compared to their democrat and independent peers.

Add to this the fact that young adult republicans are notably more likely than their democrat or independent peers to confess “people often make me feel judged when I share my political views.” The report admitted this, explaining, “These concerns are most pronounced among Republicans: nearly half (48%) agree that they often feel judged, compared with 30% of Democrats and 28% of independents.”

Fear of speaking honestly in public has been happening among college and university faculty as well. The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression’s (FIRE) most recent report on policing of speech codes on campus details how out of hand this has gotten and the emotional toll it has taken. Of professors that have had their professional communications challenged by student and others, FIRE explains, “Roughly two-thirds (65%) experienced emotional distress, and significant chunks reported facing harrowing social setbacks, such as being shunned at work (40%) or losing professional relationships (47%) and friendships (33%).”  Fifty-three percent report having suffered from loss of sleep.

What makes it worse is that college and university administrators failed to support faculty who were criticized by students or the public for stating certain academic beliefs in their writings and the classroom.

FIRE’s 2024 report states, “35% of faculty say they recently toned down their writing for fear of controversy, compared to 9% of faculty who said the same during the McCarthy era.”  It also reported that conservative faculty felt the most pressure, being more likely to feel something they said could damage their reputation or cause them to lose their job.

And for good reason. Carol Hooven, a classically liberal professor was run out of Harvard by woke students for merely speaking biological truths. Many professors and teachers have taken notice of her experience and are checking what they say. This is a travesty.

A 2022 report carefully documents the problem of self-censorship is not confined to America. It explains how a “chilling effect” is affecting Christians around the world. This report’s number one conclusion is this: “The Church has allowed itself to be self-censored.” This is a tragedy, as Christians are called to speak truth to a hungry and needy world and resist bullying to stay silent. The report’s conclusion added, “Christian leaders must be doubly prepared to defend their positions.” They must, and with unapologetic boldness.

Speaking to his follow academics, American Enterprise Institute Senior Fellow Samuel Abrams strikes the same tone, “The path back to sanity is not complicated. But it requires courage.”

Courage is required of everyone in this age of woke speech policing. Never be intimidated to say what you know to be true, doing so with conviction, utter confidence, gentleness and respect. Refusing to back down is what bullies fear most. And the woke speech police roaming our culture and school halls today are the new bullies.

They must be resisted.

Photo from Shutterstock.

Written by Glenn T. Stanton · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: censorship, free speech

Sep 04 2025

British Police Arrest Comedian for Pro-Women Tweets

Five armed British police officers arrested an Irish comedian Monday for “inciting violence” against “trans people” — with pro-women tweets he made months ago.

Graham Linehan “refuses to believe men can become women.” His staunch, often satirical, defense of biological reality makes him a frequent target of “trans” activists. The once successful screenwriter moved to the U.S. last year after the British entertainment industry reportedly blacklisted him as a “transphobe.”

British police nabbed Linehan at the Heathrow Airport Monday under “suspicion of inciting violence on X.” He spent time in a holding cell at Heathrow Police Station before an officer interviewed him about these three X posts:

The posts, which the comedian made in April, express negative opinions about “trans” activists with his characteristic comedic flair. Only one even remotely references violence.

Police treated them like a crime.

“[The officer] asked about each of the posts in turn, with the sort of earnest intensity usually reserved for discussing something serious like … oh, I don’t know — crime?” Linehan wrote in a scathing account of his experience.

When the officer zeroed in on his tweet about punching men who enter women’s spaces, Linehan said it was “a serious point made with a joke.”

“Men who enter women’s spaces are abusers, and they need to be challenged every time,” he maintained.

Linehan’s tweet would be protected under America’s First Amendment. Per the U.S. Supreme Court, “The public expression of ideas may not be prohibited because the ideas are themselves offensive to some of their hearers.” (Street v. New York, 1969).

But Britain’s Human Rights Act affords British citizens much flimsier protections. People can not only be prosecuted for inciting violence, but for uttering “hate speech” implicating a person’s “race, gender, sexuality and religion.”

What constitutes “hate speech,” you ask? Nobody knows.

Worse, the officer who interviewed Linehan for “inciting violence” apparently subscribes to radical gender ideology.

Per Linehan:

The officer mentioned the term “trans people.” I asked him what he meant by the phrase. “People who feel their gender is different then what was assigned at birth,” he said.

“Assigned at birth?” I responded. “Our sex isn’t assigned.” He called it semantics. I told him he was using activist language.

There’s nothing semantic about conceding people can be born in the wrong bodies. That single statement implies sex can not only be changed but is ultimately meaningless — two claims that defy natural law.

Ironically, the U.K is actively divorcing itself from such sentiments. In April, just days before Linehan posted the tweets that got him arrested, the U.K.’s Supreme Court defined “woman” as an adult female. The head of the U.K.’s Equality and Human Rights Commission subsequently announced men would no longer be allowed in women’s bathrooms, hospital wards and sports teams.

The decision should vindicate and embolden people, like Lineham, who speak biological truth and champion women. Instead, we’re left marveling at the U.K.’s failure to protect free speech.

Vice President J.D. Vance cautioned Europe against this exact scenario in a powerful speech at the Munich Security Conference in February.

“The threat I worry about most, vis a vis Europe, is not Russia or China or an external actor,” the vice president emphasized. “It’s the threat from within — the retreat of Europe from its fundamental values.”

He specifically exhorted Europe not to abandon free speech in favor of censorship — particularly on social media.

But here we are.

The vice president correctly recognizes Europe as a bellwether for America and the West. Though America’s free speech protections are more robust, our country is far from immune to government censorship and anti-speech laws.

Free speech protections are crucial, not only to a free society, but a flourishing Christian community. Anti-speech laws — like those preventing prayer, even silent prayer, outside abortion clinics — often target believers sharing Jesus Christ’s love, grace and truth with the world.

It is incumbent upon citizens and believers, then, to uncover and oppose violations of free speech, domestic and abroad.

President Ronald Reagan said it best in his first inaugural address:

Freedom is a fragile thing and it’s never more than one generation away from extinction. It is not ours by way of inheritance; it must be fought for and defended constantly by each generation, for it comes only once to a people.

What is Free Speech?

UK Court Demonstrates It Knows What a Woman Is, Clarifying British Law

JD Vance Defends Christianity and Free Speech in Munich Address

Opening Brief Filed at SCOTUS Defending Christian Counselor’s Free Speech

Pro-Life Activist Arrested for Peaceful Prayer Appeals to Supreme Court

House Advances Bill to Repeal Law Weaponized Against Pro-Lifers

President Trump pardons 23 Peaceful Pro-Life Protesters

JD Vance: ‘You Shouldn’t Have to Leave Your Faith at the Door’

Army Veteran Found Guilty for Praying Outside UK Abortion Facility

British Cops: ‘What is the Nature of Your Prayer?’ Man Fined for Praying for Aborted Son

Social Media Censorship Case Reaches Supreme Court

Written by Emily Washburn · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: censorship, transgender

Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | © 2025 Focus on the Family. All rights reserved.

  • Cookie Policy