• Skip to main content
Daily Citizen
  • Subscribe
  • Categories
    • Culture
    • Life
    • Religious Freedom
    • Sexuality
  • Parenting Resources
    • LGBT Pride
    • Homosexuality
    • Sexuality/Marriage
    • Transgender
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Contact
  • Donate

free speech

May 21 2026

A Young Poet’s Pro-Life Voice is Censored — But Her Poem Goes Viral Online

A misapplied liberal bumper sticker has it that “Well Behaved Women Seldom Make History.” It is never applied to strong Christian women being faithful to what God has called them to. But that is precisely what academic historian Laurel Thatcher Ulrich was referring to when she penned this quote in a scholarly 1976 journal article.

Ulrich was describing the highly devout Puritan woman of the American colonies.

There is a faithful Christian lass in Jefferson County, Colorado who is actually making history for being silenced by her liberally minded Drake Middle School teacher and school administrators. The Daily Citizen does not know this 13-year-old girl’s name, but we are deeply moved by her brilliance, conviction and passion.

Her seventh-grade class was assigned to write a slam poem about, as she explained, “a conflict in the world that we are passionate about.” She chose to write about life because choosing life is a very important part of her family’s story. Neither she nor her mother would exist if her grandmother had not bravely and selflessly chosen life when she found herself pregnant at the tender age of 14. But she did, and they are all thankful.

Yet, her teacher told her she could not present her poem before the class, even though she carefully met all the criteria outlined by the assignment. It was the topic, and her voice, that was muzzled. The mom explained she was told “because of the offensive material in the poem, that they were not going to allow her to present.” 

You can hear this creative poem and judge for yourself if it is offensive and deserving of being banned. It starts with a famous quote from Dr. Suess, “A life is a life, no matter how small.”

MUST WATCH: We asked the 13-year-old student who was barred from presenting her pro-life poem because it’s “offensive”, to read her poem so we can share it with the world.

PURE FIRE🔥

This is the poem @JeffcoSchoolsCo doesn’t want you to see.

Would be a shame if it went viral! https://t.co/ehwBVYEIce pic.twitter.com/nqaglH1qXx

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) May 20, 2026

It is a lovely, thoughtful piece of work. What a remarkable girl!

But this girl and her mom were told it was “too political.”

The mother rightfully pushed back on the teacher, explaining many other students’ poems presented controversial material like racial politics, LGBT issues, and immigration, but to no resolve.

Yet, it gets worse.

When this mindful girl asked her teacher why she would not be able to present her poem, her teacher told her she would not even be able to be present in the classroom while other students read their own poems. She would have to sit outside. Unlike Rosa Parks who was unjustly asked to move to the back of the bus, this girl was asked to step off the bus.

This young teen bravely pressed the matter and the teacher relented, allowing her to be in the class with her fellow students to hear them recite their poems.

Of her own crisis-laden conception, in which her mother bravely chose life, the student’s mother beautifully explained, “There is hope in hard situations. There is purpose in pain. And good things come out of situations that seem bleak and my family is proof of that.”

We spoke with a mother and her 13-year-old daughter after the girl was barred from reading a pro-life poem at school. They shared why this topic is so personal and important to them.

Try not to cry.. 🥹

The mother explains that her mother got pregnant with her at 14 and chose… https://t.co/ehwBVYEIce pic.twitter.com/ocypyCXKYv

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) May 20, 2026

Thank God for such beautiful strong female voices speaking truth amid a culture of death. Shame on the Jefferson County, Colorado, school officials for illiberally muting this spirited and intelligent girl’s talented pro-life voice. 

JeffCO Public Schools can be contacted at the following:

JeffCO Public Schools / 1829 Denver West Drive #27 / Golden, Colorado 80401
Phone: 303-982-6500

Written by Glenn T. Stanton · Categorized: Education · Tagged: abortion, free speech, pro-life

Apr 16 2026

Indiana School Counselor Wins Free Speech Victory Over District’s ‘Gender’ Policy

An Indiana school district agreed to pay $195,000 to settle with a school counselor who was fired for speaking to a journalist about the district policy of hiding students “gender identity” from parents.

The case involved Kathy McCord, a 37-year education veteran who objected to the school’s mandate “which required her to speak in ways that violate her sincerely held religious beliefs,” reported Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF).

The Christian legal aid group brought the lawsuit against the South Madison Community School Corporation, in Pendleton, Indiana, on her behalf.

The settlement for damages, attorneys’ fees and costs is one of many recent transgender–related cases where school districts have been forced to pay up for violating school employees’ First Amendment rights. ADF has been instrumental in many of these victories.

ADF explained that South Madison developed a Gender Support Plan in the fall of 2021 to deal with the then–growing fad of students identifying as something other than their biological sex.

ADF said the plan “required counselors and other employees to use, upon a student’s request, names and pronouns for the student that do not correspond with his or her sex – without notifying parents or seeking parental consent.”

An anonymous source sent The Daily Signal a copy of the Gender Support Plan, and reporter Tim Kinnett contacted McCord. McCord called the reporter back and answered questions about the school’s transgender policy. Kinnett explained in his December 2022 article:

McCord said she and other counselors have access to such plans, but teachers, parents, and the public do not – which she strongly disagrees with. McCord insisted that she and a few other counselors despise this district policy, describing it as both dishonest and harmful.

Kinnett added:

The South Madison district requires only that the student say that his or her parents don’t or wouldn’t approve, and the district is obliged to hide the information from parents.

The article caused great concern in the district; angry parents attended school board meetings and spoke out against the policy. Board members were also upset because they had not approved this policy – even though school administrators told teachers and staff otherwise.

Shortly thereafter, South Madison investigated McCord and fired her.

The school accused her of leaking the email and Gender Support Plan to the journalist, which she denied. According to ADF’s lawsuit, the school did not even investigate whether this accusation was true.

That’s when McCord fought back. Her lawsuit detailed the facts of the case:

  • South Madison changed students’ names and pronouns without parental notification or consent.
  • The school directed employees to stop contacting parents when children identified as something other than their birth sex.
  • South Madison trained employees according to its new gender policies.
  • McCord was fired for exercising her free speech by speaking to The Daily Signal’s reporter.

Since McCord filed her lawsuit, Indiana has passed a law keeping school staff or outside parties from talking with kindergarten through 3rd grade children about human sexuality. The law also prohibited policies like South Madison’s that kept parents in the dark about their child’s sexual identity confusion.

The law also required parental notification if a student requested a name or pronoun change.

But it came too late for McCord; she’d already been fired.

Although the settlement brings this lawsuit to an end, Defending Education reports that more than 1,200 school districts have “Transgender/Gender Nonconforming Policies” similar to South Madison’s, covering 12.3 million students.

Radical activist groups, such as the ACLU, Gender Spectrum, the National Education Association, GLSEN, and the National Center for Transgender Equality, developed “model transgender policies” which have been adapted by districts across the country.

One such plan, “Schools in Transition,” has an entire chapter telling schools how to deal with “unsupportive parents.” The guide portrays parents as an enemy of their child and places “student privacy” above parent’s rights:

Privacy and confidentiality are critically important for transgender students who do not have supportive families. In those situations, even inadvertent disclosures could put the student in a potentially dangerous situation at home, so it is important to have a plan in place to help avoid any mistakes or slip-ups.

Another “Model School District Policy on Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Students,” states:

School staff shall not disclose any information that may reveal a student’s transgender status to others, including parents or guardians and other school staff, unless legally required to do so or unless the student has authorized such disclosure.

Teachers and parents have won a number of legal battles against these unconstitutional threats to free speech, parental rights and religious freedom – including a recent Supreme Court decision. But many states, school districts and local schools still promote transgender ideology and try to hide information from parents, so it’s important for parents to stay informed about what’s happening in their children’s schools.

The case is: McCord v. South Madison Community School Corporation.

Focus on the Family’s “Equipping Parents for Back-to-School” helps you be aware of what’s happening in the classroom and empowers you to advocate for your child in school. The free, downloadable resource offers insights about exercising school choice and protecting children’s free speech and religious liberty.

Related articles and resources:

Barrett v. Kagan: Key Takeaways From Supreme Court Ruling on ‘Transgender’ School Policies

BREAKING: Big Wins for Free Speech and Religious Freedom in California

BREAKING: Judge Issues Preliminary Injunction Says California School District Cannot Force Teachers to Lie to Parents About Their Children’s ‘Gender Identity’

California Teachers Told to Hide Information About Students’ ‘Gender’ From Parents – They’re Suing

California Schools May Not Hide Students’ ‘Gender Identity’ From Parents

‘Equipping Parents For Back-To-School’ – Updated Resource Empowers Parents

Exclusive Interview: Colorado Parents Expose ‘Gender Cult’ at Public School in New Documentary

Florida Parents Sue School for Helping Teen ‘Transition’ – Without Their Knowledge or Consent

Ohio School District Violated Teacher’s Rights in ‘Transgender’ Case

Teacher Wins $650,000 After Being Fired for Refusing to Use ‘Trans’ Pronouns

Teacher Wrongly Fired for Refusing to Use ‘Preferred Pronouns’ Wins $575,000

Transgender Resources

Victory: CA School District Agrees to Notify Parents Before Teaching Gender Ideology

What’s Your School District’s ‘Transgender’ Policy?

Photo credit: Xavier Lorenzo/Shutterstock

Written by Jeff Johnston · Categorized: Education · Tagged: free speech

Mar 25 2026

Supreme Court Rules Street Preacher Can Challenge City’s Speech Ordinance

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously in favor of a street preacher who argues a city ordinance unconstitutionally prevents him from sharing his Christian faith in public.

The Supreme Court ruled 9-0 in Olivier v. City of Brandon that Gabriel Olivier can challenge Brandon, Mississippi’s ordinance that restricts “expressive activity” – and therefore, Olivier’s evangelism – near a public amphitheater.

“This is not only a win for the right to share your faith in public, but also a win for every American’s right to have their day in court when their First Amendment rights are violated,” said Kelly Shackelford, president, CEO, and chief counsel for First Liberty Institute. Olivier is represented by First Liberty.

Olivier, an evangelical Christian, often stands outside of well-attended events and shares the gospel with as many people as he can. But the city of Brandon, Mississippi, adopted an ordinance that limits speech inside a small, designated “protest zone” that is far away from crowds, limiting his ability to communicate.

In one incident, Olivier disregarded the protest zone and moved closer to the crowds so he could reach more people. As a result, the city arrested him. He paid a $304 fine and was released, serving no prison time.

First Liberty published a video explaining more about Olivier’s story, which you can watch below:


Olivier subsequently challenged the law in federal court, alleging the city ordinance violates the First Amendment’s free speech clause. The district court, however, dismissed his case. The court agreed with the city’s argument that an individual previously convicted of violating a statute cannot challenge its constitutionality under federal civil rights law (§1983).

It relied on a Supreme Court decision in Heck v. Humphery that prohibits prisoners’ use of §1983 to challenge the validity of a prior conviction to obtain release from custody or monetary damages.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit affirmed the district court’s judgement.

In its decision, the Supreme Court reversed the lower court ruling and allowed Olivier’s suit challenging the city ordinance to proceed. The Court said its Heck precedent “has no bearing on Olivier’s suit seeking a purely prospective remedy.”

Justice Elena Kagan, who authored the Court’s opinion, said, “Olivier is seeking … ‘wholly prospective’ relief – ‘only to be free from prosecutions for future violations’ of the city ordinance.”

Olivier can “sue … to enjoin future prosecutions under the city ordinance, despite his prior conviction,” Kagan said. Otherwise, Olivier would be placed in a “dilemma” to either “flout the law and risk another prosecution, or else forego speech he believes is constitutionally protected.”

Olivier’s case will now go to trial in the district court where he will argue the ordinance violates the free speech clause.

“No American should be criminally charged for sharing their faith in public,” said Nate Kellum, senior counsel at First Liberty. “This is a wonderful day for Gabe and for the First Amendment.”

“My goal from the beginning was to be granted my rights as an American citizen under our great Constitution,” said Olivier. “Now all people with deeply held Christian religious beliefs who are called to share the good news can do so in the public arena.”

The case is Olivier v. City of Brandon.

Related articles and resources:

Supreme Court To Hear Evangelist’s Religious Freedom Case

U.S. Supreme Court Will Hear Case of Evangelist Banned From Sharing His Faith

Photo from Shutterstock.

Written by Zachary Mettler · Categorized: Free Speech, Government Updates · Tagged: Evangelism, free speech, supreme court

Mar 04 2026

Teacher Wins $650,000 After Being Fired for Refusing to Use ‘Trans’ Pronouns

An Indiana school district will pay $650,000 for firing a music teacher who refused to use students’ incorrect and antiscientific “preferred pronouns” in violation of his sincerely held religious beliefs.

John Kluge taught orchestra and music theory at Brownsburg High School for several years, until the school district demanded he use students’ names and pronouns that aligned with their “gender identity,” rather than biological reality.

Kluge is a Christian, and he can’t in good conscience affirm “transgenderism” or speak in a way that violates his faith. His religious beliefs “are drawn from the Bible” and he believes “God created mankind as either male or female” and that “he cannot affirm as true ideas and concepts that he deems untrue and sinful.”

He requested a religious accommodation under Title VII, volunteering to refer to all students by their last name as a compromise. His accommodation was granted – at first.

The arrangement went smoothly until a few students and teachers complained about the compromise. As a result, the school district decided no exceptions would be allowed. The district revoked Kluge’s accommodation and forced him to resign, ending his teaching career.

Kluge filed a lawsuit arguing that Brownsburg Community School Corporation officials violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act which prohibits discrimination against employees based on their religion. Kluge is represented by Alliance Defending Freedom.

Last August, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ruled that Kluge’s case should go to a jury trial. However, Brownsburg decided to settle the lawsuit and agreed to a joint stipulation of dismissal.

Brownsburg agreed to pay $650,000 in the settlement and will also train its senior staff on how Title VII protects employees from discrimination based on their religious beliefs.

“After almost five and a half years, common sense has prevailed at Brownsburg,” said ADF Senior Counsel and Vice President of U.S. Litigation David Cortman. “This settlement confirms what the law has always said: Public schools cannot force teachers to violate their religious beliefs.”

Cortman added,

Title VII requires employers to accommodate their employees’ religious beliefs and practices. When they fail to do so – or worse, announce that they will grant no religious accommodations, as Brownsburg did – they can be held accountable.

You can learn more about the case below:

Kristen Waggoner, president and CEO of ADF, celebrated the settlement, saying, “One case at a time, we’re taking free speech back from the pronoun police.”

This high school music teacher was forced to resign in 2018 because he wouldn’t refer to girls as boys.
 
Now, to settle @ADFLegal’s lawsuit, the school district will pay $650,000.
 
One case at a time, we’re taking free speech back from the pronoun police. pic.twitter.com/W1iTlUjhrD

— Kristen Waggoner (@KristenWaggoner) March 3, 2026

Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita also lauded the decision.

🚨VICTORY for religious liberty in Indiana!

Brownsburg Community School Corp just agreed to pay former music teacher John Kluge $650,000 to settle the case after they revoked his religious accommodation and forced him out — all because he refused to use transgender pronouns that… https://t.co/Iid3aPgmyp

— AG Todd Rokita (@AGToddRokita) March 3, 2026

Brownsburg isn’t the first school district that has had to learn the hard way teachers don’t forfeit their free speech rights or freedom of religion after stepping on school grounds. And it probably won’t be the last.

Last year, Oregon’s Grants Pass School District 7 agreed to pay over half a million dollars for violating two educators’ free speech, religious freedom and equal protection rights. After the educators, Rachel Sager and Katie Medart, publicly opposed the district’s “Gender Identity, Transgender, Name, and Pronoun Guidance,” the school district fired them.

Hopefully, school districts nationwide will soon learn they must protect their employees’ constitutional rights.

Cortman said,

We hope this settlement shows teachers that they do not have to bow the knee to ideological mandates that violate their religious beliefs. And schools should learn that refusing to accommodate religious employees can be illegal and expensive.

The case is Kluge v. Brownsburg Community School Corporation.

To speak with a family help specialist or request resources, please call us at 1-800-A-FAMILY (232-6459).

Related articles and resources:

Transgender Resources

God’s Amazing Grace in a Transgendered Person’s Life

The Journey Back to My True Identity

Chloe Cole: Transgender Surgery Regret

Understanding “Transgenderism”

Responding to a Transgender-Identified Family Member

Oregon School District Pays $650,000 for Firing Teachers Opposed to ‘Trans’ Policy

Photo from Alliance Defending Freedom.

Written by Zachary Mettler · Categorized: Culture, Free Speech · Tagged: free speech, religious freedom

Feb 18 2026

Sixteen Attorneys General Demand Answers on YouTube Censorship

Sixteen state attorneys general sent a letter to YouTube executives demanding answers on YouTube’s censorship of conservative content.

Led by Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, the letter demands answers over how YouTube moderates content on its platform, and why the platform has removed and censored conservative content.

The letter is addressed to Kent Walker, Chief Legal Officer of Alphabet; Sundar Pichai, CEO of Alphabet; and Neal Mohan, CEO of YouTube. YouTube is owned by Alphabet Inc.

“We have received concerns about continued suppression of conservative voices, including voices whose YouTube channels were negatively affected by YouTube’s COVID-19 and election fraud policies that are no longer in effect,” the letter states.

“We have also received troubling reports that commentators in Iowa may have been negatively affected by YouTube’s COVID-19 and election fraud policies.”

In particular, the letter cites YouTube’s treatment of Iowa-based Christian, conservative commentator Steve Deace, host of The Steve Deace Show on Blaze Media. Deace is represented by First Liberty Institute.

YouTube removed at least four episodes of Deace’s show from its platform between 2020 and 2022 because of speech critical of COVID-19 lockdowns, the COVID-19 vaccine and the integrity of the 2020 elections.

In 2022, while the show experienced significant growth on other platforms, it experienced a precipitous decline in views and impressions on YouTube.

According to First Liberty, a Christian legal aid organization, “This strongly suggests that YouTube shadow-banned or otherwise limited the visibility of The Steve Deace Show. … [which] seems to be continuing.”

The letter notes that on September 23, 2025, Alphabet acknowledged senior officials in the Biden administration “conducted repeated and sustained outreach to Alphabet and pressed the Company regarding certain user-generated content related to the COVID-19 pandemic that did not violate its policies.”

At the same time, Alphabet affirmed that YouTube “takes seriously the importance of protecting free expression and access to a range of viewpoints” and “values conservative voices on its platform.”

Now, 16 attorneys general are demanding Alphabet live up to its promises.

The letter asks, “Does YouTube flag certain topics or phrases for more scrutiny?” and “Did YouTube limit the visibility of Iowan Steve Deace or programming on the Blaze Media platform between 2019 and present?”

“Social media monopolies admit to colluding with the government to censor speech,” said Hiram Sasser, Executive General Counsel for First Liberty Institute, in a statement.

Sasser added,

We are grateful for the leadership of Attorneys General Bird and Paxton for leading, as well as the fourteen other Attorneys General for joining this effort to get to the bottom of Big Tech censorship of conservative voices.

“I am very thankful to see Brenna Bird and all the other attorneys general take up this crucial issue,” said Steve Deace in a statement. “But I’m also not surprised, because our Republican AGs have been some of the most eager and effective warriors in our party, including my own AG Brenna Bird.”

The attorneys general requested a response by April 16, 2026.

Related articles and resources:

‘The Babylon Bee’ Fights Hawaii Law Censoring Political Speech

Elon Musk’s Free Speech Legacy

President Trump Signs Executive Order Restoring Free Speech, Ending Censorship

Zuckerberg Boots Fact Checkers – Here’s Why It’s Good News

Photo from Shutterstock.

Written by Zachary Mettler · Categorized: Government Updates · Tagged: censorship, free speech

  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Go to Next Page »

Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | © 2026 Focus on the Family. All rights reserved.

  • Cookie Policy