• Skip to main content
Daily Citizen
  • Subscribe
  • Categories
    • Culture
    • Life
    • Religious Freedom
    • Sexuality
  • Parenting Resources
    • LGBT Pride
    • Homosexuality
    • Sexuality/Marriage
    • Transgender
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Contact
  • Donate

education

Apr 09 2026

California, America Grapple with ‘Epidemic of Sexual Abuse’ in Schools

A California school district failed to properly investigate more than 100 allegations of sexual misconduct perpetrated against students by school employees over nearly a decade, investigators determined last month.

The disturbing findings are the latest development in what lawyer John Manly, who represents victims of sex abuse and assault, calls “an epidemic of sexual abuse in California by teachers, coaches and other school employees.”

California’s attorney general’s office began investigating El Monte Union High School District in late 2023 after Business Insider published “The Predators’ Playground,” a harrowing article documenting decades of educator sexual abuse at El Monte’s Rosemead High School.

The subsequent 18-month investigation, which concluded in March, determined El Monte “failed to conduct legally compliant investigations” into more than 100 cases of sexual misconduct allegations dating back to 2018.

The state also discovered at least five cases in which a staff member continued to abuse and harass students after another staffer failed to report either the perpetrator’s misconduct or allegations against the perpetrator.

School employees in California must legally report allegations, suspicions or accounts of child sexual abuse to law enforcement within 36 hours. Failure to do so can result in up to six months in jail and a $1,000 fine.

Yet, according to Manly, El Monte employees aren’t the only ones violating California’s mandatory reporting laws.

“In the vast majority of cases, the mandatory reporting statute is ignored and schools investigate [sexual misconduct allegations] themselves,” the attorney told investigative journalist Catherine Herridge in February.

“The problem when institutions or people investigate themselves, in my experience, is they rarely find themselves guilty.”

At a press conference on the El Monte investigation’s conclusion, California Attorney General Rob Bonta admitted he expects to confront similar cases in the future.

“I don’t think this will be the last case of this type, unfortunately,” he told reporters.

California school districts have lost more than $3 billion in sexual abuse cases since 2020, when the state extended its statute of limitations on crimes of child sexual abuse.

But Bonta also believes his office’s reforms can rehabilitate districts like El Monte.

“We think we’ve arrived at a model that can help districts that have failed systemically, transform,” he said.

El Monte will undergo a lengthy period of state supervision following the investigation, including:

  • State oversight of the district’s handling of sexual misconduct allegations.
  • Creating a list of all substitute teachers “found to have violated employee policy on appropriate boundaries with students.”
  • Training parents and students to better recognize signs of grooming and abuse.

The reforms compliment a new California law, which Governor Gavin Newsom signed in October 2025, creating a non-public database of school staff accused of misconduct.

While these provisions might well reduce educator sexual abuse in El Monte, they won’t “transform” it, or any other compromised districts, because they don’t address the legislative, cultural and institutional problems which perpetuate child predation in schools.

Most glaringly, Bonta’s model doesn’t address the reality that it is often faster and cheaper for schools to “pass the trash,” or shuffle school employees accused of sexual misconduct to other schools or districts, than it is to fire them.

“In public education in most states, it’s next to impossible to fire a bad teacher.” Manly tells Herridge. “They actually pay them to go away, even if they’ve sexually abused children.”

These predators get passed along to an average of three schools, often ending up in a low-income areas with a disproportionate number of vulnerable students and fewer parents with means to protect their children.

Bonta’s plan, which addresses district-by-district wrongdoing, cannot fix the fact that California law does not require schools notify parents if their child says a school employee sexually assaulted them or if another student makes an allegation of sexual misconduct against their child’s teacher.

California parents must also file a public records request to obtain any data about reported allegations of or disciplinary actions for sexual misconduct.

Manly puts it in perspective:

No one knows how many teachers have abused. Nobody knows how many teachers have been credibly accused. Nobody knows how many teachers in the state have been suspended or have had their licenses suspended. It’s completely opaque, and it shouldn’t be.

Bonta’s plan certainly doesn’t address the role teachers’ unions play in negotiating confidentiality clauses and non-disclosure agreements preventing schools from alerting future employers about sexual misconduct allegations against a former employee.

These structural problems allow educator sexual abuse to continue unchecked. Legislators and school officials must tackle them for district-by-district reforms like Bonta’s to be most effective.

Unfortunately, the epidemic of sexual abuse by school employees is not just in California. It’s a national issue — and has been for decades.

Charol Shakeshaft, a professor at Virginia Commonwealth University and the foremost authority on educator sexual abuse, estimates nearly 1 in 5 children (17%) in America experience sexual misconduct by a school employee.

The same obstacles that afflict California — passing the trash, failure to enforce mandatory reporting laws, lack of transparency and consistent reporting and predators using teachers’ unions as shields — plague every other state in the nation, too, to varying degrees.

The question isn’t whether there are victims; it’s whether schools will document victims’ claims and, subsequently, whether victims can take their cases to court.

Educator sexual abuse is prevalent and frightening. The Daily Citizen is buckling down to get you the information you need to protect your children. Stay tuned.

Additional Articles and Resources

Counseling Services

Abusive Relationships

Passing the Trash: Here’s What Parents Need to Know About Educator Sexual Misconduct

Written by Emily Washburn · Categorized: Education · Tagged: education, educator sexual abuse, parenting

Mar 13 2026

Moody Bible Institute Wins Religious Freedom Case for Student Teachers

The Chicago Board of Education settled a lawsuit with the Moody Bible Institute of Chicago that allows student teachers from Moody to train in the city’s public schools.

Chicago Public Schools (CPS) had excluded Moody’s elementary education students from its student teaching program unless the college agreed to hire employees who disagreed with the school’s biblical views on sex, sexuality and marriage.

The school district asked Moody to sign a “Vendor Agreement” and a “Student Teaching Internship Agreement” saying the college would not discriminate in hiring on the basis of “gender identity/expression (or) sexual orientation.”

This would have violated the college’s religious beliefs, which include that God made humans in His image male and female, marriage is between a husband and wife, and sexual activity outside of marriage is prohibited.

Attorneys for Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), who had filed the lawsuit on Moody’s behalf in November 2025, announced the settlement in a press statement, with ADF Senior Counsel Jeremiah Galus explaining the importance of the victory:

Chicago desperately needs more teachers to fill hundreds of vacancies, but public school administrators are putting personal agendas ahead of the needs of families.
Moody holds its faculty and students to high standards of excellence and is more than qualified to participate in Chicago’s student-teaching program. By excluding Moody for its religious beliefs, Chicago Public Schools is illegally injecting itself into a religious non-profit’s hiring practices, which the Constitution and state laws expressly forbid. 

The lawsuit explained that the Christian college hires people who agree with and live by its religious beliefs. It stated that the Illinois State Board of Education had approved the school’s teacher preparation program in January 2024, so graduates could sit for the state’s teaching licensure exam.

It’s not like CPS can afford to turn away good teachers.

The Illinois Policy Institute reported at the start of the 2025-2026 school year that Chicago’s schools are failing to educate students:

The most recent test scores for Chicago Public Schools show fewer than 1-in-3 students could read at grade level. Fewer than 1-in-5 could do math at grade level.
Each year the district gets more money to educate fewer [students], and proficiency is still far behind where it should be compared to spending.

Moody tried to work with the Chicago Board of Education, asking it to accommodate the school’s religious beliefs, since “the United States Constitution and federal, state, and local laws all permit and protect Moody’s employment practices.”

The suit also pointed out that the district seemed to single out Moody and did not enforce its policies evenhandedly:

Chicago Public Schools has allowed other universities and colleges to participate in the Pre-Service Teaching Program even though they have similar hiring practices to Moody.

ADF attorneys argued that such favoritism toward other religious schools violated the First Amendment’s establishment clause.

Public government programs cannot discriminate against participants because of their religion, the suit explained, pointing to the 2022 U.S. Supreme court decision Carson v. Makin, a case from Maine where the state created a tuition assistance program for families to send their children to private schools, prohibiting the money from being used at religious schools.

The court ruled that this violated the free exercise clause of the First Amendment.

Similarly, CPS cannot exclude Christian students from participating in the teaching program because of their or their college’s religion.

As a result of the settlement, ADF said that the school district “modified its Student Teacher Internship Agreement” and “has now listed Moody as an approved university partner on its website.” The Board also agreed to pay $100,00 in attorney’s fees.

Moody Provost Dr. Tim Sisk applauded the agreement, saying:

We are deeply grateful that a resolution has been reached affirming our constitutional right to hire individuals who are aligned with our core mission and biblical values.

The Moody Bible Institute of Chicago was founded in 1886 by evangelist Dwight L. Moody as a training center “where men and women could be transformed by the clear, practical teaching of God’s Word.”

In addition to its Chicago undergraduate campus, the college started a seminary in Chicago with a satellite campus in Plymouth, Michigan, and it operates Moody Aviation, in Spokane, Washington.

The Daily Citizen is grateful for this important victory.

Related articles and resources:

Arizona Christian University Settles with School District That Rejected Student Teachers – Because of Their Commitment to Christ

Christian University Sues School District for Rejecting Student Teachers – Because of Their Commitment to Christ and Beliefs About Marriage

Coach Joe Kennedy Finally Rehired After Religious Liberty Win at Supreme Court

Federal Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Attacking Faith-based Schools

Religious Liberty Commission Launches, Aims to Root Out Anti-Christian Bias

State Can’t Discriminate Against Religion in Tuition Assistance Program, Supreme Court Rules

Trump Admin Issues New Guidance to Protect Workplace Religious Expression

Written by Jeff Johnston · Categorized: Religious Freedom · Tagged: education, religious freedom

Mar 13 2026

Department of Education Cracks Down on Jefferson County’s Title IX Violations

The Department of Education (ED) concluded Jefferson County Public Schools in Colorado violated federal law by allowing male students to access female-only facilities and accommodations, and to compete in girls and women’s sports.

The agency concluded Jefferson County’s policies allowing individuals to access intimate facilities and participate in sports based on their “gender identity” discriminate against females and violate Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972.

The ED published its findings on March 13 and gave the district 10 days to voluntarily resolve the Title IX violations or risk imminent enforcement action.

“Today’s findings reveal sweeping Title IX violations by Jefferson County Public Schools – denying fairness and equality to female students by allowing males into their private facilities, overnight accommodations, and athletics,” said Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights Kimberly Richey.

“The District’s decision to prioritize ‘gender identity’ over ensuring equal access for its female students is unconscionable.”

The ED shared the news on X:

Today’s findings reveal sweeping Title IX violations by Jefferson County Public Schools—denying fairness and equality to female students by allowing males into their private facilities, overnight accommodations, and athletics.https://t.co/0Fm85W7M20

— U.S. Department of Education (@usedgov) March 13, 2026

Education Secretary Linda McMahon welcomed the development, saying, “The Trump Administration will not relent until female athletes’ safety, opportunities, and equal protection under the law are fully restored.”

The Trump Administration will not relent until female athletes’ safety, opportunities, and equal protection under the law are fully restored. https://t.co/EJjlQz0hi5

— Secretary Linda McMahon (@EDSecMcMahon) March 13, 2026

The ED issued a proposed resolution agreement requiring the district to, among other actions:

  • Rescind or revise any policies which permitted male students to access female intimate facilities, share overnight accommodations with females and compete in female sports.
  • Issue a public statement stating that it will comply with Title IX and provide instructions for how to report or file a complaint of sex discrimination under the district’s grievance policies.
  • Notify all staff, students and coaches of the district’s renewed compliance with Title IX.

Kristen Waggoner, president and CEO of Alliance Defending Freedom, noted that Jefferson County School District is the same district that ADF “sued for assigning an 11-year-old girl to sleep in a hotel room with a boy on an overnight trip – without parental notice.” That case will be heard by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in May.

This is the school district we sued for assigning an 11-year-old girl to sleep in a hotel room with a boy on an overnight trip—without parental notice. That case will be heard at the 10th Circuit in May.

Thank you, @usedgov, for this much-needed accountabillity. https://t.co/8XWRlv4Azz

— Kristen Waggoner (@KristenWaggoner) March 13, 2026

The ED’s enforcement action is a positive development, protecting women and girls from being forced to share sex-segregated spaces and sports with males. It’s a new day at the Education Department – a far cry from the wokeness that had infected the department under the Biden administration.

Richey added,

The District must act now to end these violations and protect future generations of girls from sex discrimination. The Trump Administration will not relent until female athletes’ safety, opportunities, and equal protection under the law are fully restored.

To speak with a family help specialist or request resources, please call us at 1-800-A-FAMILY (232-6459).

If you’re concerned about what your child may be learning in school, and what helpful, practical steps you can take to protect them, check out Focus on the Family’s free resource: Equipping Parents for Back-to-School.

The FREE downloadable resource helps you be aware of what’s going on in your child’s classroom and offers guidance for how to advocate for your child in the school year ahead.

Related articles and resources:

Transgender Resources

‘Equipping Parents For Back-To-School’ – Updated Resource Empowers Parents

Loudoun County Boys Win Settlement in Title IX Case Against School District

Trump Ends Radical Indoctrination, Promotes Education Freedom

Trump Signs Executive Order Protecting Women’s Sports and Spaces

Photo from Getty Images.

Written by Zachary Mettler · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: education, Girls Sports

Feb 25 2026

Montgomery County Must Pay $1.5 Million to Religious Parents After Supreme Court Ruling

The Montgomery County Board of Education will pay $1.5 million in damages to religious parents for trampling parental rights and trying to indoctrinate their children with LGBT content. The school board will also comply with court-enforced protections for parental rights.

The settlement comes after the Supreme Court ruled in June 2025 in Mahmoud v. Tayler that schools can’t force children to participate in LGBT classroom material without giving parents the right to opt out their children based on their religious beliefs.

“Public schools nationwide are on notice: running roughshod over parental rights and religious freedom isn’t just illegal – it’s costly,” Eric Baxter, senior counsel at Becket and lead attorney for the parents, said in a statement.

Baxter added,

This settlement enforces the Supreme Court’s ruling and ensures parents, not government bureaucrats, have the final say in how their children are raised.

The case stems from Montgomery County school board’s 2022 decision to use several LGBT children’s books in preschool through 12th grade language arts curricula. These books promote “gender transitioning, Pride parades, and pronoun preferences to children as young as three and four,” Becket, which represents the parents, states.

One book, Prince & Knight, “conveys the message that same-sex marriage should be accepted by all as a cause for celebration,” Justice Samuel Alito recounted in the Mahmoud decision.

A second book, Uncle Bobby’s Wedding, presents the message that “two people can get married, regardless of whether they are of the same or the opposite sex.”

Another book, IntersectionAllies: We Make Room for All, portrays a “transgender child in a sex-ambiguous bathroom” and “includes a discussion guide that asserts … ‘at any point in our lives, we can choose to identify with one gender, multiple genders, or neither gender.’” The book asks very young readers, “What pronouns fit you best?”

Yet another book, Born Ready, follows the story of Penelope, a biological female, who begs her mother to help her be a boy: “Please help me, Mama. Help me to be a boy.” After her mother agrees, Penelope exclaims, “For the first time, my insides don’t feel like fire. They feel like warm, golden love.”

The implication is that “it is seriously harmful to deny a gender transition and that transitioning is a highly positive experience,” Alito summarized.

When the school board first approved the curricula, it notified parents and allowed them to opt their children out of the material. In 2023, however, the district revised its policies and eliminated opt-outs.

Multiple religious families – including Muslims, Christians and Jews – successfully challenged the policy, arguing it violated their First Amendment right to freely exercise their religion.

In the Mahmoud decision, Justice Alito, writing for the Court’s majority, said, “The right of parents ‘to direct the religious upbringing of their’ children would be an empty promise if it did not follow those children into the public school classroom.”

“The Board’s introduction of the ‘LGBTQ+-inclusive’ storybooks – combined with its decision to withhold notice to parents and to forbid opt outs – substantially interferes with the religious development of their children,” Justice Alito concluded.

Now, the school board will pay a $1.5 million settlement, and a permanent injunction requires the board to “provide parents with advance notice when instructional materials addressing family life and human sexuality will be used and allow parents to opt their children out of that instruction.”

According to Becket’s 2025 Religious Freedom Index, 62% of Americans support the Court’s decision in Mahmoud.

“It took tremendous courage for these parents to stand up to the School Board and take their case all the way to the Supreme Court,” Baxter said. “Their victory reshaped the law and ensured that generations of religious parents will be able to guide their children’s upbringing according to their faith.”

To speak with a family help specialist or request resources, please call us at 1-800-A-FAMILY (232-6459).

Related articles and resources:

Resources: Sex Education

Talking About Sex And Puberty With Your Kids

How to Equip Your Teens with a Biblical Understanding of Sexuality

‘Equipping Parents For Back-To-School’ – Updated Resource Empowers Parents

Supreme Court Defends Religious Freedom, Parental Rights Over ‘LGBT’ Curriculum

Supreme Court Sympathetic to Opt-Outs for LGBT Curriculum

Photo from Shutterstock.

Written by Zachary Mettler · Categorized: Government Updates · Tagged: education, LGBT

Feb 24 2026

Court Rules Louisiana Schools Can Post Ten Commandments in Classrooms

Louisiana’s law requiring the Ten Commandments be posted in classrooms statewide can take effect, a federal appeals court decided on Friday.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled 12-6 to overturn a lower court decision that put Louisiana House Bill 71 (H.B. 71) on ice.

In June 2024, the Louisiana Legislature enacted H.B. 71 requiring public schools to “display the Ten Commandments in each building it uses and classroom in each school.” Displays may be paid for by public donations.

Shortly thereafter, a group of parents filed a lawsuit to block enforcement of the law, arguing H.B. 71 violated the First Amendment’s establishment and free exercise clauses. The ACLU, ACLU of Louisiana, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, and the Freedom From Religion Foundation represented the parents in court.

A district court judge sided with the parents and granted a preliminary injunction, which was affirmed by a three-judge panel of the Fifth Circuit.

The entire Fifth Circuit then reheard the case and now has overturned the preliminary injunction, deciding the case wasn’t ripe for judicial review, because it didn’t know how the displays would appear or how teachers would use them.

Deciding whether H.B. 71 violates the Constitution “would oblige us to hypothesize an open-ended range of possible classroom displays,” the court said. “[That] is not judging; it is guessing.”

Judge James Ho, a nominee of President Donald J. Trump, concurred with the court’s decision, but went further and argued that the law “is constitutional and consistent with our Founding traditions.”

“Our Nation’s Founders didn’t just permit religion in education – they presumed that there would be religion in education,” Judge Ho contended. “Indeed, our Founders firmly believed that our Constitution wouldn’t work without a religious people.”

“The Louisiana Ten Commandments law is not just constitutional – it affirms our Nation’s highest and most noble traditions,” Ho explained.

The ACLU called the decision “extremely disappointing,” saying it would “unnecessarily force Louisiana’s public school families into a game of constitutional whack-a-mole in every school district.”

First Liberty, a nonprofit legal aid group, applauded the court’s decision. Kelly Shackelford, First Liberty’s president and CEO, said in a statement, “We are pleased that the Fifth Circuit is allowing Louisiana’s statute that requires the posting of the Ten Commandments in schools to take effect.”

Shackelford added,

The Ten Commandments are part of the history and tradition of our country. …
We echo Judge Ho’s words that our Founding Fathers believed the Constitution didn’t simply permit religious education, it presumed it would take place.

The Fifth Circuit’s decision could have an effect on two other states’ laws – in Texas and Arkansas – which also require schools to post the Ten Commandments in classrooms.

After a lawsuit was filed against Texas’ law, the Fifth Circuit consolidated that case, Nathan v. Alamo Heights Independent School District, with the case challenging Louisiana’s law. The Texas case remains under consideration by the full slate of Fifth Circuit judges.

Texas Values, a Focus on the Family-allied state family policy counsel, praised the Fifth Circuit’s ruling, highlighting the impact it could have on Texas’ law. Jonathan Saenz, president of Texas Values, said in a statement:

The appeals court got it right by allowing the Louisiana Ten Commandments law to go into effect. We are confident the appeals court will soon rule in favor of the Texas Ten Commandments law as well.

In 1980, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Stone v. Graham that a Kentucky law requiring the Ten Commandments be posted in classrooms was unconstitutional under the establishment clause.

So, you ask, why are lower courts now reconsidering the constitutionality of such laws? Good question.

The Stone decision relied on the Lemon test (created in the 1971 case Lemon v. Kurtsman) which said a law violates the establishment clause if it fails to have “a secular legislative purpose.”

But in 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court overruled the Lemon test in Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, instead holding that “the Establishment Clause must be interpreted by ‘reference to historical practices and understandings.’”

In the wake of the opinion, multiple states – Texas, Louisiana and Arkansas – realized the Court’s Stone decision was left in tatters. So, they enacted laws requiring the Ten Commandments in classrooms, leading to the present legal battles.

As Judge Ho’s well-reasoned concurring opinion points out, “Stone relies on precedent that the Supreme Court has overturned. … Lemon is gone, so Stone is gone. We’re not bound by Stone any more.”

Louisiana’s law “is fully consistent with the Constitution,” Judge Ho continued, “and what’s more, it reinforces our Founders’ firm belief that the children of America should be educated about the religious foundations and traditions of our country.”

It’s possible the lawsuits challenging the Ten Commandments in classrooms end up in the U.S. Supreme Court since they give the Court an opportunity to formally overturn Stone. If they do, the Daily Citizen will keep you updated.

The case is Roake vs. Brumley.

Related articles and resources:

Appeals Court Favors Louisiana Ten Commandments Law for Now

Judge Temporarily Blocks Ten Commandments in Classrooms, Louisiana Will Appeal

Louisiana’s Ten Commandments Bill is Good for Kids, Communities, and the Nation

Photo from Getty Images.

Written by Zachary Mettler · Categorized: Government Updates, Religious Freedom · Tagged: education, Evangelism

  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 8
  • Go to Next Page »

Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | © 2026 Focus on the Family. All rights reserved.

  • Cookie Policy