Life

Leading up to the National March for Life, Marist collaborated with the Knights of Columbus to releasea new poll, showing that the majority of Americans support limits on abortion.

That’s a narrative abortion activists don’t want you know, but it’s true.

When asked about support for limits on abortion in the last trimester of pregnancy, the time at which a baby can live outside the womb, support for abortion limits jumps to 72%.

Marist also found that most Americans, 57%, do not support taxpayer funded abortions.

When asked specifically about taxpayer funds going to abortions outside of the United States opposition grows to 73%.

Interestingly, for the second year in a row, the survey has also demonstrated that pregnancy resource centers are widely popular with Americans. 

The survey says 83% of Americans support these help organizations for women.

This is good news because pregnancy resources centers are growing in number and scope in the United States.

As reported by the Daily Citizen, there are about 2,750 pregnancy resource centers in the Unites States.

Collectively these centers provide nearly $368 million in free medical services, $83 million in education and support services and $78 million in material goods annually.

In the latest data available, pregnancy resource centers conducted more than 16 million sessions with clients.

Focus on the Family’s Option Ultrasound works hard to save babies and their mothers from the tragedy of abortion.

Option Ultrasound equips pregnancy resource centers across the nation with ultrasound machines to give mothers considering abortion the opportunity to see their child in the womb.

Since the program’s inception 21 years ago, 500,000 babies and mothers have been saved from the tragedy of abortion.

If you are experiencing an unexpected pregnancy and want to learn more about your options, you can visit My Choice Network here.

When you need someone to talk to about your baby, or whatever else you’re going through, we’re here. Please reach out. 1-800-A-FAMILY.

Just $60 will save a life through Option Ultrasound. Will you partner with us to save a life from abortion here?

Image from Shutterstock.

Last week, the Texas attorney general sued a New York doctor for prescribing abortion medication to a Texas woman in violation of state law that makes abortion-inducing drugs illegal.

The lawsuit is the first of its kind to challenge shield laws that abortion-supporting states passed in an attempt to protect abortionists from the legal ramifications of prescribing abortion-inducing drugs to women in states with laws restricting abortion.

Background

Texas law protects preborn babies from abortion with a few limited exceptions. The law also includes provisions for private citizens to sue those who aid or abet an abortion.

This lawsuit involves a New York doctor who allegedly prescribed mifepristone and misoprostol, the two-pill cocktail known as “the abortion pill,” through a telehealth appointment. The abortion-inducing drugs resulted in serious medical problems for the 20-year-old Texas woman, which required medical intervention.

Legal Arguments

Texas contends that New York-based Dr. Maggie Carpenter knowingly violated Texas abortion law by providing medication to induce an abortion.

In their lawsuit, Texas argues that telehealth appointments must follow state law, even if the doctor is based outside of the state.

The lawsuit claims that the doctor’s continued “violations of Texas law places women and unborn children in Texas at risk.”

Texas is asking for $250,000 in damages and that the doctor be prohibited from violating Texas state law in the future.

Response

New York’s attorney general released a statement in response to the Texas lawsuit claiming New York “will always protect our providers from unjust attempts to punish them for doing their job, and we will never cower in the face of intimidation or threats.”

New York is one of 18 states that passed shield laws to limit the culpability of abortion providers. New York’s shield law helps abortionists by prohibiting cooperation with prosecutions and lawsuits in other states.

Implications

There are far-reaching consequences for this case when it comes to abortion law. This case highlights the growing tension between states that have moved to protect life and states that seek to expand abortion access. If Texas is successful, it would have a significant impact in curbing telehealth abortion services to states with pro-life laws on the books.

This case could reach the United States Supreme Court and become a landmark case addressing abortion rights and state sovereignty.

The Daily Citizen will continue to follow this developing story.

Image from Getty.