• Skip to main content
Daily Citizen
  • Subscribe
  • Categories
    • Culture
    • Life
    • Religious Freedom
    • Sexuality
  • Parenting Resources
    • LGBT Pride
    • Homosexuality
    • Sexuality/Marriage
    • Transgender
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Contact
  • Donate

abortion

May 21 2026

A Young Poet’s Pro-Life Voice is Censored — But Her Poem Goes Viral Online

A misapplied liberal bumper sticker has it that “Well Behaved Women Seldom Make History.” It is never applied to strong Christian women being faithful to what God has called them to. But that is precisely what academic historian Laurel Thatcher Ulrich was referring to when she penned this quote in a scholarly 1976 journal article.

Ulrich was describing the highly devout Puritan woman of the American colonies.

There is a faithful Christian lass in Jefferson County, Colorado who is actually making history for being silenced by her liberally minded Drake Middle School teacher and school administrators. The Daily Citizen does not know this 13-year-old girl’s name, but we are deeply moved by her brilliance, conviction and passion.

Her seventh grade class was assigned to write a slam poem about, as she explained, “a conflict in the world that we are passionate about.” She chose to write about life because choosing life is a very important part of her family’s story. Neither she nor her mother would exist if her grandmother had not bravely and selflessly chosen life when she found herself pregnant at the tender age of 14. But she did, and they are all thankful.

Yet, her teacher told her she could not present her poem before the class, even though she carefully met all the criteria outlined by the assignment. It was the topic, and her voice, that was muzzled. The mom explained she was told “because of the offensive material in the poem, that they were not going to allow her to present.” 

You can hear this creative poem and judge for yourself if it is offensive and deserving of being banned. It starts with a famous quote from Dr. Suess, “A life is a life, no matter how small.”

MUST WATCH: We asked the 13-year-old student who was barred from presenting her pro-life poem because it’s “offensive”, to read her poem so we can share it with the world.

PURE FIRE🔥

This is the poem @JeffcoSchoolsCo doesn’t want you to see.

Would be a shame if it went viral! https://t.co/ehwBVYEIce pic.twitter.com/nqaglH1qXx

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) May 20, 2026

It is a lovely, thoughtful piece of work. What a remarkable girl!

But this girl and her mom were told it was “too political.”

The mother rightfully pushed back on the teacher, explaining many other students’ poems presented controversial material like racial politics, LGBT issues, and immigration, but to no resolve.

Yet, it gets worse.

When this mindful girl asked her teacher why she would not be able to present her poem, her teacher told her she would not even be able to be present in the classroom while other students read their own poems. She would have to sit outside. Unlike Rosa Parks who was unjustly asked to move to the back of the bus, this girl was asked to step off the bus.

This young teen bravely pressed the matter and the teacher relented, allowing her to be in the class with her fellow students to hear them recite their poems.

Of her own crisis-laden conception, in which her mother bravely chose life, the student’s mother beautifully explained, “There is hope in hard situations. There is purpose in pain. And good things come out of situations that seem bleak and my family is proof of that.”

We spoke with a mother and her 13-year-old daughter after the girl was barred from reading a pro-life poem at school. They shared why this topic is so personal and important to them.

Try not to cry.. 🥹

The mother explains that her mother got pregnant with her at 14 and chose… https://t.co/ehwBVYEIce pic.twitter.com/ocypyCXKYv

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) May 20, 2026

Thank God for such beautiful strong female voices speaking truth amid a culture of death. Shame on the Jefferson County, Colorado, school officials for illiberally muting this spirited and intelligent girl’s talented pro-life voice. 

JeffCO Public Schools can be contacted at the following:

JeffCO Public Schools / 1829 Denver West Drive #27 / Golden, Colorado 80401
Phone: 303-982-6500

Written by Glenn T. Stanton · Categorized: Education · Tagged: abortion, free speech, pro-life

May 20 2026

What Does the FDA Shakeup Mean for Abortion Pill Review?

Last week, FDA Commissioner Marty Makary resigned from his position amid growing tensions over his priorities, including escalating frustration from pro-life advocates over the slow pace of FDA’s abortion pill review. 

Attorney Kyle Diamantas has been appointed as acting FDA commissioner while the administration searches for a permanent replacement. 

At first, many pro-life advocates were uncertain about the new acting commissioner. 

Reports quickly surfaced that Diamantas previously served as legal counsel for Planned Parenthood.

Simultaneously, pro-life leaders reported receiving requests from Diamantas for a conversation. 

March for Life President Jennie Bradley shared on X that Diamantas was on the phone with pro-life leaders within a few hours of being named as the acting commissioner. 

Had a great convo last night with Kyle Diamantas, the new acting FDA Commissioner. In other words, within hours of being handed this big new job, he was on the phone with pro-life leaders – which is an encouraging sign of where his priorities lie.

After talking w him I'm…

— Jennie Bradley Lichter (@JennieMFL) May 13, 2026

It's true that Diamantas was on a case team representing a Planned Parenthood affiliate in FL when he was a junior associate. My understanding is that when he was initially put on the case he felt he couldn't say no — but he ultimately asked to be removed, for conscience…

— Jennie Bradley Lichter (@JennieMFL) May 13, 2026

Lichter told EWTN News that she shared her concerns about the safety of mifepristone with Diamantas and indicated, based on their conversation, she expected to see “real movement” on the mifepristone study by the FDA. 

She told EWTN, “I feel really comfortable that he is bringing in strong pro-life commitments and a commitment to transparency and to moving with all deliberate speed to take a close look at mifepristone and then take decisive action based on what that study shows.”

Live Action President Lila Rose also spoke with Diamantas and posted on X, “He told me he regrets work he performed as an outside attorney for Planned Parenthood…. He shared that he was assigned to the case by his law firm, performed work on it, and ultimately regretted his involvement because of his moral opposition to abortion.”

She also posted, “Diamantas told me that reviewing the abortion pill is a top priority for him and the administration.”

Today I spoke directly with Acting FDA Commissioner Kyle Diamantas.

He told me he regrets work he performed as an outside attorney for Planned Parenthood in Planned Parenthood of Greater Orlando v. MMB Properties. He shared that he was assigned to the case by his law firm,…

— Lila Rose (@LilaGraceRose) May 13, 2026

Other pro-life organizations, like Students for Life and Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, have been less vocal about who is brought in as the acting FDA commissioner and are more concerned about whether he will act quickly to review mifepristone. 

If the @US_FDA cares about the safety of women and children, they will revoke their approval of Chemical Abortion Pills ASAP. How many more women and babies must die before we stop these dangerous drugs? https://t.co/4454cJXNDG

— Kristan Hawkins (@KristanHawkins) May 19, 2026

We look forward to a new FDA Commissioner who will put an end to the mail-order abortion drug regime. We must return immediately to the 1st Trump Administration standard of in-person dispensing to protect women from coercion and abuse and allow the enforcement of pro-life state…

— Marjorie Dannenfelser (@marjoriesba) May 12, 2026

A comprehensive review would include scrutiny of the pill’s safety, emergency complications, adverse effects reporting, telehealth prescriptions and mail-order distribution.

Under the Trump administration, pro-life advocates expected the FDA to conduct a comprehensive review of mifepristone — the first drug in a two-pill regimen that results in a chemical abortion.

Under the Biden administration, safeguards meant to protect women were eliminated, including in-person visits, while mail-order distribution was approved.  

In light of a safety study released last May, pro-life advocates have been calling on the FDA to conduct a full and comprehensive review of the drug. 

The study, conducted by the Ethics and Public Policy Center, revealed that nearly 11% of women who take the abortion pill experienced serious side effects within 40 days, including sepsis, hemorrhaging, infection and emergency room visits. Those numbers are 22 times higher than the FDA’s current label.

For at least six months, Senator Hawley has been calling on the FDA to stop stonewalling the review of mifepristone and reinstate safety protocols.

But instead of carrying out a comprehensive review of the abortion medication, the FDA approved a generic drug for distribution. 

In the last year there has been growing pressure for the FDA to complete the promised safety review.

Interestingly, new data shows 70% of Americans, including a majority of each political party, support increased oversight for the distribution and consumption of chemical abortion pills like mifepristone.

Pro-life leaders are calling on Commissioner Diamantas to act now to pull the abortion pill from the market. 

The FDA’s review of mifepristone is separate from the legal battle playing out in the federal courts. Judges are still considering questions related to the interstate mailing of abortion pills, while the FDA has the authority to determine drug safety standards. 

For now, the pro-life movement seems cautiously optimistic that the FDA transition could create the opportunity for a serious and genuine review of mifepristone. 

Some women, after taking the first abortion pill (mifepristone), come to regret their decision. Thankfully, there is a way to reverse the pill’s effects if prompt action is taken.

To learn more about the abortion pill reversal protocol, visit abortionpillreversal.com or call 1-877-558-0333 to be connected with a medical professional who can guide callers through the process of reversing the pill’s effects.

Additionally, if you’re struggling and need a listening ear, Focus on the Family offers a free, one-time counseling consultation with our ministry’s professionally trained counseling staff. To request a counseling consultation, call 1-855-771-HELP (4357) or fill out our Counseling Consultation Request Form.

Related articles and resources:

Pro-Life Groups Raise Alarm Over Delayed FDA Review of Abortion Pill Safety

RFK Jr. Announces ‘Complete Review’ of Abortion Pill After ‘Alarming’ New Study Reveals Dangers

Louisiana, ADF Challenge Biden-Era Abortion-By-Mail Scheme

FDA Approves Generic Abortion Pill Despite Ongoing Safety Review

Become an Option Ultrasound Life Advocate

Dealing With an Unplanned Pregnancy

I’m Pregnant, Now What?

My Choice Network

New Insights on the Dangers of the Abortion Pill

Written by Nicole Hunt · Categorized: Life · Tagged: abortion, Abortion Pill

May 15 2026

Supreme Court Restores Access to Mail-Order Abortion Pills While Legal Fight Continues

The Supreme Court Thursday granted a stay blocking enforcement of a lower court ruling that would have restricted access to the abortion pill mifepristone by mail.

The Court’s decision allows abortionists to continue prescribing mifepristone through telehealth appointments, and sending it through the mail, while Louisiana’s lawsuit seeking to require the FDA to reinstate the in-person dispensing requirement on mifepristone continues. The agency removed the requirement during the Biden presidency.

Justices Thomas and Alito dissented from the Court’s decision.

In his dissent, Justice Thomas observed that the Comstock Act “bans using ‘the mails’ to ship any ‘drug … for producing abortion.’” This means Danco Labs and GenBioPro, the manufacturers and distributors of mifepristone, which appealed to the Court for a stay, are engaged in illegal activity.

“Applicants are not entitled to a stay of an adverse court order based on lost profits from their criminal enterprise,” Justice Thomas wrote. “They cannot, in any legally relevant sense, be irreparably harmed by a court order that makes it more difficult for them to commit crimes.”

Justice Alito pointed out Louisiana’s request for the FDA to reinstate the in-person dispensing requirement is commonsense.

“Louisiana [responded to Dobbs by making] abortion illegal except in narrow circumstances,” Justice Alito wrote. “But Louisiana’s efforts have been thwarted by certain medical providers, private organizations, and States that abhor laws like Louisiana’s and seek to undermine their enforcement.”

“These medical providers and private organizations have developed an operation enabling women in Louisiana and other States that restrict abortions to place an online order for a pill called mifepristone that induces abortion.”

Around 1,000 abortions occur in Louisiana each month as a result, more than occurred before the Dobbs decision, Justice Alito acknowledged.

Alliance Defending Freedom Counsel Erin Hawley issued the following statement after the Court’s ruling:

We are disappointed by this decision that allows the FDA and the abortion industry to continue nullifying Dobbs and its promise to return the issue of abortion to the people.
It’s high time the Biden FDA be held accountable for the destruction it has caused with this high-risk drug. Together with Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill’s office, we look forward to litigating our appeal at the 5th Circuit to protect mothers and their children.

The case now goes back to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit to consider the merits of Louisiana’s case. The Daily Citizen will keep you apprised of important developments.

The case is Danco Laboratories v. Louisiana.

At Focus on the Family, we have been working to turn the cultural tide and save mothers and babies from abortion for years. Since beginning the Option Ultrasound Program in 2004, Focus has helped save over half a million lives. Just $60 will help save a life through Option Ultrasound. Will you partner with us to save lives from abortion?

If you are experiencing an unexpected pregnancy and want to learn more about your options, you can visit My Choice Network.

Related articles and resources:

My Choice Network

I’m Pregnant, Now What?

Dealing With Unplanned Pregnancy

Become an Option Ultrasound Life Advocate

New Insights on the Dangers of the Abortion Pill

Overcoming Abortion and Becoming a Force for Life

Supreme Court Temporarily Restores Access to Mail-Order Abortion Pills

Photo from Shutterstock.

Written by Zachary Mettler · Categorized: Government Updates, Life · Tagged: abortion, Life

Apr 29 2026

Rep. Brandon Gill’s Bluntness Exposes the Barbarians of Abortion

It seems that even for zealots of the evil, advocating for access to abortion is easier than talking about abortion itself.

Testifying on Tuesday before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution and Limited Government, Professor Jessica Waters, Director of the American University School of Public Affairs Leadership Program, refused to answer Rep. Brandon Gill’s line of questioning.

Lawmakers and guests were assembled to discuss “The Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act (aka the FACE Act) — legislation that’s been weaponized and applied unevenly against pro-life advocates.

In challenging Professor Waters’ characterization of abortion as routine healthcare, Rep. Gill asked the witness about her favorite type of abortion.

“I am an advocate for patients having access to the full realm of reproductive health care,” she replied.

Rep. Gill pressed on. 

“But do you have a preferred method of abortion that you like?”

Professor Waters answered she didn’t have a favorite method. 

Rep. Gill then proceeded to describe some of those methods:

“The first type is called a suction abortion,” he told her. “This is when the cervix is dilated and a strong suction, twenty-nine times the power of a household vacuum cleaner, tears the baby’s body apart, and sucks it through the hose into a container. Do you prefer that method?”

“I stand by my former testimony,” Waters replied. 

“That sounds kind of gross, doesn’t it?” Gill acknowledged. “That was pretty gruesome. Do you agree?”

He continued: 

“Okay, what about this one? This one is called dilation and curettage. After dilation of the cervix, a sharp looped knife is inserted into the uterus. The baby’s body is cut into pieces and extracted often by suction. Do you prefer that method?”

Waters once more declined to answer the question, suggesting it was irrelevant to the issue at stake.

“You’re a pro-abortion advocate,” Rep. Gill pushed back. “You don’t want to talk about abortion itself. Why is that? Is it because it’s uncomfortable to talk about? It should be uncomfortable.”

Rep. Gill then went on to discuss the “dilation and evacuation” method of abortion.

“Forceps are inserted into the uterus, grabbing and twisting the baby’s body to dismember him or her. If the head is too large, it must be crushed in order to remove it. Do you prefer that method?”

But Professor Waters stuck to her talking points. 

“It’s uncomfortable to hear this, isn’t it?” he shot back. “It is. I think it is because it’s barbaric and evil. How about this one? It’s called the saline injection.”

He then described the horrific process.

“It’s when a twenty percent salt solution is injected through the mother’s abdomen into the baby’s amniotic fluid. The baby’s skin is burned off. The baby ingests the solution and dies of salt poisoning, dehydration, and hemorrhaging of the brain.”

Once more, Rep. Gill couldn’t get Professor Waters to give a reaction to the graphic description of the specific type of abortion. 

“I wouldn’t want to talk about this either if I were you because it is barbaric and evil,” he told her.

There are some who might think Rep. Gill’s line of questioning was unnecessarily provocative, but his bluntness was desperately needed and helpful. The cruel and coldblooded murder of innocent children has become so commonplace in America that many have become numb to the reality of what is actually going on inside abortion clinics. 

Barbarians of the abortion industry have been schooled by sophisticated public relations and messaging professionals to use only soft words to describe (if necessary) the darkest deeds and horrific acts. Sanitized language and vague euphemisms are reported and repeated ad nauseum by willing members of the media. 

Rep. Gill is right to be so bold and so blunt. The silent in utero cries of innocent babies demands our voice and desperately needs our advocacy.

Written by Paul Batura · Categorized: Life · Tagged: abortion

Apr 28 2026

Should Colleges Be Forced to Push Abortion Pills on Campus? Colorado Lawmakers Say Yes

Colorado is once again attempting to establish itself as one of the most progressive states in the nation on abortion policy.

A new bill would require most colleges and universities to provide access to abortion pills through student health centers. 

The measure, HB 26-1335, requires institutions of higher education to carry and dispense abortion pills on campus through a student health center or an on-site pharmacy, or submit a prescription for abortion pills to an off-site pharmacy.

The language of the bill includes an exception for religious colleges and universities, but the intent of the legislation is clear — to normalize and institutionalize abortion in taxpayer supported education systems. 

Colorado law already permits abortion throughout all 40 weeks of pregnancy for any reason whatsoever.

As reported by the Daily Citizen, in November 2024, Colorado voters passed an abortion amendment enshrining abortion access in the state constitution.

Then last April, Colorado lawmakers passed a new law forcing Colorado taxpayers to spend millions of their dollars every year to fund Medicaid abortions against their conscience.

Colorado received national attention when it considered this bill because the pro-abortion speaker of the House gave testimony in support of the measure saying it was cheaper for the state to pay for abortions than pay for a baby to be born. 

SHOCKING: Speaker Julie McCluskie (D) is effectively encouraging Coloradans on Medicaid to have an abortion instead of giving birth, because it's cheaper for the state.

This occurred yesterday. Really showing your cards @McCluskieforCO #COPolitics pic.twitter.com/lbhguaYLeO

— Scott Shamblin (@scottpshamblin) March 26, 2025

President of Focus on the Family Jim Daly responded, “To suggest that abortion is acceptable because it saves the state of Colorado money is dystopian and morally objectionable on every level. If we ever hope to attain a more civil society, we must start by respecting human life at all stages of development. Children are not a burden on society – they are a blessing.”

Forcing colleges and universities to provide access to abortion pills is just the next step in the abortion industry’s efforts to indoctrinate young people, normalize a culture of death, and use taxpayer dollars to support big abortion.

On April 27, 2026, the Colorado House of Representatives passed the bill 41-22. 

The measure now goes to the state Senate for consideration where it is expected to garner more than enough support to go to the governor’s desk for signature.

If it becomes law, Colorado will become one of only six states (including California, New York, Massachusetts, Delaware and Illinois) to require colleges and universities to provide access to abortion pills.

Abortion pills account for 63% of abortions committed in the United States each year.

In a chemical abortion a pregnant woman takes two medications. The first pill, mifepristone, kills the baby by stopping its development. The second set of pills, misoprostol, causes the mother’s body to expel the dead baby.

A study released last May by the Ethics and Public Policy Center revealed that nearly 11% of women who take the abortion pill experienced serious side effects within 40 days, including sepsis, hemorrhaging, infection and emergency room visits. Those numbers are 22 times higher than the FDA’s current label.

Prolife activists continue to call on the FDA to conduct a comprehensive review of abortion pill safety. 

Interestingly, new data shows 70% of Americans support increased oversight for the distribution and consumption of chemical abortion pills like mifepristone.

Some women, after taking the first abortion pill (mifepristone), come to regret their decision.

Thankfully, there is a way to reverse the pill’s effects if prompt action is taken. 

To learn more about the abortion pill reversal protocol, visit abortionpillreversal.com or call 1-877-558-0333 to be connected with a medical professional who can guide callers through the process of reversing the pill’s effects.

Additionally, if you’re struggling and need a listening ear, Focus on the Family offers a free, one-time counseling consultation with a licensed or pastoral counselor. To request a counseling consultation, call 1-855-771-HELP (4357) or fill out our Counseling Consultation Request Form.

Related articles and resources:

Become an Option Ultrasound Life Advocate

Dealing With Unplanned Pregnancy

I’m Pregnant, Now What?

My Choice Network

New Insights on the Dangers of the Abortion Pill

Written by Nicole Hunt · Categorized: Life · Tagged: abortion, Abortion Pill

  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 11
  • Go to Next Page »

Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | © 2026 Focus on the Family. All rights reserved.

  • Cookie Policy