• Skip to main content
Daily Citizen
  • Subscribe
  • Categories
    • Culture
    • Life
    • Religious Freedom
    • Sexuality
  • Parenting Resources
    • LGBT Pride
    • Homosexuality
    • Sexuality/Marriage
    • Transgender
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Contact
  • Donate

pro-life

May 21 2026

A Young Poet’s Pro-Life Voice is Censored — But Her Poem Goes Viral Online

A misapplied liberal bumper sticker has it that “Well Behaved Women Seldom Make History.” It is never applied to strong Christian women being faithful to what God has called them to. But that is precisely what academic historian Laurel Thatcher Ulrich was referring to when she penned this quote in a scholarly 1976 journal article.

Ulrich was describing the highly devout Puritan woman of the American colonies.

There is a faithful Christian lass in Jefferson County, Colorado who is actually making history for being silenced by her liberally minded Drake Middle School teacher and school administrators. The Daily Citizen does not know this 13-year-old girl’s name, but we are deeply moved by her brilliance, conviction and passion.

Her seventh-grade class was assigned to write a slam poem about, as she explained, “a conflict in the world that we are passionate about.” She chose to write about life because choosing life is a very important part of her family’s story. Neither she nor her mother would exist if her grandmother had not bravely and selflessly chosen life when she found herself pregnant at the tender age of 14. But she did, and they are all thankful.

Yet, her teacher told her she could not present her poem before the class, even though she carefully met all the criteria outlined by the assignment. It was the topic, and her voice, that was muzzled. The mom explained she was told “because of the offensive material in the poem, that they were not going to allow her to present.” 

You can hear this creative poem and judge for yourself if it is offensive and deserving of being banned. It starts with a famous quote from Dr. Suess, “A life is a life, no matter how small.”

MUST WATCH: We asked the 13-year-old student who was barred from presenting her pro-life poem because it’s “offensive”, to read her poem so we can share it with the world.

PURE FIRE🔥

This is the poem @JeffcoSchoolsCo doesn’t want you to see.

Would be a shame if it went viral! https://t.co/ehwBVYEIce pic.twitter.com/nqaglH1qXx

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) May 20, 2026

It is a lovely, thoughtful piece of work. What a remarkable girl!

But this girl and her mom were told it was “too political.”

The mother rightfully pushed back on the teacher, explaining many other students’ poems presented controversial material like racial politics, LGBT issues, and immigration, but to no resolve.

Yet, it gets worse.

When this mindful girl asked her teacher why she would not be able to present her poem, her teacher told her she would not even be able to be present in the classroom while other students read their own poems. She would have to sit outside. Unlike Rosa Parks who was unjustly asked to move to the back of the bus, this girl was asked to step off the bus.

This young teen bravely pressed the matter and the teacher relented, allowing her to be in the class with her fellow students to hear them recite their poems.

Of her own crisis-laden conception, in which her mother bravely chose life, the student’s mother beautifully explained, “There is hope in hard situations. There is purpose in pain. And good things come out of situations that seem bleak and my family is proof of that.”

We spoke with a mother and her 13-year-old daughter after the girl was barred from reading a pro-life poem at school. They shared why this topic is so personal and important to them.

Try not to cry.. 🥹

The mother explains that her mother got pregnant with her at 14 and chose… https://t.co/ehwBVYEIce pic.twitter.com/ocypyCXKYv

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) May 20, 2026

Thank God for such beautiful strong female voices speaking truth amid a culture of death. Shame on the Jefferson County, Colorado, school officials for illiberally muting this spirited and intelligent girl’s talented pro-life voice. 

JeffCO Public Schools can be contacted at the following:

JeffCO Public Schools / 1829 Denver West Drive #27 / Golden, Colorado 80401
Phone: 303-982-6500

Written by Glenn T. Stanton · Categorized: Education · Tagged: abortion, free speech, pro-life

Feb 05 2026

National Pro-Life Summit: Equipping Students to Lead with Courage

As many as 2,000 high school and college-aged students attended the 2026 National Pro-Life Summit on January 24 for advocacy, leadership and policy engagement training.

The annual Summit, which Students for Life hosted for the fifth year in a row, is held the day after the National March for Life in Washington, D.C., bringing together pro-life advocates, students and leaders for training, workshops and strategy sessions. 

Over the past five years the Summit has expanded in scope and attendance. The first Summit was held about six months before the Dobbs decision overruled Roe v. Wade.

The legal, cultural, and medical landscape has changed quite significantly since then, with an increased emphasis on state-level pro-life legislation, pro-life apologetics, and becoming influencers for life on campus and online. 

This year marked the first-ever live Summit debate held the evening before the event. Two pro-life advocates, including Students for Life President Kristen Hawkins, debated two abortion activists. 

The debate demonstrated why advocates for life must be intellectually prepared as well as morally grounded to make the case for life — especially on college campuses that can be more hostile to the pro-life movement.

At last year’s Summit, Charlie Kirk was honored with the Defender of Life Award. He challenged attendees not to be afraid to engage in politics to advance the cause of life. 

Participants at this year’s Summit were encouraged to continue the Kirk’s good work by standing for life on their campuses.

Students for Life also honored Kirk and his legacy at the National March for life by making and distributing special signs. One sign read, “Freedom for Preborn Babies.” The other included an outline of Charlie Kirk with his first in the air and read, “Get married and have babies. You won’t regret it.” 

Those signs were among the most popular at the March for Life.

The heart of the one-day Summit is a line of workshops and keynote speeches.

The workshops were divided into three tracks: Leading to Win, Changing Minds, and Serving Women and Saving Live. 

The Leading to Win track focused on policy, with workshops like “Defunding Big Abortion: In Congress & the States,” “Beyond Roe: Legal Landscape of Pro-Life Laws & Litigation Post-Dobbs,” and “Raising Your Political Voice.”

The Changing Minds track focused on intellectual preparedness with workshops on advanced apologetics, how the Christian theology of the body shapes a pro-life culture, and pro-life concerns with in vitro fertilization.  

The Serving Women and Saving Lives track offered workshops that helped students consider working in the pro-life movement after college, discuss the latest innovations being used to change minds about abortion, and the essential role the church must play in ending abortion.

This year’s keynote speaker was Riley Gaines. In her speech, she encouraged students to be courageous and bold in defending preborn life, without fear of political consequences. 

Gaines, who became a mother in October, championed the strength and beauty of motherhood, calling it the most rewarding thing she’s ever done.

She offered the audience four pieces of advice:

• You don’t need to have every answer to speak the truth. Conviction matters more than perfection. 

• Speak even if you feel fear. Courage is acting in spite of fear.

• Be calm and confident as you speak the truth.

• Find community. Community allows us to multiply courage in the movement.

The Daily Citizen applauds Students for Life for equipping the next generation to advocate for a culture of life in America. The pro-life movement is clearly alive and well among young people.

Written by Nicole Hunt · Categorized: Life · Tagged: abortion, pro-life

Dec 22 2025

Which Book Would You Want Your Child to Read?

Two children’s books. Two opposing worldviews. One cultural fork in the road.

This month, Live Action released I’m a Baby. Watch Me Grow, a children’s board book highlighting prenatal human development in the womb.

Next month, Abortion Is Everything, a children’s book written by abortion activists and aimed at kids as young as five, will be released.

The timing is not accidental. It reflects a broader cultural struggle over who will shape the values of the next generation — and how early that influence begins.

Abortion Is Everything was written by the founders of Shout Your Abortion, an organization devoted to normalizing abortion. Marketed directly to young children, the book presents abortion as a “superpower” — a tool that enables people to pursue their future.

This is not education. It is indoctrination.

The book offers no honest account of abortion’s reality: that it ends a human life. It entirely avoids the moral gravity of that act. Instead, abortion is framed as something good, necessary and affirming — presented to children who are still learning the most basic distinctions between right and wrong.

The underlying message is clear: personal autonomy matters more than life itself.

In sharp contrast stands I’m a Baby. Watch Me Grow. It simply presents biological reality — heartbeat, growth, movement and development in the womb.

It doesn’t mention abortion. It doesn’t need to.

Both books communicate a position on abortion, but they do so in fundamentally different ways.

One begins with a political conclusion and attempts to train children to accept it morally.

The other begins with biological truth and allows moral understanding to follow naturally.

One refuses to recognize the preborn child at all.

The other acknowledges that the preborn baby is a human being in its earliest stage.

These books reflect a deep cultural divide — a disagreement not just about policy, but about who is human and which humans deserve protection.

Abortion advocates understand this debate is not merely legal, but moral and generational. They know children form beliefs early, so they wrap abortion in pictures, affirming language and emotional appeals.

Pro-life advocates are responding by grounding children in truth: that life before birth is real, human and worthy of moral consideration.

Every culture reveals what it values by what it protects. Are we a culture that elevates self-autonomy and self-interest above all — even when the cost is a vulnerable human life? Or are we a culture that recognizes the value of human life regardless of size, location, ability or dependency?

Children’s books are not neutral. They are tools of moral formation. They teach children what matters — and who matters.

One book teaches children that abortion is freedom. The other teaches that life is worthy of protection.

These are not competing facts. They are competing visions of humanity.

One leads toward a culture that affirms death. The other toward a culture that chooses life.

So, which book would you want your child to read?

Written by Nicole Hunt · Categorized: Life · Tagged: abortion, family, Life, pro-life

Nov 12 2025

Arkansas Named Most Pro-life State in America for Sixth Year

Americans United for Life named Arkansas the most pro-life state in the nation for the sixth year in a row. This recognition, which AUL announced in its newly released 2026 life list, affirms Arkansas’ long-term leadership in defending life from conception to natural death.

AUL’s annual ranking of all 50 states evaluates state-specific abortion regulations, protections for the preborn, end-of-life care, conscience protections for health care workers and efforts to promote a culture of life. The list also offers a comprehensive look at each state’s life-affirming policies, including bioethics, assisted suicide, conscience protections for medical workers and abortion policy.

Once again, Arkansas was recognized as a national model for pro-life policy and comprehensive legislative action. It protects all preborn babies, promotes adoption, defends conscience protections, advocates for vulnerable groups like the elderly and disabled, and provides funding for pregnancy resource centers.

The top five most pro-life states in the nation were Arkansas, Louisiana, Indiana, Oklahoma and Mississippi. Each demonstrated a strong commitment to strengthening life protections for the preborn and expanding support for expecting mothers and families. Rounding out the top ten are South Dakota, Arizona, Kentucky, Idaho and Tennessee.

Unfortunately, pro-life momentum from past years has waned as many states have contended with pro-abortion ballot measures attempting to enshrine abortion-on-demand in state constitutions.

In the last year, seven states passed amendments to put so-called abortion rights in state constitutions, including Arizona, Colorado, Maryland, Missouri, Montana, Nevada and New York. However, for the first time, three states (Florida, Nebraska and South Dakota) successfully defeated efforts to enshrine abortion in their constitution.

The five lowest-ranking states on this year’s list were Washington, Hawaii, Vermont, New Jersey and Oregon, with Oregon coming in last. These states received the lowest marks for their expansive abortion-on-demand laws, permissive assisted suicide statutes and laws shielding abortion providers from liability for violating other states’ pro-life laws.

Source: Americans United for Life

AUL’s life list is important because it serves as a scorecard for the pro-life community to identify which states are advancing the cause of life and to determine where more work needs to be done to promote life-affirming laws and policies.

Arkansas’s consistent leadership in advancing comprehensive pro-life policies demonstrates how one state’s vision and commitment can serve as a roadmap for other states seeking to strengthen a culture of life through law.

To learn more about how each state can strengthen its life-affirming state-based laws, consider consulting AUL’s State Spotlight.

In addition, state legislators may wish to connect with AUL regarding model legislation they can introduce in their state to protect and promote life.

Click here to see where your state ranks on the life list.

Image from Shutterstock.

Written by Nicole Hunt · Categorized: Life · Tagged: pro-life

Aug 15 2025

Pro-Abortion States Beef Up Protections for Abortion Pill Prescribers

JUMP TO…
  • Prescription Label Laws
  • Shield Laws
  • Pro-Life Challenges to Shield Laws
  • Why It Matters

Pro-abortion states are passing laws stripping prescriber names off chemical abortion pill labels.

The laws further insulate doctors who prescribe chemical abortion pills to people in pro-life states from investigation and prosecution.

Prescription Label Laws

New York, Maine, Vermont, Washington and Colorado have passed laws allowing prescribers to remove their names from prescriptions for mifepristone and misoprostol, the drugs used in a chemical abortion.

The laws make it nearly impossible for pro-life states to identify out-of-state, online abortionists—let alone investigate or sue them.

It’s unclear whether this kind of legislation is even legal; federal law requires prescriber names appear on all drug labels. But, so far, the laws remain unchallenged — and deeply problematic for pro-life states.

Importantly, prescription label laws making abortionists anonymous cover both local doctors prescribing abortions and doctors from other states that fill orders through local pharmacies. That means a mail-order abortionist in California could strip his name from a chemical abortion prescription if he filled the script at a pharmacy in New York.

California hopes to capitalize on this loophole by passing AB 260 — a bill that would remove both prescriber and patient names from chemical abortion pill labels. Most pharmacies that dispense mifepristone are in California, according to the left-leaning news outlet 19th Street

AB 260 is awaiting committee action in the California Senate. It passed the Assembly in May.

Shield Laws

Prescription label laws anonymizing abortionists beef up pro-abortion “shield laws” against pro-life judicial challenges.

States with abortion “shield laws” promise not to investigate out-of-state abortion providers or cooperate with investigations and prosecutions from pro-life states.

Eight states — California, Colorado, Maine, Massachusetts, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington — have shield laws explicitly protecting doctors who prescribe chemical abortions to patients in other states.

Fifteen others offer at least some protection from pro-life states’ investigations.

Of the 95,710 abortions prescribed or performed nationwide in December, an estimated one-in-seven were prescribed to women in pro-life states by abortionists in shield law states, according to a Kaiser Family Foundation analysis of data collected by the Society of Family Planning.

Pro-Life Challenges to Shield Laws

Pro-life states are workshopping ways to circumvent shield laws in court.

Louisiana and Texas pursued state judgements against Maggie Carpenter, a New York mail order abortionist, earlier this year— but they proved impossible to enforce without New York’s cooperation.

Now, pro-life states are empowering individual citizens to sue out-of-state abortionists for wrongdoing.

In July, Texas father Jerry Rodriguez sued California abortionist Remy Coeytaux in federal court for the wrongful death of Rodriguez’ pre-born children. A federal judgement in favor of Rodriguez would effectively strip Coetytaux of California’s shield law protections.

A Louisiana law allowing citizens to sue out-of-state abortionists, and extending the statute of limitations on abortion lawsuits to five years, took effect earlier this month.

Prescription laws anonymizing abortionists make it harder to file lawsuits like these by hiding the offenders’ identity.

Why It Matters

Chemical abortions are extremely dangerous. Nearly 11% of the more than 865,000 women who filed insurance claims for chemical abortions between 2017 and 2023 experienced severe adverse medical events within 45 days of taking mifepristone, according to data analysis by the Ethics and Public Policy Center, including:

  • Sepsis
  • Infection
  • Blood loss requiring a transfusion
  • Hemorrhage
  • Related hospitalization
  • Related ER visit
  • Related life-threatening cardiac, pulmonary and allergic reactions
  • Repeated surgical abortion
  • Other severe or life-threatening abortion-specific complications

Out-of-state, online abortion providers compound these dangers by prescribing abortion pills to:

  • Women more than 10-weeks pregnant, which is the FDA’s gestational limit for chemical abortions.
  • Teenage girls, often without parents’ consent, and even though mifepristone has never undergone pediatric testing.
  • Women who have not had an ultrasound, which doctors use to detect dangerous ectopic pregnancies mifepristone can disguise.
  • Women who will take the pills without a doctors’ supervision, which greatly increases the rate of complications.
  • People on behalf of women, which can indicate a woman is being coerced or tricked into getting an abortion.

Pro-abortion states should not be allowed to absolve abortionists of responsibility for the harms their actions cause vulnerable women.

To speak with a family help specialist or request resources, please call us at 1-800-A-FAMILY (232-6459).

If you are experiencing an unexpected pregnancy and want to learn more about your options, visit My Choice Network.

Some women, after taking the first abortion pill (mifepristone) come to regret their decision. Thankfully, there is a way to reverse the pill’s effects if prompt action is taken. To learn more about the abortion pill reversal protocol, visit abortionpillreversal.com or call 1-877-558-0333 to be connected with a medical professional who can guide callers through the process of reversing the pill’s effects.

To learn more about pro-life legislation in your state, contact your state Family Policy Council.

To learn more about the consequences of a chemical abortion, visit the links below.

Additional Articles and Resources

Texas Father Sues Out-of-State Abortionist for Killing His Preborn Children

Shield Laws Enable Chemical Abortion in Pro-Life States

Shield Law Abortion Providers Advertised Alongside Black Market Abortion Pills

Texas Sues New York Doctor for Prescribing Abortion Meds

New Abortion Pill Study Confirms Danger to Mothers

Woman Nearly Dies from Abortion Pill, Story Reflects Disturbing EPPC Data

Focus on the Family Broadcast: Abortion Pill Reversal

#AbortionChangesYou: A Case Study to Understand the Communicative Tensions in Women’s Medication Abortion Narratives (Health Communication)

The Abortion Pill Harms Women: Insurance Data Reveals One in Ten Patients Experiences a Serious Adverse Event (Ethics and Public Policy Center)

Written by Emily Washburn · Categorized: Government Updates, Life · Tagged: abortion, mifepristone, pro-life

  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 5
  • Go to Next Page »

Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | © 2026 Focus on the Family. All rights reserved.

  • Cookie Policy