• Skip to main content
Daily Citizen
  • Subscribe
  • Categories
    • Culture
    • Life
    • Religious Freedom
    • Sexuality
  • Parenting Resources
    • LGBT Pride
    • Homosexuality
    • Sexuality/Marriage
    • Transgender
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Contact
  • Donate

religious freedom

Sep 04 2026

Liberty University Students Lose State Tuition Grants After Choosing Ministry Degrees

Imagine qualifying for college grants and then losing your tuition assistance because you majored in a ministry degree.

That’s exactly what’s happened to several Liberty University students in Virginia. Now, their cases have been appealed to the United States Supreme Court. 

Virginia offers residents attending a private college or university up to $5,250 a year for undergraduate students, and more for graduate students, through its Virginia Tuition Assistance Grants (VTAG) program.

Students at Liberty University had those funds denied for pursuing majors related to ministry, like pastoral leadership, music and worship, youth ministry and a Master of Divinity.

Alliance Defending Freedom, First Liberty and National Legal Foundation, among other law firms, are challenging state policy on behalf of these students.

The question before the U.S. Supreme Court is: Can a state offer tuition assistance to students generally, and then take it back when a student chooses to prepare for a career in ministry?

Virginia says a 2004 U.S. Supreme Court decision allows it to deny funding to some students.

The students argue the Supreme Court’s more recent religious liberty decisions make that kind of distinction unconstitutional. 

Bethany Hall’s Case

Bethany Hall enrolled at Liberty University as a Music Education major. She qualified for a $5,000 grant from Virginia.

Later, she felt called to ministry and changed her major to Youth Ministries and Music & Worship. She was told that those degrees made her ineligible for the grant.

Hall sued Virginia, arguing the state violated her First Amendment right to the free exercise of religion. A federal district court dismissed her case, and in May 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit upheld the lower court decision.

Both courts relied on a U.S. Supreme Court case called Locke v. Davey.

In Locke, the Court ruled 7-2 that Washington state could exclude students from scholarship money for pursuing theology degrees.  Justices Scalia and Thomas dissented, arguing that to exclude students pursuing a ministry degree amounted to religious discrimination.

In Hall’s case, the Fourth Circuit maintained that Locke is binding law.

Hall has now appealed her case to the U.S. Supreme Court in hopes that the Court will overturn Locke.

Bethany Hall is being represented by a coalition of lawyers including First Liberty, Alliance Defending Freedom and National Legal Foundation.

Second Case on Behalf of Three Liberty University Students

A second case involves several Liberty University students: Cameron Johnson, Luke Thomas and graduate student Trace Stevens. They are represented by Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) and National Legal Foundation.

Johnson wants to major in Pastoral Leadership and minor in business. Thomas plans to major in Music and Worship and start his own business. Stevens is in the National Guard, already has a B.S. in Religion from Liberty University, and now wants to pursue a Master of Divinity.

ADF contends all three students have been treated as second-class citizens because their majors were deemed too religious by the state. 

The students sued in May 2025.

In March 2026, a federal judge dismissed the students’ claims and ruled that Locke was binding law.

In April, ADF appealed the lower court’s decision and filed an emergency motion to the Fourth Circuit. The emergency motion was denied.

Last month, the students asked the U.S. Supreme Court to take up their case.

What’s at Stake?

Religious freedom is a foundational American right. It protects not only the right to believe, but also the right to live out those beliefs in the public square without discrimination.

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider adding both cases to the docket for the term beginning this October.

The Daily Citizen will continue to follow these developing cases.

Written by Nicole Hunt · Categorized: Religious Freedom · Tagged: religious freedom

Jul 29 2026

DOJ Releases Guidance Strengthening Religious Liberty Protections

The U.S. Department of Justice released updated guidance strengthening federal protections for religious liberty.

The DOJ’s updated memorandum, released on July 23, revises and expands the department’s 2017 Religious Liberty Guidelines in light of significant developments over the last nine years.

“Religious liberty is one of our Nation’s founding principles and a fundamental right guaranteed by the Constitution,” Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said in a press release.

“It is essential that federal agencies fully respect and protect the ability of all Americans to live out their faith in daily life, including in their interactions with the federal government.”

The DOJ’s updates in the guidance include:

  • Integration of recent Supreme Court precedent. Recent court decisions clarify the scope of the First Amendment, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA’s) broad protection of religious liberty, and the requirement of equal treatment towards religious organizations in government programs.
  • Protection of parental rights. The Supreme Court’s recent precedents confirm the Constitution protects parents’ right to direct the upbringing of their children.
  • Reaffirmation of church autonomy. Constitutional protections bar government interference in internal religious governance, including employment.
  • Expanded direction for federal agencies. Agencies must consider religious-liberty impacts when developing rules and policies.
  • Clarified protections in federal employment. Agencies must follow recent Office of Legal Counsel opinions when accommodating religious expression and practice in the workplace.
  • Safeguards for religious organizations in federal contracting and grant programs. Agencies may not condition an individual’s participation in federal programs on relinquishing their religious character or hiring rights. Religious organizations must be permitted to compete on equal footing with secular organizations.

“The new religious liberty guidance instructs agencies on how to protect one of our most fundamental constitutional guarantees: religious liberty,” said Assistant Attorney General Dan Burrows for the DOJ’s Office of Legal Policy.

“It helps ensure that federal actions do not discriminate on the basis of religion and furthers the protection of both individual practitioners and religious organizations.”

This isn’t the first action the Trump administration has taken to protect religious liberty. On May 1, 2025, President Donald Trump established the Religious Liberty Commission which was tasked with “safeguarding and promoting America’s founding principle of religious freedom.”

Members of the commission included Reverend Franklin Graham, Dr. Ben Carson, New York Archbishop Timothy Cardinal Dolan, Bishop Robert Barron, Kristen Waggoner, Kelly Shackelford, Ryan Anderson, Alveda King and others.

Days before our nation’s 250th anniversary, the commission released its final 224-page report including specific policy recommendations to safeguard our nation’s first freedom.

It was one of our nation’s foremost founding fathers, Alexander Hamilton, who said, “Remember civil and religious liberty always go together, if the foundation of the one be sapped, the other will fall of course.”

The Trump administration deserves great credit for prioritizing religious freedom and taking concrete steps to secure one of our most important liberties.

Related articles and resources:

The Truth About Religious Freedom and Free Speech

Faith, Freedom, and the Future of America

Optimism, Faith and Freedom in America

Religious Freedom is Not a Problem to Be Managed

Photo from Getty Images.

Written by Zachary Mettler · Categorized: Government Updates · Tagged: religious freedom, Trump

Mar 27 2026

Finland’s Päivi Räsänen Convicted For ‘Insulting’ Homosexuals

In a 3-2 decision, the Finnish Supreme Court convicted Dr. Päivi Räsänen and Lutheran Bishop Juhana Pohjola of “insulting” homosexual-identified individuals in a church pamphlet written and published in 2004. 

According to ADF International, which coordinated their defense along with criminal defense lawyer Matti Sankamo, “She was charged under a section of the Finnish criminal code titled ‘war crimes and crimes against humanity’ for sharing her Christian beliefs on marriage and sexual ethics.” 

“The conviction is for ‘making and keeping available to the public a text that insults a group,’” the legal aid group added. 

Following the ruling, Dr. Räsänen stated: 

I am shocked and profoundly disappointed that the court has failed to recognize my basic human right to freedom of expression. I stand by the teachings of my Christian faith and will continue to defend my and every person’s right to share their convictions in the public square.

Separately, the court unanimously acquitted Dr. Räsänen for posting Romans 1:24-27 on X in 2019 when the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland announced its partnership with LGBT Pride 2019. 

In her post, she asked the question: 

How does the church’s doctrine, the #raamattu [Holy Bible], align with elevating shame and sin to a source of pride?

In addition to being a medical doctor, Räsänen is a grandmother who was first elected to the Finnish Parliament in 1995 and has served continuously since then. In 2004, she wrote a 21-page pamphlet for the Lutheran Heritage Foundation, “Male and Female He Created Them: Homosexual relationships challenge the Christian concept of humanity.” 

As dean of the foundation, Bishop Pohjola published the pamphlet, which the court said “was intended as teaching material … [and] had been distributed to researchers and to the parishes operating within the foundation.” 

The law prohibiting “ethnic agitation” was passed in Finland in 1970, with a provision adding sexual orientation as a protected characteristic in 2011. The Finnish Parliament redefined marriage to include same-sex unions in 2014. 

In 2019, the pamphlet was republished and shared on social media. Only then was a police report filed and a preliminary investigation initiated, the court explained. 

The pamphlet begins by describing the social and political debate in Finland surrounding same-sex partnerships, which were approved by an Act of Parliament in 2001. Dr. Räsänen wrote: 

During the processing of this Act, it was affirmed to the Church, and to Christians concerned about the consequences, that the Church could retain its own values and views on homosexuality.

Promises made, promises broken. 

The pamphlet then went on to discuss the importance of male-female marriage and the breakdown of sexual ethics in the culture. She wrote, 

The family (mother and father) is the most important unit in our society, and marriage is per se the most secure model for family life. The well-being of families determines the well-being of society. … 

Marriage is a family support network whose primary purpose is to provide children with a stable mental home and lasting human relationships.

Dr. Räsänen then discussed homosexuality in individuals, saying: 

Medical studies have obtained no proof for the claims that homosexuality is genetic, hereditary or inborn. Without any exception, talks of the discovery of homosexual genes have proved false. On the other hand, it is true that people seldom consciously decide to become homosexual. … 

Instead, the scientific material unequivocally proves that homosexuality is a disorder of psycho-sexual development.

Finland’s highest court pointed to sections like this, saying, 

The article does not consider homosexuals to be of equal value to heterosexuals, because the article does not consider homosexuality to be a natural variation of sexuality andclaims that it is sexually deviant, while heterosexuality is presented as a standard of normality towards which a homosexual can potentially become whole.

The Supreme Court found that these “statements have insulted homosexuals as a group on the basis of sexual orientation.” 

Since this medical section of the article did not make “religious statements,” the court found itwas not protected speech: 

Since tolerance and respect for the equal dignity of all persons are the foundations of a democratic and pluralistic society, there may be sufficient grounds for restricting freedom of expression where the aim is to prevent all forms of expression which spread, encourage, promote or justify hatred based on intolerance (including religious intolerance).

Executive Director of ADF International Paul Coleman decried the conviction, saying: 

Freedom of speech is a cornerstone of democracy. It is right that the Court has acquitted Päivi Räsänen for her 2019 Bible verse tweet. However, the conviction for a simple church pamphlet published decades ago – before the law under which she has been convicted was even passed – is an outrageous example of state censorship. This decision will create a severe chilling effect for everyone’s right to speak freely. 

ADF International explained the penalties for Dr. Räsänen and Bishop Pohjola, “The Supreme Court has imposed criminal fines of several thousands of Euros and ruled that the impugned statements must be “removed from public access and destroyed” (their emphasis). 

The case has been working its way through the court system since 2021, and an appeal to the European Court of Human Rights is being considered. 

Related articles and resources: 

Finnish Member of Parliament Found Not Guilty of Hate Speech for Quoting the Bible

Finnish Member of Parliament Is Acquitted of ‘Hate Speech’ for Quoting the Bible; Prosecutors May Appeal

Finland Prosecutes Christian Member of Parliament for Hate Speech After Quoting Bible

Written by Jeff Johnston · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: religious freedom

Mar 27 2026

Louisville to Pay $800,000 for Violating Christian Photographer’s Free Speech Rights

The city of Louisville, Kentucky will pay $800,000 in attorneys’ fees for violating the First Amendment rights of a Christian photographer and blogger.

“The government cannot force Americans to say things they don’t believe,” said Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) Senior Counsel Bryan Neihart. “For almost six years, Louisville officials tried to do just that by threatening to force Chelsey to promote views about marriage that violated her religious beliefs.”

Chelsey Nelson, owner of Chelsey Nelson Photography, uses her passion for photography to celebrate marriage. She believes that God created marriage as a lifelong commitment between one man and one woman.

While Chelsey works with clients of all different faiths and backgrounds, she can’t in good conscience use her talents and abilities to celebrate ceremonies she disagrees with – like “same-sex weddings.”

However, the city of Louisville, invoking its public accommodation law (Metro Ordinance § 92.05), used the threat of “limitless damages, compliance reports, posting of notices, and court orders to force Chelsey to create photographs for, blog about, and participate in” same-sex weddings.

The city also made it illegal for Chelsey to explain why she believes marriage is between a man and a woman on her own business website. Can you imagine a more direct attack on free speech than that?

To protect her own conscience, business and constitutional rights, Chelsey filed a lawsuit alleging Louisville’s law violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments and the Kentucky Religious Freedom Restoration Act. Chelsey is represented by attorneys with ADF.

The organization published a video sharing more of Chelsey’s story, which you can watch below:

On August 30, 2022, the U.S. District Court of the Western District of Kentucky issued a permanent injunction barring Louisville from enforcing its public accommodation law against Chelsey.

The court said laws like Louisville’s “coerce” Americans into “betraying their convictions.” Indeed, “The First Amendment exists to …  keep the artist’s expression truly free,” it added.

Now, the city of Louisville has agreed to settle the lawsuit and pay $800,000 in attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses. The city decided to finally settle after a September 2025 ruling from the court, stating, “Nelson suffered a First Amendment injury.”

“Louisville’s threats contradicted bedrock First Amendment principles which leave decisions about what to say with the people, not the government,” Neihart added. “This settlement should teach Louisville that violating the U.S. Constitution can be expensive.”

No Christian should be forced by the government to violate their sincerely held religious beliefs and celebrate a ceremony they believe is sinful.

We congratulate Chelsey on her victory and applaud her for standing up for her faith and constitutional rights.

The case is Chelsey Nelson Photography v. Louisville-Jefferson County Metro Government.

To speak with a family help specialist or request resources, please call us at 1-800-A-FAMILY (232-6459).

Related articles and resources:

Religious Freedom and Free Speech

Austin Fire Chaplain Wins Settlement After Being Fired for Defending Biological Reality

Teacher Wins $650,000 After Being Fired for Refusing to Use ‘Trans’ Pronouns

Oregon School District Pays $650,000 for Firing Teachers Opposed to ‘Trans’ Policy

Christian Wedding Photographer May Refuse Same-Sex Events, Kentucky Federal Court Rules

Photo from Alliance Defending Freedom.

Written by Zachary Mettler · Categorized: Culture, Religious Freedom · Tagged: religious freedom

Mar 16 2026

Religious Liberty Commission Hears Testimony From Healthcare Workers

President Trump’s Religious Liberty Commission held its sixth hearing at the Museum of the Bible on Monday to discuss religious liberty in health care and social services.

President Trump established the Religious Liberty Commission via executive order on May 1, 2025, tasking the 14-member commission with creating a comprehensive report:

  • Exploring the foundations of religious liberty in America.
  • Considering the impact of religious liberty on American society.
  • Identifying current threats to domestic religious liberty.
  • Developing strategies to preserve and enhance religious liberty protections for future generations.
  • Recommending programs to increase awareness of and celebrate America’s peaceful religious pluralism.

Trump appointed Texas Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick to chair the commission alongside Vice Chair Dr. Ben Carson. Other commission members include:

  • Ryan T. Anderson
  • Bishop Robert Barron
  • Cardinal Timothy Dolan
  • Pastor Franklin Graham
  • Allyson Ho
  • Dr. Phil McGraw
  • Eric Metaxas
  • Kelly Shackelford
  • Rabbi Meir Soloveichik
  • Paula White

Since its establishment, the Religious Liberty Commission has held regular meetings to hear from experts on religious freedom and witnesses whose religious liberty has been violated.

On March 16, the commission heard testimony from Kaley Chiles, a licensed professional counselor in Colorado, who spoke about Colorado’s law that unconstitutionally censors the speech of licensed counselors.

“Counseling is about uncovering the roots, the fears, the wounds, the questions underneath the surface, so real healing can happen,” Chiles shared. “In 2022 … I discovered Colorado had passed a law dictating which counseling conversations my clients and I are allowed to have.”

Colorado’s HB19-1129, the “Prohibit Conversion Therapy for a Minor Act,” prohibits licensed mental health professionals from offering therapy to help those struggling with unwanted same-sex attraction or sexual identity confusion.

Chiles, with the help of Alliance Defending Freedom, sued to prevent enforcement of the state’s law. The U.S. Supreme Court took up Chiles’ case and heard oral arguments in October. A ruling is expected by June 2026.

You can watch Chiles’ testimony below:

WATCH: "I became a counselor because I know truth’s power to set people free."

ADF client, Kaley Chiles, testifies at the Religious Liberty Commission hearing.@TheJusticeDept @WhiteHouse pic.twitter.com/tUe9NzPvr3

— Alliance Defending Freedom (@ADFLegal) March 16, 2026

Alliance Defending Freedom President and CEO Kristen Waggoner, who attended the meeting with Chiles and serves on the commission’s Advisory Board of Legal Experts, posted about the hearing on X:

At President Trump’s Religious Liberty Commission this morning with @ADFLegal client Kaley Chiles (and several others), to discuss religious liberty in healthcare and social services.

Watch the hearing live: https://t.co/QH5L0iK5NR pic.twitter.com/zfbXIEHoqE

— Kristen Waggoner (@KristenWaggoner) March 16, 2026

The commission also heard testimony from Valerie Kloosterman, a First Liberty client, who was fired by the University of Michigan Health System for her religious beliefs.

Kloosterman worked as a physician assistant for 17 years and had “exemplary performance reviews” and a “stellar” reputation with patients.

Nevertheless, Michigan Health fired Kloosterman after she asked for a religious accommodation from affirming statements that violated her Christian faith and medical judgement. A Michigan Health diversity representative called her “evil” and blamed her for gender dysphoria-related suicides, telling her she could not take the Bible or her religious beliefs to work.

Kloosterman filed a lawsuit against Michigan Health with First Liberty’s help. Her case remains ongoing.

Kloosterman told the commission, “I’m praying that God would use my case to protect religious liberty for my children and for the next generation so they can freely live out their faith in the workplace.”

“It’s bad medicine to force religious healthcare professionals like Valerie to choose between their faith and their job,” said First Liberty President, CEO and Chief Legal Counsel Kelly Shackelford in a statement, adding,

It is disgraceful and unlawful to ask any person to violate their conscience rights and religious beliefs that are protected by the Constitution.

Americans’ First Amendment right to religious freedom has come under assault in recent years, especially since the Supreme Court concocted a constitutional right to “same-sex marriage” in its 2015 Obergefell decision.

Thankfully, the Religious Liberty Commission is serving an important role in restoring Americans’ constitutional rights by examining the myriad threats to religious freedom.

The commission will hold its capstone hearing to discuss the past, present and future of religious liberty in America on April 13 at the Museum of the Bible. A livestream will be available.

Related articles and resources:

Religious Freedom and Free Speech

Religious Liberty Commission Launches, Aims to Root Out Anti-Christian Bias

Photo from First Liberty.

Written by Zachary Mettler · Categorized: Government Updates, Religious Freedom · Tagged: religious freedom

  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 6
  • Go to Next Page »

Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | © 2026 Focus on the Family. All rights reserved.

  • Cookie Policy