• Skip to main content
Daily Citizen
  • Subscribe
  • Categories
    • Culture
    • Life
    • Religious Freedom
    • Sexuality
  • Parenting Resources
    • LGBT Pride
    • Homosexuality
    • Sexuality/Marriage
    • Transgender
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Contact
  • Donate

transgender

Jul 14 2025

California Interscholastic Federation ‘Gender Diversity Toolkit’ Reveals Extent of Radical ‘Transgender’ Participation Policies

The California Interscholastic Federation (CIF) allows boys nearly unrestricted freedom to play girls sports and change in girls’ locker rooms, a “gender diversity toolkit” for coaches reveals.

The only criteria? The male student must “most consistently express himself” as a girl (whatever that means).

It’s no secret CIF and the California Department of Education allow students to participate in sports consistent with their subjective “gender identity,” rather than their biological sex. The Department of Justice sued them for it last week, alleging the policy violates Title IX protections against sex discrimination in federally funded educational institutions and activities.

But the true extent of CIF’s “gender inclusion” policy is hidden in the “Gender Diverse Youth Sport Inclusivity Toolkit,” an online guide helping coaches integrate “transgender” and “nonbinary” players.

Thus far, the rules primarily apply to boys interested in joining girls teams.

Here’s what the Daily Citizen uncovered.

Male students can participate in girls sports with no objective criteria.

CIF does not require male athletes submit any proof of gender confusion to play in girls sports.  The toolkit claims asking for such evidence not only violates “transgender” students’ privacy but levies “arbitrary and discriminatory” requirements against them.

The document references a policy brief from the California School Board Association (CSBA), which prohibits school officials from soliciting documentation of a student’s “gender-related identity” unless they have “credible information” indicating the identity is false.

The brief does not clarify what constitutes such information. In Lucia Mar Unified School District, two girls publicly alleged a male teammate acted inappropriately in the girls’ locker room.

He remains on the girls team.

Students can switch “identities” and teams at will.

The toolkit says students that switch “gender identities” may be allowed to participate on a girls team one semester and a boys team the next.

CIF’s “Philosophy of Gender Identity Participation,” as articulated in the toolkit, allows athletes to play on teams consistent with their gender identity or “the gender most consistently expressed.”

This addition, which is not included in CIF’s bylaws, allows students significant room to change their “gender identity.” The toolkit normalizes such changes, telling coaches:

A student’s understanding of their gender identity may take some time to fully discern. They may understand the gender they are not but still need to discover the gender that they are.
Students can change their “gender identities” based on factors like their “confidence.”

One of the Frequently Asked Questions included in the toolkit asks how coaches should determine what sports league a “nonbinary” student should join.

In this case, CIF instructs coaches to allow the student to “select the gendered team on which they feel most comfortable participating.” The policy allows the student to consider factors like “established camaraderie with fellow athletes, personal safety and privacy concerns.”

CIF allows the student to change their “selected gender,” so long as the change “is a result of a deeper understanding of their gender identity.”

It’s unclear how coaches can make this determination without asking for documentation but, regardless, it’s not a hard and fast requirement. The toolkit reads:

A student may have other reasons for changing their gender identification and those can be considered with an emphasis on optimizing the athlete’s confidence, safety and privacy.
While any student may ask for a private space to change, coaches are not allowed to preemptively move a boy to a separate changing area.

The toolkit instructs coaches to accommodate students that ask for a private space to change. However, it stops coaches from assigning “transgender” students a separate changing area unless they ask for it.

“No student should be forced to use an all-gender facility such as a staff bathroom simply because they are trans or gender diverse,” it reads, calling such actions discriminatory.

CIF encourages coaches to prepare girls for a boy to join their team.

The toolkit encourages coaches to mentally prepare girls to accept a male on their team and in their locker room in the name of sportsmanship.

“There is no need to wait for the arrival of a trans athlete to begin conversations with team members about the value of inclusion,” the toolkit reads, continuing:

Any team would benefit from the articulation of, and expectations surrounding, good sportsmanship values.

In another section articulating CIF’s expectations of students, it associates accepting “transgender” athletes with “being gracious winners and losers,” “being a team player,” and “having a supportive and encouraging attitude towards yourself and others.”

“Communication of these expected practices are what builds the foundation for any unexpected situation, including the welcoming of a new trans teammate,” the toolkit concludes.

In this way, CIF enlists coaches in rewiring girls’ perceptions of their own physical boundaries. The University of Pennsylvania tried the same trick in 2022,  when Lia — formerly Will —Thomas joined the women’s swim team.

When athletes like Paula Scanlon expressed discomfort changing in front of Thomas, UPenn officials allegedly offered them therapy to “become more comfortable sharing previously sex-segregated spaces with members of the opposite sex.”

CIF will not tell parents when a “transgender” athlete joins their child’s team.

Perhaps most alarmingly, CIF will not, as a rule, inform athletes and their parents when a boy joins a girls team unless he gives officials explicit permission.

This is consistent with the way CSBA instructs schools to “balance” a “transgender” student’s “right” to conceal their “gender identity” and other students’ right to privacy — just issue a blanket disclosure about the state’s “gender inclusion” policies at the beginning of each year.

CIF’s “Gender Diverse Youth Sport Inclusivity Toolkit” offers boys every incentive to assume a female or “nonbinary” “gender identity.” Meanwhile, female athletes have no guarantee of privacy or equal athletic opportunity, and no recourse in the event of sexual assault and harassment.

Unfortunately, CIF isn’t alone. Public school systems across the country are adopting similar policies, to the unmitigated detriment of students and families.

To learn more about problematic school policies in other states, click on the links below.

Additional Articles and Resources

DOJ Lawsuit Describes California Department of Education’s Infuriating Treatment of Girls

Feds Sue California Department of Education, Interscholastic Federation for ‘Illegal Sex Discrimination’

UPenn Will Strip ‘Lia’ Thomas of Medals, Apologize to Female Athletes

Yes, Girls Care When Boys Take Their Trophies

California Sues DOJ Over ‘Transgender’ Athlete Ban

Feds Pressure California After Boy Wins in Girls Track and Field Championship

Girls Sports Coaches are Incentivized to Recruit Men — Parents Shouldn’t Let Them

Department of Justice Launches Title IX Task Force to Protect Women’s Sports

Girls Shouldn’t Apologize for Protesting Boys in Girls Sports

Trump Signs Executive Order Protecting Women’s Sports and Spaces

President Trump: ‘There are Only Two Genders: Male and Female’

Written by Emily Washburn · Categorized: Culture, Education · Tagged: California, Girls Sports, Title IX, transgender

Jul 10 2025

DOJ Lawsuit Describes California Department of Education’s Infuriating Treatment of Girls

The Department of Justice (DOJ) describes the California Department of Education (CDE) and the California Interscholastic Federation’s (CIF) infuriating treatment of female athletes in a lawsuit filed yesterday.

The complaint alleges CDE and CIF violated — and continue to violate — Title IX, a federal law prohibiting sex discrimination in federally funded educational institutions and activities, by allowing boys to compete in girls sports and change in girls’ locker rooms.

The court’s ruling will determine whether California remains eligible to receive federal tax dollars. CDE and CIF received more than $44 billion in federal education funding this fiscal year alone, the DOJ reports.

The DOJ’s complaint argues CDE and CIF policies illegally discriminate against and harm girls in two ways: by depriving them of equal athletic opportunities and by creating a hostile educational environment.

The DOJ proves its first claim by identifying five male athletes that competed in California girls sports leagues in 2024 and 2025. Though the suit identifies none by name, the identities of all but one are public knowledge.

The first male athlete listed is AB Hernandez, the boy who infamously won two California girls state track and field titles in May. According to the complaint, Hernandez has been competing in girls events since 2022.

In the 2024-2025 outdoor track and field season, the DOJ estimates Hernandez won “at least 36 first place victories or gold medals” at CIF events.

‘Abigail’ Jones, which the DOJ calls “Student 2,” has been competing in girls track and field and cross country since 2023. In 2025, he took first place in the 100-meter hurdles at the Big VII League Championships.

When Jones transferred to Martin Luther King High School in November 2024, Fox reports, an athlete named Taylor lost her position on the girls varsity cross country team.

When she and a teammate, Kaitlyn, wore “Save Girls Sports” shirts to protest Taylor’s ouster, MLK officials allegedly told them to change or cover up.

“School officials … told [the girls] that wearing the shirts was like ‘wearing a swastika in front of Jewish students,’” the DOJ’s complaint reads, citing the incident as evidence CIF and CDE retaliate against girls who protest boys invading their sports.

‘Lily’ Norcross, “Student 3,” has run girls track and field since 2023. In the 2024-2025 season, Norcross competed in Division 1 CIF events.

Henry Hanlon, “Student 4,” has competed in girls volleyball, basketball and soccer since 2021. When Hanlon, who is notorious for dwarfing his competitors, skipped a basketball game in February, his team lost by 26 points, the New York Post reports.

“Student 5,” an anonymous male who has competed in girls volleyball with Half Moon Bay High School since 2022, led his team to victory at the Peninsula Athletic League volleyball championship in 2024.

The DOJ uses Norcross, “Student 3,” and his effect on girls in Lucia Mar Unified School District to prove its second claim — that CIF and CDE have created a “hostile educational environment” by forcing girls to share locker rooms with boys.

Two athletes came forward at Lucia Mar school board meetings in May and April, respectively, to describe their experience changing in front of Norcross.

“I strongly disagree with what is going on in the girls’ locker room and on the girls track team, so much so that I change in my car for track practice because I feel way more comfortable in my car than I do in my own school’s locker room,” Audrey Venherweg, a junior, told the board in May.

In April, 17-year-old Celeste Duyst tearfully recounted:

I went into the women’s locker room to change for track practice when I saw, at the end of my row, a biological male watching not only myself, but the other young women undress. This experience was beyond traumatizing.

The DOJ uses Duyst’s testimony as an example of the ways co-ed locker rooms “substantially increase the risk of sexual harassment, assault and voyeurism in girls’ locker rooms and bathrooms,” further noting of Norcross:

[Duyst] states [he] had already dressed for track practice at the beginning of the day. [He] had no reason to be in a locker room other than to watch the girls undress.

The DOJ asks the court to find CIF and CDE in violation of Title IX and issue a permanent injunction requiring them to:

  • Keep boys out of girls sports.
  • Implement a monitoring system to ensure all schools and institutions under CIF and CDE’s authority comply with Title XI.
  • “Establish a process to compensate female athletes who have been denied athletic opportunities due to [CDE and CIF’s] violations, including correcting past athletic records.”
  • Submit Title IX compliance reports to the federal government for at least five years following the judgement.

The DOJ also requests the court make CIF and CDE pay punitive damages to the United States, as well as court costs and “an award of all such additional relief as the interests of justice may require.”

Federally funded institutions are supposed to protect the safety and rights of female students. CIF and CDE, in contrast, are actively endangering girls and stifling those trying to stand up for themselves.

The DOJ puts it well:

This discrimination is not only illegal and unfair but also demeaning, signaling to girls that their opportunities and achievements are secondary to accommodating boys.
It erodes the integrity of girls sports, diminishes their competitive experience and undermines the very purpose of Title IX: to provide equal access to education benefits, including interscholastic benefits.

CIF and CDE should not receive a dime more of taxpayers’ money until they agree to uphold their responsibility to the female students whose parents trust them to protect.

The case is United States of America v. California Interscholastic Federation and California Department of Education.

To read more about the conflict between California and the Trump administration, click on the links below.

Additional Articles and Resources

Feds Sue California Department of Education, Interscholastic Federation for ‘Illegal Sex Discrimination’

UPenn Will Strip ‘Lia’ Thomas of Medals, Apologize to Female Athletes

Yes, Girls Care When Boys Take Their Trophies

California Sues DOJ Over ‘Transgender’ Athlete Ban

Feds Pressure California After Boy Wins in Girls Track and Field Championship

Girls Sports Coaches are Incentivized to Recruit Men — Parents Shouldn’t Let Them

Department of Justice Launches Title IX Task Force to Protect Women’s Sports

Girls Shouldn’t Apologize for Protesting Boys in Girls Sports

Trump Signs Executive Order Protecting Women’s Sports and Spaces

President Trump: ‘There are Only Two Genders: Male and Female’

Written by Emily Washburn · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: DOJ, Girls Sports, transgender

Jul 10 2025

Feds Sue California Department of Education, Interscholastic Federation For ‘Illegal Sex Discrimination’

The Department of Justice (DOJ) sued the California Department of Education (CDE) and California Interscholastic Federation (CIF) yesterday for violating Title IX,  just two days after the institutions refused to voluntarily keep boys out of girls sports and locker rooms.

The suit is the latest in an escalating national battle over the meaning and intent of Title IX — and whether taxpayers must fund educational programs that fail to protect girls.

“The Governor of California has previously admitted that it is ‘deeply unfair’ to force women and girls to compete with men and boys in competitive sports,” Attorney General Pam Bondi wrote in a press release announcing the suit, referencing remarks California Governor Gavin Newsom made about girls sports in March.

“But not only is it ‘deeply unfair,’ it is also illegal under federal law,” she continued. “This Department of Justice will continue its fight to protect equal opportunities for women and girls in sports.”

Title IX prevents sex discrimination in educational institutions and activities supported by the federal government. Despite receiving more than $44 billion in federal funding this fiscal year, according to the DOJ, CIF and CDE continue to violate Title IX by allowing students to join sports leagues consistent with their “gender identity,” rather than their biological sex.

“The results of these illegal policies are stark,” the DOJ’s complaint reads. “Girls are displaced from podiums, denied awards and miss out on critical visibility for college scholarships and recognition.”

It continues:

This discrimination is not only illegal and unfair but also demeaning, signaling to girls that their opportunities and achievements are secondary to accommodating boys.
It erodes the integrity of girls’ sports, diminishes their competitive experience and undermines the very purpose of Title IX: to provide equal access to educational benefits, including interscholastic athletics.

California and the Trump administration have been on a collision course over the integrity of girls’ sports and spaces since February, when President Donald Trump signed executive orders protecting women’s private spaces and prohibiting boys from playing girls sports in programs that receive federal funding.

The DOE launched an investigating into CIF after it publicly refused to follow the president’s order “Keeping Men Out of Women’s Sports.” Instead, CIF told Fox on February 7 it would continue enforcing California Education Code Section 221.5(f), which reads:

A pupil shall be permitted to participate in sex-segregated school programs and activities, including athletic teams and competitions, and use facilities consistent with his or her gender identity, irrespective of the gender listed on the pupil’s records.

CIF hit the Trump administration’s radar again in May when AB Hernandez, a boy, qualified for California’s girls track and field championships.

“California … continues to illegally allow men to play in women’s sports,” President Trump weighed in on Hernandez’ qualification on social media. “Please be hereby advised that large scale funding will be held back, maybe permanently, if the executive order [“Keeping Men Out of Women’s Sports”] is not adhered to.”

Hernandez went on to win two girls’ state titles.

The DOE Office of Civil Rights’ investigation found CIF and CDE in active violation of Title IX on June 25. The organizations were given ten days to voluntarily:

  • Instruct all recipients of federal funding under their control to stop allowing boys to compete in girls sports.
  • Rescind all awards, titles and records given to males and, if applicable, award them to the real winners.
  • “Send a personalized letter [to each female athlete to whom an individual recognition is restored] apologizing on behalf of the state of California for allowing her educational experience to be marred by sex discrimination.”
  • Propose a monitoring system to ensure all recipients of federal funding are following Title IX.

CIF and CDE formally refused the DOE’s requests on July 7. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon promptly referred the case to the DOJ, which filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California on July 9.

If the court rules in favor of the DOJ, CIF and CDE would have to keep boys out of girls sports or risk losing their massive federal endowment.

“It’s totally unfair to have men competing against women in sports, and also to share their intimate locker facilities [with them],” McMahon told Fox yesterday, continuing:

Women fought hard for these rights. It is the law, and the president means business with it.

The case is United States of America v. California Interscholastic Federation and California Department of Education. You can read the Daily Citizen’s detailed analysis of the allegations here.

Additional Articles and Resources

UPenn Will Strip ‘Lia’ Thomas of Medals, Apologize to Female Athletes

Yes, Girls Care When Boys Take Their Trophies

California Sues DOJ Over ‘Transgender’ Athlete Ban

Feds Pressure California After Boy Wins in Girls Track and Field Championship

Girls Sports Coaches are Incentivized to Recruit Men — Parents Shouldn’t Let Them

Department of Justice Launches Title IX Task Force to Protect Women’s Sports

Girls Shouldn’t Apologize for Protesting Boys in Girls Sports

Trump Signs Executive Order Protecting Women’s Sports and Spaces

President Trump: ‘There are Only Two Genders: Male and Female’

Written by Emily Washburn · Categorized: Culture, Government Updates · Tagged: DOJ, Girls Sports, transgender

Jul 02 2025

New Paper Details ‘Emerging and Accumulating’ Adverse Effects of ‘Gender Affirming’ Estrogen

Yet another group of scientists call for “rigorous further investigation” into “transgender” hormone interventions in a paper details new, adverse effects associated with giving men and boys “gender affirming” estrogen.

Unproven, opposite-sex hormone treatments wreak havoc the body and the brain. Estrogen consumption among men and boys has long been associated with infertility, testicular atrophy, cognitive decline and increased risk of testicular cancer, dementia, venous thromboembolism and stroke.

Despite these risks, and with an astonishing lack of testing and research, doctors across the globe have been administering opposite-sex hormones to adults and children with sexual identity confusion.

“Beyond previously identified harms associated with estrogen use by [natal men], many new safety signals are emerging, [including] exacerbation of some previously identified harms associated with long-term [estrogen] use,” psychiatrist Lauren Schwartz and experts from Genspect and the Society for Evidence-Based Gender Medicine write in their new paper, “Emerging and accumulating safety signals for the use of estrogen among [natal men].”

In pharmacology, “safety signals” refer to “information suggesting a previously unknown, potentially causal, association between a medicine and an adverse event.” Scientists document these signals to evaluate the ongoing effectiveness and safety of treatments.

The paper lays out several emerging “safety signals” plausibly related to men taking estrogen, including increased risk of:

  • Death
    A Dutch study of more than five decades-worth of patients at the Amsterdam gender identity clinic found biological men that took opposite-sex hormones died earlier than women and men who did not take opposite-sex hormones, most frequently from cardiovascular disease and cancer.
  • Developing or worsening autoimmune diseases
    One man with an autoimmune disease affecting his skin experienced a life-threatening manifestation in his kidneys after he began taking estrogen.
  • Diabetes
    Estrogen decreases lean mass, increases fat mass and worsens insulin resistance in men.
  • Pancreatitis
    Estrogen can increase triglyceride levels, which are associated with pancreatitis and gallstone pancreatitis
  • Thyroid cancer
  • Breast cancer
    Higher levels of estrogen are associated with breast cancer development in men.
  • Developing cancerous neoplasms or experiencing cardiovascular anomalies after taking certain medications.

Schwartz and company dedicate a large section of the paper to the effects of estrogen on the male brain, which evolutionary biologist Colin Wright summarizes in an article for City Journal.

“Estrogen and testosterone blockers reduced brain volume and altered brain chemistry,” Wright paraphrases, noting the same effects occurred when scientists fed male rates estrogen.

Estrogen consumption in men is also associated with declining Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) — a chemical Wright describes as “critical to mood and memory.” BDNF decline not only elevates risk for developing major depressive disorder but decreases the size of the hippocampus and damages the brain’s frontal lobe, grey and white matter.

These cases, Schwartz and company emphasize, need not be conclusively linked to “gender affirming” estrogen to be highly concerning.

“Even if causality cannot (perhaps yet) be firmly established, adverse effects must be reported to communicate potential risks to clinicians and patients … and to motivate further investigating,” Schwartz writes, continuing:

Medical decision-making tends to prioritize avoiding harm over achieving benefit, particularly when harms are severe and benefits are modest. Cataloguing potential harms is thus a critical part of evaluating treatments.

But experts in “gender affirming” care demonstrate suspicious reluctance not only to evaluate their treatments, but inform patients of their considerable risks. The paper assesses:

[Risks] associated with estrogen as a treatment for gender dysphoria do not seem widely known to clinicians treating this population or to the patients themselves, which undermines ethically necessary informed consent.”

It points to doctors like Stephen M. Rosenthal, the co-founder and medical director of the University of San Francisco’s Child and Adolescent Gender Center, who maintains there are “no clinically significant effects with gender-affirming sex hormones.”

Rosenthal was one of several transgender “experts” the federal government has paid to inject healthy children with opposite-sex hormones.

Dr. Richard Ogden Roberts of Texas Children’s Hospital (TCH) repeated a similar line to Rosenthal’s at a prestigious medical lecture in 2023, claiming, “Gender-affirming hormone therapy overall appears to be safe and effective.”

Roberts was later identified as one of at least two doctors performing transgender medical interventions on children long after TCH claimed to have shut down its transgender program.

The common thread here is profit. Those who make the most money from “gender affirming” hormone treatments consistently minimize concerns from the wider medical community about performing unproven, irreversible experiments on children.

The Daily Citizen applauds Shwartz, her colleagues, Genspect and the Society for Evidence-Based Gender Medicine for defending medical ethics.

Additional Articles and Resources

FBI Investigates Three Major Hospitals for Mutilating Children

INVESTIGATION: Taxpayers Fund Transgender Experiments on Children

HHS Releases Report on Harms of ‘Transgender’ Medical Interventions for Minors

New Research: 50-Fold Increase in ‘Gender Dysphoria’ in UK

Doctor Refuses to Publish Major Study Finding Puberty-Blocking Drugs Don’t Help Children

UPDATE: Evidence Reveals DOJ Oversight in Haim Case

England’s NHS Stops Dispensing Puberty Blockers for Children — Not Safe or Effective

EXCLUSIVE: The Daily Citizen interviews Dr. Eithan Haim, the surgeon who exposed a secret transgender medical program at Texas Children’s Hospital

Written by Emily Washburn · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: transgender

Jul 02 2025

Public Libraries Promote ‘LGBT’ Books to Children and Teens – Year Round

(Caution: Includes disturbing content and links to book reviews with graphic content.)

Public libraries across the nation celebrated “LGBT pride month” by promoting sexually confusing books with homosexual and “transgender” themes to children and teens.

But it’s not just June when LGBT identities and behaviors are pushed on children, as many libraries promote age-inappropriate books throughout the year.

This is especially the case as the American Library Association has become more radical and promotes sexualized books for children. But it’s also because LGBT folks and their allies claim more days, weeks and months to celebrate various sexual proclivities – from Bisexual Health Awareness Month in March to Transgender History Month in August, and from Aromantic Spectrum Awareness Week in February to Transgender Awareness Week in November.

Libraries also promote inappropriate material during so-called Banned Books Week, in October each year.

Parents should be aware that this happens across the country – even in conservative communities.

In North Carolina, John Murawski reported at Real Clear Investigations about Raliegh public libraries celebrating LGBT pride month:

Like public libraries across the country, branches in North Carolina’s capital city turn rainbow-hued each June in celebration of Pride Month. Festive book displays featuring “queer-themed” titles written for all ages – from toddlers to teens and adults – are set out for the public as innocently as if the subject in question were cooking, gardening, or personal finance. 

He notes that the books promote a variety of sexual fetishes, including “cross dressing, drag queens, kink, BDSM (bondage, domination, etc.), poppers (recreational drugs used at sex clubs), … [and] polyamory (consensual non-monogamy) … among other delectations of the flesh.”  

While these books are especially featured during LGBT pride, parents should be aware that these books are available to children and teens all year long.

Libraries in Boston offer “We Are Pride Booklists” for children, teens and adults. That’s right, the staff-curated lists lump sexually explicit adult books together with LGBT books intended for children and teens. Hundreds of books are listed, such as: 

  • Who Are You? The Kid’s Guide to Gender Identity. The author is Brook Pessin-Whedbee, “a public school teacher and mama to three little ones who joyfully bend and break the gender boxes.” Written for children ages 5-8, the book introduces children to gender ideology, presenting “clear and direct language for understanding and talking about how we experience gender: our bodies, our expression and our identity.”
  • Transphobia: Deal With It and Be a Gender Transcender, is written by J. Wallace Skelton, “an educator, activist and writer.” Written for children ages 9-15, the book explains “Transphobia is intolerance of any part of the range of gender identity.” Through “information, quizzes, comics and true-to-life scenarios,” Transphobia helps “kids better understand gender identity and determine what they can do to identify and counter transphobia in their schools, homes and communities.”

Colorado Springs, Colorado is a generally conservative city, but libraries offer a list of “LGBTQIA+” books to adolescents and teens. The list, placed in the teen section of the library all year long, includes many unsuitable books:  

  • Cool for the Summer, by Dahlia Adler, is about a teenage girl who “is conflicted about her sexuality while she has romantic relationships with another teenage girl and her long-time boy crush.” One summary of concerns with the book says: “This book contains alternate gender ideologies; profanity [dozens of incidents]; sexual activities; sexual nudity; and alternate sexualities.”
  • Queer: A Graphic History, by Meg John Barker, has chapters like “Interrogating Heteronormativity,” “Open Non-monogamy,” “Polynormativity and Kinknormativity.” Rated Books says, “This book contains alternate sexualities; alternate gender ideologies; and controversial racial and social commentary.”
  • The Black Flamingo, by Dean Atta, a “fierce coming-of-age verse novel about identity and the power of drag,” is about a “mixed-race gay teen growing up in London” who explores sex with men and discovers his identity as a drag performing – the Black Flamingo. According to one review, the book contains: alternate sexualities; inexplicit sexual nudity; sexual activities; drug and alcohol use; alternate gender ideologies; controversy racial commentary; and references to racism.

While many librarians are helpful and hold conservative values, the American Library Association is a radical organization that has promoted unsuitable books for children for decades. The association dishonestly calls any parents’ concerns about sexualized books for children “book banning” and “censorship.”

The American Library Association’s “Library Bill of Rights” includes the following articles, which demonstrate what the group believes about parental involvement in children’s book choices:

  • Libraries should challenge censorship in the fulfillment of their responsibility to provide information and enlightenment.
  • A person’s right to use a library should not be denied or abridged because of origin, age, background, or views.
  • All people, regardless of origin, age, background, or views, possess a right to privacy and confidentiality in their library use. Libraries should advocate for, educate about, and protect people’s privacy, safeguarding all library use data, including personally identifiable information.

Basically, the association believes children should be able to check out whatever books they want, regardless of age, and that they deserve “privacy and confidentiality” – including from parents – in those decisions.

With libraries across the country promoting LGBT books throughout the year, it’s incumbent upon parents to give children a solid understanding of God’s good design for relationships, identity, sexuality and marriage.

In addition, parents should strive to maintain a healthy, open relationship with their children, so that when they do come across disturbing sexual content, they feel free to talk about these experiences.

Related articles and resources:

American Library Association Chooses Marxist Lesbian as President-Elect

‘Banned Books Week’ – What a Fraud

LGBT Activists, NEA and Librarians Promote Annual ‘Transgender’ Reading Day in Schools

Montana Library Commission Votes to Leave American Library Association Due to Marxist President

National Education and Library Groups Co-Sponsor ‘Transgender’ Reading Day for Elementary School Children

Sexualizing Schoolchildren: Classroom and Library Books

Surprise, Surprise — Planned Parenthood Gave Children Explicit Coloring Books

Three Ways the Media Supports Sexually Explicit, Inappropriate Books for Children

Focus on the Family:

Child or Teen Disturbed by Exposure to Pornography

Counseling Consultation and Referrals

Homosexuality Resources

Parenting Resources

Transgender Resources

Image from Getty.

Written by Jeff Johnston · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: LGBT, library, transgender

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 13
  • Page 14
  • Page 15
  • Page 16
  • Page 17
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 34
  • Go to Next Page »

Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | © 2026 Focus on the Family. All rights reserved.

  • Cookie Policy