• Skip to main content
Daily Citizen
  • Subscribe
  • Categories
    • Culture
    • Life
    • Religious Freedom
    • Sexuality
  • Parenting Resources
    • LGBT Pride
    • Homosexuality
    • Sexuality/Marriage
    • Transgender
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Contact
  • Donate

transgender

Oct 30 2024

Drag Queen at Seven Years Old — The Sobering Reality of Children in Drag

JUMP TO…
  • “Would Asa Want to Wear a Dress?”
  • Not Born This Way
  • X-Rated
  • Why It Matters

Many toddlers with an early affinity for dance end up in ballet or tap class. Seven-year-old Asa’s parents helped him become, “The most FABULOUS 7yo gender nonconforming Baby Drag Queen ever.”

A video compilation of Asa performing as his drag alter-ego, LuLu Lovely Twirls, collected more than three million views on X (formerly Twitter) this week over at least three accounts. Some clips show him holding hands with scantily dressed men. Others show him collecting tips from spectators.

The post draws heavily from a VICE video profile featuring Asa and his parents, who claim their son’s drag performances are no different than dance recitals.

Asa collects tips. Courtesy of VICE.

“[Our kids] all do different sports. They all have different activities that they do. But we have a child that’s interested in something that’s maybe not as traditional,” Asa’s dad told cameras.

“If he were a girl doing these exact same things, no one would be saying anything,” the seven-year-old’s mom added.

In the mini-documentary, Asa’s parents’ parrot two false narratives the Daily Citizen confronts often — that indulging gender ideology is compassionate and inclusive, and that sexual preferences and behaviors are part of a person’s identity.

In reality, they’ve set their son up for a lifetime of confusion and exploitation.

“Would Asa Want to Wear A Dress?”

The seven-year-old’s parents work hard to abdicate responsibility for their son’s hobby.

“Asa refers to himself as a drag queen,” his mom assures cameras. “He does it very proudly.”

Asa with adult performers. Courtesy of VICE.

“He’s done this since he was four, five and now six years old,” his dad claims, recalling how much Asa loved dancing as a toddler.

Asa performing. Courtesy of VICE.

But it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see that Asa wouldn’t be in this predicament without his parents’ encouragement and instruction. Asa never spontaneously expressed interest in drag. He saw his first drag show at the tender age of four when his parents brought him to a Pride parade.

“[My wife] thought it would be a good way to bring our kids in and let them see the diversity of the world around us,” Asa’s dad explained, looking at his wife for confirmation.

Asa’s mom said her son became “obsessed with drag” for a year after his first exposure, which she claims “led to [the couple asking], ‘Would Asa ever want to wear a dress?’” Eventually, she bought him one.

Young children respond notoriously poorly to overwhelming, life-defining choices and notoriously well to positive reinforcement. Assuming he wasn’t hopelessly confused by choosing his gender and pronouns, there’s little reason Asa would refuse wearing a dress if it got him positive attention.

Notably, Asa told interviewers he wouldn’t wear a dress to school. Outside his character, Asa said he was a boy. As “Lulu Lovely Twirls,” the six-year-old said his pronouns were “she/they”.

Most young children can’t identify pronouns — at all at least not without an adult’s help.

A particularly disturbing incident occurred sometime after Asa’s mom bought him a dress. This is how she tells the story.

[Asa] said to me one day, “I’m going to go put on my dress and I am going to sing, and you’re going to video me and put me on Facebook so everybody can give me likes.” And I said, “Okay.” And that’s the video that really kind of spurred this journey, because I shared that video, and that’s how we got invited to the first [drag queen] brunch. That just led us to subsequent invitations.

It’s difficult to imagine Asa voicing this request independently. Regardless, his mom subsequently decided to film that video, share it on a platform infamous for child exploitation, and accept an invitation for her six-year-old to perform at an adult drag queen brunch.

That’s three conscious decisions to endanger her son.

Now, Asa’s parents say he performs at one event a month. They pay for hand-trimmed wigs and costumes. “There’s even adult performers he can sometimes outperform,” his mom bragged.

To people who worry Asa will later regret his drag days, his mom simply replies:

We’ve talked about it, and at the end of the day, we’ve raised a good ally and he’s done nothing wrong.
Not Born This Way

Asa’s mom repeatedly implies her son was destined to be a drag queen.

“He puts together and produces his own numbers for drag shows,” she explains. “I am in awe constantly with the fact that he can just maneuver and work the stage on a dime. It’s something innate in him.”

“It’s like he was born to do this,” she fawns another time, painting thick pink makeup over Asa’s eyelids.

These comments go beyond minimizing her responsibility. They make drag performance out to Asa’s identity — one of the essential, unchanging characteristics at the core of his being.

It isn’t. The God-given talents that make Asa a good performer aren’t his whole identity, either.

People’s talents, gifts, preferences, relationships, behaviors and passion for drag can all change. The only constant traits are sex, which dictates the construction of every human cell, and status as child of God.

Asa is a son of God. He wasn’t born to be anything else.

X-Rated

Asa’s mom claims “indecent drag” doesn’t take place in front of children.

If the clips of Asa picking up tips, mimicking traditionally provocative dance moves wearing fishnet stockings, and standing surrounded by men in varying states of undress represents “decent drag” — who knows what “indecent drag” entails.

Asa with adult drag queen. Courtesy of VICE.

Dubious, “kid-friendly” messaging doesn’t change that drag is inherently sexual.

The first documented “queen of drag” used the costume in sexual escapades. According to investigative journalist Christopher Rufo’s detailed exposé on drag, this man later spent 300 days in jail for running a brothel.

In the late 1960’s, drag became a means for the disenfranchised to topple established sexual norms. Performances would imitate taboo practices including bestiality, necrophilia and pedophilia to protest the domination of monogamy and marriage.

These roots did not disappear when RuPaul re-packaged the drag queen for common consumption. The dance moves, pageantry and caricature of womanhood come from a distinctly profane, sexual place. Asa’s parents allow their small son to partake in it all.

Asa’s receipt of tips is particularly problematic given a study of drag culture by queer theorist Sarah Hankins. The academic called the drag scene a “sociosexual economy” where people paid for sexual gratification. She writes of her experience,

As an audience member, I have always experienced the tip exchange as payment for sexual gratification. And I am aware that by holding up dollar bills, I can satisfy my arousal, at least partially: I can bring performers’ bodies close to mine and induce them to touch me or let me touch them.

Seven-year-old children are morally and legally precluded from providing sexual gratification for money. But Asa is — and his parents are cheering him on.

Asa collecting tips. Courtesy of VICE.
Why It Matters

Asa’s case exemplifies a larger cultural acceptance of children participating in drag. It’s vitally important for citizens to comprehend this perversion so they can intervene on behalf of children like Asa.

This case interacts with other deep, cultural flaws. Most states haven’t pursued bills preventing children from attending drag shows. At least two have failed — including one in Asa’s home state of Nebraska. Meanwhile, parents who disagree with gender ideology have been denied the opportunity to foster and adopt children. In some heartbreaking cases, families have had their children taken away for refusing to affirm their gender confusion.

The Daily Citizen reminds you not to grow desensitized to these issues. Evil should always grieve us. If you’re looking to help, remember to vote in this election! You can find other ways to get involved by contacting your state’s Focus on the Family-allied Family Policy Council.

Additional Articles or Resources

Children in Drag

Do Not Fall for the ‘Affirm Them or They Will Die’ Lie

No, You Shouldn’t Take Your Children to an LGBT Pride Parade

Christopher Rufo Explains the Real, Dark Intentions Behind Drag Queen Story Hour

New Research Confirms Previous Findings: Most Gender Confused Kids Desist

Gallup Poll Shows Yet Another Increase in ‘LGBTQ+’ Identities

Are People Born Gay? A Look At What the Research Shows and What It Means for You

Written by Emily Washburn · Categorized: Culture, Sexuality · Tagged: identity, LGBT, transgender

Oct 28 2024

Dr. Phil is Right: Don’t Let Bullies Bully You

Dr. Phil gave a profoundly important speech this weekend in New York City encouraging his fellow citizens to stand up to bullies.

He told the largest crowd he has ever spoken to in person,

I may not be an expert in politics, but I am an expert about bullying. And bullying is when you seek to harm somebody, you seek to intimidate, coerce, cause distress, fear, and cause risk to their well-being. It can be physical, verbal, relational, or cyber-bullying. And it’s always wrong.

He strongly encouraged Americans to never allow themselves to be bullied by people who use their power to make them feel ashamed of their deepest-felt convictions about life, liberty and the essential values that make our country great.

Dr. Phil acknowledged that bad things happen today to people who stand up for what is right, saying, “They get canceled, intimidated, marginalized, excluded, or even fired or boycotted.”

He continued, “And you know what that means? In short, that adds up to being bullied,” adding, “That’s what happening in this country right now, and that’s not okay!”

It’s time that everyone of us close ranks and stop this now! It’s time that we push back against cancel culture. It’s time that we push back against intimidation tactics.

He’s precisely right.

Good Christians and average citizens have silenced themselves because they fear what could happen if they were to fully speak up for what they believe and the way they vote. They fear what could happen to their reputations, livelihoods and their freedoms. They fear their friends, family members and even their own children with different beliefs might cut off relationships because of these convictions.

That is emotional bullying in the extreme.

It is unhealthy behavior, but it works in silencing people.

Dr. Phil is telling all Americans to refuse to be bullied by such tactics. Be bold in speaking up for what you believe. Never back down. Disregard what those who disagree with you might say or do to intimidate you. Our country needs good people to strongly stand for what they know is right.

It seems to be women who are more willing to take bold, convictional stands. They are doing it on the life issue. They are doing it on gender and trans issues. They are doing it on legal issues like religious freedom. They are doing it on racial politics. They are doing it on DEI and media manipulation.

We should all encourage such strength and do our best to replicate it.

As we engage the profoundly important issues facing our country and its future, we must do so with resolute courage. You will likely be bullied for those beliefs, but courageous citizens are never swayed or intimidated by such ploys. Strong individuals know what is true and always stand for it.

That was the important message that Dr. Phil delivered this weekend in New York City.

We should all take heed of it.

Written by Glenn T. Stanton · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: LGBT, transgender

Oct 23 2024

Women Golfers Protest LPGA Policy Allowing ‘Transgender’ Competitors

Two hundred seventy-five women golfers sent a letter to the Ladies Professional Golf Association, the International Golf Federation, and the United States Golf Association protesting policies allowing men to compete against women.

The LPGA hosts a qualifying series of tournaments, known as qualifying schools, where players compete for a tour card, giving them membership in next year’s tour. This membership allows them to compete in many events without having to compete to qualify.

This year, “transgender”-identified golfer Hailey Davidson is set to play against 245 women at the LPGA Qualifying Series, October 20-25, in Venice, Florida.

The Independent Women’s Forum (IWF), a conservative group that “celebrates women’s accomplishments and fights to expand women’s options and opportunities,” believes:

Men and women are equal, but we are not the same. Biological differences between the sexes are more than skin-deep, and profoundly shape our lives.
The law must recognize this reality in certain circumstances, such as in sex-segregated sports teams or prisons, or it risks placing women and girls in harmful or even dangerous situations. E]

Men and women are equal, but we are not the same. Biological differences between the sexes are more than skin-deep, and profoundly shape our lives.

The law must recognize this reality in certain circumstances, such as in sex-segregated sports teams or prisons, or it risks placing women and girls in harmful or even dangerous situations. 

IWF shared the golfers’ letter with Fox Corporation’s Outkick, a sports and culture website. The letter states:

We all know there can be no equal athletic opportunity for women without a separate female golf category. Yet, the Ladies Professional Golf Association continues to propagate a policy that allows male athletes to qualify, compete and win in women’s golf, even as several national and international governing bodies of sport and state legislatures increasingly reject these unjust and inequitable policies that harm female athletes.

The 275 female athletes who signed the letter oppose the LPGA’s Gender Policy, which seeks “to provide transgender athletes an avenue to membership and opportunity to participate in events, and in an effort to assure fair competition for all members and participants.”

The policy states:

Tournaments and membership are open only to female athletes, including transitioned female athletes.

“Transitioned female athletes” don’t exist, of course. Only men and women exist, and they cannot “transition” to the other sex.

Transgender-identified applicants must notify the LGPA Tour of their “gender reassignment from male to female after puberty” and “provide proof of gender.” The policy lists two requirements:

The applicant must have undergone gender reassignment surgery (i.e., a gonadectomy) prior to submitting an application for membership or entering the tournament; and
The applicant must have undergone, for at least one (1) year, appropriate hormonal therapy and maintained testosterone levels in a verifiable manner sufficient to minimize or negate gender-related advantages in sport competitions

But a male athlete who has gone through puberty, even if he has his testicles removed and is taking estrogen, still maintains most of the size, strength and performance advantages of a male athlete, as the letter to the LPGA explains:

The male advantage in driving the ball is estimated around a 30% performance advantage; this is an enormous difference in the context of sport. Anatomical differences between males and females affect clubhead speed and regulating consistency at ball contact.
Females have higher mean heart rates and encounter greater physiological demands while playing, especially at high altitudes. The anatomical differences are not removed with male testosterone suppression. There is no way to turn a male into a female. Being female is not equated to being male with a reduction in strength [our emphasis].

Outkick reports that the female golfers are asking the LPGA, the U.S. Golf Association, and the International Golf Federation to:

Repeal all policies and rules that allow male golfers to participate in women’s golf events” and “establish and enforce the right of female professional golfers to participate in women’s golf based on sex-eligibility must be limited to members of the female sex.

Allowing men to compete in women’s athletics is inherently unfair, as men take opportunities, scholarships, places on teams and victories from women. Women’s privacy and safety are also at risk when men play women’s sports.

The website SheWon.org lists hundreds of “female athletes who were displaced by males in women’s sporting events and other types of competitions expressly for women.”

So far, the site lists 717 female athletes who lost 1,055 “medals, scholarships or other opportunities,” in 522 competitions in 37 sports – everything from cycling to disc golf, skiing to track and field, and swimming to rowing. She Won shows the women who would have won – if men had been kept from competing against them.

Related articles and resources:

Addressing Gender Identity with Honesty and Compassion

Counseling Consultation & Referrals

No, It’s Not ‘Complicated’ to Keep Men Out of Women’s Sports

Riley Gaines and 15 Other Female Athletes Sue NCAA Over ‘Transgender Policy’

#SaveGirlsSports – New Campaign Launched by Family Policy Alliance

Shoving Girls Off the Podium: More Male Athletes Participating in Girls Sports

Third Court Halts DOE’s Title IX Rewrite, Girls’ Sports & Spaces Preserved

Transgender Resources

Image from Shutterstock.

Written by Jeff Johnston · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: Girls Sports, LGBT, transgender

Oct 17 2024

Yes, Gender Confusion is Socially Contagious

Epidemics demand explanation. When a hospital receives a sudden influx of patients with similar symptoms, doctors look for a shared cause, contagion, or incident. However, for some reason, a public health crisis that emerged in recent years has not triggered a large-scale investigation into causes. In fact, we are hardly allowed to acknowledge it as a problem.  

At her Substack, Generation Tech, psychologist and author Jean Twenge explained a new paper she and two colleagues published on the explosion of gender confusion. Analyzing government data on nearly two million adults since 2014, Twenge and her colleagues found that transgender identification in the general population has increased by nearly 70%. For Americans 18-25, trans identity skyrocketed from just over half a percent of the population in 2014 to over three percent of the population in 2023. In other words, in less than a decade, the share of American young people identifying as transgender quintupled, with the vast majority of that increase among women and girls.   

The story that has been told to explain this, one the public has been almost required to believe, is that gender expression is an expression of one’s authentic self, probably something people are born with, and finally we are a culture that allows people to be their true selves. However, if that is the case, why is this epidemic occurring overwhelmingly in one age bracket and one sex? The usual rationalizations that there is less social stigma and more diagnosis and treatment cannot explain these disparities. 

The phenomenon that does explain them is one about which Twenge has written extensively. Social contagion, the spread of disorders among peers consciously or unconsciously imitating one another, often explains the measurable spread of mental health conditions among vulnerable populations. Factors known to fuel social contagion today are digital devices and social media.  

When rates of mental illness, smartphone and social media use, and transgender identification are traced, the graphs align with eerie precision. One particular year, in fact, stands out. 2013 was the first year most Americans owned a smartphone. It was also the year adolescent mental health problems began to noticeably climb. For example, rates of depression and anxiety rose by nearly 50% in the decade following 2013, and suicide among teen girls more than doubled. That same year, transgender identity among teenage girls also began its epidemic spread. 

Social contagions are often accompanied by co-morbidities, or conditions not caused by the contagion but that often make patients more vulnerable to it. In a Breakpoint Forum earlier this year, Dr. Stephen Grcevich, president and founder of Key Ministry, shared a bevy of statistics that showed a troubling connection between disability and gender confusion.    

For example, a 2020 analysis by the pro-LGBT Human Rights Campaign found that in every category of disability, including cognitive, mobility, and sensory, transgender adults were overrepresented. A 2020 study in the U.K. found that transgender-identified persons are over five times more likely to have autism, over six times more likely to have ADHD, almost four times more likely to have depression, five times more likely to have bipolar disorder and OCD, and over 28 times more likely to have schizophrenia. 

The politically correct explanation for these data points is that transgender identity is innate and immutable, and just happens to occur more readily among young people with smartphones, especially women and those with disabilities. The far more likely explanation is that these groups are, in different ways, more susceptible to social contagion than the general population. 

Dr. Grcevich favors the second, noting how many young people with disabilities that he works with experience other forms of body dysmorphia, like anorexia. These individuals may cling to dysmorphia with intense devotion as a way to make sense of suffering that actually arises from their co-morbidity. When they are told, maybe the reason for this suffering isn’t disability, but the fact that you were born the wrong sex, it’s a lie with sinister appeal. 

In the end, the explosive epidemic of people identifying as transgender is a real phenomenon, and it is not because more people are “coming out of the closet.” It is a social contagion, fueled by digital tech, that predictably and disproportionately attacks certain groups of vulnerable people.  

Any adequate response to this kind of a mental health crisis must be multi-pronged and cannot resort to quickly administering “treatments” that are irreversibly damaging. The first, non-negotiable step is to give up on this myth that transgender identity is innate. It is far more often caught like a virus.  

If our society continues to refuse to address this now obvious and manifest fact, more vulnerable people will suffer unnecessarily. 

Written by John Stonestreet · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: LGBT, transgender

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 25
  • Page 26
  • Page 27

Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | © 2025 Focus on the Family. All rights reserved.

  • Cookie Policy