• Skip to main content
Daily Citizen
  • Subscribe
  • Categories
    • Culture
    • Life
    • Religious Freedom
    • Sexuality
  • Parenting Resources
    • LGBT Pride
    • Homosexuality
    • Sexuality/Marriage
    • Transgender
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Contact
  • Donate

transgender

Dec 02 2024

NCAA and San Jose State ‘Transgender’ Volleyball Player Usurp Women’s Rights

Boise State forfeited the semifinal game of the 2024 Mountain West Women’s Volleyball Championship tournament rather than play San Jose State, which had a “transgender” volleyball player on its team.

The school’s courageous stand for women-only sports and private spaces demonstrates the high cost of the NCAA’s “Transgender Student-Athlete Participation Policy,” which allows participation in sports based on an athlete’s “gender identity.”

The policy threatens women’s accomplishments and rights, but the Boise team is part of a growing backlash against transgender ideology that claims a man can become a woman through clothing and makeup, drugs, hormones and surgeries. Or just by proclaiming it so.

Boise teammates and sisters Kiersten and Katelyn Van Kirk explained the decision to Fox News’ sports outlet OutKick, with Katelyn saying:

And in the end, I guess we all had to come to terms with the idea that this is bigger than ourselves and a championship has to be given up for this fight [to protect women’s sports] to actually keep going.

Boise State forfeited twice to SJSU during the regular season. Southern Utah, the University of Wyoming and Utah State also withdrew from games with the Spartans due to the presence of Blaire Fleming, who was born male but attempts to live as a woman.

🚨 UNPRECEDENTED: Boise State forfeits their Conference tournament semifinal match against SJSU, refusing to face male athlete Blaire Fleming. A truly heroic stand for women’s sports, led by sisters @Katelynvankirk & @KierstenVanKirk, who are currently suing the Mountain West for… pic.twitter.com/xfCq478wKd

— ICONS (@icons_women) November 28, 2024

Nine players filed a lawsuit to block Fleming from playing in the tournament, but Denver Judge S. Kato Crews ruled against them.

SJSU went on to lose to Colorado State for the championship in four sets.

But the tournament highlights harms when males are allowed to play women’s  sports, including:

  • Girls and women lose scholarships and positions on teams. Fleming received a full scholarship that should have gone to a woman.
  • After working for years to achieve athletic success, 717 female athletes have lost more than 1,055 competitions and 518 medals to boys and men, reports the website SheWon.org. SJSU’s inclusion of a male brought losses to dozens of women throughout the season and in the championship tournament.
  • Male athletes endanger women athletes. A Title IX complaint from SJSU Associate Head Coach Melissa Batie-Smoose said, “Even defenders on Fleming’s own team, concerned for their safety, now sometimes turn away during practice matches when Fleming is winding up for a kill – a fear response … virtually unheard of in women’s volleyball.”
  • Teachers and coaches have been fired for not kowtowing to transgender policies and ideology. Batie-Smoose was suspended from her coaching position after filing her complaint in defense of the women she coached.
  • Athletes and teams have been banned from competition for opposing males in girls and women’s sports.
  • When males enter female-only restrooms, locker rooms, showers and lodging rooms, girls and women lose their privacy and are unwillingly exposed to male bodies. SJSU’s co-captain Brooke Slusser was forced to share rooms with Fleming – without being told her teammate was male. 

In addition to these harms, women who speak out against transgender policies are often targeted by transgender-identified activists and their allies. Slusser was threatened after she spoke out against Fleming’s presence on the team, leading to a police presence and metal detectors at a Spartan game against Colorado.

Thankfully, there is a growing backlash against men in women’s sports and private spaces.  A 2023 Gallup poll showed that 69% of Americans believe transgender athletes “should only be allowed to play on sports teams that match their birth gender’ – an increase from 62% in 2021.

Along with refusing to compete against males, women are also fighting back with lawsuits. Swimmer and women’s rights activist Riley Gaines, along with more than a dozen other female athletes, sued the NCAA in May 2024 over its policy that permits men to compete against them and use female locker rooms.

Earlier this month, the Van Kirks and ten other women sued the Mountain West Conference for violating their Title IX and First Amendment rights.

The forfeiture was painful for the Boise State women. But Kiersten explained its importance, as the team fights for women athletes across the nation. She told OutKick:

It’s just disheartening and heartbreaking that it had to come to this. But I know that we are all working towards future generations being able to have a safe place for female athletes to compete and putting that above ourselves, which is a really hard thing to do because obviously our goal was to win a championship. And I think that it’s extremely unfair and really terrible that it had to come to that.

The Daily Citizen applauds these women for their courageous, costly stance. We too want future generations of girls and women to have access to female-only sports, privacy and safety.  

Related articles and resources:

Counseling Consultation & Referrals

Transgender Resources

Canadian Powerlifter Faces Two-Year Ban for Protesting Males in Her Sport

Four Women’s Volleyball Teams Forfeit – Won’t Play Team with a Man

San Jose Coach Suspended for Filing Discrimination Complaint Against Transgender Player

#SaveGirlsSports – New Campaign Launched by Family Policy AllianceCanadian Powerlifter Faces Two-Year Ban for Protesting Males in Her Sport

Image from Getty.

Written by Jeff Johnston · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: Girls Sports, transgender

Dec 02 2024

Kindergarteners Taught Gender Ideology in New York School District

This is the first in a two-part series examining the New York State Education Department’s (NYSED) systematic indoctrination of its students. Part 1 reveals a New York school district’s adoption of gender ideology. Part 2 explores the NYSED’s intentional perpetuation of Critical Theory.

A New York elementary school found itself in hot water shortly before Thanksgiving after it allegedly introduced a new “gender curriculum” for kindergartners. But Superintendent William S. McKersie says it’s nothing new — the whole school district has been teaching gender ideology for years.

The popular X account @LibsofTikTok outed Hillside Elementary School for teaching gender ideology after it obtained a copy of its kindergarten “gender curriculum.” The program synopsis, which Hillside reportedly emailed to parents, endeavors to “center [kindergarten students’] discussions on gender identity” by introducing concepts like:

  • “Identity is who you are.”
  • “Identity includes your gender and the pronouns that you use.”
  • “There is no right or wrong way to be any gender.”

The curriculum teaches that gender isn’t linked to biological sex. The five- and six-year-olds learn to use “cisgender,” “transgender” and “non-binary” to describe a person whose internal sense of being male or female matches their biological sex, a person whose feeling of being male or female doesn’t match their biological sex, and a person who doesn’t feel male or female, respectively.

Unlike the alphabet or addition, Hillside’s kindergarten gender lessons don’t teach students how to perceive or navigate reality. Instead, it perpetuates a philosophical belief system that denies the importance and, in some cases, the existence of biological sex.

But don’t worry, parents — educators will introduce this vocabulary in a “developmentally appropriate way.”

@LibsofTikTok’s original post suggested that Hillside hadn’t yet implemented the curriculum. Superintendent McKersie’s internal response to the backlash claims gender ideology has been a district-wide mainstay for years.

“The gender lessons have been in place for several years and are rooted in Hillside’s core values of respect and fostering dignity for all students,” he wrote.

McKersie claims the brouhaha began when his district, Hastings-on-Hudson, “notified elementary families that Curriculum Synopses for all subjects were available on the website.” By his reckoning, parents should not have been surprised:

The gender lessons have been well received by the vast majority of students and families. We have made annual presentations to families about the lessons. I also have made a point to meet with parents regarding the gender lessons.

A third-grade gender curriculum obtained by @LibsofTikTok supports McKersie’s claim that gender ideology is an established part of the district’s teaching material. The synopsis suggests the school’s 8- and 9-year-olds learn to use people’s “preferred pronouns” as soon as they learn what a pronoun is.

McKersie promises HOH’s gender lessons “do not address sex education or sexuality.” But gender ideology is intimately tied to sexual expression and behavior. Consider this “resource” design to help students determine their “gender identity”:

Regardless, teaching gender ideology defeats the purpose of sending children to school. Taxpayers pay for public schools so kids can become productive members of society. Perpetuating gender ideology diminishes their creative potential.

Teaching children they can “choose” their gender exponentially increases their likelihood of experiencing gender confusion. Natural bodily discomforts become indications a child was “born in the wrong body.” Gender-confused children learn to interpret their bodies as worthless errors, rather than intentional gifts.

Though research shows gender confusion is a socially sensitive, often temporary phenomenon, some of these children will undergo irreversible opposite-sex hormone treatments and surgeries to “affirm” their “gender identity.” These interventions occur before the legal age of consent but consign the recipient to a lifetime of medical complications. “Gender affirming treatments” do not demonstrably improve mental health, but frequently result in sterilization.

Prioritizing “gender identity” over biological sex effectively eliminates sex-based protections for women. Men who “identify” as women can access women’s sports, bathrooms, locker rooms and other private spaces. Biological differences that can make women vulnerable to men, like men’s greater strength and bone density, are minimized or ignored.

In other words, gender ideology has the educational benefit of a beginner’s course in Klingon and the social benefit of “Armed Robbery 101.”  The fact that a New York school district has been hawking gender ideology for years — apparently without some parents’ knowledge — is unconscionable.

Even worse? The tax-funded body responsible for more than 2.4 million public school students explicitly endorses it.

Stay tuned for Part 2.

Additional Articles and Resources

Court Sides With parents Over Teaching First Graders ‘Transgender Ideology’

The Shifting Ground of ‘Gender-Affirming Care’

‘Transgender’ Means Many Different Things — and Nothing

Here’s What Happens When Good People Don’t Connect Gay and Trans Ideology

U.K.’s Review of Child Gender Policy Reveals Profound Failures that U.S. Still Defends

The WPATH Files Exposes ‘Surgical and Hormonal Experiments on Children’

England’s NHS Stops Dispensing Puberty Blockers for Children — Not Safe or Effective

Former ‘Transgender Clinic’ Worker Blows the Whistle, Becomes First to Speak Out Against ‘Transitioning’ Minors

Gaines, Women’s Rights Groups Support Women Appealing Case of man Joining Sorority

New Research Confirms Gender Dysphoria Usually Temporary in Children and Young Adults

Written by Emily Washburn · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: education, LGBT, transgender

Dec 02 2024

‘Transgender’ Means Many Different Things — and Nothing

When we think about the phenomenon of transgenderism, we must consider all the permutations this involves. They are endless; literally, as varied as the human imagination. It is certainly not one thing, and it is not all what most people assume.

First, we must appreciate that the American Psychiatric Association holds the term “transgender” is a generalized “umbrella term” for anyone whose “inner sense or gender” is different than their body. That is so elastic it includes almost anything. They also explain it is a “non-medical term” without any scientific specificity.

Transgender as Cosplay

There is gender exploratory behavior that is essentially cosplay, demonstrated in make-believe play-actors like Dylan Mulvaney and ideological groomers like Jeffery Marsh. You can be whatever you want to be, and if you call it “trans” then that’s what you are. And the ideology demands everyone else play along. But no one should feel compelled to change their understanding of reality to make someone feel good about him- or herself.

In that regard, it is a social psychosis.

Trans as Social Contagion

We must also understand the role of social media capture and contagion in youth and young adults, persuading them to make claims they are the sex opposite their biological sex, or simply non-binary, which is not a thing. Abigail Shrier documented this well in her book, Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters.

This is what is driving Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria (ROGD) with untold numbers of young people, largely young girls, swept up in it. It is not rooted in any objective clinical condition beyond impressionable adolescents and young adults persuaded by peers and online influences. Of course, trans activists claim ROGD is not real because it undercuts their “this is just the way nature made me” sympathy narrative.

Part-Time Transgender

It is important to note that a minority of people who consider themselves “transgender” identify with and present as their alternative gender 100% of the time. Most are merely part-time identifiers in public. Most (62%) “trans” identifying people imprecisely define themselves as “non-binary” or “gender non-confirming.” Only 12% define themselves as the binary “trans man” and 22% identify as “trans woman.” You can see how fluid all this is in a major Washington Post survey.

Genuine Debilitating Gender Dysphoria

What is more, the number of “transgender” people saying they have severe or debilitating distress over a misalignment between their self-perception of their sex and their objective physical body is not large at all, only 0.6% of the U.S. population. Compare this with 5% of young adults in the U.S. who identify as some category of “transgender.”

Very few people who identify as “transgender” suffer from what clinicians refer to as diagnosable gender dysphoria (GD). This condition can be truly excruciating for the patient, and can be understood as a sex-based “body identity integrity disorder” or BIID. This is where the individual does not identify with a perfectly healthy part of their body. They desire deeply to have that body part removed and will go to great and damaging lengths to have it do so. Published scientific research shows notable similarities between GD and BIID, here, here and here.

Autogynephilia

Finally, there is autogynephilia, which is a paraphilia. It is described in the academic literature as “a male’s propensity to be sexually aroused by the thought of himself as a female.” Or as Anne Lawrence, a leading scholar on the topic and autogynephilic individual himself explains, it is a man’s effort to “become what he loves” or desires. In more academic parlance, Lawrence explains,

Autogynephilia exemplifies an unusual paraphilic category called “erotic target identity inversions”, in which men desire to impersonate or turn their bodies into facsimiles of the persons or things to which they are sexually attracted.

The academic literature reports that “nearly 3% of men in Western countries may experience autogynephilia” making it a leading reason for “trans” identity and behavior.

Michael Bailey, a professor of psychology at Northwestern University, and one of the world’s longest and leading experts on autogynephilia, strongly supposes that Bruce Jenner is autogynephilic rather than gender dysphoric. Bailey explained on a 2015 podcast,

I believe it is very likely that Caitlyn Jenner’s transition was motivated by intense autogynephilia. I believe this because the best science suggests there are two completely different reasons why natal males become women: because they are feminine androphiles (lovers of men) or because they are autogynephilic. Jenner’s history shows none of the former and is very consistent with the latter. I refer specifically to his previous heterosexual marriages and secretive crossdressing.

Of course, this means these are men entering women’s private spaces because of their sexual desire to “become” that which they sexually desire. And we are told we are to fully accept them as actual “women.”

This means many “trans women” (i.e., men presenting as women) that you interact with at work, school or shopping centers are actually men who dress as women because they get a sexual thrill from it. It is a fetish.

This fact should deeply concern all women, girls and the men who seek to protect the women in their lives.

Conclusion

It is important that we understand what people mean when they use the term “trans” to get what they want in society. Few have said it better than liberal feminist Kara Dansky in her book, The Abolition of Sex: How the “Transgender” Agenda Harms Women and Girls,

Here is the truth we cannot speak: “gender identity” does not exist in any real, material sense, and “transgender” is simply a made-up concept that is used to justify all kinds of atrocities. It is in effect, a men’s rights movement intended to objectify women’s bodies and erase us a class. It is left-wing misogyny on steroids. I say this as a leftist and a Democrat.

Be properly discerning as loved ones, forces in your workplace, school, media and cultural elites try to convince you that “transgender” is natural and harmless. It is not.

It is an illusion that turns reality on its head.

Related articles and resources:

If you or someone you know is struggling with transgenderism or other sexuality issues, and you don’t know where to turn, Focus on the Family is here to help.

Focus offers a one-time counseling consultation with a licensed or pastoral counselor free of charge thanks to generous donor support. If you would like to request a consultation with Focus’ Counseling Department, call 1-855-771-HELP (4357) weekdays from 6:00 AM to 8:00 PM (Mountain Time) or complete our Counseling Consultation Request Form.

American Academy of Pediatrics Captured by Gender Ideology; Mainstream Professionals Are Calling Them Out

Transgenderism and Minors: What Does the Research Really Show?

What Does it Mean to Be Trans, Anyway?

Transgenderism and Minors: What Does the Research Really Show?

Do Not Fall for the ‘Affirm Them or They Will Die’ Lie

How to Defeat Gender Ideology, Protect Children and End ‘Trans America’

New Research Confirms Previous Findings: Most Gender Confused Kids Desist

The Shifting Ground of ‘Gender-Affirming Care’

How the “Trans” and Gender Redefinition Issue Attacks the Family

How to Respond to “Trans” and Gender Ideology? Simple: Live Not by Lies

Are Sex and Gender Different Things?

No, Trans Rights Are Certainly NOT Human Rights

The Embarrassing Crack-Up of the LGBT Project

Yes, Transgenderism is a False Belief System

Image from Shutterstock.

Written by Glenn T. Stanton · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: LGBT, transgender

Nov 25 2024

President Trump to Medically Discharge ‘Trans’ Soldiers

According to major news outlets, defense sources suggest President-elect Donald Trump will issue an executive order banning “transgender” troops. The order is expected shortly after Trump is sworn into office January.

Trump spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt tempered expectations, telling Newsweek, “No decisions on this issue have been made. No policy should ever be deemed official unless it comes directly from President Trump or his authorized spokespeople.”

During his first administration, the 45th president enacted a similar policy, but allowed other sexually confused military personnel to remain in their positions. Sources suggest this latest order will be wider reaching, impacting upwards of 15,000 individuals.

President Biden previously reversed the first Trump ban just days after taking office in 2021. During his latest campaign for president, Donald Trump made clear his intentions on the issue, lamenting the evolving wokeness of our armed forces:

“I will ban the Department of Veterans Affairs from wasting a single cent to fund transgender surgeries or sex change procedures,” President-elect Trump said.  “Those precious taxpayer dollars should be going to care for our veterans in need, not to fund radical gender experiments for the communist Left.”

He added, saying, “I’ll also restore the Trump ban on transgender in the military.”

In addition to covering the cost of sexual mutilation surgeries, our tax dollars are being spent to cover the travel costs of those who are transported out of state for an abortion.

Other examples of wokeness in the United States military include forcing recruits to watch videos on “proper pronoun usage” and the need for using “inclusive language” in day-to-day operations. CRT books have been added to the Navy Professional Reading Program, including, How to Be Antiracist by Ibram X. Kendi. The author suggests, “The only remedy to past discrimination is present discrimination” and “capitalism is essentially racist.”

American citizens have also funded military trips to annual “pride” events. The Navy even enlisted the help of Yeoman 2nd Class Joshua Kelley, who is also a drag queen, to serve as a “Navy Digital Ambassador.”

Critics of the ban suggest it will undermine military readiness and harm recruitment – claims they make with a straight face. Those who oppose President Trump’s plans are quick to point out that a mass exodus will harm an already depleted and struggling military. As of last year, the Marine Corps were the only branch that met its recruiting goals.

It never seems to occur to supporters of a woke military that current policies actually keep good people away, putting the military as a whole in jeopardy.

America’s storied military cannot afford to be hobbled by sexually confused individuals who leverage the platform to carry out a disastrous and ill-conceived social experiment.

The Transgender revolution has backfired spectacularly on the Left, but many seem either oblivious or disinterested in reconsidering their devotion to it.

Our men and women in uniform deserve better.

Image from Getty.

Written by Paul Batura · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: LGBT, Paul Random, transgender

Nov 25 2024

The Shifting Ground of ‘Gender-Affirming Care’

Among the most significant developments of the past year has been the strong pushback against radical gender ideology and the growing evidence against so-called “gender-affirming care.”

Early in 2024, internal files leaked from the World Professional Association of Transgender Health (WPATH), the self-anointed medical association that has pushed for the chemical and surgical “gender transition” of minors, were made public.

For years, clinical, political, and pop culture activists have cited WPATH in order to claim that the science on “gender-affirming care” is “settled,” and that social, chemical, and surgical “transition” interventions are safe, reversible, and lifesaving.   

The leaked files from WPATH revealed a different, and far more damning story.

Far from being settled science, these “treatments” were known to be experimental and known to lead to painful complications, including life-threatening conditions like cancers. In a leaked video, a leading WPATH doctor admitted that a minor could not fully understand the implications of “treatment,” especially for his or her future fertility. In other words, this pseudoscience was being pushed on minors who were unable to grant consent. 

A few weeks later, the U.K.’s National Health Service released an almost 400-page report on the state of “gender identity services for children and young people.” The Cass Review was a bombshell. Contrary to the standard narrative peddled by activists, this report affirmed that “gender-affirming care” is built on “shaky foundations” and that the evidence supporting the use of puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and sex-change surgeries to “treat” gender dysphoria is “remarkably weak.”  

According to the report, most of the studies cited in support of social, chemical or surgical “transition” lacked the quality required to reliably and safely guide clinicians and families in caring for gender dysphoric young people.  

Much was also learned in 2024 about the comorbidities accompanying gender confusion.

For example, research out of the U.K. exposed that adults who identified as transgender were six to seven times more likely to have ADHD, four times more likely to suffer from depression, five times more likely to have bipolar disorder, more than five times as likely to have obsessive compulsive disorder and, shockingly, over 28 times more likely to have a diagnosis of schizophrenia.  

Another study found that youth who experience gender dysphoria are far more likely to have experienced emotional abuse and physical and emotional neglect. Before the summer heat arrived, a survey of millions of patients over the course of two decades dropped suggesting that those who undergo “gender transition” surgery are 12 times more likely to attempt suicide than the general population.  

That last study exposes the evil of the suicide myth, an enduring lie that has effectively driven the transgender epidemic for years now. Counselors and activists have pressured parents into “affirming” their children’s dysphoria, with the manipulative question, “Would you rather have a live son or a dead daughter?”  

These revelations that continued to emerge throughout 2024 confirm what Christians should already know to be true. Even more, they should inspire us to steward this cultural moment faithfully. To paraphrase G.K. Chesterton, we must be a church not moved by the world, but stubborn in our belief that the world can be moved by a church committed to Christ and to truth. For us, this means having the courage to counter the lies of gender ideology while caring for those victimized by these bad ideas.  

This proper response requires a worldview big enough to make sense of the world. We not only must know what is true, we must have the courage to live by truth. Just a year ago, the trans agenda seemed unstoppable and out-of-control. Today, its lies have been exposed, and more people are speaking out. Praise God.  

Written by John Stonestreet · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: LGBT, transgender

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 29
  • Page 30
  • Page 31
  • Page 32
  • Page 33
  • Page 34
  • Go to Next Page »

Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | © 2026 Focus on the Family. All rights reserved.

  • Cookie Policy