LGBT Organization Sues to Block Florida Law that Protects Women’s Sports
As it had promised, the Human Rights Campaign (HRC), an LGBT activist organization, has filed a lawsuit in federal court alleging that Florida’s new law, called the “Fairness in Women’s Sports Act,” violates federal education statutes as well as the U.S. Constitution. The new law declares that one’s biological sex at birth will define who can play on boys and girls sports teams at public high schools and colleges and universities in the state.
HRC, which has also promised additional lawsuits challenging similar laws in Arkansas, Mississippi and Tennessee, describes the Florida law as “ironically” titled, and repeats the current talking point of transgender ideology that “a transgender woman is a woman.”
“SB 1028, ironically titled the ‘Fairness in Women’s Sports Act,’ has nothing to do with fairness or equality for girls or women in sports. By excluding transgender girls and women from girls sports teams and forcing them, if they want to play sports at all, to join a team that matches neither their gender identity nor their current physical status, the bill discriminates on the basis of sex and transgender status in violation of the United States Constitution and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. § 1681, et seq,” the federal lawsuit states.
While it is true that the U.S. Supreme Court ruled – in Bostock v. Clayton County – that the definition of “sex” under federal employment nondiscrimination laws can include gender identity, the justices left open the question whether the same reasoning it used in the employment context should now apply to Title IX, which was specifically passed in 1972 to afford women equal opportunities in education. And that law was specifically designed to remedy the disparity in funding between men’s and women’s sports.
Title IX specifically allows schools receiving federal funding to segregate teams and facilities on the basis of sex. That in itself is a recognition of the biological differences between men and women.
The current administration has sided with the position HRC has taken, asserting that Title IX’s use of the word “sex” includes transgender women – i.e., biological men.
It has been apparent in states like Connecticut, for example, where transgender women are allowed to compete in women’s sports, that they dominate the competition, taking trophies, scholarships and opportunities away from biological women who can’t compete against biological males who enjoy inherent advantages of strength, speed and endurance.
It would appear that what HRC is arguing for in the Florida lawsuit is directly contrary to the original purpose of Title IX. It remains to be seen, however, whether the Supreme Court will agree.
The Bible tells us that God made us in His image, and that image includes “male and female,” Genesis 1:27 (ESV). But that does not mean that God is androgynous, or that his image bearers – men and women – can choose their sex. Gender dysphoria – when your emotional and psychological identity doesn’t match the biological sex you were born with – is a real phenomenon that must be treated with grace and compassion in order for boys, girls, men and women to accept who God created them to be.
The world offers the lie that boys can be girls and men can be women, and vice versa. God offers his Son, and the healing and love of the Father that accompanies a life committed to Christ. Pray for those dealing with gender dysphoria, and that the truth of God’s creation of male and female would carry the day in this legal case.
Related:
A Biblical Perspective on Transgender Identity: A Primer for Parents and Strugglers
Biden Becomes Nation’s Most Powerful Trans Activist With Executive Order
DOE Holds Hearings on Pushing ‘Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity’ in Education
‘Not Only Arrogant, But Wrong’: Justice Alito Slams SCOTUS Majority for Redefining ‘Sex’
President Biden Signs Executive Orders to Undo Trump Policies as First Official Act
Responding to “SOGI” Laws—Tone and Truth
Transgenderism Trumping Parents’ Rights
When Sexuality Trumps Religious Freedom — The Problem With “SOGI” Laws
Photo from Shutterstock
’Tis the season for holiday reading!
Check out Daily Citizen’s cheery winter reads.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Bruce Hausknecht, J.D., is an attorney who serves as Focus on the Family’s judicial analyst. He is responsible for research and analysis of legal and judicial issues related to Christians and the institution of the family, including First Amendment freedom of religion and free speech issues, judicial activism, marriage, homosexuality and pro-life matters. He also tracks legislation and laws affecting these issues. Prior to joining Focus in 2004, Hausknecht practiced law for 17 years in construction litigation and as an associate general counsel for a large ministry in Virginia. He was also an associate pastor at a church in Colorado Springs for seven years, primarily in worship music ministry. Hausknecht has provided legal analysis and commentary for top media outlets including CNN, ABC News, NBC News, CBS Radio, The New York Times, the Chicago Tribune, The Washington Post, The Washington Times, the Associated Press, the Los Angeles Times, The Wall Street Journal, the Boston Globe and BBC radio. He’s also a regular contributor to The Daily Citizen. He earned a bachelor’s degree in history from the University of Illinois and his J.D. from Northwestern University School of Law. Hausknecht has been married since 1981 and has three adult children, as well as three adorable grandkids. In his free time, Hausknecht loves getting creative with his camera and capturing stunning photographs of his adopted state of Colorado.
Related Posts
Olympic Women’s Boxing Champ is Officially a Man
November 5, 2024
Meta to Decide Whether “Misgendering” Is Hate Speech
October 16, 2024