• Skip to main content
Daily Citizen
  • Subscribe
  • Categories
    • Culture
    • Life
    • Religious Freedom
    • Sexuality
  • Parenting Resources
    • LGBT Pride
    • Homosexuality
    • Sexuality/Marriage
    • Transgender
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Contact
  • Donate

Life

May 27 2026

The Courageous Christian Doctor Waging War Against the Fertility Industry 

Dr. John David Gordon was a reproductive endocrinologist without a home.

With a medical degree from Duke and his residency at Stanford, the Boston native, who was raised Jewish and converted to Christianity in 2000, is a skilled physician committed to helping infertile couples have children. His credentials and skills are unassailable and unbeatable.

But there was a problem – and it was a moral and ethical one of major proportions. 

Serving in a leadership role at a fertility clinic just outside of Washington, D.C., for over twenty years, Dr. Gordon began having significant misgivings about how his facility was doing business.

Like almost every fertility clinic these days across the reproductive medicine industry, the establishment was employing nearly every available technology to help maximize success. This included creating as many embryos as possible with each patient, a strategy that allows physicians to be choosy when it comes to selecting which ones to transfer to the mother.

At fertility clinics across the world, embryos are literally graded and evaluated, and those statistically most likely to implant and grow are the winners. Those that don’t make the cut are either frozen or discarded.

While nobody knows for sure, it’s estimated that more than thirty million embryos are created around the world each year because of IVF technology. A typical IVF cycle in a traditional clinic will result in up to 15 embryos. Most clinics recommend transferring only three or four.

Although his motives were redeeming, Dr. Gordon began feeling the ethical burden of being part of this industry that had grown increasingly reckless and mercenary. “It’s too morally problematic,” Gordon concluded. “I don’t know where you draw the line.”

After consulting with his wife, Allison, who also shared his deep Christian convictionsand unease over the direction of reproductive medicine, Dr. Gordon decided to leave the Washington, D.C. clinic and open one that would operate within biblical moral and ethical boundaries.

Setting up shop in eastern Tennessee, “Rejoice Fertility was created with a clear vision: to deliver an unparalleled patient experience where couples could openly discuss their moral, ethical, spiritual, and religious concerns about reproductive medicine.”

Specifically, Rejoice Fertility is a “no-discard” IVF clinic. Patients are encouraged to create only the embryos they will transfer or use for a future IVF. 

Any embryos created are either used for fresh transfer or preserved for future frozen embryo transfer.

For decades, Focus on the Family has been asked by married couples on how best to navigate the myriad of ethical considerations and challenges surrounding IVF. The ministry has recognized that across Christendom, believers may view the issue very differently.

While the Catholic Church has remained steadfast in their opposition to it, the Southern Baptists traditionally supported it but have since expressed a growing concern. The denomination’s convention passed a resolution decrying the ethical lines most clinics regularly cross. In doing so, they were correctly calling out the rise in embryo destruction, elective reduction, genetic screening, and the astronomical number of frozen embryos. They stopped just short of calling for an all-out ban. 

Given that the Bible doesn’t offer clear guidance on the overarching technology, we’ve thoughtfully and prayerfully studied the question. We’ve long said that doctors can take proactive steps to address many of the moral and ethical concerns associated with IVF – steps that Dr. Gordon and his team appear to be acknowledging and grappling with on a daily basis.

In the instances where couples may be unable to transfer frozen embryos, Rejoice Infertility strongly advocates for the couple agreeing to make the baby available for adoption. “Snowflake” embryo adoption has been a wonderful program that seeks to find forever homes for these babies locked in a perpetual frozen state.

In a world swirling with countless moral and ethical conundrums, we applaud Dr. Gordon for his efforts to care for his patients and prayerfully address and wage a fight that far too many medical professionals have long ago abandoned. 

Related articles and resources:

IVF: Moral and Ethical Considerations

Christians Must Consider the Moral and Ethical Hazards of IVF

Written by Paul Batura · Categorized: Life · Tagged: Fertility, IVF, Life

May 15 2026

Supreme Court Restores Access to Mail-Order Abortion Pills While Legal Fight Continues

The Supreme Court Thursday granted a stay blocking enforcement of a lower court ruling that would have restricted access to the abortion pill mifepristone by mail.

The Court’s decision allows abortionists to continue prescribing mifepristone through telehealth appointments, and sending it through the mail, while Louisiana’s lawsuit seeking to require the FDA to reinstate the in-person dispensing requirement on mifepristone continues. The agency removed the requirement during the Biden presidency.

Justices Thomas and Alito dissented from the Court’s decision.

In his dissent, Justice Thomas observed that the Comstock Act “bans using ‘the mails’ to ship any ‘drug … for producing abortion.’” This means Danco Labs and GenBioPro, the manufacturers and distributors of mifepristone, which appealed to the Court for a stay, are engaged in illegal activity.

“Applicants are not entitled to a stay of an adverse court order based on lost profits from their criminal enterprise,” Justice Thomas wrote. “They cannot, in any legally relevant sense, be irreparably harmed by a court order that makes it more difficult for them to commit crimes.”

Justice Alito pointed out Louisiana’s request for the FDA to reinstate the in-person dispensing requirement is commonsense.

“Louisiana [responded to Dobbs by making] abortion illegal except in narrow circumstances,” Justice Alito wrote. “But Louisiana’s efforts have been thwarted by certain medical providers, private organizations, and States that abhor laws like Louisiana’s and seek to undermine their enforcement.”

“These medical providers and private organizations have developed an operation enabling women in Louisiana and other States that restrict abortions to place an online order for a pill called mifepristone that induces abortion.”

Around 1,000 abortions occur in Louisiana each month as a result, more than occurred before the Dobbs decision, Justice Alito acknowledged.

Alliance Defending Freedom Counsel Erin Hawley issued the following statement after the Court’s ruling:

We are disappointed by this decision that allows the FDA and the abortion industry to continue nullifying Dobbs and its promise to return the issue of abortion to the people.
It’s high time the Biden FDA be held accountable for the destruction it has caused with this high-risk drug. Together with Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill’s office, we look forward to litigating our appeal at the 5th Circuit to protect mothers and their children.

The case now goes back to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit to consider the merits of Louisiana’s case. The Daily Citizen will keep you apprised of important developments.

The case is Danco Laboratories v. Louisiana.

At Focus on the Family, we have been working to turn the cultural tide and save mothers and babies from abortion for years. Since beginning the Option Ultrasound Program in 2004, Focus has helped save over half a million lives. Just $60 will help save a life through Option Ultrasound. Will you partner with us to save lives from abortion?

If you are experiencing an unexpected pregnancy and want to learn more about your options, you can visit My Choice Network.

Related articles and resources:

My Choice Network

I’m Pregnant, Now What?

Dealing With Unplanned Pregnancy

Become an Option Ultrasound Life Advocate

New Insights on the Dangers of the Abortion Pill

Overcoming Abortion and Becoming a Force for Life

Supreme Court Temporarily Restores Access to Mail-Order Abortion Pills

Photo from Shutterstock.

Written by Zachary Mettler · Categorized: Government Updates, Life · Tagged: abortion, Life

May 15 2026

White House Launches Moms.Gov Directing Women to Pregnancy Resource Centers

On Mother’s Day, the White House announced the creation of Moms.gov, an innovative website connecting new and expectant mothers with pregnancy resource centers and other helpful information.

The webpage’s adoption section links to Focus on the Family’s resource “Considering Adoption.”

However, the website also directs women to drugs and medications related to in vitro fertilization (IVF), which (as usually practiced) disrespects and denies the right to life of preborn children.

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) launched the website, calling it a “first-of-its-kind resource” offering “guidance and information to support the health and well-being of mothers and their families.”

“This Mother’s Day, the Trump Administration is strengthening its commitment to America’s families by equipping mothers and fathers with the resources and information they need to build healthy, prosperous lives,” said HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

“Moms.gov delivers critical tools and support to help parents foster healthy pregnancies, strengthen young families, and create brighter futures for their children. This is how you Make America Healthy Again.”

According to HHS, the new platform features information on:

  • Support Services and Health Centers (Pregnancy Centers and FQHCs).
  • Nutrition quick facts for mothers based on the Dietary Guideline for Americans.
  • Trump Accounts.
  • Trump Rx.
  • Resources for women and parents.
  • Preconception health.
  • Breastfeeding.
  • Mental health.
  • Adoption.

The White House announced the creation of the website on social media, calling it a “one-stop home for all the resources needed for expectant mothers including nutrition, pregnancy support, lifesaving care and more.”

Finally a one-stop home for all the resources needed for expectant mothers including nutrition, pregnancy support, life saving care and more. 🩷🇺🇸

Visit https://t.co/SuYznQeQuN pic.twitter.com/aYMzjlXOJa

— The White House (@WhiteHouse) May 11, 2026

Pro-life advocate Lila Rose shared the announcement, saying the website connects women with “life-affirming support.”

“Abortion tells a woman she must kill her child to succeed. THAT IS A LIE,” Rose added. “Mothers deserve hope, help, and real care. Every child deserves the chance to live.”

Speaking from the Oval Office at an event on maternal health care, President Trump touted the website as a part of his “ambitious agenda to support American mothers.”

Secretary Kennedy, speaking at the event, said, “I just want to stress what a huge win for the MAHA movement, and for the pro-life movement Moms.gov is. It is one-stop shopping for IVF, for prenatal care, for postnatal care, for nutrition, for baby formula.”

Individuals can purchase drugs commonly used in IVF, including Gonal-F – an injectable medication containing follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) – through Trump Rx, which is accessible through Moms.gov.

It is good news the Trump administration is directing women to pregnancy resource centers, which provide life-affirming care to moms and dads. There are 2,750 centers nationwide that provide nearly $368 million annually in free support to clients, including $206 million in free medical services, $83 million in education and support services and $78 million in material goods.

However, Secretary Kennedy is incorrect to call IVF “pro-life.” As it is usually practiced, IVF is not pro-life.

Only around 2.3% of babies created through IVF will be born alive; the vast majority are genetically screened, sex-selected and graded out of existence.

In fact, more preborn babies die due to IVF each year than abortion.

The Trump administration certainly deserves praise for supporting the life-affirming work of pregnancy resource centers.

At the same time, pro-life supporters must reaffirm that all human embryos are made in God’s image and worthy of life and legal protection from the moment of conception. Helping more woman access IVF is certainly not a “win” for the pro-life movement.

If you are experiencing an unexpected pregnancy and want to learn more about your options, you can visit My Choice Network.

Related articles and resources:

My Choice Network

Counseling Consultation & Referrals

I’m Pregnant, Now What?

Dealing With Unplanned Pregnancy

Become an Option Ultrasound Life Advocate

New Insights on the Dangers of the Abortion Pill

Alternatives to Abortion: Pregnancy Resource Centers

IVF: Moral and Ethical Considerations

Photo from Getty Images.

Written by Zachary Mettler · Categorized: Government Updates, Life · Tagged: Life

May 08 2026

Kristan Hawkins Lobbies Feds to Enforce Comstock Act

The Supreme Court this week temporarily allowed women to obtain chemical abortion pills remotely while it considers Louisiana’s case against the FDA’s regulation of mifepristone.

Behind closed doors, Students for Life President Kristan Hawkins lobbied the Department of Justice (DOJ) to shut down the mail-order abortion industry altogether by enforcing the Comstock Act.

“All it would take is for the Trump DOJ to issue a memo and say, ‘We’re going to enforce the law.’” Hawkins told the Daily Citizen.

“That, overnight, would end this wild, wild west of abortion we are currently facing in our country.”

When the FDA began allowing physicians to prescribe the chemical abortion pill mifepristone remotely without “adequately studying” the safety of such a step, the agency birthed a massive, unregulated, interstate drug market.

“Any person — sex abuser, human trafficker, a man, a minor, a girl who has a life-threatening ectopic pregnancy — can go online to a couple of websites and order chemical abortion pills within two minutes,” said Hawkins. “It doesn’t matter what state she’s in.”

There’s no guarantee the pills these women receive contain mifepristone and misoprostol, the second chemical in the abortion cocktail which sends women into labor.

“It’s a problem [abortionists] are having in their own industry,” she explained. “There’s zero accuracy to make sure the pills women are getting are even abortion pills and not placebos.”

The federal government doesn’t need to pass a law to take on the wildly exploitative chemical abortion industry. It’s already illegal under the Comstock Act.

The act, which Congress passed in 1873, prohibits the interstate transportation of “obscene or crime-inciting” materials, including every “article, instrument, substance, drug, medicine or thing” used to facilitate or perform abortion.

Thus far, however, the DOJ has refused to enforce Comstock.

Under the Biden administration, the department issued an opinion finding the law did not apply to interstate shipments of chemical abortion pills.

The tortured take relies on judicial interpretations of Comstock from the early twentieth century which determined violators must knowingly send “obscene or crime-inciting” materials to perform, not just any abortions, but unlawful abortions.  

Of course, at the time of Comstock’s creation, virtually all abortions were unlawful. The DOJ apparently did not consider this fact when, in December 2022, it determined that Comstock did not apply to chemical abortion pills because abortionists could intend the pills be used in lawful abortions.

With the stroke of a pen, the current DOJ could rescind this memo and begin enforcing the act, effectively banning the sale of mifepristone and misoprostol across state lines.

“A simple memo tomorrow from the DOJ could save hundreds of thousands of lives,” Hawkins emphasized. “That’s all we’re asking for.”

Enforcing the Comstock Act wouldn’t just score the Trump administration a win with the pro-life community, Hawkins told DOJ officials. It would support the president’s belief that abortion policy should be determined by the states.

“Even while I disagree with the president on that fact,” Hawkins told the Daily Citizen, noting “terrible, tragic things” happen when leaders allow human rights to begin and end at state lines, “if he truly believes [abortion] to be a state’s rights issue, the solution is to get the federal government completely out of abortion.”

That, she elaborated, requires two things: Extending the defunding of Planned Parenthood and enforcing the Comstock Act, which would prevent pro-abortion states from flooding pro-life states with chemical abortion pills.

“These are simple things the administration can do that would be in alignment with what the president himself has said about abortion policy that would save hundreds of lives,” Hawkins reiterated.

She was encouraged to hear DOJ officials confirm the Comstock Act had come up in several conversations at the department.

“So at least they know about it!” she exclaimed.

If the DOJ didn’t before this week, they do now. Hawkins and Students for Life Action delivered tens of thousands of petitions to the department’s doorstep Wednesday supporting the Comstock Act’s enforcement.

As consequential questions about mail-order abortion, the true danger of mifepristone and funding for Planned Parenthood linger over Capitol Hill, the Daily Citizen prays the Trump administration will take bold steps to protect women, babies and life by enforcing the Comstock Act.

Additional Articles and Resources

Supreme Court Temporarily Restores Access to Mail-Order Abortion Pills

Texas Father Sues Out-of-State Abortionist for Killing His Preborn Children

Federal Government Makes Abortion Pill Widely Available, Okays Mail Orders Despite Law Prohibiting Them

Shield Laws Enable Chemical Abortion in Pro-Life States

Shield Law Abortion Providers Advertised Alongside Black Market Abortion Pills

#AbortionChangesYou: A Case Study to Understand the Communicative Tensions in Women’s Medication Abortion Narratives (Health Communication)

New Abortion Pill Study Confirms Danger to Mothers

The Abortion Pill Harms Women: Insurance Data Reveals One in Ten Patients Experiences a Serious Adverse Event (Ethics and Public Policy Center)

Written by Emily Washburn · Categorized: Life · Tagged: comstock, Life, mifepristone

May 08 2026

Congress Must Extend Defund of Planned Parenthood

This Fourth of July will be a huge celebration of America’s 250th birthday. It will also be the day our nation’s largest abortion giant, Planned Parenthood, receives a multi-million-dollar gift – unless Congress intervenes.

Last year, Congress defunded Planned Parenthood – which killed 434,350 preborn children in one year according to its latest annual report – of around $850 million in federal taxpayer money. Since then, around 50 Planned Parenthood clinics have closed, in part because of financial troubles.

The defund provision (Section 71113) was included in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which President Trump signed into law on July 4, 2025. The bill also cut taxes on working families, provided additional funding for border security and immigration enforcement, and beefed-up spending on national security.

While the Hyde amendment prohibits taxpayer dollars from directly going to pay for abortions, Planned Parenthood could receive federal monies, including government grants, contracts and Medicaid reimbursements, for other services.

All money is fungible, so these federal dollars indirectly supported the organization’s grisly abortion business by allowing it to pay salaries, sustain operating expenses and open new locations. That’s how Planned Parenthood grew into a $2.1 billion enterprise.

Originally, it wasn’t clear whether the defund provision would even go into effect after Planned Parenthood, and a coalition of 23 states, filed separate lawsuits arguing Section 71113 violated the U.S. Constitution.

Federal Judge Indira Talwani initially sided with the abortion giant, ruling Section 71113 violated the equal protection clause and was an unconstitutional bill of attainder, just three days after the president signed the bill.

However, Judge Talwani’s decision was quickly overturned by the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which was notable, since the 1st Circuit is widely seen as one the most liberal appellate courts in the country. The 1st Circuit unanimously upheld Section 71113.

The defund provision lasts only one year, however, meaning it will expire in less than two months unless Congress acts to extend the provision.

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act was enacted through the reconciliation process, which Congress can generally use once per year to enact tax- and spending-related priorities. The reconciliation process allows legislation to pass the U.S. Senate by simple majority vote, rather than the usually required 60-vote threshold.

The current Congress, however, can use the reconciliation process twice more before the end of this year. Pro-life advocates have been urging Congress to use the opportunity to defund Planned Parenthood again.

Congress recently advanced a “skinny” reconciliation bill to fund the Department of Homeland Security to end the agency’s shutdown. That leaves one reconciliation bill left which could be used to extend the defund provision.

According to House Pro-Life Caucus Co-Chair Rep. Chris Smith, R-N.J., Speaker of the House Mike Johnson is “doing everything he can to make sure that happens.”

Speaker Johnson told the Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America Gala on April 29, “We’ve been very creative in how we’ve used [the reconciliation process], and we’re intending to do that again.”

Rep. Smith said Planned Parenthood again receiving taxpayer dollars would sour the celebration of America’s 250th birthday on July 4.

“It would mar the event,” Smith told the Daily Signal.

Nearly 250 years ago, America’s Founding Fathers signed the Declaration of Independence, proclaiming the self-evident truth that all men have unalienable rights to “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

Our elected representatives in Congress must ensure our nation lives up to its founding principles by barring taxpayer dollars from going to a massive enterprise that kills thousands of innocent Americans annually, depriving them of their right to life.

At Focus on the Family, we have been working to turn the cultural tide and save mothers and babies from abortion for years. Since beginning the Option Ultrasound Program in 2004, Focus has helped save over half a million lives. Just $60 will help save a life through Option Ultrasound. Will you partner with us to save lives from abortion?

If you are experiencing an unexpected pregnancy and want to learn more about your options, you can visit My Choice Network.

Related articles and resources:

My Choice Network

I’m Pregnant, Now What?

Dealing With Unplanned Pregnancy

Become an Option Ultrasound Life Advocate

New Insights on the Dangers of the Abortion Pill

Overcoming Abortion and Becoming a Force for Life

New Planned Parenthood Annual Report: More Abortions, Fewer Services

Planned Parenthood Drops Suit After Trying to Force Taxpayers to Fund Abortions

Conservative Lawmakers Propose Budget Bill Defunding Big Abortion – Again

Appeals Court Upholds Defunding of Big Abortion Businesses

Photo from Getty Images.

Written by Zachary Mettler · Categorized: Government Updates, Life · Tagged: Life

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 12
  • Go to Next Page »

Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | © 2026 Focus on the Family. All rights reserved.

  • Cookie Policy