• Skip to main content
Daily Citizen
  • Subscribe
  • Categories
    • Culture
    • Life
    • Religious Freedom
    • Sexuality
  • Parenting Resources
    • LGBT Pride
    • Homosexuality
    • Sexuality/Marriage
    • Transgender
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Contact
  • Donate

Random

May 05 2025

Who Falls in Love Faster, Men or Women?

Families usually start with a man and woman falling in love. So how and when love develops between romantic partners is an important topic for those interested in studying how marriages and families form.

A recent study published in the journal Biology of Sex Differences conducted by an Australian research team examines the very interesting question of who typically falls in love first.

This study claims to be the first to explore this question in a substantive, cross-cultural sample with validated measures. It involved a sample of 808 young adults (age 18-25) who are currently experiencing romantic love, residing in 33 different countries.

This research finds that while women think about their love-interest more often than men do – in 54% of their waking hours, compared to 44% of men’s waking hours – men are slightly more likely to fall in love with their girlfriends and do so markedly sooner. These scholars explain,

The [time] difference was about one month, with females falling in love on average about two months after starting a romantic relationship and males falling in love on average about one month after starting a romantic relationship. It was also demonstrated that a larger proportion of males than females had fallen in love before a romantic relationship had commenced.

The authors add, “Falling in love one month earlier is practically meaningful.”

This is because “Falling in love one month earlier provides males with a greater opportunity to use romantic love to promote courtship, to demonstrate romantic love as an honest signal of commitment, and to say ‘I love you’ first.”

Yes, the study states, “There is good evidence that males express their love sooner than females do” in dating relationships and these findings are internationally robust.

Overall, the study discovered:

  • Males fall in love slightly more often than females do, which is consistent with previous research.
  • Males fall in love about one month earlier than females do.
  • Females experience romantic love slightly more intensely than males do.
  • Females in love think about their loved one more than males do.
  • Females in love are slightly more committed than males are.

Why Do Males Fall in and Express Love Faster?

Is it because males are more feeling and sentimental than women? Few would argue this, but it is an interesting question. To understand the reasons, we must first define what falling in love means.

Most agree it is more of an emotional experience than a rational one. The study’s authors, coming at this academically, explain “falling in love” is “early-stage romantic” or “passionate love.” They offer a very clinical definition: Romantic love is “a motivational state typically associated with a desire for long-term mating with a particular individual.” It is a uniquely intense human attraction.

The authors of this study, who titled their published article “Sex Differences in Romantic Love: An Evolutionary Perspective,” clearly come at this from a naturalistic, evolutionary perspective.

They are interested in how human males and females cooperate to pass their DNA onto the next generation of the human species. In essence, they ask: Why is it in the male’s best mating interest to declare his love for the potential mother of his children first?

They conclude, “According to this line of thinking, romantic love may initially serve the function of a commitment device whereby a male shows they are committed to a female, providing the female with a signal that allows her to become emotionally, physically, and reproductively invested in the male.”

Since the work of passing on one’s DNA to the next generation is practically more difficult and time-intensive for the woman, “A female would be less likely to fall in love before a male has shown adequate behavioral signs of commitment, which are the signal that typically enable the female to fully fall in love.”

But do the man and woman potentially forming familial relationships really make such calculated considerations when negotiating the emotions of falling in love? Humans are certainly more than breeding beings and love is a higher order and uniquely human experience than participating in the evolutionary game of sending one’s DNA into the future.

It seems clear we need something more than an evolutionary model to answer the question of why males fall in love more often and sooner than their female love interests. An important question that this study does not address is whether women prefer their male mates to take the lead in communicating their love. Do women actually enjoy and find comfort in young men taking that lead?

Data seems to indicate that they do.

“Subsequent studies have provided an important scientific advance in documenting that women prefer mates who are kind and trustworthy specifically with respect to themselves and their families.” The male being first to express his love can certainly be an indicator of these essential qualities in a potential and reliable marriage partner. But the woman’s determination of the man’s sincerity of his declaration of love and his ability to deliver on that claim is even more critical.

A family certainly requires much more than just love. But a family without love is not desirable either. In Mere Christianity, C.S. Lewis explains,

Being in love is a good thing, but it is not the best thing. There are many things below it, but there are also things above it. You cannot make it the basis of a whole life. It is a noble feeling, but it is still a feeling. Now no feeling can be relied on to last in its full intensity, or even to last at all. Knowledge can last, principles can last, habits can last but feelings come and go. And in fact, whatever people say, the state called ‘being in love’ usually does not last.

A man’s words of “being in love” must be backed up by many actions that are the day-in and day-out demonstration of that love. The daily decision of a man to love his wife and children is the foundation of a family, and his wife’s reciprocation of that demonstration are its continuation and life.

Image from Shutterstock.

Written by Glenn T. Stanton · Categorized: Marriage · Tagged: Random, Study

May 05 2025

Religious Liberty is the Preserver to Keep America Afloat

At an ecumenical prayer breakfast in Dallas back in 1984, President Ronald Reagan said,

“Without God, there is no virtue, because there’s no prompting of the conscience. Without God, we’re mired in the material, that flat world that tells us only what the senses perceive. Without God, there is a coarsening of the society. And without God, democracy will not and cannot long endure. If we ever forget that we’re one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under.”

Those words swirled in my head, as I had the honor to attend the Rose Garden ceremony as President Donald Trump announced the formation of a presidential commission to protect religious liberty. The commission members are:

Texas Lt. Governor Dan Patrick, chair
Dr. Ben Carson, vice chair
Ryan Anderson
Bishop Robert Barron
Carrie Boller
Cardinal Timothy Dolan, archbishop of New York
Rev. Franklin Graham
Allyson Ho
Dr. Phil McGraw
Eric Metaxas
Kelly Shackelford
Rabbi Meir Soloveichik
Pastor Paula White

In his executive order announcing the commission, Trump stated,

“It shall be the policy of the executive branch to vigorously enforce the historic and robust protections for religious liberty enshrined in Federal law.  The Founders envisioned a Nation in which religious voices and views are integral to a vibrant public square and human flourishing and in which religious people and institutions are free to practice their faith without fear of discrimination or hostility from the Government.”

The commission will protect parental rights, conscience and school choice. It will also address anti-religious bias and government overreach and advise the White House on policies to safeguard religious liberty.

The present struggle over religious liberty, and the need for such a commission, boils down to two competing sides. The first side believes they have a fundamental right protected by the First Amendment to practice their faith freely and openly in society. The second believes religious liberty is not a fundamental right, and any mention or practice of faith in the public square is a dangerous conflation of church and state.

Unfortunately, for the past 60 plus years, any public display of faith by an individual or community – prayers by elected officials, religious content in public schools, and many other expressions of religious conviction – has come under attack.

The result has been, as Reagan so eloquently noted, a coarsening of society with Americans now warring against each other rather than standing together in a common bond of unity, regardless of their faith.

If there is a real attack on democracy, it is because of this lack of respect for religious liberty.

President John Adams warned us of this in 1798 when he told the Militia of Massachusetts: “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious People. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”

Daniel Mark, an assistant professor of political science at Villanova University and an Orthodox Jew, understands this. He has written that religious freedom is under attack because traditional beliefs are a threat to radical autonomy. He concluded: “We need to discover – or recover – a proper account of rights. This begins with a proper grasp of the good of religion, and finally, all of the goods that constitute human flourishing.”

Or in the words of another great American, President Dwight D. Eisenhower, in his 1953 inaugural address:

“We who are free must proclaim anew our faith. This faith is the abiding creed of our fathers. It is our faith in the deathless dignity of man, governed by eternal moral and natural laws. This faith defines our full view of life. It establishes, beyond debate, those gifts of the Creator that are man’s inalienable rights, and that make all men equal in His sight.”

He then added a short sentence that succinctly sums up our nation’s current state: “A people that values its privileges above its principles soon loses both.”

It is no coincidence that the roots of our present poisonous public discourse can be traced to the abandonment of religious liberty. If we are to preserve our fragile union, it is critical that we set aside our differences and restore religious liberty for all. Otherwise, as Adams, Eisenhower and Reagan warned us, we will lose it all.

That is why I see the establishment of this commission by President Trump as a hopeful first step to bringing about that restoration so that we can once again, be “One nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.”

Written by Timothy S. Goeglein · Categorized: Religious Freedom · Tagged: Random, religious freedom, Trump

May 01 2025

Wesley Huff is a Brilliant Christian Apologist You Must Know About

Wesley Huff is a 33-year-old Canadian Christian apologist and Ph.D. candidate in New Testament Studies that every believer should know about it.

He burst onto the scene in a big way in early January 2025 when mega-ton gorilla podcaster Joe Rogan had Huff on his show for over three hours to talk about the historicity of Jesus of Nazareth, his death and resurrection and the reliability of the biblical texts with an emphasis on the New Testament.

More recently he was featured on Easter weekend for a full hour on Piers Morgan “Uncensored.”

Not only is Huff one of the smartest and most articulate Christian apologists working today in defense of the faith, but he is genuinely one of the kindest and inviting, while still standing for uncompromising orthodoxy. For such a young man, still plowing his way through school, his breadth of knowledge and gift for explaining the depths of it all in a concise way are remarkable.

Huff, born in Multan, Pakistan, was miraculously restored at age 12 from a rare neurological condition that paralyzed him from the waist down. Doctors have no explanation for his recovery, but Huff explains that today, he is the walking result of a “true supernatural experience.”

In fact, he says his doctors were the first ones to use the m-word: miracle. But the experience shored up his faith and compelled him to start studying where truth can be found in various religions and worldview perspectives. He has settled on biblical Christianity and has risen as one of its most insightful and compelling defenders. Beyond his studies as a Ph.D. student and growing media sensation, Huff serves as the Central Canada Director for Apologetics Canada.

Piers Morgan asked Huff at the beginning of his interview, “Is it indisputable to you that Jesus Christ existed?”

Huff confidently responded, “Oh, definitely so” adding, “Even the most skeptical scholars grant, that if we know very little about Jesus, we know that he did exist and that he was crucified in and around the beginning of the first century under the overseeing of the governor of Judea, Pontius Pilate.”

But what about the supernatural resurrection of the historic Jesus of Nazareth? Huff explained the textual evidence we possess, both biblical and extra-biblical, supports the conclusion that “if you could have a camera running on the tomb in or around 33 A.D., [it would show] that an actual Jesus would have walked out on the third day, after his crucifixion and burial.”

Piers Morgan followed up by admitting, “And that is the crux of this, isn’t it? Whether Jesus of Nazareth was resurrected really goes to the absolute essence and heart of Christianity because obviously, that is a miracle and everyone who believes in Christianity would feel validated.”

Huff’s conversations with both Piers Morgan and Joe Rogan are well worth watching and taking in the gifted and informed explanations for Christianity’s documented truth! (Due to some typical language from Rogan, the Morgan interview is the better to watch with your teen and pre-teen kids. They would greatly benefit from Huff’s insights and approach.)

Related Articles and Resources

The Church’s Lane is the Whole Cosmos

The Cultural Paradox of Following Jesus Christ

Why Believe in Christianity? Because it is True.

How Big is Your View of the Gospel?

Dear Christian, Have Hope in Jesus Christ Amid Our Cultural Chaos

Appreciating the Full Scope of the Lordship of Christ – and the Gospel Itself

Christianity is Both a Religion and a Relationship

Written by Glenn T. Stanton · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: Evangelism, Random

Apr 21 2025

The Cornerstone of a Legacy

Today is the anniversary of the death of Chuck Colson, the founder of the Colson Center and the daily Breakpoint commentaries. Chuck had a very public and highly scrutinized conversion to Christ, one that involved political scandal, C.S. Lewis, and federal prison. It led to a lifetime of ministry, especially through Prison Fellowship. Every Easter, Chuck would go back to prison and share that Christ had risen.  

He often shared that his experience in political scandal, in the end, convinced him of the resurrection:  

[A]s Paul writes in 1 Corinthians, the historical fact of Christ’s resurrection is the only basis of our hope. Without the resurrection, our faith is futile. This is why critics of Christianity often try to explain away the empty tomb. They claim that the disciples lied — that they stole Jesus’ body themselves and conspired together to pretend He had risen. The apostles then managed somehow to recruit more than 500 other people to lie for them as well, to say they saw Jesus after He rose from the dead. 

But just how plausible is this theory? 

To answer that question, fast forward nearly 2,000 years, to an event I happen to know a lot about: Watergate. You see, before all the facts about Watergate were known to the public —in March 1973 — it was becoming clear to Nixon’s closest aides that someone had tried to cover up the Watergate break-in.  

There were no more than a dozen of us. Could we maintain a cover-up—to save the president? Consider that we were political zealots. We enjoyed enormous political power and prestige. With all that at stake, you’d expect us to be capable of maintaining a lie to protect the president.  

But we couldn’t do it. The first to crack was John Dean. First, he told the president everything, and then just two weeks later he went to the prosecutors and offered to testify against the president. His reason, as he candidly admits in his memoirs, was to “save his own skin.” After that, everyone started scrambling to protect himself. What we know today as the great Watergate cover-up lasted only three weeks. Some of the most powerful politicians in the world–and we couldn’t keep a lie for more than three weeks. 

So back to the question of the historicity of Christ’s resurrection. Can anyone believe that for fifty years that Jesus’ disciples were willing to be ostracized, beaten, persecuted, and all but one of them suffer a martyr’s death — without ever renouncing their conviction that they had seen Jesus bodily resurrected? Does anyone really think the disciples could have maintained a lie all that time under that kind of pressure?  

No, someone would have cracked, just as we did so easily in Watergate. Someone would have acted as John Dean did and turned state’s evidence. There would have been some kind of smoking gun, or a deathbed confession. 

So why didn’t they crack? Because they had come face to face with the living God. They could not deny what they had seen. The fact is that people will give their lives for what they believe is true, but they will never give their lives for what they know is a lie. The Watergate cover-up proves that 12 powerful men in modern America couldn’t keep a lie—and that 12 powerless men 2,000 years ago couldn’t have been telling anything but the truth. 

The Colson Center is proud to carry on the legacy of Chuck Colson in advancing Christian worldview and equipping believers to make sense of the world and live out truth in this cultural moment.

Written by John Stonestreet · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: Random

Apr 17 2025

May Easter Bless Our Republic

“[O]ur Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ—the living Son of God … conquered death, freed us from sin, and unlocked the gates of Heaven for all of humanity.”

One might think this is from a sermon of a religious leader, but it’s actually from the White House, specifically from President Trump’s message for Holy Week 2025.

Many Christians are finding this a refreshing change from past presidents, who, at times, would omit specific references to Jesus on the occasion of Easter, or specific references to God on the occasion of Thanksgiving.

Why the contrast?

It may have something to do with how willing our leaders are to do what the Founders did, namely, to acknowledge “the laws of Nature and of Nature’s God, from Declaration of Independence.

In other words, it comes down to this simple truth, which everyone needs to know and live, and which is at the core of religion: “There is a God, and it isn’t me!”

Some want to make God in their own image, determine their own truth, write their own commandments. This is moral relativism, or more accurately, moral chaos. Nobody wins in that scenario, and there’s no such thing as repentance.

But Christians realize that Faith is not a matter of slapping a religious label on whatever lifestyle we want to embrace or philosophy we want to live by.

Faith means acknowledging the truth that comes from God and embracing what He wants us to know and do. It means accepting some very specific things accepting Christ’s saving death), rejecting other very specific things (like abortion), and repenting of some very specific sins.

That’s why President Trump’s message is so refreshing. If we are celebrating the Resurrection of a specific person, Jesus Christ, it means that everything He taught is true. Rising from the dead, after having been crucified for His message, is a pretty strong vindication of that message.

And when the leader of a nation indicates that we are celebrating someone who “freed us from sin,” that gives some pretty clear guidance to a people who, because they govern themselves, need to know the difference between what’s good for the people and what will destroy them.

May this Holy Week and Easter be a blessing for our great Republic.

Image from Shutterstock

Written by Rev. Frank Pavone · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: Easter, Random

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 9
  • Page 10
  • Page 11
  • Page 12
  • Page 13
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 17
  • Go to Next Page »

Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | © 2025 Focus on the Family. All rights reserved.

  • Cookie Policy