• Skip to main content
Daily Citizen
  • Subscribe
  • Categories
    • Culture
    • Life
    • Religious Freedom
    • Sexuality
  • Parenting Resources
    • LGBT Pride
    • Homosexuality
    • Sexuality/Marriage
    • Transgender
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Contact
  • Donate

Random

Mar 19 2025

Culture is Bigger Than Policy

At the Alliance for Responsible Citizenship (ARC) conference in London, many referred to the past year of conservative wins in the U.S. and other Western nations as a “vibe shift.” Perhaps, but it’s just as clear that not everyone got the memo. Many legislative bodies have doubled down on far progressive ideology, showing how different laws actually reflect wildly different understandings of reality and the human person. 

 For example, a Colorado bill just passed through the House that would make “misgendering” the dead a class 2 misdemeanor punishable with up to 120 days in jail and up to $750 in fines. “If they happen to die of prostate cancer and their gender identity is female, that’s important information for us to have,” democratic Representative Karen McCormick, of Longmont, CO said. So, coroners and other officials who sign a death certificate that does not align with the deceased’s “gender identity” could face punishment similar to someone who runs a brothel. 

Biologist (and atheist) Colin Wright had a different take on the bill, 

[I]f a female who “identifies” as a male dies of ovarian cancer, recording her as “male” would skew medical stats and obscure real biological trends with fraudulent sex data. Over time, and across all medical contexts, this will mess with how we understand and tackle health issues. 

Meanwhile, the House Speaker for the state of Maine repeatedly silenced, and then House Democrats officially censured, state Representative Laurel Libby for arguing in session that men should not compete against women in sports. Pretending instead that the matter was settled, and that opposition is discrimination, this state legislative body is defying President Trump’s recent executive order on the matter. ADF General Counsel Kristen Waggoner described the situation in Maine as, “. . .the same old leftist playbook we’ve seen for years: shaming and silencing women who dare to point out the reality of what is happening in their sports.” 

Lawmakers in Scotland are also working to ensure that no challenges to abortion are allowed, from anywhere. According to ADF International, Sara Spencer, a young American mother, was suspended from her midwifery studies in Dundee, Scotland for posting to social media her belief that unborn children deserve protection. It remains unclear whether one can be arrested for a silent prayer at home against abortion in Scotland, as Vice-President J.D. Vance recently claimed.  

And in England, teacher Kevin Lister remains in a years-long legal battle against progressive speech codes. Lister refused to use a student’s “preferred pronouns” and was eventually fired, even though he was willing to accommodate by using a “gender-neutral communication style.” His case is ongoing. 

These episodes reveal that despite the dramatic change in the White House, nations do not live by executive orders alone. Culture matters, and culture is both reflected in and reinforced by political realities, especially in a local context.   

America’s divide, especially on issues of identity and sexual morality, is vast. In fact, the last time our nation was so divided, state by state, on an issue of such moral gravity, was over slavery. We are that divided again. In places like California and Colorado, lawmakers are becoming even more creative in enforcing their ideas and punishing any who oppose.  

It’s far easier when our political conflicts are merely about different policies that aim to accomplish the same goal. It’s far more difficult when the political landscape is about achieving different ends altogether. More than mere disagreements about how to achieve a shared understanding of human flourishing, our political realities point to fundamentally different ideas about what human flourishing is, or even what a human is.  

Because of these high stakes, politics matters and will continue to matter for the foreseeable future. However, behind the questions of elections, candidates, and policies are deeper ones, worldview questions that matter even more and are reflected in more than just the political realm. To fight in politics without addressing the worldview conflict upstream from politics will be, in the end, an exercise in futility. 

Written by John Stonestreet · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: John Stonestreet, Random

Mar 17 2025

Christian Movie Madness: What’s the Best Christian Movie Ever?

Focus on the Family’s Plugged In movie reviewers just unveiled their Christian Movie Madness Bracket – where you can join in the fun and pick what you think are the best Christian movies of all time.

Our crack Plugged In team pulled 64 of the top-grossing Christian films of all time, seeding them according to Box Office Mojo’s lifetime adjusted box office earnings. The films are placed in four different brackets and paired off against each other according to their seeding.

Plugged In’s Bret Eckelberry told me the one film that was included that wasn’t on Box Office Mojo’s list was Cru’s The Jesus Film. He explained,

“The exception to this was The Jesus Film from 1979. Though we couldn’t find specific financial information about it, Cru (which distributes the film) estimates that 5 billion people have seen the film across the globe. We felt like that deserved a #1 seed!”

People have strong feelings about movies. I’m sure you have your own favorites, whether it’s The Chronicles of Narnia: the Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe; The Kendrick Brothers’ Courageous; War Room; Jonah: A VeggieTales Movie; Sound of Freedom; or God’s Not Dead.

But we all know what films deserve to be in the final four. Seriously, I’d hate to influence your vote, but here are my picks:

  • The Ten Commandments, Cecille B. DeMille’s epic 1956 film, of course. And what a cast! The film starred Charlton Heston as Moses, and it featured film greats like Anne Baxter, Yul Brynner, Yvonne De Carlo, Vincent Price and Edward G. Robinson.
  • Mel Gibson’s The Passion of the Christ, starring Jim Caviezel. (Though Plugged In gives it a “Heavy” content caution, due to the vivid, bloody violence – definitely not for kids.) I sobbed all the way through this at the theater.
  • Ben-Hur, the classic 1959 film with Charlton Heston won a record 11 Academy Awards. (Not the 2016 remake!) The chariot scene, the epic sea battles, the leprosy – who cares that it runs more than three hours? Go ahead and get more Milk Duds and make more popcorn during the intermission!
  • Les Misérables – WAIT A MINUTE – THEY DIDN’T INCLUDE LES MISÉRABLES?? With one of the most powerful Christian conversion scenes ever? The scene where the Bishop extends grace to Jean Valjean and his life is redeemed from hatred? Or the part where Fantine is redeemed from sin and goes to heaven? Makes me cry just re-watching the video clips.

Here’s how Eckelberry explained these grievous omissions: “Movies like Lord of the Rings and Les Misérables, while packed with Christian themes, were not officially designated as ‘Christian films’ and so were left off the list.”

Hmph!

I’d forgotten about Lord of the Rings until Eckelberry mentioned it, and that would’ve been my overall top pick, of course, but Tolkien did set the books in a pre-Christian era.  

Still, kind of a lame excuse, if you ask me.

And really? Why is The Shack even on the list?

Easy to replace that with LOTR, Les Misérables or even Max Von Sydow in The Greatest Story Ever Told.

Some have even wondered why Lord of the Beans isn’t on the list (well, okay, one person asked about this film’s omission). But of course that Veggie Tale classic never had a theatrical release. Sorry, only on video.

Like I said, people have strong feelings about movies.

Eckleberry explained that multiple films on the list come from the same producers or series:

We’ve got three movies from Chronicles of Narnia, three from God’s Not Dead, two from VeggieTales and two from Omega Code. We’ve even got some original films and their reboots in Ben-Hur and Left Behind! The Kendrick Brothers [films such as Facing the Giants, Overcomer, The Forge, Fireproof and War Room] and the Erwin Brothers [films like October Baby, Moms’ Night Out and I Can Only Imagine] are also well represented in the bracket with several films each.

He added, “Vote for your favorite movies and, if there are films in the bracket that you don’t like, vote against them! The point is to see the scope of Christian movies over time and have fun rooting for your favorite films to move onto the next round.”

Half the fun of the brackets is seeing all the random movie matchups. Case in point: The Case for Christ vs. Jonah: A VeggieTales Movie. Or Fireproof vs. The Omega Code. Lots of fun matchups in the first round, and many more to come in the next rounds!

Voting for the first round is live NOW!  

  • Round of 64: March 15-20, 2025.
  • Round of 32: March 21-25, 2025.
  • Big 16: March 26-30, 2025.
  • Epic Eight: March 31-April 4, 2025.
  • Famous Four: April 5-9, 2025.
  • Championship: April 10-14, 2025.
  • Winner Revealed: April 15, 2025

Eckleberry told us, “People can jump in and vote at any time. You don’t have to have voted in the last round to vote in the next.”

Plugged In will be updating the Christian Movie Madness page regularly as rounds wrap up and winners move on to the next matchup until one movie is left standing – the greatest Christian movie of all time (as voted on by our audience). So remember to vote each round!

So what are your top picks? What Christian-themed movies should be in the Final Four?

Vote now at Plugged In’s Christian Movie Madness.

More Resources:

Focus on the Family’s Plugged In website offers reviews from a biblical perspective for popular movies, TV shows, music, games, and books.

Follow Plugged In on Facebook, Instagram or YouTube.

What is the Plugged In e-newsletter, and how do I subscribe or unsubscribe?

Written by Jeff Johnston · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: Random

Mar 13 2025

The Beauty of the Bible’s Interconnectedness

A year ago, I was taking an online class through Regent University’s School of Divinity when another student posted an image in a discussion post: a beautiful visualization of “Bible Cross-References.”

The image was created by Chris Harrison, an associate professor at Carnegie Mellon University’s Human-Computer Interaction Institute. He also directs the university’s Future Interfaces Group.

The image takes data from 63,779 cross references in the King James Bible, between its 1,189 chapters, depicting them in a “multi-colored arc diagram.” Cross references are words, phrases, people and quotes used by one biblical author and repeated by that author or picked up and used in other Bible books.

Harrison explains his visualization, saying, “Each of the 63,779 cross references found in the Bible are depicted by a single arc – the color corresponds to the distance between the two chapters, creating a rainbow-like effect.”

Harrison’s academic work, listed on Google Scholar, includes titles about computers and technology this English major can barely begin to understand, such as “TeslaTouch: electrovibration for touch surfaces.”

Another of his research presentations is titled, “Electrick: Low-Cost Touch Sensing Using Electric Field Tomography.”

“Electric Field Tomography.” Sure.

But the Bible Cross-References I get. The image demonstrates the interconnectedness of Scripture, or what Norman Geisler and William Nix call “the unity of the Bible,” in their book From God to Us: How We Got Our Bible.

They explain that this unity offers evidence for the inspiration of the Bible, which is “composed of sixty-six books, written over a period of some fifteen hundred years by nearly forty authors in several languages containing hundreds of topics.”

Geisler and Nix add,

“Yet the Bible possesses an amazing unity of theme – Jesus Christ. One problem – sin – and one solution – the Savior – unify its pages from Genesis to Revelation.”

While this is not conclusive evidence for the inspiration of Scripture, it strongly indicates a divine hand behind the writing and editing and formation of the Bible, guiding each writer and bringing these books together as they were written through God’s chosen people, the Jews.  

Harrison explains how this image, which portrays that unity, came to be, saying,

This set of visualizations started as a collaboration between Pastor Christoph Römhild and myself in 2007. He had assembled a digital dataset of cross references found in the King James Bible.
Cross-references are conceptual links between verses, connecting locations, people, phrases, etc., found in different parts of the Bible. Cross-references are included in the margins or footnotes of some Bibles.

One example of these connections would be a word like “covenant,” an agreement between God and an individual or group of people, that is used by different biblical authors and elaborated on throughout Scripture. The word is used 282 times in the Old Testament and 34 times in the New Testament.

Different references to covenants can be traced throughout the Bible, from Abraham to Moses at Sinai, and from David to the New Covenant given to us by the Son of David, Jesus Christ.

Another example would be similar commands like “fear not” or “do not be afraid” – repeated hundreds of times, in different contexts, through the books of the Bible.

Harrison says that he and Pastor Römhild “struggled to find an elegant solution to render the data – 63,779 cross references in total.”

Eventually, he writes,

“We set our sights on something more beautiful than functional. At the same time, we wanted a visualization that honored and revealed the complexity of the Bible at every level – as one leans in, smaller details should become visible. This ultimately led us to the multi-colored arc diagram.”

Harrison explains what the whites and grays at the bottom of the image represent:

The bar chart that runs along the bottom represents all of the chapters in the Bible, starting with Genesis 1 on the left. Books alternate in color between light and dark gray, with the first book of the Old and New Testaments in white. The length of each bar denotes the number of verses in that chapter (for instance, the longest bar is the longest chapter in the Bible, Psalm 119).

Harrison has also created visuals showing the “Distribution of Biblical People and Places” and a “Biblical Social Network (People and Places).” They’re worth checking out, as well.

Related Articles and Resources

Bestselling Author Lee Strobel and the 4 Proofs of the Resurrection

The Case For a Creator

Celebrate Lent with Your Kids this Easter

Exclusive: Christian Philosopher William Lane Craig Responds to Hawk Nelson Singer’s Leaving Christianity

Harvard Scientist: Wonders of the Universe Point to a Creator

How Jesus’ Incarnation Changes Everything

Leading Scientist: The Universe Points to the Existence of God

RVL Discipleship: The Study

Tim Allen Finishes Reading Entire Old Testament: ‘What a Treasure’

Why Believe in Christianity? Because it is True.

Christianity is Both a Religion and a Relationship

Image credit: Chris Harrison

Written by Jeff Johnston · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: Evangelism, Random

Mar 12 2025

Advocating for Educational Freedom and School Choice

Focus on the Family was recently contacted by a secular news agency with questions about education freedom and the popularity of homeschooling and private education options over government-run schools. This gave us the opportunity to explain more fully why school choice matters to families and sets students up for success.

Right now, with so many fundamental assumptions about the government’s involvement in education being questioned, this is the perfect time to have conversations with our neighbors and friends about why education freedom is essential to the future of the education movement in the United States.

Here’s how Focus on the Family made the case for school choice and education freedom.

Advantages of School Choice

Focus on the Family believes parents have the God-given, fundamental right to direct their children’s education.

School vouchers give parents more independence to direct their children’s education. We know that children have different personalities and learning styles. Parents know their children and are equipped to make education decisions in their child’s best interest.

Focus on the Family will continue to advocate for parental rights and equip parents to understand their rights. We want parents to feel confident in their ability to advocate for their rights as parents and for their children.

Implications of Families Choosing Homeschool and Private Education Over Government-Run Public Schools

As President Trump’s Executive Order “Expanding Educational Freedom and Opportunity for Families” explains, public schools are failing. Recent reports show that only 30% of eighth graders are proficient in reading and math. This is despite federal, state and local combined government funding of $17,700 per student. 

Rather than continuing to subsidize the failing public education monopoly, having more school options means public schools are competing for education dollars, and competition generally leads to better options – in this case, better education options for students and improved student achievement.

The federal government can’t mandate educational freedom – that’s a state issue – but it can offer incentives for states to give families more options, which is what this order does. Increasing educational freedom is good for students, families and our country.

Trump’s Executive Order Prohibiting Indoctrination in the Classroom

Focus on the Family applauds the new Executive Order, “Ending Radical Indoctrination in K-12 Schooling,” that will end the activist indoctrination in K-12 schools.

We know some public schools have become politically and sexually radicalized. They teach, promote and celebrate values and ideologies that are in direct conflict with the spiritual values of many parents.

It is the duty of schools to teach students how to think and engage in discussions with civility — not to indoctrinate students with radical racial and gender ideology.

Education Freedom is Widely Popular

According to Real Clear Opinion Research, Americans overwhelmingly support school choice in education — by a margin of 71% to 13%.

Americans believe in education freedom because it equalizes education opportunities regardless of family income. Education freedom is about helping students attain the education that’s best for them.

Resource for Parents

Focus on the Family has a free parent resource on education — “Equipping Parents for Back-to-School.” It explains issues like educational freedom, parental rights in education, and religious freedom and free speech in schools. It’s a terrific resource for parents who want to advocate for their children and guide them toward academic success.

Related Articles and Resources:

Department of Education: Schools Embracing DEI Will Lose Funding

Don’t Let the Media Deceive You About Trump’s Order Protecting Female Athletes

Trump Ends Radical Indoctrination, Promotes Education Freedom

Trump Signs Executive Order Protecting Women’s Sports and Spaces

Image from Shutterstock

Written by Nicole Hunt · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: education, Random

Mar 11 2025

Kids From Strong Families Less Likely to Fall in Love with Robots

The complications of creating artificially intelligent robots for service, companionship, or sex has been the plot of movies and TV shows for decades, from Terminator to Bicentennial Man to A.I. to Westworld. While some of these entertainment properties portrayed the human-AI relationships as potentially good, others warned of the inevitable, unforeseen dangers. All assumed that such “relationships” are indeed possible, that electronic or robotic entities can achieve self-awareness, human-like emotions, and authentic relationships.   

Perhaps the years of being primed by science fiction explains the curiosity about and even openness to relationships with emerging, real-world AI. For example, a group of researchers who analyzed a million ChatGPT conversations recently reported that “sexual role-playing” was the second most prevalent way in which people are relating to AI. Other uses include companionship and even therapy. The Verge reported that the Psychologist bot on one AI character generator service has received more than 95 million messages. The same service allows users to generate a near infinite variety of customizable AI “friends.” A new YouGov/Institute for Family Studies survey of 2,000 adults under age 40 found that 10% of respondents were open to having an AI friendship, while a quarter believed that AI has the potential to replace real-life romantic relationships.

According to another analysis from the Institute for Family Studies, those who tend to believe what was until recently considered fiction fall into two groups: those whose human relationships are already absent or broken; and those who already turn to digital substitutes, especially pornography, for intimacy. In contrast, young adults from intact families are significantly less comfortable treating AI entities like human beings. Sixty-one percent who still had married parents at age 16 were against AI “friendships,” while only 52% from non-intact households were against them. Those who grew up without married parents were also more likely to say they were “not sure” or have “mixed feelings” about friendships with artificial intelligences. 

While opposition to sexual or romantic relationships with AI was a bit higher across the board, the same general trend held. Seventy-five percent of single young adults from intact families were “against or uncomfortable with” AI romances, compared with 66% of those from non-intact families. And tellingly, the group most open to befriending or dating a chat bot, according to this survey, were those who said they were already daily porn users. 

In short, less real-world family stability equals more openness to AI “relationships” of all types. More addiction to virtual substitutes for human intimacy equals more openness to “sex bots” and other erotic uses of AI. The clear pattern reveals more about who we are as human beings than about AI’s ability to know, think, or love.  

God made us to be in relation with parents, friends, spouses, and children, and those with genuine bonds in their lives are less likely to fall for artificial substitutes. Conversely, those who lack a strong family foundation, either because of an absent parent, divorce, or death are more vulnerable to emerging technologies that mimic these things. Those already accustomed or addicted to a screen instead of a spouse for erotic fulfillment are sitting ducks now that the screens are “talking” back. 

There is both warning and encouragement in these numbers. The warning is that our longstanding, generational forms of relational brokenness, family fracture, loneliness, and addiction are likely to metastasize in the age of AI. Those who turn to simulated relationships will not find what they’re looking for, because contrary to much science fiction, these things aren’t human, or even conscious. They will be, quite literally, looking for love in all the wrong places. Sadly, that won’t stop many from trying and wandering further into unreality in denial of their God-given humanity. 

The encouragement from these surveys is reality’s inoculating effect. Anyone who knows God’s real blessings are, in a sense, forearmed against dangerous substitutes. To borrow an analogy from C.S. Lewis’ The Weight of Glory, those who know what is meant by a holiday at the sea will not settle for “mud pies in the slums.”  

Intact families, real friendships, and genuine romantic love make AI counterfeits less appealing. This should motivate all who have found the fulfillment of being in relationship with God to protect and cultivate these blessings, and to invite those without them into the warmth of genuine relationships, to know and be known by God and their fellow image bearers. After all, the evidence suggests that when they know the difference, people prefer relationships with other people over even the most sophisticated of digital products.

Written by John Stonestreet · Categorized: Family · Tagged: Random

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 11
  • Page 12
  • Page 13
  • Page 14
  • Page 15
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 17
  • Go to Next Page »

Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | © 2025 Focus on the Family. All rights reserved.

  • Cookie Policy