Trump

Taxpayer Money Should Never Go to Planned Parenthood For Any Reason Ever

It might surprise you to learn that the Trump administration has restored millions of dollars in funding to pro-abortion groups, including Planned Parenthood.

Last spring, federal monies designated for the “Title X Family Planning Program” had been frozen — a move widely celebrated by pro-life advocates. The federal program, which dates to 1970, is a welfare subsidy that ostensibly offers “family planning services” to low-income individuals. Groups who facilitate these offerings include the abortion giant Planned Parenthood.

Advocates for the program claim that the federal funds provide critical services for the poor — birth control, sexually transmitted disease testing, cancer screenings, etc. 

Yet, dollars are fungible, and the prospect of providing any amount of money, let alone tens of millions of dollars, to groups that champion and celebrate the slaughter of innocent lives is deeply disturbing and objectionable.

When Trump administration officials froze the money last year, they suggested the groups were in possible violation of numerous laws, including servicing illegal aliens and engaging “in widespread practices across hiring, operations, and patient treatment that unavoidably employ race in a negative manner.”

Not surprisingly, the American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit on behalf of the National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association demanding that grants worth upwards of $65.8 million be restored to Planned Parenthood and the other groups earmarked for the funds. 

According to the lawsuit, the dollars were set to be distributed to 865 service sites thatare treating 842,000 individuals.

The lawsuit was dropped after the funding was restored, apparently in December. Administration officials have not responded to requests to explain their decision. But Clare Coleman, who heads up the National Family Planning group that championed the legal action, claimed officials were guilty of “illegally” withholding “vital family planning funds.”

At the core of the problem is a broken system that can tie the hands of government officials who may want to stop feeding the abortion machine but seem helpless in stopping it. 

Kristan Hawkins, who serves as president of Students for Life, is calling on the government to “debar” Planned Parenthood. Basically, through legislation and policies they would ban the abortion behemoth from contracting with the federal government. 

“Planned Parenthood needs a full DOGE experience, of evaluating them for fraud and for all the allegations of failure to report sex crimes or operating a racist work environment, to name only a few of the charges recently made,” Hawkins said.

Another tactic that could slow and stop any federal monies from going to such groups would be to reinstate “The Protect Life Rule” which was enacted during President Trump’s first term.

As drafted and enforced, it required any organization that received Title X funds not to provide abortions or refer patients for abortion. The Biden administration rescinded the rule in 2021.

President Trump ignited a firestorm earlier this month when he urged Republicans “to be a little flexible on Hyde” — an amendment that bans taxpayer dollars from funding abortion itself. At issue is Congress attempting to extend ObamaCare subsidies. A bill recently passed by the House didn’t include the Hyde protections. Its fate in the Senate remains uncertain. 

It’s a good thing when principled pro-lifers push back on legislators and a president otherwise friendly in so many ways to the pro-life cause. With the reversal of Roe in 2022, abortion remains a hot button issue at both the federal and state level. Some may have grown weary of the battle, but the fate of innocent lives remains at stake every single day. 

When it comes to our resolve concerning the defense of babies in the womb, the words of the 17th century German theologian Rupertus Meldenius comes to mind:

“In essentials, unity; in non-essentials, liberty; in all things, charity.”

The sanctity of life may be debated in a political realm, but it is a moral principle.

Just ahead of the annual “National March for Life,” please join us in praying that administration officials will either reinstate “The Protect Life Rule” or once and for all defund Planned Parenthood and stop the flow of taxpayer dollars to any group even remotely associated with abortion.

Proposed Executive Order Would Protect Parental Rights

A pro-family, pro-child coalition urged the Trump administration this week to issue an executive order protecting parental rights and the religious freedom of Christian parents and foster parents.

The proposed order, which the coalition workshopped with the White House Domestic Policy Council on Wednesday, would:

  • Explicitly affirm parents’ constitutional right to raise their children according to their religious beliefs.
  • Repeal federal foster care rules preventing or obstructing people who affirm biological sex from becoming foster parents.
  • Prohibit organizations from using federal funds to remove children from parents who do not affirm same-sex attraction or sexual identity confusion.
  • Remove federal funding from organizations which help children conceal sexual identity confusion from their parents.

These four recommendations would prevent federal and state governments from unconstitutionally withholding adoption and foster care licenses from Christians or taking children with sexual identity confusion away from loving, Christian parents.

States like Colorado, Massachusetts, Vermont, Oregon, Washington and California require prospective foster parents to affirm a child’s same-sex attraction and sexual identity confusion.

In 2024, the Department of Health and Human Services released regulations giving progressive, “gender affirming” foster care placement organizations privileged status over biology-affirming ones.

Policies like these prevent people like Jessica Bates, Bryan and Rebecca Gantt, Brian and Katy Wuoti and Mike and Kitty Burkes from fostering or adopting some of the estimated 400,000 children in the U.S. foster care system.

Parents in many states can also lose custody of their children for failure to affirm their same-sex attraction or sexual identity confusion.

The Indiana Department of Child Services took custody of Mary and Jeremy Cox’s 16-year-old son after the couple refused to affirm his “transgender identity.” A court eventually found the Cox’s had not abused their son — but the state never gave him back.

He remained in the department’s care to receive treatment for an eating disorder which had worsened while he was away from home.

The Coxes are just one of innumerable heartbreaking examples of state agencies taking children from loving parents who affirm biological. Erin Friday, one of the coalition leaders who met with the White House on Wednesday, says the number of families in this situation far exceeds most people’s expectations.

“The public is unaware that children are being kidnapped by child protective services and family judges because these cases are usually sealed or there are confidentiality laws that prevent parents from going public,” she told The Daily Signal.

Christian parents need not have their child taken to suffer under child protective agencies’ scrutiny.

Erin Lee received an unexpected visit from the Colorado Department of Human Services after she tried to hold her daughter’s public school accountable for secretly teaching gender ideology.

“We managed to evade losing our children that day, but I’ve met many parents who weren’t so lucky,” Lee, who eventually saved her daughter from damaging sexual identity confusion, told the Daily Wire.

She continued:

I also had a six-year-old and an infant at the time and I shudder to think that I could have lost all three of my kids for being a good parent, for being unwilling to lie to my daughter and send her down a path of self-hatred and destruction.

Laws and policies penalizing Christian parents and prospective foster parents for questioning “gender affirming care” are increasingly ludicrous given the mounting evidence proving sex-rejecting procedures harm minors.

The Department of Health and Human Services’ own, peer-reviewed report found “transgender” medical interventions — including puberty blockers, wrong-sex hormones and surgeries — pose “significant, long term and too often ignored” harms to children.

It’s about time America’s foster care systems reflect reality.

Additional Articles and Resources

Wait No More

Wait No More Suitcase Bundle

When Government is Hostile to Christian Foster Parents

President Trump to Sign Executive Order Strengthening Foster Care

Christians Banned as Fathers to the Fatherless

Christian Families Are Not Second-Class Foster Parents

‘Art Club’ Documentary—One Family’s Escape from Gender Ideology, and the Bigger Trend Sweeping the Nation

Radical Colorado ‘Transgender’ Bill Threatens Parents’ Rights and Free Speech

Riley Gaines Asks For Colorado Parents to Help Save Girls’ Sports and Defend Parental Rights

Court Frees Christian Mom to Adopt, Stops Oregon’s Gender Ideology Adoption Mandate

Indiana Family Loses Custody of Son Over Religious Beliefs; Supreme Court Won’t Hear Case

Thank You, Senator Scott, For Leading Charge to Stand Up for Parents and Children in Foster Care

Massachusetts DCF Denied a Catholic Couple’s Foster Care License — Now, They’re Being Sued for Religious Discrimination

Court Upholds Trump Ban on ‘Transgender’ Service Members

A federal appeals court on Tuesday allowed the Trump administration to enforce its prohibition on transgender-identified individuals from serving in the military.

In a 2-1 decision, a panel of judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled a lower court had afforded “insufficient deference” to the secretary of war to enforce strict medical standards on service members.

The decision stays Biden-nominated Judge Ana C. Reyes’s March 18 preliminary injunction that had placed the Pentagon’s policy on ice after several transgender-identifying service members filed a lawsuit to prevent the policy’s enforcement.

Judge Reyes is the “first openly LGBT” person to serve on the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and “is a longtime Democrat Party donor,” The Federalist reports.

Judge Gregory Katsas, a Trump nominee, authored the Court of Appeals’ decision and explained the Hegseth Policy “is likely constitutional because it reflects a considered judgement of military leaders and furthers legitimate military interests.”

“The government identifies several legitimate military interests that the Hegseth Policy advances,” Judge Katsas continued. “Chief among them is military readiness. … Secretary Hegseth had before him evidence that treatments for gender dysphoria would limit deployability and may not be effective. … His predecessors unanimously agreed that these concerns are serious ones.”

In May, the U.S. Supreme Court stayed a separate preliminary injunction in a related case that had prohibited the Pentagon from disqualifying transgender-identified individuals from military service. Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson had dissented from the Court’s decision.

Judge Katsas cited the Supreme Court’s 6-3 ruling as a further reason for staying Judge Reyes’ preliminary injunction.

“The Supreme Court has already held that the government is likely to succeed on its contention that the Hegseth Policy does not violate equal protection,” Judge Katsas wrote.

Judge Neomi Rao, also a nominee of President Trump, joined the Court of Appeals’ majority opinion. Judge Cornelia Pillard, a nominee of former President Barack Obama, dissented.

Just one week after taking office for the second time, President Donald J. Trump signed an executive order, Prioritizing Military Excellence and Readiness, that made it the policy of the U.S. government to “establish high standards for troop readiness, lethality, cohesion, honesty, humility, uniformity, and integrity.”

The order properly explained,

This policy is inconsistent with the medical, surgical, and mental health constraints on individuals with gender dysphoria. This policy is also inconsistent with shifting pronoun usage or use of pronouns that inaccurately reflect an individual’s sex.

The Pentagon then issued a directive on February 26 disqualifying individuals with a current diagnosis, or exhibiting symptoms, of gender dysphoria from military service. The directive also stipulates:

  • All service members will only serve in accordance with their sex.
  • Pronoun usage within the military must reflect service members’ sex.
  • Sleeping, changing and bathing facilities will be designated based on biological sex.
  • The Department of Defense will not pay for transgender medical interventions.

The directive reversed two previous presidential policies, implemented by the Obama and Biden administrations, that had relaxed the military’s policy of prohibiting “individuals with gender dysphoria, a medical condition associated with clinically significant distress,” from serving in the military.

Between 2015 and 2024, the U.S. Department of Defense spent over $52 million providing transgender medical interventions to active-duty service members.

Following the Court of Appeals’ ruling, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth posted a meme depicting his foot kicking “Woke Culture” and “DEI Military” out the front door of the Department of War.

“This administration has done a great deal from day one to remove the social justice, politically correct and toxic ideological garbage that had infected our department. To rip out the politics,” Secretary Hegseth told hundreds of our nation’s top military leaders in a speech in September.

“No more identity months, DEI offices, dudes in dresses. No more climate change worship. No more division, distraction or gender delusions. No more debris.”

Now, two of our nation’s highest courts have upheld one of the administration’s initiatives to restore a “warrior ethos” to the military and end the “woke” at the Department of War.

Liberty Counsel founder and chairman Mat Staver issued a statement after the Court of Appeals’ ruling, saying, “The D.C. Court of Appeals ruling affirms that the Equal Protection Clause does not require the armed forces to disregard its legitimate medical standards that are essential for mission success.”

“The ‘Hegseth Policy’ is grounded in objective medical criteria and the natural differences between the sexes to ensure that every servicemember is fully prepared — physically and mentally — to meet the challenges of defending our nation.”

The Daily Citizen will keep you updated of any important developments in this case.

The case isTalbott v. United States.

Related articles and resources:

Hegseth: No More ‘Woke’ At Department of War

Supreme Court Lets Trump’s ‘Transgender Military Ban’ Take Effect

SecDef Hegseth: Military Reinstating 8,700 Wrongly Discharged Servicemembers

Biden-Appointed Judge Blocks Trump Ban on ‘Transgender’ Service Members

Pentagon Ends Paid Travel Expenses and Time Off for Abortions

Photo from Getty Images.

President Trump: ‘We’re Saying Merry Christmas Again’

President Trump declared the return of “Merry Christmas,” an open invitation for Americans to be bold and unafraid to share their Christian faith this Christmas season.

“We’re saying MERRY CHRISTMAS again!” the White House posted on X on December 1, alongside a picture of the smiling president beside a fully decorated Christmas tree in the Oval Office.

During his first campaign for president, then-candidate Trump would regularly assure crowds that “We’re going to be saying ‘Merry Christmas’ again.”

“You go into a department store. When was the last time you saw ‘Merry Christmas?’ You don’t see it anymore,” Trump contended during a speech at Liberty University in January 2016. “They want to be politically correct. If I’m president, you will see ‘Merry Christmas’ in department stores, believe me, believe me.”

The president, known for speaking in generalities and hyperboles, certainly recognized a very real cultural phenomenon.

According to a 2022 report produced by the International Institute for Religious Freedom, Christians often engage in “various forms of self-censorship” in response to secular intolerance.

The report, focused on France, Germany, Columbia and Mexico, found secular intolerance has a “chilling effect on Christians, which directly affects their capacity to express their faith freely in society.” That reality is surely present in the United States as well.

Could such self-censorship influence Christians to wish others a more general greeting of “Happy Holidays” – to include Kwanzaa, Yule and Hanukah – rather than “Merry Christmas?” Perhaps.

Either way, Christians should be intentional in looking for opportunities – especially during Christmastime – to share our faith with others. Scripture urges us to “always be prepared to make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you; yet do it with gentleness and respect” (1 Peter 3:15, ESV).

This year, a secular “chilling effect” certainly hasn’t stopped the White House from going all-out in their Christmas decorations, perhaps as a part of the president’s desire to strengthen the Christmas season.

On Dec. 1, first lady Melania Trump unveiled the White House’s Christmas decorations.

WASHINGTON, DC – DECEMBER 01: Christmas trees and holiday decorations surround the Cross Hall during an advance tour of the 2025 White House Christmas decorations on December 01, 2025 in Washington, DC. The theme for this year’s White House Christmas decorations is “Home Is Where The Heart Is.” (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

The first lady personally selected the White House’s 2025 Christmas theme, “Home Is Where The Heart Is,” and appointed renowned designer Hervé Pierre to oversee the implementation of her creative vision. The theme is meant to illuminate the “heartfelt character of America within the People’s House.”

Mrs. Trump decorated the White House with 25,000 feet of ribbon; 10,000 butterflies; 700 feet of garland; 120 pounds of gingerbread; 75 signature wreaths with classic red bows; and more than 50 Christmas trees.

According to the White House, the first lady drew creative inspiration from “the joys, challenges, and frequent motion derived from motherhood and business.”

“The constant movement has taught me that home is not merely a physical space; rather, it is the warmth and comfort I carry within, regardless of my surroundings,” America’s first lady reflected.

WASHINGTON, DC – DECEMBER 01: Christmas trees and holiday decorations surround the Cross Hall during an advance tour of the 2025 White House Christmas decorations on December 01, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

Mrs. Trump’s decorations include specially themed rooms, including the “Fostering the Future Red Room,” which the White House described as “a transformational experience dedicated to the foster-care community.” Blue butterflies contrast with the red color to symbolize the meaning of transformation and renewal.

WASHINGTON, DC – DECEMBER 01: Blue butterflies are seen in the Red Room during an advance tour of the 2025 White House Christmas decorations on December 01, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

The Blue Room features the official White House Christmas tree, an 18-foot concolor fir from Sidney, Michigan, commemorating Gold Star Families “with gold stars and ornaments representing the official bird and flower of every U.S. state and territories – a tribute to the resilience, bravery, and sacrifice of our military personnel and their families.”

WASHINGTON, DC – DECEMBER 01: The White House Christmas tree is seen in the Blue Room during an advance tour of the 2025 White House Christmas decorations on December 01, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

In the White House’s East Room, “Patriotic exhibits featuring America’s signature red, white, and blue” highlight the upcoming 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence according to the theme, “Home is Where the Heart Is: America, Our Home,” Fox News reports. On the trees are 56 eagle ornaments representing every state and territory; and 250 stars representing America’s 250th anniversary celebration.

WASHINGTON, DC – DECEMBER 01: The “America 250” logo is seen on a Christmas tree skirt in the East Room during an advance tour of the 2025 White House Christmas decorations on December 01, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

“This Christmas, let’s celebrate the love we hold within ourselves, and share it with the world around us,” Mrs. Trump said. “After all, wherever we are, we can create a home filled with grace, radiance, and endless possibilities.”

The stunning Christmas decorations reflect so many important pieces of our nation – from foster families to Gold Star families to our shared status as American citizens.

Yet as Christians, we know the true reason we celebrate the Christmas season: “For to us a child is born, to us a son is given; and the government shall be upon his shoulder, and his name shall be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace” (Isaiah 9:6, ESV).

From our families to yours, Merry Christmas!

Related articles and resources:

Wait No More

Christmas Stories

Examining the Evidence of Christmas

Connect with Christ Through Song This Christmas Season

Finding True Joy at Christmas

Traditions: Old and New Ways to Celebrate Christmas

The Purpose of Christmas

Street-Smart Faith: Speaking Truth with Grace

J.John: Winsomely Sharing the Hope of the Gospel

John Smoltz: Unashamed of the Gospel

Child Corrects First Lady Jill Biden: ‘Happy Christmas!’

Photos from Getty Images.

Trump Admin: ‘The Days of Anti-Christian Bias in the Federal Government are Over’

Apple founder Steve Jobs famously said you can’t connect the dots looking forward – you can only connect them looking backward – a truism of life that’s especially relevant as the federal government looks to root out anti-Christian bigotry.

Created by President Donald Trump’s Executive Order 14202, “The Task Force to Eradicate Anti-Christian Bias” has released its initial findings of examples of religious bigotry during the previous four years.

They concluded, “A review of federal departments and agencies revealed a consistent and systematic pattern of discrimination against Christians during the Biden Administration. Where there should have been “equal justice under law” there was unequal treatment–policies and practices that singled out Christian people, Christian houses of worship, and Christian convictions for disfavored treatment.”

The dots they connect won’t come as a surprise to faithful readers of Daily Citizen or those who have been paying attention, but they’re still sobering to see listed all in one place.

Here are a few examples:

  • The Department of Labor eliminated the Office of Faith-Based Initiatives and replaced it with the Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Office.
  • Social media posts acknowledging such sacred celebrations as Palm Sunday, Good Friday and Easter were taken down while posts noting “Pride Month,” Ramadan and Diwali were left up.
  • Employees were forced to use preferred pronouns and include rainbow flags in communication regardless of faith objections.
  • The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission expanded the “Pregnant Workers Fairness Act” to include abortion and even suggested that denying males access to female restrooms constituted harassing conduct.
  • The Department of State likened homeschooling to child abuse.
  • The Department of Justice arrested individuals for praying and protesting outside abortion clinics – yet ignored protestors outside churches and pregnancy resource centers.
  • Requests for COVID-19 vaccine religious wavers were regularly ignored and denied.
  • Under the Biden administration, the FBI unfairly targeted “radical-traditionalist” Catholics, even labeling them as “domestic terrorism threats” given their opposition to abortion.

The reports also concluded that the Biden administration harassed Christian universities like Grand Canyon and Liberty, slapping extraordinary fines on them over unfounded or trumped-up charges. This past May, the Department of Education reversed course and removed a $37.7 million fine on GCU. The school had been previously accused of misleading graduate students.

During the last four years, anti-Christian bias has also been evident in what might be considered passive aggressive declarations. For example, back on Easter Sunday in 2023, the Biden administration declared it to be “Transgender Day of Visibility.” There were 364 other days they could have chosen – but they chose the day Christians celebrate Jesus’ resurrection from the dead.

Over the years, we’ve seen religious bias on display in the foster care system where prospective parents have been told they have to play along with a child’s sexual confusion if they want to be permitted to serve. On college campuses, Christian groups have been told they can’t discriminate and have been told atheists should be permitted to be in leadership roles. Then there are the Little Sisters of the Poor being constantly harassed and told as an organization that they need to pay for abortifacients.

Thankfully, President Trump and Attorney General Pam Bondi are saying, “No more!”

The report concludes:

“The Task Force makes this commitment: the federal government will never again be permitted to turn its power against people of faith. Under President Trump and Attorney General Bondi’s leadership, in partnership with all members of this Task Force, the rule of law will be enforced with vigor, and every religion will be treated with equality in both policy and action. The days of anti-Christian bias in the federal government are over. Faith is not a liability in America–it is a liberty.”

Amen.

Image from Getty.