• Skip to main content
Daily Citizen
  • Subscribe
  • Categories
    • Culture
    • Life
    • Religious Freedom
    • Sexuality
  • Parenting Resources
    • LGBT Pride
    • Homosexuality
    • Sexuality/Marriage
    • Transgender
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Contact
  • Donate

women's rights

May 20 2026

‘Tickle v. Giggle’: Australian ‘Transgender’ Court Case Is No Joke for Women

No, it’s not what you get when you poke the Pillsbury Doughboy in the belly. 

Tickle v. Giggle is the actual name of a legal dispute where an Australian Federal Court ruled against women – and in favor of a biological male who goes by the moniker “Roxanne Tickle.”

The court upheld a lower court decision that Tickle was discriminated against when the women-only networking app “Giggle for Girls” denied him access. 

Tickle v. Giggle has gained international attention as it demonstrates the disastrous results when being female is redefined to include men claiming to be women. In their rulings, Australian courts eradicated the scientific categories of male and female, stripped women of their privacy and safety, erased womanhood, and punished those who refuse to accept transgender ideology.

Sall Grover created Giggle in 2020. She explained in her affidavit to the Federal Court why she designed the female-only app: 

The vision was to create a little corner of the Internet where women from all over the world could have a refuge away from men. It could be for serious reasons, very superficial reasons, or very practical reasons. It would be a place without harassment, “mansplaining,” “d*** pics”, stalking, and aggression, and other male patterned online behaviour. 

She added: 

During development, I would often say, “I want to ensure that women can have access to a female support network in the palm of their hand whenever they need it” and that is essentially what we were creating. 

According to court documents, the conflict between Tickle and Giggle began in February 2021, when Tickle downloaded the app and registered as a female user, which included downloading a photograph of his face. In October, he was blocked from using the app after Giggle software and employees determined he was a male masquerading as a woman. 

Tickle claimed that “trans women” “are morally and legally women.” 

He then filed a complaint with the Australian Human Rights Commission, saying Grover and Giggle for Girls had violated the Sex Discrimination Act of 1984 and accusing both of gender identity discrimination. 

The original Act prohibited discrimination based on sex, marital status, and pregnancy or potential pregnancy. But in 2013, the Act was amended to include the artificially fabricatedcategories of sexual orientation and gender identity, putting those social constructs on a collision course with biological sex – being male or female. 

Grover stalwartly refused to participate in any reconciliation process with the Australian Human Rights Commission or Tickle, which would’ve meant allowing him on the app. So he sued her and Giggle. 

In a ruling as ridiculous as the case’s name, Judge Robert Bromwich said that because Tickle had “a labioplasty and vaginoplasty” – removal of his genitals and inverting his penis to create a faux vagina – his sex changed to “that of a woman.”

Of course, it did not.

In his decision, Bromwich assaulted what we know from science, writing ideologically: 

  • “Sex is not confined to being a biological concept referring to whether a person at birth had male or female physical traits.”
  • Sex is not “confined to being a binary concept, limited to the male or female sex, but rather takes a broader ordinary meaning, informed by its use, including in State and Territory legislation.”
  • “Sex can refer to a person being male, female, or another non-binary status.”
  • Sex “also encompasses the idea that a person’s sex can be changed.”

He is deeply mistaken. Sex is not determined by surgery, legislation, or public usage of the word. 

The judge ruled that Giggle and Grover engaged in “indirect gender identity discrimination against the applicant,” ordering them to pay up to $60,000 AUD in damages and legal fees, about $43,000 in U.S. dollars. 

Tickle had also demanded a published written apology, but Bromwich said any apology would be “insincere,” adding: 

It is plain that any apology given by Ms Grover, and any apology given by her on behalf of Giggle, would be through clenched teeth and utterly devoid of sincerity. She would be doing no more than saying she was sorry, but she would not in fact be sorry at all. She adheres to her sincerely held beliefs.

Grover appealed the ruling to the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia, and on May 15, 2026, the judges upheld Bromwich’s ruling. 

The ruling is a slap in the face to Australian women and basic reason, as it means that being a woman has no real meaning. It means that any Aussie male who claims to be female has access to all women-only activities and spaces. 

To add insult to injury, the court ruling doubled the compensation to Tickle for damages and legal costs. In addition, the court upgraded the offense to direct “gender identity” discrimination. 

Grover has said she will appeal the decision. She wrote about the consequences of the ruling in a post on X, “Men who claim to be women have more rights than actual women in Australia.” 

I am absolutely devastated
Men who claim to be women have more rights than actual women in Australia.
It is women who are being discriminated against, not the men who claim to be us.

But in a sense, nothing has changed: we will all wake up tomorrow & men will still not be women.

— Sall Grover (@salltweets) May 15, 2026

She’s right, male transgenderism trumps women’s rights in Australia – and any place where sex is redefined to include “gender identity.” Let’s hope the High Court of Australia has more sense.

The case is Tickle vs. Giggle. 

Related articles and resources: 

Activist Erin Friday on Protecting Kids and Fighting ‘Gender’ Ideology

Do Not Fall for the ‘Affirm Them or They Will Die’ Lie

ADF International: 

“Sex is not confined to being a biological concept” rules Australian Court

Australian court dismisses appeal to uphold biological reality in ‘What is a woman?’ case

Family First New Zealand: Interview with Sall Grover

HHS Releases Report on Harms of ‘Transgender’ Medical Interventions for Minors

How the “Trans” and Gender Redefinition Issue Attacks the Family

Medicalizing Gender Confusion Makes Things Worse, New Research Confirms

Stella O’Malley: Sall Grover – The Woman Who Refused to Lie

Transgender Ideology is Inherently Destructive

Transgender Ideology is Inherently Destructive, Part 2

Why Christians Can’t Avoid the “Trans” and Gender Redefinition Issue

Yes, Girls Care When Boys Take Their Trophies

Yes, Transgenderism is a False Belief System

Photo courtesy of Sky News Australia and ADF International.

Written by Jeff Johnston · Categorized: Culture, Sexuality · Tagged: transgender, women's rights

Mar 13 2026

Iranian Women’s Soccer Team Reminds Americans What It Means to Fight for Women’s Rights

Six members of the Iranian women’s soccer team publicly defected this week after an act of peaceful protest left them in the crosshairs of a notoriously brutal regime.

The Iranian government labeled the team “wartime traitors” earlier this month after they refused to salute or sing the Iranian national anthem before a match in Australia.

“Traitors during wartime must be dealt with more severely,” an anchor on the government-run Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting commented on March 5 — less than a week after America launched devastating strikes on Iranian leadership.

“For you to go [to Australia] and not sing the national anthem, this is the pinnacle of dishonor and lack of patriotism,” the host continued. “Both the people and officials should treat these individuals as wartime traitors.”

Five soccer players — Fatemeh Pasandideh, Zahra Ghanbari, Zahra Sarbali, Atefeh Ramazanzadeh and Mona Hamoudi — accepted Australian humanitarian visas on March 9. Australian police secreted the women out of their hotel, where their security had reportedly sequestered the team for bad behavior.

The next day, player Mohaddeseh Zolifi and support staff member Zahra Soltan Meshkeh Kar also chose to stay in Australia. Unfortunately, one of the duo — it’s unclear which — changed her mind. She returned to Iran with the rest of the team on March 11.

The brave women who fought to remain in Australia leave loved ones at the mercy of the Iranian regime. The equally brave women who returned to Iran could face fines, imprisonment — even execution.

The Iranian government has killed women for far less.

The sacrificial courage and conviction of the Iranian women’s soccer team is a poignant foil to what many American activists consider “fighting for women’s rights.”

Here, some women fight for the “right” to kill their preborn babies at any gestation and for any reason. Others fight for men who “identify” as women to invade women’s sports and spaces.

American women can fight for these incoherent and immoral interests precisely because they live in America, where the freedoms and protections guaranteed by the Constitution apply equally to both sexes.

Iran confers few such rights on any of its citizens — but women and girls least of all.

The Iranian constitution stipulates women need only receive equal rights and treatment to men when required by “Islamic criteria” — an undefined term giving the government near unfettered power to restrict women’s freedoms.

Accordingly, Iran does not offer women the same rights as men in:

  • Marriage, divorce and custody proceedings
  • Political participation
  • Participation in sports, arts and the workforce
  • Freedom of movement and dress

The Iranian justice system is similarly biased. Women receive less compensation for violations of their rights and face obstacles to winning in court. At best, the testimony of a woman carries half the legal weight of a man’s. For many crimes, women’s testimonies cannot be used at all.

Their lack of legal power is particularly problematic given how vulnerable Iranian women are to sexual assault and domestic violence. The law contains many loopholes for husbands and male relatives to harm women, including through so-called honor killings.

If a woman reports one of the few crimes of legally recognized sexual assault, she can only win her case if the perpetrator confesses or if she obtains testimony equivalent to that of four male witnesses. If she fails to prove her case, she can be prosecuted for sexual activity outside of marriage, which can result in punishments including flogging, stoning and death.

In 2024, the Iranian government passed new dress code restrictions further empowering government officials to arrest, detain and punish women for “inappropriate hijab,” including showing skin below the neck, above the ankles or above the forearms and wearing “tight clothing.”

The government ruthlessly suppresses protests against this and other laws restricting women’s freedoms. New outlets estimate the regime executed as many as 33,000 civilians leading up to American and Israeli strikes on the country in late February.

Iranian women must fight for women’s rights because they do not have any. American activists would do well to consider Iranians’ plight before deciding laws restricting abortion or protecting single-sex spaces come anywhere close to “violating” women’s rights.

Let’s strive for an iota of perspective.

Additional Articles and Resources

United Nations Round-Up: Iran Heads Human Rights Council Assembly, Fails to Condemn Hamas

Israel-Hamas War — How Does Iran Fit In?

Women’s Rights Groups Silent on Hamas Sexual Violence, Analysis Shows

Young Women Reflects on International Women’s Day

Wives and Mothers Should Be the Stars of Women’s History Month

Colorado Abortion Clinic Performs Third Trimester Abortions ‘For Any Reason’

Fact Check: Some babies are executed after they’re born.

Celebs Lobby Against Keeping Boys Out of Women’s Sports in ACLU Ad

Ad Targets ACLU for Not Knowing What a Woman Is

Photo credit: Getty

Written by Emily Washburn · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: Iran, women's rights

Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | © 2026 Focus on the Family. All rights reserved.

  • Cookie Policy