• Skip to main content
Daily Citizen
  • Subscribe
  • Categories
    • Culture
    • Life
    • Religious Freedom
    • Sexuality
  • Parenting Resources
    • LGBT Pride
    • Homosexuality
    • Sexuality/Marriage
    • Transgender
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Contact
  • Donate

parenting

Mar 25 2026

Ohio Court: Parents Not Required To Support Child’s ‘Transsexual Identity’

An Ohio court ruled that the state’s juvenile court was wrong to suggest that a mother and father were unfit parents because they would not affirm their daughter’s “transsexual identity.” 

Across the country, child protective service agencies, courts and state legislatures have worked to label non-affirmation of a child’s “gender identity” a sign of “abuse” or “coercive control.” 

Children’s agencies and courts in Arizona, California, Indiana, Maryland, Montana, Texas and other states have removed children from parents’ custody because they would not allow damaging transgender medical interventions. Many of those parents are now fighting lengthy, expensive court battles to regain their children.

The court’s ruling is a welcome affirmation of parental rights and a rejection of “transgender” ideology. 

The decision from the Court of Appeals Twelfth Appellate District of Ohio involved a child custody battle as the court decided whether her mother, father, or Clinton County Children Services should have permanent custody over a 14-year-old girl, “Sara.” 

The opinion, from Judge Matthew R. Byrne, joined by Judges Robert A. Hendrickson and Robin N. Piper, explained in a footnote: 

Though not stated explicitly, there is some suggestion in the state’s brief and in the juvenile court’s permanent custody decision that Mother and Father were unfit as parents because they both were initially reluctant to embrace Sara’s announcement that she was transgender and/or using male pronouns. We disagree. 

There is no requirement in Ohio law that parents must unquestioningly accept and support their minor children’s claims of transsexual identity or preferred pronouns.

The ruling pointed to the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision Mirabelli v. Bonta which upheld parents’ rights to raise their children free from transgender indoctrination and subterfuge from local schools: 

Quite recently, Justice Barrett, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Kavanaugh, emphasized that “the doctrine of substantive due process has long embraced a parent’s right to raise her child, which includes the right to participate in significant decisions about her child’s mental health.”

The Ohio judges went on to explain that her mother and father’s “cautious reaction” to their daughter’s vacillating “gender identity” was not cause for removing Sara from their custody: 

From a best-interest analysis perspective, we see no serious concern presented by Mother’s and Father’s cautious reactions to Sara’s disclosure of her perceived transgender status and preference for male pronouns. 

This lack of concern is particularly bolstered here, where both Karen [Sara’s half-sister] and Sara’s therapist testified that Sara is struggling with gender identity and sexuality, and Karen explained that Sara tended to “change” her sexuality every four to five weeks.” Children who struggle with these issues deserve sober and sensitive guidance, and Ohio law does not require parents unquestioningly to accept whatever their children say about their gender identity or sexuality at that particular moment.

The decision highlights serious problems with transgender ideology: Most children and adolescents who struggle with gender identity will desist and embrace their biological reality. 

Sara’s use of pronouns illustrate the impermanence of her changing, unstable identity, as the court detailed: 

The record indicates that, during the pendency of the children’s services case, Sara repeatedly changed the pronouns that she prefers. We will refer to Sara accurately, as a female.

Activists and their allies, on the other hand, falsely promote transgenderism as stable and permanent. So they’ve worked to remove children from parents who won’t affirm these mostly transient identities. 

In Sara’s case – because of other serious parental and family problems – the court did rule that it was in her best interest to come under the custody of Clinton County Children’s services. 

But the court sensibly ruled that Sara’s parents’ response to her sexual identity confusion was not an issue in their decision. 

The decision, In re. S.B., can be found here. 

Related articles and resources: 

Activist Erin Friday on Protecting Kids and Fighting Gender Ideology

Colorado Bill Would Force Parents to Accept Child’s New ‘Gender Identity’

Erin Friday on Family Courts, ‘Transgender’ Sanctuary States and Fighting to Protect Parental Rights

HHS Tells States Not to Remove Children From Parents Who Affirm Biological Reality

Indiana Family Loses Custody of Son Over Religious Beliefs; Supreme Court Won’t Hear Case

Proposed Executive Order Would Protect Parental Rights

Sixteen States Sue Trump Administration for Protecting Children from ‘Trans’ Procedures 

Supreme Court Affirms Parents’ Rights Over California’s ‘Transgender’ School Policies

Written by Jeff Johnston · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: parenting

Mar 20 2026

Kentucky Assembly Overrides Veto to Join Education Freedom Tax Credit Program 

The Kentucky General Assembly overrode a veto to join the newly created Education Freedom Tax Credit program. 

The federal program gives taxpayers up to a $1,700 tax credit for contributing to approved Scholarship Granting Organizations (SGO), nonprofits that provide scholarships for education-related expenses like tuition, fees, tutoring and classroom supplies at public or private schools. 

Kentucky joins almost 30 other states that have opted in or plan to participate in the program thus far. 

The Assembly passed House Bill 1 in late February, but Governor Andy Beshear vetoed the measure. The House voted 77-14-1 to overturn the veto, and the Senate followed up with a vote of 31-5. 

David Walls, executive director of The Family Foundation of Kentucky, a pro-life, pro-family organization, applauded the veto override, saying: 

The final passage of HB 1 by the General Assembly is a huge win for all Kentucky students. This program will give Kentucky students more resources to further their education regardless of where they go to school, a victory for educational freedom and parental rights.

In his veto message, Governor Beshear pointed to the Kentucky Constitution which requires public dollars be used only for public education – not private schools. He stated: 

With House Bill 1, the [Republican] supermajority is at it again, wanting to use a federal tax credit to divert public dollars to private schools.

But the governor was disingenuous. No public dollars are involved in the program, and no state money, either. 

Private citizens choose to donate to a nonprofit SGO – or not. Those organizations give scholarship money to K-12 students, many of whom attend public schools but will receive assistance for tutoring and school supplies. 

No state money is diverted from public schools. 

Even if students use the scholarship to attend a private school, it doesn’t take Kentucky dollars from public schools. 

The Education Freedom Tax Credit was created as part of the Working Families Tax Cuts Act, also known as “The One Big Beautiful Bill Act.” While any taxpayer can donate to an SGO and receive the tax credit, states must join the program for its K-12 students to receive scholarship money. 

Next, as the Departments of Education and Treasury explain in a fact sheet, the state provides a list of qualifying SGOs to the federal government. Taxpayers can donate to any listed organization and receive the tax credit. 

K-12 students in participating states “from a household with income not greater than 300% of the area’s median gross income” can then apply for scholarships for educational needs. 

Taxpayers in states that don’t join the program can still donate to a qualified charitable scholarship organization and receive the tax credit, but students from that state will not be able to apply for scholarships. 

Walls explained that the program, like all educational freedom measures, benefits all families, allowing them to improve their children’s academic achievement: 

This new Federal Scholarship Tax Credit program exists to give more choice and opportunity to students across the country. If the governor and teachers unions had their way, Kentucky students would miss out on money that students in other states have access to. 

Thankfully, the General Assembly chose to stand with Kentucky families and students over ideology. With the final passage of HB 1, Kentucky students are better off and will have more educational opportunities moving forward.

Related articles and resources: 

3 Reasons to Pay Attention to Your Child’s School

Advocating for Educational Freedom and School Choice

Deep Dive: What the Media Gets Right and Wrong About the Big, Beautiful Bill — and Why Families Should Care.

Education Department Celebrates National School Choice Week

‘Equipping Parents For Back-To-School’ – Updated Resource Empowers Parents

House Passes ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’ With Tax Cuts & Pro-Family Policies

House Passes ‘One Big Beautiful Bill Act,’ Finally Defunding Planned Parenthood

The Family Foundation of Kentucky

New Education Secretary Linda McMahon: ‘Send Education to the States’

School Choice for Parents

Schooling Options

Senate Passes ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’ to Defund Planned Parenthood, Lower Taxes

Trump Ends Radical Indoctrination, Promotes Education Freedom

Written by Jeff Johnston · Categorized: Education, Government Updates · Tagged: parenting

Mar 10 2026

Every Parent Wants a Son Like Paul Skenes

Team USA’s Paul Skenes delivered a commanding performance on Monday night against Mexico in the World Baseball Classic (WBC), an international tournament featuring twenty nations.

The 2024 National League Rookie of the Year and last year’s Cy Young Award winner who plays for the Pittsburgh Pirates, Paul Skenes threw four scoreless innings and struck out seven in Team USA’s 5-3 win.

Speaking with FOX Sports’ Ken Rosenthal after the game, he was asked what it meant to represent the United States.

“That’s what we do it for,” he replied. “This is the greatest country in the world.”

The pitcher’s patriotism didn’t start in Houston but was nurtured and amplified during his two years as a cadet at the United States Air Force Academy in Colorado Springs. Born and raised in California, the All-Star pitcher was inspired to pursue military service growing up around two uncles, one who graduated from the Naval Academy and one who served in the Coast Guard.

“Everything I saw from them — how they lived their lives and the values they represented — I had the utmost respect for those who serve,” Skenes wrote this week.

Arriving at the Air Force Academy in the summer of 2020, the then fourth-class cadet said he was moved when taking the “Oath of Enlistment.”

“I got the chills reciting that pledge,” he recalled. “Just from how proud I am of this country. I’m actually getting chills right now remembering back to that time. Because when you love something so much that you’re willing to lay down your life for it? It’s pretty meaningful stuff. And, truth be told, as much as I love the game of baseball … that’s much bigger than any sport.”

It wasn’t a surprise that Paul Skenes pitched well for the Air Force Falcons, but nobody expected him to dominate as he did, especially in his freshman year. After enjoying two commanding seasons, he realized he had a life-altering decision to make. Were he to remain at the Academy, Cadet Skenes would be obligated to serve five years as an Air Force officer following graduation. This was an attractive option given that he had chosen the Academy to pursue his dream of being a fighter pilot. But it would also mean that his chances of playing Major League Baseball would be greatly diminished if not dashed all together.

Ultimately, Skenes decided to transfer to LSU, a school with a highly regarded baseball program. He helped his team win the National Championship in 2023. After graduation, he was drafted by the Pittsburgh Pirates.

Prior to pitching on Monday night in Houston, Skenes wrote, “A Letter to All Little Leaguers Out There,” a heartfelt reflection detailing his love of America and his hope to somehow encourage younger players to follow in his footsteps:

Everyone on this team, they’re all here because they do something different than everybody else. And I’m all about finding out what that exceptional trait is. Whether it’s Bobby, or Bryce, or Tarik, and on down the line. It’s been so much fun for me to be able to do that. I’ve enjoyed every minute of it.  

But this tournament is not about me. It’s not about any of us, really. 

It’s bigger than any one person. It’s about country.  

Paul Skenes went on to stress that the secret to any success is sacrifice and dedicated effort:

I’ll finally give you that tip I mentioned. (And I hope your parents are reading this, too.)

“How does my kid make it to the bigs?”

I’ve been asked that so many times. It’s like your parents are looking for a cheat code or something. But I’ll tell you all right now….

It’s not magic. It’s not luck. It’s work! 

Hard work is the minimum if you want to be successful in anything. That’s baseball, and that’s life. Please always remember that. And take that with you wherever you go in this world. 

It will serve you well, I promise.

Careful viewers and fans of Paul Skenes may have noticed a not-so-subtle clue that might explain the star pitcher’s stability and confidence both on and off the mound.

On the pinky finger of his baseball glove, you’ll see “2 Timothy 1:7.”

Wrote the Apostle Paul, “For God has not given us a spirit of timidity, but of power and love and discipline.”

Whether serving at the Air Force Academy or playing baseball for LSU, the Pittsburgh Pirates or Team USA, that biblical guidance has served him well.

It’s an open question if Team USA will prevail in the World Baseball Classic, and Paul Skenes isn’t alone with his patriotism and faith. But in a world that so often seems upside down, it’s refreshing to see the spotlight shine so brightly on a young man who so clearly loves his country, believes in hard work, and who appears to unapologetically and openly declare his Christian faith.

Written by Paul Batura · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: parenting

Mar 09 2026

Do Strict Parents Have a Better Relationship with Their Kids?

Do strict parents have better relationships with their kids? According to new research from the Institute for Family Studies, the answer may be yes.

The Institute surveyed more than 24,000 parents with over 40,000 children and found something surprising — families with clear rules and firm expectations reported stronger parent-child relationships.

For years, parents have been told that having too many rules could push their children away.Some parenting advice suggests that fewer rules, fewer conflicts and more freedom create a stronger connection between parents and children.

But this new research challenges that assumption.

The data shows that families who enforce bedtimes, curfews, household expectations, screen-time limits, and homework time, and require more outdoor play were more likely to report closeness between parents and children.

Even more surprising, it wasn’t just the parents who reported a better relationship — so did the teenagers.

The survey shows that setting boundaries didn’t damage the relationship; it appeared to strengthen it.

Setting rules and consistently enforcing them is often one of the most difficult aspects of parenting. It can create conflict in the moment and requires persistence and patience. But according to the research, those efforts appear to pay off in the long run.

Easier and Harder Stages for Moms and Dads

The survey also found that parenting feels easier for mothers and fathers during different stages of childhood.

Fathers reported that parenting was most difficult when children were under the age of two and easiest when children were between the ages of nine and eleven. 

Mothers reported the opposite pattern. For many moms, the early years felt easier, while parenting became most challenging when children were between the ages of four and seven.

These shifting challenges reflect the reality that every stage of childhood brings its own unique demands, and moms and dads experience them in different ways.

Parenting Easiest with Support

Not surprisingly, the survey also found that parenting feels easier when parents have strong support systems. Both mothers and fathers reported lower levels of stress when they felt supported by their spouse and community.

For mothers especially, the support of a husband made a significant difference in how manageable parenting felt.

Importance of Loving Leadership and Firm Expectations in the Family

This research offers an important reminder — loving leadership from parents in the household is not harmful to children — it is often exactly what they need. Children flourish when they are guided with wisdom, consistency, and love.

Parenting is not easy, and setting boundaries is often one of the hardest parts of the job. 

But when parents enforce rules and correct behavior, they are communicating trust, security, respect and love to their children.

Written by Nicole Hunt · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: parenting

Mar 05 2026

Barrett v. Kagan: Key Takeaways From Supreme Court Ruling on ‘Transgender’ School Policies

The U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision in Mirabelli v. Bonta was an important victory for parents, ruling against California policies that required schools to hide information about a child’s sexual identity confusion. 

The emergency ruling has implications for thousands of parents whose local schools implemented “Transgender Model Policies,” which radical activists helped create. Those policies forced educators to accept false “gender ideology” and directed them to affirm students’ “gender identities” — behind parents’ backs. 

Mirabelli will affect the many similar cases already making their way through the courts and could open the floodgates to even more lawsuits from parents. It’s a significant turning point in the battle against schools indoctrinating students with “gender ideology.” 

The decision reinstates the district court’s permanent injunction, protecting parental rights while the lawsuit plays out. It was not a decision on the merits of the case.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote an opinion supporting the per curiam ruling, which overturned a Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision that had stopped a lower court decision blocking California schools from continuing these harmful policies. 

Justice Elena Kagan wrote an opposing dissent. 

Here are some key arguments and quotes from the decision and the opinions by the two justices. 

California Violated Parents’ Religious Freedom

Some parents had religious objections to schools withholding information about their child’s sexual identity confusion. These parents’ faith teaches that God created only two sexes, male and female, and children can’t change to a different “gender.” 

Of course, this is also biological reality.

The Court highlighted two significant cases that affirm parents’ constitutional right to religious freedom over coercive state policies, Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972) and Mahmoud v. Taylor (2025).

The ruling said: 

We conclude that the parents who seek religious exemptions are likely to succeed on the merits of their Free Exercise Clause claim. California’s policies likely trigger strict scrutiny under that provision because they substantially interfere with the “right of parents to guide the religious development of their children.” 

The Mirabelli decision also pointed out that the Ninth Circuit ignored the recent Supreme Court ruling in Mahmoud v. Taylor, adding this comment:  

The intrusion on parents’ free exercise rights here — unconsented facilitation of a child’s gender transition — is greater than the introduction of LGBTQ storybooks.

Justice Kagan argued that the First Amendment violation was irrelevant, arguing it only covered some California parents, not all. She said the legal doctrine of “substantive due process,” a doctrine developed from the Fourteenth Amendment, was the only legal basis for the right “to direct the upbringing and medical care of their children.” 

“The Court made its free exercise ruling superfluous, because the due process ground protects every parent, whether or not religious,” Kagan wrote. 

Which brings us to the second reason the Court ruled as it did in Mirabelli. 

California Violated Parents’ Right to Raise Their Children

Parents also objected that school secrecy policies violated their Fourteenth Amendment right to due process. That amendment’s due process clause says, “nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” 

Not every human right is expressed or listed in the Constitution, but the Court, as Barrett explained, “has crafted a demanding test for recognizing unexpressed rights.” 

She wrote, 

When rights are unstated, how do judges know what they are? 

The obvious risk is that judges will use their own values as a guide, thereby jeopardizing the People’s right to self-governance. To mitigate this risk, the Court has crafted a demanding test for recognizing unexpressed rights: They must be “deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition” and “implicit in the concept of ordered liberty.”

The right to parent one’s child is one such right. It is not given to parents by the state but is a natural, fundamental right which good governance recognizes and protects. 

Mirabelli cited two longstanding Supreme Court decisions that acknowledge parental rights, Pierce v. Society of Sisters, from 1925, and Meyer v. Nebraska, from 1923. These hundred-year-old cases ruled that parents have the fundamental right to provide for the care, nurturing and moral and religious upbringing of their children. 

The Pierce decision famously declared: 

The child is not the mere creature of the State; those who nurture him and direct his destiny have the right, coupled with the high duty, to recognize and prepare him for additional obligations. 

Mirabelli said that parents who object to schools hiding information about their children’s mental health would likely win: 

The right protected by these precedents includes the right not to be shut out of participation in decisions regarding their children’s mental health. 

Even Justice Kagan, who dissented from the decision, seemed to agree that parents might win on constitutional grounds: 

None of this is to say that the Court gets the merits here wrong. … I have no doubt that parents have rights, even though unenumerated, concerning their children and the life choices they make.

She added that states have an interest “in the care and education of children,” but admitted that California’s regulations “could have crossed the constitutional line.” 

But The Court Moved Too Quickly …

Kagan complained that the Court was acting hastily on a case that “so cries out for reflection and explanation.” She said the majority decision showed how the Court’s “emergency docket can malfunction,” adding: 

The ordinary appellate process has barely started; only a district court has ruled on the case’s merits. The Court receives scant and, frankly, inadequate briefing about the legal issues in dispute. 

The justice said Mirabelli should have gone all the way through the years-long judicial process before arriving at the Court for oral arguments and deliberations, “as procedures dictate.” 

Kagan added that, in ruling on Mirabelli, the Court ignored almost 40 other cases raising similar issues: 

The Court resolves the issues raised through shortcut procedures on the emergency docket even though it has had — for months now — the option of doing so the regular way, on our merits docket. 

The justice referenced Foote v. Ludlow School Committee, a Massachusetts case from 2022, where parents say the local school “transitioned” their 11-year-old daughter against their express wishes. 

Foote has been brought up at the justice’s conference meeting nine times since November 2025, including an upcoming conference on March 6, where the Court could still decide to take up the case. 

The Daily Citizen, too, would like the Court to give a full hearing to a similar case — or combine several cases together — where parents’ rights have been so outrageously harmed by a school’s transgender secrecy policy. 

Allowing California Policies to Continue Causes Irreparable Harm

Justice Barrett responded to Kagan’s argument against the emergency decision, saying that parents would be harmed if schools continued to exclude them from issues that affect children’s health and well-being: 

Granting interim relief is not a sign of the Court’s “impatience” to reach the merits. Instead, the grant reflects the Court’s judgment about the risk of irreparable harm to the parents. … 

Under California’s policy, parents will be excluded — perhaps for years — from participating in consequential decisions about their child’s mental health and wellbeing. Thus, the parents are likely to suffer irreparable harm if California enforces its policy while this litigation winds its way through the courts.

The Court recognized that parents’ rights were abrogated by California school policies, saying the continued denial of constitutional rights “during the potentially protracted appellate process constitutes irreparable harm.” 

Parents are harmed when schools work to transition children, especially without their consent. But children are harmed, too, when schools inculcate them into false ideologies and move them toward a lifetime of costly and debilitating medical procedures. 

We are thankful for the Court’s ruling in Mirabelli, and we hope other families will see justice done as they push back against gender dogma. 

Related articles and resources:

Read Mirabelli v. Bonta

BREAKING: Judge Issues Preliminary Injunction Says California School District Cannot Force Teachers to Lie to Parents About Their Children’s ‘Gender Identity’

California Teachers Told to Hide Information About Students’ ‘Gender’ From Parents – They’re Suing

California Schools May Not Hide Students’ ‘Gender Identity’ From Parents

‘Equipping Parents For Back-To-School’ – Updated Resource Empowers Parents

Exclusive Interview: Colorado Parents Expose ‘Gender Cult’ at Public School in New Documentary

Florida Parents Sue School for Helping Teen ‘Transition’ – Without Their Knowledge or Consent

Homosexuality Resources

Montgomery County Must Pay $1.5 Million to Religious Parents After Supreme Court Ruling

Supreme Court Affirms Parents’ Rights Over California’s ‘Transgender’ School Policies

Supreme Court Declines to Hear Colorado Case on Parental Rights, Still Considering Two Similar Cases

Supreme Court Defends Religious Freedom, Parental Rights Over ‘LGBT’ Curriculum

Supreme Court Sympathetic to Opt-Outs for LGBT Curriculum

Transgender Resources

What’s Your School District’s ‘Transgender’ Policy?

Written by Jeff Johnston · Categorized: Education, Religious Freedom · Tagged: parenting

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 8
  • Go to Next Page »

Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | © 2026 Focus on the Family. All rights reserved.

  • Cookie Policy