• Skip to main content
Daily Citizen
  • Subscribe
  • Categories
    • Culture
    • Life
    • Religious Freedom
    • Sexuality
  • Parenting Resources
    • LGBT Pride
    • Homosexuality
    • Sexuality/Marriage
    • Transgender
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Contact
  • Donate

abortion

Jun 04 2026

5 Phrases Christians Should Banish From Their Vocabularies

Estimations vary, but there are approximately one million words in the English language, though most dictionaries include between two hundred thousand and five hundred thousand or so of them. The average person has a vocabulary of between 10,000 and 30,000 words. 

Of those in the available lexicon, there are profane and crass words and terms that Christians should never use, of course, but there are also five more that believers should banish from their vocabulary.

Scripture has something important to say about the power of the words we use, specifically noting that how we choose to communicate can be consequential not only in our own lives, but also influence those around us.

“Death and life are in the power of the tongue, and those who love it will eat its fruits,” wrote King Solomon (Proverbs 18:21). He also noted, “The soothing tongue is a tree of life, but a perverse tongue crushes the spirit” (Proverbs 15:4).

Historically, Christians have put a high value on communicating clearly and truthfully. We should say what we mean and mean what we say. Writing to believers in Corinth who were debating the matter of speaking in tongues, the Apostle Paul wisely noted that it’s impossible for anyone to know what you’re saying if you’re not speaking intelligibly. In fact, he likened it to “speaking into the air” (1 Cor. 14:9).

But good communication isn’t simply about being heard audibly, but also about being understood. We can best accomplish that by choosing our words carefully and deliberately. Speaking plainly and truthfully trumps the use of big flowery words that are vague or downright misleading.

Which brings us to five terms Christians should never use:

The first two: “trans man” and/or “trans woman.”

The primary reason we shouldn’t be using these terms is because neither a “trans man” nor a “trans woman” exists. They’re fantastical creations of a delusional ideology. A so-called “trans woman” is a man who thinks he’s a woman. A “trans man” is a woman who thinks she’s a man.

Big media requires their writers to use the terms, so we’re regularly subjected to seeing them in print. Focus on the Family prioritizes God’s truth and the exclusivity of two immutable and unchanging sexes, so you won’t see those terms in any of our publications.

Focus on the Family’s Glenn Stanton has debated this issue on college campuses and has written extensively about it. In a Daily Citizen essay, he noted that many well-meaning folks say the terms should be used to spare the feelings of the sexually confused. But Glenn correctly states, “Compassion doesn’t require saying untrue things.”

He added:

“People do have the right to choose their own identity and live by it the best they can. That is called individual autonomy. However, no one has the right to demand that everyone else agree with that identity.

“Some may choose to use new preferred pronouns and names for the sake of personal relationship. But no one should be forced to say things they know to be untrue. Not even about what it means to be male or female. That is forced speech.”

The other terms Christians should avoid using are an oldie and two emerging new ones – but phrases some believers regularly let slide into their vocabulary: “pro-choice,” “abortion rights,” and “reproductive rights.” 

Prior to the emergence of the “Right to Life” movement following the Supreme Court’s horrific 1973 decision legalizing abortion in all fifty states, advocates for abortion were known as “abortion rights” advocates or “pro-abortion” activists. 

The term “pro-choice” emerged as a public relations ploy to counter the pro-life surge.

In recent years, “abortion rights” and “reproductive rights” are the newest euphemisms used to try and socially soften the reality of what radical activists are defending and championing: the killing of innocent pre-born life.

C.S. Lewis once gave writing advice to a young girl in Florida that applies to Christians as they navigate communication involving both abortion and the sexually confused.

“Always try to use the language so as to make quite clear what you mean, and make sure your sentence couldn’t mean anything else,” Lewis wrote. “Always prefer the plain direct word to the long, vague one.”

In summation, watch and cultivate your words carefully – and avoid these five terms: trans woman, trans man, pro-choice, abortion rights, and reproductive rights.

Written by Paul Batura · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: abortion, transgender

Jun 02 2026

What to Know About the Life at Conception Act Introduced in the U.S. Senate

Important legislation was introduced earlier this year to protect all preborn human life from the moment of creation, and it deserves the attention of every American who believes all human life has value.

Senator Mike Rounds (SD) introduced the Life at Conception Act (S. 3667) in the United States Senate earlier this year. Companion legislation, H.R. 722, was introduced in the United States House of Representatives by Congressman Eric Burlison (MO).

The Act would clarify by statute that the right to life is guaranteed by the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution to every human being at all stages of life, beginning at the moment of conception and continuing until natural death.

The legislation was cosponsored by Focus on the Family friend Senator Jim Banks as well as Senators James Lankford, Marsha Blackburn, John Kennedy, Roger Wicker, Tommy Tuberville, Kevin Cramer, Bill Hagerty, Mike Crapo, John Hoeven, Steve Daines, Joni Ernst and John Boozman.

Many pro-life organizations support the measure, including Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, Students for Life, Family Research Council and Concerned Women for America.

Since Roe’s reversal in 2022, the pro-life movement has continued to advance the cause of life state-by-state and at the federal level.

This federal bill seeks to establish the principle that many Americans already believe and science affirms  — that human life begins at conception, and every human being deserves equal protection under the law.

The measure is based on the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which declares that no state shall “deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

This bill would establish federal law that preborn children are human beings deserving of constitutional protection.

Supporters of the bill contend that preborn babies are human beings and should be recognized as persons entitled to the same legal protections as every other human being.

Modern science confirms that a new and genetically distinct human organism is created at fertilization. From that moment on, the developing human grows through many stages, but the humanity of the preborn baby does not change. The only thing added is time and nutrition.

Pro-life advocates contend that this scientific reality carries significant legal and moral implications.

If human beings possess inherent dignity and worth, then the law should not exclude an entire class of human beings just because they are more dependent than other human beings.

This bill reflects an ongoing conversation within the pro-life movement following the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe in 2022. The decision to overturn Roe did not answer whether preborn children are “persons” under the 14th Amendment. This legislation would answer that question directly — with a resounding yes.

To date, both measures have been referred to committees but have not advanced any further in the legislative process.

If you believe every human life deserves legal protection from its earliest creation, consider contacting your senators and representatives today and ask them to support the Life at Conception Act.

Written by Nicole Hunt · Categorized: Life · Tagged: abortion, Life

May 21 2026

A Young Poet’s Pro-Life Voice is Censored — But Her Poem Goes Viral Online

A misapplied liberal bumper sticker has it that “Well Behaved Women Seldom Make History.” It is never applied to strong Christian women being faithful to what God has called them to. But that is precisely what academic historian Laurel Thatcher Ulrich was referring to when she penned this quote in a scholarly 1976 journal article.

Ulrich was describing the highly devout Puritan woman of the American colonies.

There is a faithful Christian lass in Jefferson County, Colorado who is actually making history for being silenced by her liberally minded Drake Middle School teacher and school administrators. The Daily Citizen does not know this 13-year-old girl’s name, but we are deeply moved by her brilliance, conviction and passion.

Her seventh-grade class was assigned to write a slam poem about, as she explained, “a conflict in the world that we are passionate about.” She chose to write about life because choosing life is a very important part of her family’s story. Neither she nor her mother would exist if her grandmother had not bravely and selflessly chosen life when she found herself pregnant at the tender age of 14. But she did, and they are all thankful.

Yet, her teacher told her she could not present her poem before the class, even though she carefully met all the criteria outlined by the assignment. It was the topic, and her voice, that was muzzled. The mom explained she was told “because of the offensive material in the poem, that they were not going to allow her to present.” 

You can hear this creative poem and judge for yourself if it is offensive and deserving of being banned. It starts with a famous quote from Dr. Suess, “A life is a life, no matter how small.”

MUST WATCH: We asked the 13-year-old student who was barred from presenting her pro-life poem because it’s “offensive”, to read her poem so we can share it with the world.

PURE FIRE🔥

This is the poem @JeffcoSchoolsCo doesn’t want you to see.

Would be a shame if it went viral! https://t.co/ehwBVYEIce pic.twitter.com/nqaglH1qXx

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) May 20, 2026

It is a lovely, thoughtful piece of work. What a remarkable girl!

But this girl and her mom were told it was “too political.”

The mother rightfully pushed back on the teacher, explaining many other students’ poems presented controversial material like racial politics, LGBT issues, and immigration, but to no resolve.

Yet, it gets worse.

When this mindful girl asked her teacher why she would not be able to present her poem, her teacher told her she would not even be able to be present in the classroom while other students read their own poems. She would have to sit outside. Unlike Rosa Parks who was unjustly asked to move to the back of the bus, this girl was asked to step off the bus.

This young teen bravely pressed the matter and the teacher relented, allowing her to be in the class with her fellow students to hear them recite their poems.

Of her own crisis-laden conception, in which her mother bravely chose life, the student’s mother beautifully explained, “There is hope in hard situations. There is purpose in pain. And good things come out of situations that seem bleak and my family is proof of that.”

We spoke with a mother and her 13-year-old daughter after the girl was barred from reading a pro-life poem at school. They shared why this topic is so personal and important to them.

Try not to cry.. 🥹

The mother explains that her mother got pregnant with her at 14 and chose… https://t.co/ehwBVYEIce pic.twitter.com/ocypyCXKYv

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) May 20, 2026

Thank God for such beautiful strong female voices speaking truth amid a culture of death. Shame on the Jefferson County, Colorado, school officials for illiberally muting this spirited and intelligent girl’s talented pro-life voice. 

JeffCO Public Schools can be contacted at the following:

JeffCO Public Schools / 1829 Denver West Drive #27 / Golden, Colorado 80401
Phone: 303-982-6500

Written by Glenn T. Stanton · Categorized: Education · Tagged: abortion, free speech, pro-life

May 20 2026

What Does the FDA Shakeup Mean for Abortion Pill Review?

Last week, FDA Commissioner Marty Makary resigned from his position amid growing tensions over his priorities, including escalating frustration from pro-life advocates over the slow pace of FDA’s abortion pill review. 

Attorney Kyle Diamantas has been appointed as acting FDA commissioner while the administration searches for a permanent replacement. 

At first, many pro-life advocates were uncertain about the new acting commissioner. 

Reports quickly surfaced that Diamantas previously served as legal counsel for Planned Parenthood.

Simultaneously, pro-life leaders reported receiving requests from Diamantas for a conversation. 

March for Life President Jennie Bradley shared on X that Diamantas was on the phone with pro-life leaders within a few hours of being named as the acting commissioner. 

Had a great convo last night with Kyle Diamantas, the new acting FDA Commissioner. In other words, within hours of being handed this big new job, he was on the phone with pro-life leaders – which is an encouraging sign of where his priorities lie.

After talking w him I'm…

— Jennie Bradley Lichter (@JennieMFL) May 13, 2026

It's true that Diamantas was on a case team representing a Planned Parenthood affiliate in FL when he was a junior associate. My understanding is that when he was initially put on the case he felt he couldn't say no — but he ultimately asked to be removed, for conscience…

— Jennie Bradley Lichter (@JennieMFL) May 13, 2026

Lichter told EWTN News that she shared her concerns about the safety of mifepristone with Diamantas and indicated, based on their conversation, she expected to see “real movement” on the mifepristone study by the FDA. 

She told EWTN, “I feel really comfortable that he is bringing in strong pro-life commitments and a commitment to transparency and to moving with all deliberate speed to take a close look at mifepristone and then take decisive action based on what that study shows.”

Live Action President Lila Rose also spoke with Diamantas and posted on X, “He told me he regrets work he performed as an outside attorney for Planned Parenthood…. He shared that he was assigned to the case by his law firm, performed work on it, and ultimately regretted his involvement because of his moral opposition to abortion.”

She also posted, “Diamantas told me that reviewing the abortion pill is a top priority for him and the administration.”

Today I spoke directly with Acting FDA Commissioner Kyle Diamantas.

He told me he regrets work he performed as an outside attorney for Planned Parenthood in Planned Parenthood of Greater Orlando v. MMB Properties. He shared that he was assigned to the case by his law firm,…

— Lila Rose (@LilaGraceRose) May 13, 2026

Other pro-life organizations, like Students for Life and Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, have been less vocal about who is brought in as the acting FDA commissioner and are more concerned about whether he will act quickly to review mifepristone. 

If the @US_FDA cares about the safety of women and children, they will revoke their approval of Chemical Abortion Pills ASAP. How many more women and babies must die before we stop these dangerous drugs? https://t.co/4454cJXNDG

— Kristan Hawkins (@KristanHawkins) May 19, 2026

We look forward to a new FDA Commissioner who will put an end to the mail-order abortion drug regime. We must return immediately to the 1st Trump Administration standard of in-person dispensing to protect women from coercion and abuse and allow the enforcement of pro-life state…

— Marjorie Dannenfelser (@marjoriesba) May 12, 2026

A comprehensive review would include scrutiny of the pill’s safety, emergency complications, adverse effects reporting, telehealth prescriptions and mail-order distribution.

Under the Trump administration, pro-life advocates expected the FDA to conduct a comprehensive review of mifepristone — the first drug in a two-pill regimen that results in a chemical abortion.

Under the Biden administration, safeguards meant to protect women were eliminated, including in-person visits, while mail-order distribution was approved.  

In light of a safety study released last May, pro-life advocates have been calling on the FDA to conduct a full and comprehensive review of the drug. 

The study, conducted by the Ethics and Public Policy Center, revealed that nearly 11% of women who take the abortion pill experienced serious side effects within 40 days, including sepsis, hemorrhaging, infection and emergency room visits. Those numbers are 22 times higher than the FDA’s current label.

For at least six months, Senator Hawley has been calling on the FDA to stop stonewalling the review of mifepristone and reinstate safety protocols.

But instead of carrying out a comprehensive review of the abortion medication, the FDA approved a generic drug for distribution. 

In the last year there has been growing pressure for the FDA to complete the promised safety review.

Interestingly, new data shows 70% of Americans, including a majority of each political party, support increased oversight for the distribution and consumption of chemical abortion pills like mifepristone.

Pro-life leaders are calling on Commissioner Diamantas to act now to pull the abortion pill from the market. 

The FDA’s review of mifepristone is separate from the legal battle playing out in the federal courts. Judges are still considering questions related to the interstate mailing of abortion pills, while the FDA has the authority to determine drug safety standards. 

For now, the pro-life movement seems cautiously optimistic that the FDA transition could create the opportunity for a serious and genuine review of mifepristone. 

Some women, after taking the first abortion pill (mifepristone), come to regret their decision. Thankfully, there is a way to reverse the pill’s effects if prompt action is taken.

To learn more about the abortion pill reversal protocol, visit abortionpillreversal.com or call 1-877-558-0333 to be connected with a medical professional who can guide callers through the process of reversing the pill’s effects.

Additionally, if you’re struggling and need a listening ear, Focus on the Family offers a free, one-time counseling consultation with our ministry’s professionally trained counseling staff. To request a counseling consultation, call 1-855-771-HELP (4357) or fill out our Counseling Consultation Request Form.

Related articles and resources:

Pro-Life Groups Raise Alarm Over Delayed FDA Review of Abortion Pill Safety

RFK Jr. Announces ‘Complete Review’ of Abortion Pill After ‘Alarming’ New Study Reveals Dangers

Louisiana, ADF Challenge Biden-Era Abortion-By-Mail Scheme

FDA Approves Generic Abortion Pill Despite Ongoing Safety Review

Become an Option Ultrasound Life Advocate

Dealing With an Unplanned Pregnancy

I’m Pregnant, Now What?

My Choice Network

New Insights on the Dangers of the Abortion Pill

Written by Nicole Hunt · Categorized: Life · Tagged: abortion, Abortion Pill

May 15 2026

Supreme Court Restores Access to Mail-Order Abortion Pills While Legal Fight Continues

The Supreme Court Thursday granted a stay blocking enforcement of a lower court ruling that would have restricted access to the abortion pill mifepristone by mail.

The Court’s decision allows abortionists to continue prescribing mifepristone through telehealth appointments, and sending it through the mail, while Louisiana’s lawsuit seeking to require the FDA to reinstate the in-person dispensing requirement on mifepristone continues. The agency removed the requirement during the Biden presidency.

Justices Thomas and Alito dissented from the Court’s decision.

In his dissent, Justice Thomas observed that the Comstock Act “bans using ‘the mails’ to ship any ‘drug … for producing abortion.’” This means Danco Labs and GenBioPro, the manufacturers and distributors of mifepristone, which appealed to the Court for a stay, are engaged in illegal activity.

“Applicants are not entitled to a stay of an adverse court order based on lost profits from their criminal enterprise,” Justice Thomas wrote. “They cannot, in any legally relevant sense, be irreparably harmed by a court order that makes it more difficult for them to commit crimes.”

Justice Alito pointed out Louisiana’s request for the FDA to reinstate the in-person dispensing requirement is commonsense.

“Louisiana [responded to Dobbs by making] abortion illegal except in narrow circumstances,” Justice Alito wrote. “But Louisiana’s efforts have been thwarted by certain medical providers, private organizations, and States that abhor laws like Louisiana’s and seek to undermine their enforcement.”

“These medical providers and private organizations have developed an operation enabling women in Louisiana and other States that restrict abortions to place an online order for a pill called mifepristone that induces abortion.”

Around 1,000 abortions occur in Louisiana each month as a result, more than occurred before the Dobbs decision, Justice Alito acknowledged.

Alliance Defending Freedom Counsel Erin Hawley issued the following statement after the Court’s ruling:

We are disappointed by this decision that allows the FDA and the abortion industry to continue nullifying Dobbs and its promise to return the issue of abortion to the people.
It’s high time the Biden FDA be held accountable for the destruction it has caused with this high-risk drug. Together with Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill’s office, we look forward to litigating our appeal at the 5th Circuit to protect mothers and their children.

The case now goes back to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit to consider the merits of Louisiana’s case. The Daily Citizen will keep you apprised of important developments.

The case is Danco Laboratories v. Louisiana.

At Focus on the Family, we have been working to turn the cultural tide and save mothers and babies from abortion for years. Since beginning the Option Ultrasound Program in 2004, Focus has helped save over half a million lives. Just $60 will help save a life through Option Ultrasound. Will you partner with us to save lives from abortion?

If you are experiencing an unexpected pregnancy and want to learn more about your options, you can visit My Choice Network.

Related articles and resources:

My Choice Network

I’m Pregnant, Now What?

Dealing With Unplanned Pregnancy

Become an Option Ultrasound Life Advocate

New Insights on the Dangers of the Abortion Pill

Overcoming Abortion and Becoming a Force for Life

Supreme Court Temporarily Restores Access to Mail-Order Abortion Pills

Photo from Shutterstock.

Written by Zachary Mettler · Categorized: Government Updates, Life · Tagged: abortion, Life

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 18
  • Go to Next Page »

Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | © 2026 Focus on the Family. All rights reserved.

  • Cookie Policy