• Skip to main content
Daily Citizen
  • Subscribe
  • Categories
    • Culture
    • Life
    • Religious Freedom
    • Sexuality
  • Parenting Resources
    • LGBT Pride
    • Homosexuality
    • Sexuality/Marriage
    • Transgender
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Contact
  • Donate

DOJ

Jul 10 2025

DOJ Lawsuit Describes California Department of Education’s Infuriating Treatment of Girls

The Department of Justice (DOJ) describes the California Department of Education (CDE) and the California Interscholastic Federation’s (CIF) infuriating treatment of female athletes in a lawsuit filed yesterday.

The complaint alleges CDE and CIF violated — and continue to violate — Title IX, a federal law prohibiting sex discrimination in federally funded educational institutions and activities, by allowing boys to compete in girls sports and change in girls’ locker rooms.

The court’s ruling will determine whether California remains eligible to receive federal tax dollars. CDE and CIF received more than $44 billion in federal education funding this fiscal year alone, the DOJ reports.

The DOJ’s complaint argues CDE and CIF policies illegally discriminate against and harm girls in two ways: by depriving them of equal athletic opportunities and by creating a hostile educational environment.

The DOJ proves its first claim by identifying five male athletes that competed in California girls sports leagues in 2024 and 2025. Though the suit identifies none by name, the identities of all but one are public knowledge.

The first male athlete listed is AB Hernandez, the boy who infamously won two California girls state track and field titles in May. According to the complaint, Hernandez has been competing in girls events since 2022.

In the 2024-2025 outdoor track and field season, the DOJ estimates Hernandez won “at least 36 first place victories or gold medals” at CIF events.

‘Abigail’ Jones, which the DOJ calls “Student 2,” has been competing in girls track and field and cross country since 2023. In 2025, he took first place in the 100-meter hurdles at the Big VII League Championships.

When Jones transferred to Martin Luther King High School in November 2024, Fox reports, an athlete named Taylor lost her position on the girls varsity cross country team.

When she and a teammate, Kaitlyn, wore “Save Girls Sports” shirts to protest Taylor’s ouster, MLK officials allegedly told them to change or cover up.

“School officials … told [the girls] that wearing the shirts was like ‘wearing a swastika in front of Jewish students,’” the DOJ’s complaint reads, citing the incident as evidence CIF and CDE retaliate against girls who protest boys invading their sports.

‘Lily’ Norcross, “Student 3,” has run girls track and field since 2023. In the 2024-2025 season, Norcross competed in Division 1 CIF events.

Henry Hanlon, “Student 4,” has competed in girls volleyball, basketball and soccer since 2021. When Hanlon, who is notorious for dwarfing his competitors, skipped a basketball game in February, his team lost by 26 points, the New York Post reports.

“Student 5,” an anonymous male who has competed in girls volleyball with Half Moon Bay High School since 2022, led his team to victory at the Peninsula Athletic League volleyball championship in 2024.

The DOJ uses Norcross, “Student 3,” and his effect on girls in Lucia Mar Unified School District to prove its second claim — that CIF and CDE have created a “hostile educational environment” by forcing girls to share locker rooms with boys.

Two athletes came forward at Lucia Mar school board meetings in May and April, respectively, to describe their experience changing in front of Norcross.

“I strongly disagree with what is going on in the girls’ locker room and on the girls track team, so much so that I change in my car for track practice because I feel way more comfortable in my car than I do in my own school’s locker room,” Audrey Venherweg, a junior, told the board in May.

In April, 17-year-old Celeste Duyst tearfully recounted:

I went into the women’s locker room to change for track practice when I saw, at the end of my row, a biological male watching not only myself, but the other young women undress. This experience was beyond traumatizing.

The DOJ uses Duyst’s testimony as an example of the ways co-ed locker rooms “substantially increase the risk of sexual harassment, assault and voyeurism in girls’ locker rooms and bathrooms,” further noting of Norcross:

[Duyst] states [he] had already dressed for track practice at the beginning of the day. [He] had no reason to be in a locker room other than to watch the girls undress.

The DOJ asks the court to find CIF and CDE in violation of Title IX and issue a permanent injunction requiring them to:

  • Keep boys out of girls sports.
  • Implement a monitoring system to ensure all schools and institutions under CIF and CDE’s authority comply with Title XI.
  • “Establish a process to compensate female athletes who have been denied athletic opportunities due to [CDE and CIF’s] violations, including correcting past athletic records.”
  • Submit Title IX compliance reports to the federal government for at least five years following the judgement.

The DOJ also requests the court make CIF and CDE pay punitive damages to the United States, as well as court costs and “an award of all such additional relief as the interests of justice may require.”

Federally funded institutions are supposed to protect the safety and rights of female students. CIF and CDE, in contrast, are actively endangering girls and stifling those trying to stand up for themselves.

The DOJ puts it well:

This discrimination is not only illegal and unfair but also demeaning, signaling to girls that their opportunities and achievements are secondary to accommodating boys.
It erodes the integrity of girls sports, diminishes their competitive experience and undermines the very purpose of Title IX: to provide equal access to education benefits, including interscholastic benefits.

CIF and CDE should not receive a dime more of taxpayers’ money until they agree to uphold their responsibility to the female students whose parents trust them to protect.

The case is United States of America v. California Interscholastic Federation and California Department of Education.

To read more about the conflict between California and the Trump administration, click on the links below.

Additional Articles and Resources

Feds Sue California Department of Education, Interscholastic Federation for ‘Illegal Sex Discrimination’

UPenn Will Strip ‘Lia’ Thomas of Medals, Apologize to Female Athletes

Yes, Girls Care When Boys Take Their Trophies

California Sues DOJ Over ‘Transgender’ Athlete Ban

Feds Pressure California After Boy Wins in Girls Track and Field Championship

Girls Sports Coaches are Incentivized to Recruit Men — Parents Shouldn’t Let Them

Department of Justice Launches Title IX Task Force to Protect Women’s Sports

Girls Shouldn’t Apologize for Protesting Boys in Girls Sports

Trump Signs Executive Order Protecting Women’s Sports and Spaces

President Trump: ‘There are Only Two Genders: Male and Female’

Written by Emily Washburn · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: DOJ, Girls Sports, transgender

Jul 10 2025

Feds Sue California Department of Education, Interscholastic Federation For ‘Illegal Sex Discrimination’

The Department of Justice (DOJ) sued the California Department of Education (CDE) and California Interscholastic Federation (CIF) yesterday for violating Title IX,  just two days after the institutions refused to voluntarily keep boys out of girls sports and locker rooms.

The suit is the latest in an escalating national battle over the meaning and intent of Title IX — and whether taxpayers must fund educational programs that fail to protect girls.

“The Governor of California has previously admitted that it is ‘deeply unfair’ to force women and girls to compete with men and boys in competitive sports,” Attorney General Pam Bondi wrote in a press release announcing the suit, referencing remarks California Governor Gavin Newsom made about girls sports in March.

“But not only is it ‘deeply unfair,’ it is also illegal under federal law,” she continued. “This Department of Justice will continue its fight to protect equal opportunities for women and girls in sports.”

Title IX prevents sex discrimination in educational institutions and activities supported by the federal government. Despite receiving more than $44 billion in federal funding this fiscal year, according to the DOJ, CIF and CDE continue to violate Title IX by allowing students to join sports leagues consistent with their “gender identity,” rather than their biological sex.

“The results of these illegal policies are stark,” the DOJ’s complaint reads. “Girls are displaced from podiums, denied awards and miss out on critical visibility for college scholarships and recognition.”

It continues:

This discrimination is not only illegal and unfair but also demeaning, signaling to girls that their opportunities and achievements are secondary to accommodating boys.
It erodes the integrity of girls’ sports, diminishes their competitive experience and undermines the very purpose of Title IX: to provide equal access to educational benefits, including interscholastic athletics.

California and the Trump administration have been on a collision course over the integrity of girls’ sports and spaces since February, when President Donald Trump signed executive orders protecting women’s private spaces and prohibiting boys from playing girls sports in programs that receive federal funding.

The DOE launched an investigating into CIF after it publicly refused to follow the president’s order “Keeping Men Out of Women’s Sports.” Instead, CIF told Fox on February 7 it would continue enforcing California Education Code Section 221.5(f), which reads:

A pupil shall be permitted to participate in sex-segregated school programs and activities, including athletic teams and competitions, and use facilities consistent with his or her gender identity, irrespective of the gender listed on the pupil’s records.

CIF hit the Trump administration’s radar again in May when AB Hernandez, a boy, qualified for California’s girls track and field championships.

“California … continues to illegally allow men to play in women’s sports,” President Trump weighed in on Hernandez’ qualification on social media. “Please be hereby advised that large scale funding will be held back, maybe permanently, if the executive order [“Keeping Men Out of Women’s Sports”] is not adhered to.”

Hernandez went on to win two girls’ state titles.

The DOE Office of Civil Rights’ investigation found CIF and CDE in active violation of Title IX on June 25. The organizations were given ten days to voluntarily:

  • Instruct all recipients of federal funding under their control to stop allowing boys to compete in girls sports.
  • Rescind all awards, titles and records given to males and, if applicable, award them to the real winners.
  • “Send a personalized letter [to each female athlete to whom an individual recognition is restored] apologizing on behalf of the state of California for allowing her educational experience to be marred by sex discrimination.”
  • Propose a monitoring system to ensure all recipients of federal funding are following Title IX.

CIF and CDE formally refused the DOE’s requests on July 7. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon promptly referred the case to the DOJ, which filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California on July 9.

If the court rules in favor of the DOJ, CIF and CDE would have to keep boys out of girls sports or risk losing their massive federal endowment.

“It’s totally unfair to have men competing against women in sports, and also to share their intimate locker facilities [with them],” McMahon told Fox yesterday, continuing:

Women fought hard for these rights. It is the law, and the president means business with it.

The case is United States of America v. California Interscholastic Federation and California Department of Education. You can read the Daily Citizen’s detailed analysis of the allegations here.

Additional Articles and Resources

UPenn Will Strip ‘Lia’ Thomas of Medals, Apologize to Female Athletes

Yes, Girls Care When Boys Take Their Trophies

California Sues DOJ Over ‘Transgender’ Athlete Ban

Feds Pressure California After Boy Wins in Girls Track and Field Championship

Girls Sports Coaches are Incentivized to Recruit Men — Parents Shouldn’t Let Them

Department of Justice Launches Title IX Task Force to Protect Women’s Sports

Girls Shouldn’t Apologize for Protesting Boys in Girls Sports

Trump Signs Executive Order Protecting Women’s Sports and Spaces

President Trump: ‘There are Only Two Genders: Male and Female’

Written by Emily Washburn · Categorized: Culture, Government Updates · Tagged: DOJ, Girls Sports, transgender

Jun 03 2025

DOJ Targets Those Mutilating Children with ‘Transgender’ Drugs and Surgeries

The FBI is targeting medical professionals and institutions that mutilate children with experimental “transgender” interventions – drugs, hormones and surgeries – that leave children sterile, sick and permanently damaged.

The announcement came on Facebook and X:

Help the FBI protect children. As the Attorney General has made clear, we will protect our children and hold accountable those who mutilate them under the guise of gender-affirming care.

Report tips of any hospitals, clinics, or practitioners performing these surgical…

— FBI (@FBI) June 2, 2025

The move by the FBI to protect children followed Attorney General Pam Bondi’s internal memorandum titled “Preventing the Mutilation of American Children“:

There is a radical ideological agenda being pushed throughout every aspect of American life – from TV programming and Hollywood film production to children’s books and elementary school classrooms – that teaches children to deny biological reality.

Gender ideology, masked as science, teaches that children should process adolescent stress and confusion as a case of mistaken identity and that the solution is not to root out and eliminate the underlying condition but to acquiesce in it permanently through life-altering chemical and surgical intervention.

Bondi rebuked the medical community, which should be rooted in evidence-based science and medicine, for not serving “as a bulwark against this sociological disease,” adding,

“Between 2019 and 2023, an estimated 14,000 children received “treatment” for gender dysphoria, with more than 5,700 subjected to life-altering surgeries.”

“The practitioners who provided this so-called ‘care’ profited while their patients were left permanently disfigured, scarred and sterilized.”

The memorandum spotlighted the influence of social media on detransitioner Chloe Cole, who was 11 years old when she “joined Instagram and was bombarded with ‘LGBT content and activism’”

As Daily Citizen previously reported, medical professionals chemically and surgically “transitioned” Cole when she was a young teenager, prescribing puberty blockers and testosterone when she was just 13 years old and performing a double mastectomy when she was only 15.

Cole has been a staunch opponent of what is erroneously labeled “gender-affirming care, testifying against these medical interventions before Congress and state legislatures.

She also filed a lawsuit against Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, The Permanente Medical Group and three doctors that had improperly treated her with chemical and surgical interventions, leaving her with “deep physical and emotional wounds, severe regrets, and distrust of the medical system.”

Transgender medical procedures can have life-long consequences, such as those Cole described in her testimony before Congress, saying testosterone gave her “menopausal-like hot flashes,” deepened her voice and masculinized her appearance. She said her future fertility is “unknown.”

She went on to state, “I still struggle to this day with sexual dysfunction, and I have massive scars across my chest and skin grafts that they used, that they took from my nipples, are weeping fluid today, and they were grafted into a more masculine positioning, they said.”

All these procedures worsened her mental health and did not turn her into a male.

Bondi’s memorandum followed an executive order from President Trump “Protecting Children from Chemical and Surgical Mutilation.” It states says the DOJ will investigate crimes “under the banner of so-called ‘gender-affirming care’” as female genital mutilation, a felony.

In addition, “The Department of Justice will investigate and hold accountable medical providers and pharmaceutical companies that mislead the public about the long-term side effects of chemical and surgical mutilations.”

The DOJ is also investigating violations of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act for making false claims. The agency will work with state attorneys general to prosecute hospitals and practitioners of “gender medicine,” and promote legislation to protect children.

The memorandum ends with a statement on the urgency of protecting children from mutilation.

“Protecting America’s children must be our top priority, whether from drug cartels, terrorists or even our own medical community.”

“Every day, we hear more harrowing stories about children who will suffer for the rest of their lives because of the unconscionable ideology behind ‘gender-affirming care.'”

Daily Citizen is thankful for this effort from the DOJ and the FBI to safeguard children from dangerous, ineffective, traumatizing medical procedures.

Again, you can report tips of any hospitals, clinics or practitioners performing these surgical procedures on children at 1-800-CALL-FBI or tips.fbi.gov.

Related Articles and Resources:

Colorado Counselor Asks U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Free Speech Case

Counseling for Sexual Identity Concerns: A Measured, Careful, and Compassionate Approach.

Expert in ‘Transitioning’ Children Admits ‘We Were Wrong’ About Puberty Blockers

Four Brave Young Women File Lawsuits Alleging Harm from ‘Transgender’ Interventions

HHS Releases Report on Harms of ‘Transgender’ Medical Interventions for Minors

Important New Journal Article Calls Out Doctors for Harming Youth with Medicalized Gender Ideology

New Video Equips Parents and Counselors to Help ‘Gender Dysphoric’ Children

President Trump Signs Order Protecting Children From Transgender Medical Interventions

Transgenderism and Minors: What Does the Research Really Show?

If you or someone you know need help dealing with the transgender issue, check out Focus on the Family’s Transgender Resources page.

Focus on the Family’s Counseling Department offers help from licensed counselors. To request a conversation with Focus on the Family’s Counseling Department, call 1-855-771-HELP (4357) weekdays from 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. (Mountain Time), or complete our Counseling Consultation Request Form. Please be prepared to leave your contact information for a counselor to return a call to you as soon as possible. The consultation is available at no cost to you due to generous donor support.

To learn more about defeating gender ideology, click here.

Image from Shutterstock.

Written by Jeff Johnston · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: DOJ, FBI, LGBT, transgender

May 06 2025

Why did Trump Justice Department ask to Dismiss Abortion Pill Lawsuit?

Pro-lifers were taken aback on Monday with news the Justice Department has asked to dismiss a lawsuit restricting access to the abortion pill over health and safety concerns.

The lawsuit in question, which was originally filed in 2022 by pro-life doctors, was rejected by the Supreme Court back in June of 2024 for lack of standing. A revised suit was initiated later in the year by three state attorneys in Missouri, Idaho and Kansas.

In the lawsuit, attorneys are requesting a myriad of changes that have led to the explosive and reckless growth of mifepristone – an expansion that exponentially increases the health risk to women in addition to the certain death of their preborn children.

For example, current rules don’t require women to see a doctor in person, and even nurse practitioners and other healthcare workers can prescribe the toxic, deadly drug. This lethal pharmaceutical cocktail is being sent through the mail and, in many cases, available at your neighborhood drugstore where you buy eye drops and greeting cards.

The New York Times reports:

The Trump administration’s request makes no mention of the merits of the case, which have not yet been considered by the courts. Rather, echoing the argument that the Biden administration made shortly before Mr. Trump took office, the court filing asserts that the case does not meet the legal standard to be heard in the federal district court in which it was filed.

The Times goes on to quote Mary Ziegler, a law professor at the University of California Davis, as suggesting the Trump administration may not be signaling its objection to the merits of the lawsuit but rather strategizing their next move regarding its opposition to the drug.

“I think the best way to read it is that they’re just buying time to figure out what to do about mifepristone,” she said. Professor Ziegler noted the request to dismiss the suit “avoids saying anything on the substance at all.”

On Monday, Senator Steve Daines of Montana noted the study released last week detailing the health dangers of mifepristone.

“The science is clear: The abortion pill is not safe for women, and it never has been,” he said in a statement. “This recent study is proof that pro-abortion advocates care more about promoting their radical agenda than they do about women’s health.”

But just because the Trump Justice Department requests the lawsuit be dismissed doesn’t necessarily mean the federal judge assigned to the case will oblige.

Judge Matthew Joseph Kacsmaryk, who is overseeing the suit and who serves as a United States district judge in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, was nominated by President Donald Trump in 2017.

Back in 2023, the New York Times and other liberal activists pointed out that Judge Kacsmaryk didn’t use the language of the left in his original ruling on the case:

Throughout the opinion, Judge Kacsmaryk uses the language of the anti-abortion movement instead of conventional medical terms. The ruling calls medication abortion “chemical abortion,” refers to abortion providers as “abortionists” and describes a fetus or embryo as an “unborn human” or “unborn child.” By contrast, a conflicting ruling by a judge in Washington State that barred the F.D.A. from limiting the availability of mifepristone used terminology like “the termination of an early pregnancy,” “fetal loss” and “patients and providers.”

While jarring that the current Justice Department is asking for a lawsuit against the abortion pill be dismissed, time will soon reveal where the administration lands on the larger issue at hand. If previous action is indicative of future behavior, pro-lifers should be able to trust that the current administration will act in a way consistent with efforts to protect preborn life.

The proliferation of the abortion pill poses a monumental threat to not only the children it’s designed to kill, but to the mothers who are ingesting it. Please join us in praying for wisdom and boldness of action in addressing the use and abuse of this dangerous abortifacient.

Written by Paul Batura · Categorized: Life · Tagged: DOJ, Paul Random

Mar 07 2025

Trump DOJ Drops Case Against Idaho’s Pro-Life Law, Still Faces Legal Challenge

Thankfully, Idaho no longer has to fight the federal government to defend its right to protect mothers and babies from abortion.

This week, the Trump Department of Justice (DOJ) dropped the Biden DOJ’s lawsuit targeting Idaho’s pro-life law. In the self-executing motion filed with the court on Wednesday, the Trump DOJ voluntarily dismissed the case with no further action required by the court.

Background

Following the reversal of Roe v. Wade in 2022, Idaho’s Defense of Life Act went into effect, prohibiting abortion unless it is necessary to save the life of the mother, or in cases of rape or incest.

In August 2022, the Biden DOJ sued the state of Idaho over its pro-life law. 

It argued that the state law conflicted with federal law because the state law only permitted abortion in life-saving situations and not all emergency situations.

Attorneys for the state of Idaho argued that the pro-life law allows doctors to provide care to women experiencing ectopic pregnancies, miscarriages and other life-threatening conditions, which is exactly what the federal law requires.

Many in the pro-life community believe the abortion industry is using the federal law to try to create a loophole for elective abortions in Idaho.

Supreme Court Action

The cases — Moyle v. United States and Idaho v. United States — were argued before the Supreme Court last year.

The question before the Court was whether a federal law, known as the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA), overrode the Idaho law regarding when an abortion can be performed.

As reported by the Daily Citizen, the Court did not decide on the merits of the case but instead dismissed it and sent it back to the lower court for continued consideration. The justices held that dismissal was appropriate because the cases had shifted in theory and arguments.

Future of Idaho’s Pro-Life Law

Idaho’s pro-life law still faces a legal challenge from St. Luke’s hospital system. St. Luke’s filed a lawsuit against the state in anticipation of the Trump DOJ dropping the case.

The hospital system, like Biden’s DOJ, is claiming that women in medical emergencies won’t be able to get an abortion to save their lives.

The district court judge granted the hospital’s request for a temporary restraining order (TRO) to allow for emergency abortions in the state.

So, for now, the TRO will remain in place and allow for emergency abortions in Idaho pending further litigation.

The Daily Citizen will continue to follow this case and provide additional updates.

Image from Getty.

Written by Nicole Hunt · Categorized: Life · Tagged: DOJ, Policy, Trump

Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | © 2025 Focus on the Family. All rights reserved.

  • Cookie Policy