• Skip to main content
Daily Citizen
  • Subscribe
  • Categories
    • Culture
    • Life
    • Religious Freedom
    • Sexuality
  • Parenting Resources
    • LGBT Pride
    • Homosexuality
    • Sexuality/Marriage
    • Transgender
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Contact
  • Donate

Girls Sports

Oct 15 2026

Washington School System Harasses Parents Protecting Daughters From Boy in Girls Cross-Country Meet

At least 12 high school girls chose to forfeit a cross-country race in Washington on Tuesday rather than compete against their teammate — a boy.

About half of the Camas High School girls’ cross-country team walked off the course Tuesday instead of racing against an 11th grade boy who, until September 5, competed with the boys.

In his last race with the junior varsity boys, the male athlete placed 76th. On September 15, in his first race with Camas High’s varsity girls, he placed seventh.

On Tuesday, he placed second.

This latest injustice in Washington interscholastic sports illustrates the continued cowardice of teachers, administrators and coaches, none of whom have come out in support of these defenseless girls.

At best, they fear for their jobs. At worst, they, too, believe hundreds of female athletes should sacrifice their athletic success and comfort so a boy can feel good about himself.

The girls, the children, do the hard thing, instead. They willingly sacrifice their opportunities. They face down the idealogues and bullies, because adults won’t do it for them.

When their parents try to protect and support them, Camas School District and the Washington Interscholastic Activities Association (WIAA) play hardball.

Skyview High School students Sierra and Charlie, both just 16 years old, chose not to race against the male athlete on September 15. The duo walked off the course at the sound of the starting gun, their arms and legs painted with, “Keep women in women’s sports,” their cheeks painted with “XX” and “XY.”

Sierra’s parents stood in support at the starting line, holding signs that read, “It will never be ok for an XY to steal an opportunity from an XX,” and, “Please only XX competing with XX [and] XY competing with XY — keep it fair.”

An official told them to leave the area within twenty seconds, Sierra’s dad, Joel, told Undivided podcast host Brandi Kruse in an interview.

“I looked at the fellow and asked why I needed to leave,” Joel contisued. “He said it was against the WIAA rules to have any signage other than a school flag.”

WIAA, consistent with the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction, also requires students play sports and use changing rooms according to their “gender identity,” rather than their biological sex.

Joel avoided being kicked out by putting down his sign. He stayed long enough to watch the girls exit the course. But he wasn’t finished — not by a long shot. He told Kruse:

I decided to make a scene since they wouldn’t let me peacefully protest. I decided to protest loudly on my way to my vehicle. I knew they were going to ask me to leave. So I let myself out by holding up the sign and just chanting, “Keep boys out of girls sports.”
I basically chanted that from the starting line to my car. Then I got in my car and drove past the venue with a friend holding the sign and honking to try and get as much attention as we could.

“Again, that was not our intention,” Joel clarified. “Our intention was just to peacefully hold the sign, but we weren’t allowed to do that. So we decided to get the word out our way.”

Camas School District responded by criminally trespassing the father from district property for the rest of the year.

Joel is a local soccer coach. He is still unsure whether he can coach his team at a Camas facility.

Holly Burns is one of the twelve Camas High students who sacrificed her race Tuesday to protest competing against a boy. Her parents, Sarah and Kevin Burns, came to support the girls with signs. They, too, faced opposition.

“[Security] said that we’re not allowed to hold up signs at this event today,” Kevin told Outkick reporter Jackson Thompson. “I questioned them if that was constitutionally legal, if we could express ourselves by just holding a sign.”

“In the end, it didn’t seem like they really had a grasp on what they could tell us to do or not.”

Eventually, says Kevin, he and Sarah managed to hold their signs — but security dogged their every step, telling them to leave. The couple refused.

These families’ experiences illustrate how much influence the public school system wields, not just over students, but the adults that are supposed to protect them.

How egregious that the only recourse left to these families is for the girls — the children — to show more bravery than the school officials around them.

What a world.

Happily, Washington voters can change girls’ bleak reality at the ballot box this November. Initiative 638, “Protect Fairness in Girls Sports,” would prevent males from competing in girls sports.

A “yes” vote on Initiative 638 would protect girls like Sierra, Charlie and Holly from having to race against — and change next to — a male athlete. A “no” vote would allow boys to continue competing in girls sports categories on a whim.

Initiative 638 could protect the dignity and safety of hundreds of female athletes to come. But change may not come fast enough for cross-country athletes like those at Camas High School.

Initiative 638, if approved, would take effect thirty days after election day on November 3.

The Washington state cross-country championships will take place on November 7.

Additional Articles and Resources

Washington Ballot Measures protect Girls Sports and Parental Rights

Paradox Institute: Sex Screening in Sports: How It Works

Female Wrestler Sues Washington School District, Others for Forcing Her to Face Male Opponent

4 Developments in Case of High School Wrestler Allegedly Assaulted by Male Opponent

Washington School District Buries Female Wrestler’s Sexual Assault Complaint Against Male Opponent

Written by Emily Washburn · Categorized: Culture, Sexuality · Tagged: Election 2026, Girls Sports, transgender

Oct 09 2026

Washington Ballot Measures Protect Girls Sports and Parental Rights

Washington state has two important measures on the ballot this November: Initiative 26-638 would protect fairness in girls sports, and Initiative 26-001 protects parental rights in education. 

Initiative 638, “Protect Fairness in Girls Sports,” was placed on the ballot after Let’s Go Washington collected more than 445,000 voter signatures. The Washington Legislature had the option to pass the measure, but since legislators would not vote to keep female athletes safe, voters will now decide. 

The measure will appear on the ballot with this title and description: 

Initiative Measure No. IL26-638 concerns participation in athletics at K-12 schools. This measure would prohibit students it defines as “biologically male” from competing in certain school athletic activities intended for female students only. It would require verification of biological sex by students’ healthcare providers. 

In support of the measure, Let’s Go Washington quotes two young Washington women who have been affected by boys in girls sports. 

In 2024, Ahnaleigh Wilson came in second to a male athlete in the 1,600-meter race at the Cashmere, Washington, Junior Olympics. Frances Staudt was subjected to verbal abuse and a school district investigation after she “bullied” and “misgendered” an 18-year-old boy – by refusing to play against him in a girls basketball game.  

The young ladies explained their support for Initiative 638: 

Biological men are competing in girls’ sports in Washington State, and it’s destroying fairness in girls’ sports. Title IX created opportunities for women and girls to compete in sports, and those opportunities are being erased. 

Advocates of boys in girls sports, such as Pro-Choice Washington, the ACLU of Washington, and the National Education Association, have contributed more than $2.1 million to the groups No Hate in WA State and Defend Washington to defeat the measure. 

They claim that Initiative 638 “could force tens of thousands of Washington girls each year to undergo invasive, embarrassing, and potentially harmful genital exams just to play sports.” They also spout the nonsense that these examinations could occur “in group settings in gyms.” 

Right. Doctors will examine girls in front of other students and reveal the results to the whole crowd. No HIPAA violations here! 

In reality, as the ballot measure explains: 

Existing Washington state law and school district policies require students to undergo a routine physical examination prior to participation in interscholastic sports, which includes documentation of the student’s sex assigned at birth. 

A health care provider simply has to verify a student’s biological sex based on: “The student’s reproductive anatomy, genetic makeup, or normal endogenously produced testosterone levels.” 

A simple cheek swab is all that’s needed to verify a person’s genetic makeup. 

A “yes” vote safeguards girls sports. 

Initiative 001 is commonly known as “Restoring the Parents’ Bill of Rights” or “Strengthen Communication Between Parents and Schools.”

The measure will appear on the ballot with this title and description: 

Initiative Measure No. IL26-001 concerns parental rights relating to their children in public school. This measure would repeal amendments to a statute listing certain rights of parents and guardians of public-school children and re-enact the law as it was originally enacted by Initiative to the Legislature 2081.

Initiative 001 has a convoluted history. In 2024, Let’s Go Washington submitted almost 450,000 signatures to send Initiative 2081, the first version of The Parents’ Bill of Rights, to the Washington Legislature. 

Among other things, The Parents’ Bill of Rights gave parents broader and quicker access to their students’ records, required curriculum transparency, mandated notice before medical services were given to a child, and required immediate notice after emergency treatment and if a crime was committed against a child. 

The initiative passed and was signed into law. 

But then, the Legislature went on to gut the new law, by passing HB 1296, which undermined local control of schools, supposedly “balanced” students’ rights with parents’ rights and actually eliminated some parents’ rights.

Citizens are battling back: Initiative 001 restores the original Parents’ Bill of Rights and rolls back the damaging effects of HB 1296. 

A “yes” vote helps protect parents’ rights in Washington. 

Photo from Shutterstock.

Related articles and resources: 

Christians: Go Out and Vote This November

Family Policy Institute Washington

Let’s Go Washington

Let’s Go Washington: Initiative 001

Let’s Go Washington: Initiative 638

Paradox Institute: Sex Screening in Sports: How It Works

Washington State Citizens Fight for Parents’ Rights, Girls Sports

World Athletics Announces Testing Protocols to Keep Men Out of Women’s Athletics

World Rugby Finds Men and Women are Different: Announces New Guidelines Protecting Elite Women Players

Written by Jeff Johnston · Categorized: Government Updates · Tagged: Girls Sports, parenting

Oct 08 2026

Arizona Amendment Would Protect Girls and Women’s Sports and Restrooms

Arizonans will vote in November on a constitutional amendment to base participation in sports and use of athletic private facilities on biological sex. 

A “yes” vote on Proposition 318, the “Protect Girls Sports in Arizona Act,” would: 

• Prohibit males from playing in school or athletic association teams designated for girls or women. 

• Require public and private schools, athletic associations and higher education institutions to only allow individuals to use athletes’ showers, locker rooms and restrooms that align with their biological sex. 

• Allow athletes to sue schools and athletic associations that violate this law. 

• Continue to allow males and females to participate together on coed and mixed athletic teams. 

The ballot measure defines “sex” as: “an individual’s biological status as male or female as recorded at birth on the individual’s original birth certificate.” It also removes a provision in current Arizona law that allows females to participate on school or athletic association teams designated for males. 

Peter Gentala, president of the Center for Arizona Policy, expressed his support for the amendment in an email, saying: 

Prop 318 says girls’ teams in Arizona are for girls, and it adds common sense privacy protections for the places girls change and shower. 

Gentala went on to explain that Arizona already has a law protecting girls sports, but he added the measure “has spent most of the time since it was enacted in a courtroom instead of ensuring fairness, safety, and privacy for girls.” 

He’s referring to a lawsuit challenging Arizona’s Save Women’s Sports Act, signed by then-Governor Doug Ducey. The National Center for LGBTQ Rights filed a lawsuit challenging the act, on behalf of two male, transgender-identified athletes who wanted to compete against girls.

The Ninth Circuit ruled against girls and women, and in favor of the male athletes, but the suit was dropped after the Supreme Court ruled that laws protecting girls sports were constitutional and did not violate Title IX, the 1972 federal law that prohibits sex-based discrimination in education programs. 

The opinion in State of West Virginia v. BPJ and Little v. Hecox made clear that “sex” in Title IX actually supports female-only sports and private spaces. The Court said:

The ordinary meaning of the term “sex” at the time of enactment in the early 1970s was biological sex and not gender identity, particularly in the sports context.

Despite this, the constitutional amendment is still needed, Gentala said: 

A law can be undone by the next legislature. But what the voters pass, politicians cannot repeal and a hostile Governor cannot veto.

Arizona’s girls need you to vote yes on Prop 318. This November, you settle it. Not for one season, but for the girls who are five years old right now. (His emphasis.) 

The website He Cheated reports that more than 1,524 male athletes have “robbed FEMALE athletes of success and opportunities in sport” (their emphasis). The group provides a database of male athletes who have broken more than 700 girls and women’s sports records and finished in first place in almost 6,900 female athletic events. 

He Cheated details why constitutional amendments like Proposition 318 are necessary: 

A boy pretends to be a girl. His parents conceal his sex and lie to fellow classmates and parents. He joins a girls’ athletic team and proceeds to excel, dominating the competition.… 

Female players are left on the bench or excluded from competitions. His inclusion is paramount, theirs, an afterthought.

He’s allowed in the locker rooms where female athletes are changing, in a state of undress and a position of vulnerability. They are given no warning. They are given no autonomy over their own bodies. No privacy or safe spaces. Every accommodation is made for him. His comfort is of the utmost importance. Theirs is dismissed. (Emphasis in the original.) 

A “yes” vote on the “Protect Girls Sports in Arizona Act,” defends against this unfairness and guards girls and women’s privacy and safety. 

Early voting in Arizona begins October 7. 

The Center for Arizona Policy offers information about Arizona’s election and a personalized “AZ Voter Guide” at www.azvoterguide.com. The “AZ Voter Guide” is a nonpartisan, educational resource provided as a public service. No candidates are endorsed.

Related articles and resources: 

Blockbuster Supreme Court Ruling: Girls Sports Are for Girls

He Cheated lists male athletes who displaced female athletes, while She Won lists the girls and women harmed by this. 

How to Get in Touch With Your State Policy Group

Nebraska Citizens to Vote on Constitutional Amendment Protecting Girls Sports

Protecting Children Is On the Ballot in Colorado

‘Save Girls Sports’ on the November Ballot — Here’s How You Can Help

World Rugby Finds Men and Women are Different: Announces New Guidelines Protecting Elite Women Players

Top 5 Moments From Supreme Court Arguments Over Girls Sports

Yes, Girls Care When Boys Take Their Trophies

Written by Jeff Johnston · Categorized: Culture, Education · Tagged: Girls Sports

Oct 02 2026

Protecting Children Is On the Ballot in Colorado

Colorado has three propositions on the November ballot where voters can take action to protect children.

Propositions 133, 134 and 135, respectively, protect children from sexual predators, keep girls sports for females and boys sports for males, and ban irreversible “transgender” surgeries for minors.

A “Yes” vote on all three initiatives will make Colorado safer for children.

After the Colorado General Assembly voted against all three measures, Protect Kids Colorado coordinated a remarkable campaign to place the propositions on the ballot. The organization worked with other groups like Colorado Parent Advocacy Network and Catholic Vote to collect signatures.

Working on a shoestring budget, more than 3,300 volunteer petition circulators gathered more than 500,000 signatures for the three measures. Hundreds of churches across the state hosted signature-gathering events.

Here’s what they were able to place on the November ballot:

  • Proposition 133, “Penalties for Human Trafficking of a Minor,” is also known as “The Children Are Not for Sale Act.” This citizen initiative elevates human trafficking of a minor for sexual servitude from a second-class to a first-class felony. It would require a life sentence in prison for human trafficking of a minor – without parole.
  • Proposition 134, “Male and Female Participation in School and Collegiate Sports,” defines male and female based on biological sex. It mandates that colleges and K-12 schools designate boys and men’s sports for males and girls and women’s sports for females. This commonsense measure is also known as “The Protect Girls Sports Act.”
  • Proposition 135, “Prohibit Surgery on Minors in Response to Perception of Sex or Gender,” prohibits health care professionals from performing “transgender” surgeries on minors with sexual identity confusion. Also known as “The Protect Kids From Irreversible Sex-Change Surgery Act,” this measure keeps state and federal money from being spent on these destructive surgeries.

Here’s more important information to know.

The Children Are Not for Sale Act

Proposition 133 also expands the definition of trafficking of a minor for sexual servitude to include “knowingly trading anything of monetary value to buy or sell sexual activity with a minor.”

The pro-abortion group Cobalt Advocates opposes this initiative, as it is afraid this expanded definition could be used by abortion opponents to prosecute anyone who helps a minor travel to Colorado to obtain an abortion.

Erin Lee, executive director of Protect Kids Colorado, told The Colorado Sun this was “patently false,” adding, “There is nothing in Proposition 133 that creates a new crime related to abortion.”

She added:

The legislature had an opportunity to strengthen these protections and failed. Now Colorado voters have the opportunity to decide for themselves whether these crimes deserve stronger consequences.

The Protect Girls Sports Act

Some voters think the two recent Supreme Court decisions in Little v. Hecox and State of West Virginia v. BPJ already protect girls and women’s sports.

But those decisions only upheld state laws designating girls and women’s sports for females; they did not overturn laws and education policies in states that still allow – or fight to allow – men in women’s sports.

And while the Trump administration’s Department of Justice and Education Department have acted to protect girls and women’s Title IX education rights, states like Colorado still allow boys in girls sports and private spaces.

Proposition 134 is opposed by a coalition of groups called Families, Not Politics. It includes LGBT activist organizations like One Colorado, Transgender Law Center and Inside Out Youth Services. Joining them are radical education and abortion groups, such as the Colorado PTA, the Colorado Education Association, Cobalt Advocates and Rocky Mountains Planned Parenthood, as well as a couple of Unitarian Universalist groups.

The Protect Kids From Irreversible Sex-Change Surgery Act

Colorado has been at the forefront of promoting false transgender ideology and the destructive “transitioning” of children.

Among other harmful actions, the state’s General Assembly voted to mandate teaching about “LGBT individuals” in all K-12 social studies classes, restricted any beneficial therapy for children with sexual identity confusion, made the state a sanctuary for transgender medical procedures for minors, and allow children as young as 12 to receive therapy without parental knowledge or consent.

While the Department of Health and Human Services and the Justice Department are working to stop irreversible transgender medical procedures, all this work could be reversed with a new administration that espouses transgenderism.

Colorado begins sending out ballots to all registered voters on October 2. Voters may mail in their ballots, or drop them off in ballot boxes or at Voter Service and Polling Centers, where they can also vote in person. The state also has same day registration.

For more information, go to Colorado Elections and Voting.

Related articles and resources:

‘Art Club’ Documentary — One Family’s Escape from Gender Ideology, and the Bigger Trend Sweeping the Nation

Colorado Committee Kills ‘Children Are Not for Sale Bill’

Meet Three Heroes Working to Protect Colorado Children

Nebraska Citizens to Vote on Constitutional Amendment Protecting Girls Sports

One Mom’s Journey Advocating for Children and Parental Rights

‘Protect Kids Colorado’ Qualifies Three Child Safety Ballot Measures for November

‘Save Girls Sports’ on the November Ballot — Here’s How You Can Help

Supreme Court to Hear Title IX Girls Sports Case

Washington State Citizens Fight for Parents’ Rights, Girls Sports

Written by Jeff Johnston · Categorized: Government Updates · Tagged: Election 2026, Girls Sports, transgender

Sep 28 2026

Department of Education Defines ‘Sex’ in Title IX to Mean Male and Female

The U.S. Department of Education rescinded 2024 Title IX regulations that defined “sex discrimination” to include “sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination.” 

Education Secretary Linda McMahon said in a press release that the restored rule “clears the Biden Administration’s illegal rewrite of Title IX from the Code of Federal Regulations.” 

In April 2024, then-Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona announced the addition of “sexual orientation” and “gender identity” to Title IX. This redefinition of “sex” led to horrible consequences, as McMahon explained: 

The Biden Administration’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) pushed schools across the country to illegally allow males to intrude into women’s sports and intimate facilities, and it investigated school staff for using incorrect pronouns or failing to ask students to declare a preferred gender. The Trump Administration has rescinded these agreements. 

Women’s sports advocate Jennifer Sey posted about the Education Department’s actions on X, affirming Title IX says nothing about sexual orientation or gender identity but specifically designed to protect girls and women. 

Title IX protections are for girls.

“On the basis of sex” is how it’s written. Not gender identity. Not sexual orientation.

There are no Title IX protections specific to LGBT students. Just for girls. https://t.co/celXFu9qpJ

— Jennifer Sey (@JenniferSey) September 28, 2026

McMahon said that restoring Title IX to prohibit “sex discrimination” restored “the commonsense language promulgated in the first Trump Administration, which we have been enforcing since the first days of the Administration.” 

The secretary was referencing a number of actions the administration has taken to protect girls and women’s educational opportunities, including their participation in women’s-only sports and female restrooms, locker rooms and showers. 

According to her press release, these actions include: 

• “Returning Enforcement to Biological Reality: Within its first two weeks of being in office, the Department returned to enforcing the first Trump Administration’s 2020 Title IX rule, reversing the Biden Administration’s illegal 2024 re-write. This once again aligns Title IX’s sex-based protections with biological reality, not ideological fantasy.  

• “Securing Resolution Agreements with Higher Education Institutions: The Department signed resolution agreements, including with the University of Pennsylvania and Wagner College, which obligated them to re-establish sex-separated sports and intimate facilities, restore to females their titles misappropriated by male athletes, and apologize to female athletes for their prior policies allowing sex discrimination.    

• “Creating Title IX Special Investigations Team: The Department partnered with the U.S. Department of Justice to create the Title IX Special Investigations Team (Title IX SIT) consisting of expert attorneys and investigators to ensure consistent investigations and expeditious enforcement for Title IX violations.” (Their emphasis.)

That partnership with the DOJ has led to multiple investigations into states, schools and districts that violated Title IX by allowing males into girls and women’s sports and private spaces. 

Charges and lawsuits have been filed against many of these, as the Daily Citizen has reported, including: five districts in Northern Virginia, 36 school districts in Illinois, the California Department of Education, San Jose State and Minnesota. 

In addition to these actions, the press release noted eight different courts, including two federalcourts, had ruled against including “sexual orientation” and “gender identity” in Title IX. 

McMahon explained that the recission of the 2024 rule followed these court directives, as well as Congress’ intent in passing Title IX. 

Thanks to today’s action, the published Title IX regulations faithfully reflects court orders and Congressional intent—reducing confusion for parents, students, and educational institutions. 

We will continue to relentlessly champion equal opportunity for all Americans and hold accountable any school or college that violates the rights, privacy, or athletic opportunities of our women and girls.

Related articles and resources: 

Blockbuster Supreme Court Ruling: Girls Sports Are for Girls

Department of Education Redefines ‘Sex’ in Title IX to Include ‘Sexual Orientation’ and ‘Gender Identity’

DOE Holds Hearings on Pushing ‘Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity’ in Education

DOJ Investigates Illinois School Districts for Violating Parental Rights With LGBT Content

Ed Dept. Finds Northern Virginia School Districts Violated Title IX

Ed Dept. Finds San José State Violated Title IX With Male Athlete in Women’s Volleyball

Feds Open Yet Another Title IX Investigation Into Loudoun County Schools

Feds Sue California Department of Education, Interscholastic Federation For ‘Illegal Sex Discrimination’

Minnesota Allowed Boys to Compete on Six Girls Teams, Federal Investigation

New Biden Admin. Rule Lets Men into Women’s Locker Rooms, Bathrooms and Sports

Written by Jeff Johnston · Categorized: Culture, Education · Tagged: Girls Sports, Title IX

  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 16
  • Go to Next Page »

Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | Š 2026 Focus on the Family. All rights reserved.

  • Cookie Policy