• Skip to main content
Daily Citizen
  • Subscribe
  • Categories
    • Culture
    • Life
    • Religious Freedom
    • Sexuality
  • Parenting Resources
    • LGBT Pride
    • Homosexuality
    • Sexuality/Marriage
    • Transgender
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Contact
  • Donate

LGBT

Aug 01 2025

Baby Should Be Immediately Removed from Convicted Child Predator

Brandon Keith Mitchell is a Tier 1 registered sex offender, and yet he and his homosexual partner recently obtained custody of a newborn baby through surrogacy.

How is this even possible?

There’s a loophole in Pennsylvania law that doesn’t bar sex offenders from privately contracting with other parties in reproductive agreements.

Mitchell and his partner have been parading the baby on social media, and even solicited funds to pay for the surrogate. A journalist decided to dig into the background of the two men and discovered Mitchell had previously been arrested for soliciting a 16-year-old boy.

As a chemistry teacher at Downingtown West High School in Downingtown, Pennsylvania, the 30-year-old Mitchell pleaded guilty to felony child pornography charges and corruption of a minor. He sent over 12,000 text messages to the student. He was sentenced to two years in prison.

Not surprisingly, none of this wickedness was disclosed in the two men’s GoFundMe campaign or in their exploitive videos with the newborn baby.

Earlier this week, York, Pennsylvania County District Attorney Tim Barker acknowledged the serious issue with state law.

“I thoroughly appreciate the concerned and outraged emotions expressed by many that a loophole exists in the law that allows a registered sex offender to become a parent through surrogacy without the same intense scrutiny, accountability, and judicial oversight mandated for the adoption process,” York told Newsweek.

“Pennsylvania law currently does not, in and of itself, prohibit a registered sex offender from becoming a parent through surrogacy,” Barker stated. “Given this fact, no one presently has brought forth to my office an allegation of a criminal violation being perpetrated by Mitchell in York County. Accordingly, my office lacks any legal basis to act on this matter.”

Pennsylvania lawmakers must get to work to right this dangerous legal loophole.

Tragically, the husband of the surrogate told Newsweek that Mitchell had told the couple there was “something in my past” but that neither the mother or father followed up.

“I didn’t know the story and I didn’t care to dig into it,” stated Theodore Martinovich.

At the core of this evilness isn’t simply a legal loophole but a fundamental disregard for what’s in the best interest of children. This apathy and indifference manifests on many levels but especially in support for same-sex adoption.

Same-sex adoption deliberately and unapologetically deprives a child of either a mother or a father. It normalizes the abnormal. It exposes children to a confused and destructive sexual ethic.

Those who support same-sex parenting often to point to studies indicating there’s no difference between a child being raised by two men or two women compared to being raised by a mother and a father. Yet, those studies have been shown to be fundamentally flawed. They’re often based on self-reporting, feature individuals recruited from same-sex advocacy groups – and are often only looking at small groups for a short period of time.

The Pennsylvania legislature needs to immediately close the loophole that allows convicted child sexual predators to contract to basically buy a child. That’s legislation every sane person should unequivocally support.

Image credit: Pennsylvania Police

Written by Paul Batura · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: LGBT, Paul Random

Jul 29 2025

State AGs Call on NCAA to Restore Women’s Sports Records

In a powerful moment of legal unity, a coalition of 27 attorneys general issued a formal letter to the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) calling on the body to restore records and honors to female athletes that were displaced by men competing in women’s sports.

The effort marks a pivotal moment in the cultural debate swirling around “LGBT” policy and a shift back to commonsense protections for female athletes.

The letter demands the NCAA reinstate “all championships, titles, wins, awards, records and other recognitions that were wrongfully awarded to male athletes competing in NCAA women’s category events.”

Signatories argue that the NCAA’s past policy, which allowed men to compete in women’s sports, undermined the purpose of Title IX, which guarantees equal opportunities for women in education and athletics.

The attorneys general (AGs) contend:

“There is no doubt that the women forced to compete against biological males in female events were impacted negatively and unfairly disadvantaged.”

The letter recognizes the significant policy change the NCAA made in February, limiting female sports to students “assigned female at birth only,” following an executive order to keep men out of female sports, and urges them to extend that policy to practice as well.

The AGs note a February letter from the U.S. Department of Education to the NCAA and its member institutions urging the organizations to “restore to female athletes all records, titles, awards, and recognitions wrongfully credited to male athletes.”

Over 500,000 college athletes are impacted by NCAA policies, and these AGs maintain that the NCAA has not done enough to repair the damage caused by their policies.

The AGs contend, “The NCAA should take this step for former athletes to preserve the integrity of Title IX and show your support for the women harmed by years of bad policy.”

Attorneys general of the following states signed on to the letter: Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wyoming.

To date, the NCAA has not issued a public response.

Related Articles and Resources

Allowing ‘Transgender Women’ to Compete Against Biological Women in Sports is Anti-Woman

Addressing Gender Identity with Honesty and Compassion

The Journey Back to My True Identity

What is ‘Gender Identity’

Trump Signs Executive Order Protecting Women’s Sports and Spaces

How Science and Faith Can Defeat Gender Ideology – Part One

Written by Nicole Hunt · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: Girls Sports, LGBT, NCAA

Jul 23 2025

Radical and Dangerous Coed Olympic Scam is Over

Reflecting on his misgivings regarding slavery, Thomas Jefferson once wrote, “Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just; that his justice cannot sleep for ever…”

The United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee expressed no such angst on Monday, but justice was nevertheless served in their decision to officially exclude sexually confused men from competing in women’s sports.

The overdue announcement was ultimately made in order to comply with President Trump’s executive order barring men from squaring off against women in women’s sports.

Titled, “Keeping Men Out of Women’s Sports,” the official presidential action (Executive Order 14201) declares:

It is the policy of the United States to rescind all funds from educational programs that deprive women and girls of fair athletic opportunities, which results in the endangerment, humiliation, and silencing of women and girls and deprives them of privacy.  It shall also be the policy of the United States to oppose male competitive participation in women’s sports more broadly, as a matter of safety, fairness, dignity, and truth.

In announcing the eligibility changes, the Olympic Committee said they were “committed to protecting opportunities for athletes participating in sport,” and would work to “ensure that women have a fair and safe competition environment.”

Sadly, the National Women’s Law Center, which claims to “fight for gender justice,” condemned the change.

“By giving into the political demands, the USOPC is sacrificing the needs and safety of its own athletes,” they wrote.

It seems that intense political hatred and bias have blinded many to the greater needs and concerns of female athletes. In fact, the Olympic Committee is finally doing what radical groups like the National Women’s Law Center have refused to do – defend and protect women athletes.

Radicals criticizing opposition to the “trans” circus will often point out just how few sexually confused athletes are actually competing overall. In the 2024 Olympics, there were two known such athletes on Team USA. Of course, that means there were two women robbed of their lifelong dream who were kept off the squad. This was a season they’ll never get back, stolen away from them due to someone else’s delusion, selfishness and a governing body that was derelict in their duty.

Reports of this week’s announcement continue to promulgate an utter lie. Scan the internet and you’ll see countless headlines about the USOC barring “trans women” from competition.

It’s a lie.

There is no such thing as “trans women” – there are only men and women (Genesis 1:27). The only thing the USOPC did was ban men from competing against women.

Following the announcement, a spokesperson for the International Olympic Committee told ABC News, “This is a highly complex topic which has been approached by International Federations and National Olympic Committees in different ways depending on their sport and their national legislation and context.”

In actuality, it’s not complex at all. It’s commonsense. It’s only weak and confused male athletes who want to compete against female athletes. It took too long for the USOC to finally act – but at least they acted. The bullying of women athletes must stop.

Image from Getty.

Written by Paul Batura · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: LGBT, Paul Random, transgender

Jul 22 2025

Christian Bookstore Sues Colorado Over Radical ‘Trans’ Law

Last week, a Colorado Springs-based Christian bookstore, Born Again Used Books, filed a lawsuit against Colorado, claiming the state’s radical “trans” law violates their constitutional right to free speech and religious freedom.

This is the third suit filed against the so-called “Kelly Loving Act” since it was passed in May.

Born Again Used Books filed its complaint on July 16, 2025 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado. The case is Born Again Used Books v. Sullivan, represented by Alliance Defending Freedom.

Background

In May, Colorado lawmakers passed a law requiring places of public accommodation, like bookstores, to use people’s “preferred” pronouns and titles, or face discrimination claims.

As previously reported by the Daily Citizen, Focus on the Family spoke out against the law, noting it would threaten free speech by forcing schools and businesses to adopt gender-affirming policies that violate their beliefs.

Focus on the Family President, Jim Daly, spoke out against the bill online. Three analysts from the organization testified against the measure, and in support of parental rights and free speech, at the state capitol.

Complaint

The Christian bookstore argues Colorado’s new law violates their rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution.

The owners of Born Again Used Books will sell their books to anyone, but they do not wish to violate their Christian beliefs about human sexuality. The bookstore owners believe God created sex to be immutable and that it is biologically determined.

The bookstore insists it is their constitutional right to recognize biological reality and use titles and pronouns consistent with their faith beliefs when addressing staff and the public.

They want to formalize the policy for the public, explaining their religious beliefs. However, under Colorado’s law it is illegal.

In a press release, ADF Senior Counsel Hal Frampton, director of the ADF Center for Conscience Initiatives explained, “The government cannot force Americans to say things they do not believe. Compelled speech — particularly on matters of conscience and belief — is unconstitutional.”

Specific Violations

The complaint alleges Colorado’s law violates the constitutional rights of the bookstore owners in three ways.

First, plaintiffs argue it compels them to use “preferred” pronouns and titles, or stay silent, which conflicts with their free speech.

Second, the bookstore alleges the law substantially burdens its sincerely held religious beliefs by preventing it from expressing its religious view on human sexuality and gender.

Third, the complaint argues the law is overly vague and can be used by the state to discriminate against viewpoints it dislikes.

Lastly, plaintiffs allege it violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because it is not narrowly tailored to a legitimate government interest.

The legal question before the court is whether a state can compel individuals or businesses to use language that affirms a view of gender identity they reject on moral or religious grounds.

ADF Senior Counsel Hal Frampton further explained the store’s position:

As the Supreme Court has repeatedly affirmed, the government has no business trying to strip traditional views about sex and gender from the marketplace of ideas. Nor can the state compel Coloradans to speak in ways that violate their deeply held religious beliefs. Born Again Used Books shouldn’t have to continually choose between violating the law and speaking consistent with its Christian beliefs.

Request for Relief

The bookstore is seeking a preliminary and permanent injunction to keep the state from enforcing the law against them, in addition to a declaratory judgment on the merits of the case finding the law, as applied to the bookstore, to be unconstitutional.

Impact

This case is not just about whether a bookstore is forced to use “preferred” pronouns and titles. Rather, it’s about whether Americans have the right to speak according to their conscience.

For many families concerned about government overreach into religious beliefs, especially in education, the outcome of this case could either affirm their rights or threaten a new era of state-mandated ideology.

Daily Citizen will continue covering this story.

Related Articles and Resources

Oppose Colorado’s Radical Abortion and ‘Transgender Rights’ Legislation

Focus on the Family Testifies Against Nightmare Bill, Colorado’s Radical ‘Trans’ Legislation Advances

Colorado Governor Signs Extreme Act: ‘Legal Protections for Transgender Individuals’

Parents’ Rights Groups Sue Colorado Over Radical Trans Law

Radical Colorado ‘Transgender’ Bill Threatens Parents’ Rights and Free Speech

Image credit: ADF

Written by Nicole Hunt · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: kelly loving act, LGBT, transgender

Jul 17 2025

Gavin Newsom and the Dead-End Politics of the Sexual Revolution

California Governor Gavin Newsom is languishing in a political purgatory of his own making.

An ambitious and astute politician, the governor embarked on a media tour this month to position himself as the reigning “moderate” in a leaderless and increasingly radical Democrat party.

But the governor is struggling to reconcile his new, “common sense” platform with the progressive ideology that propelled him to prominence. The disconnect is nowhere more evident than in his shifting position on “transgenderism.”

Newsom began distancing himself from his more radical colleagues in March, when he called publicly called forcing girls to compete against boys in sex-segregated sports “deeply unfair.”

His comments effectively launched his centrist rebrand. But they also landed him in hot water with some of his most powerful supporters.

“My party was [angry], the LGBTQ caucus [was angry],” Newsom told podcaster Shawn Ryan in an interview released this week.

“I’ll never forget that meeting with my friends, furious with me because I don’t think it’s fair [to allow boys to compete in girls sports].”

Of course the LGBT caucus was angry; Newsom, a self-described “champion” of LGBT rights, has been a staunch supporter of the caucus’ agenda for more than two decades. In 2004, as mayor of San Francisco, he issued marriage licenses to same-sex couples — before it was legal to do so.

In his interview with Ryan, Newsom called it one of his “proudest accomplishments.”

The governor reconciles his long-standing support of the LGBT agenda, particularly same-sex marriage, and his new position on sex-segregated sports by treating them as two entirely separate issues.

“When you get to issues [of boys participating in girls sports], that’s no longer about celebrating [someone’s] rights,” Newsom told Ryan. “It’s about denying [other] people theirs.”

But they aren’t two separate issues — far from it. The rise of “transgenderism” is the direct result of the legalization and normalization of same-sex relationships.

Gender ideology, including “transgenderism,” and same-sex marriage both stem from the ideology of the sexual revolution, which Dr. Jay Richards describes as the legal and social “fracturing” of marriage, sex and childbirth.

Richards, who directs the Heritage Foundation’s DeVos Center for Life, describes the sexual revolution as a train traveling toward the end of a track. In this metaphor, each stop represents an increasingly radical manifestation of the sexual revolution’s core ideology.

The legalization and normalization of same-sex marriage is one such stop. At this station, the politics of the sexual revolution effectively fractured marriage and the sexual binary. The government cosigned the lie that all family structures are equally good — for society, for the health of both spouses and for the rearing of children.

The rise of “transgenderism” is just one stop further down the track. Whereas the legalization of same-sex marriage diminished the significance of male and female in a marriage partnership, “transgenderism” erases the distinctions between male and female all together.

This ideology treats men and women as entirely interchangeable. It recognizes nothing significant or unique about the complimentary construction of male and female humans. Thus, boys can compete in girls sports and children can casually flood their bodies with opposite-sex hormones.

In short, Newsom cannot logically support same-sex marriage and simultaneously oppose the participation of boys in girls sports because “transgenderism” is the logical consequence of legalizing alternative family structures.

Perhaps the governor recognizes this logical bind, at least subconsciously. When Ryan asked him point-blank if he believes an 8-year-old should be allowed to “consent” to  irreversible transgender medical interventions, Newsom replied:

Yeah. Look, now that I have a nine-year-old, come on man, I get it. So, those [concerns about age] are legit.

That’s not an answer. He never gives one, other than to say he’s still learning about the issue.

It takes no more than half an hour of reading from unbiased sources to understand the devastating effects opposite-sex hormones and surgical mutilation wreak on children’s physical and mental development. Newsom’s reticence isn’t about knowledge — it’s about ideology.

If he admits kids can’t be born in the wrong body, the ideology he’s fought for for decades will collapse. He’ll lose his voter base while trying to reach Democrats who defected from the party during the 2024 presidential election.

Where does this leave Newsom? Trapped. The politics of the sexual revolution, which made him a powerful Democrat player in California, are keeping him from seizing an unprecedented opportunity to ascend to party leadership on a national scale.  

He can’t convincingly accept the moderate policy positions his colleagues have rejected after years of supporting an ideology that can only become more radical.

Additional Articles and Resources

Legalization of Same-Sex Marriage Harms Children and Society

‘Mass Exodus’: Dr. Jay Richards on the Demise of Gender Ideology and What It Means for the Pro-Life Movement

Here’s What Happens When Good People Don’t Connect Gay and Trans Ideology

Sorry ‘Gays Against Groomers,’ But Gay Activists Helped Start This Transgender Fire

Sorry ‘Gays Against Groomers,’ But Gay Activists Helped Start This Transgender Fire — Part Two

The Two-Parent Privilege: Understanding Contemporary Family Formation

Different Family Forms Lead to Prison or College for Young Men

Important New Research on How Married Parents Improve Child Well-Being

Feds Sue California Department of Education Interscholastic Federation for ‘Illegal Sex Discrimination’

New Paper Details ‘Emerging and Accumulating’ Adverse Effects of ‘Gender Affirming’ Estrogen

INVESTIGATION: Taxpayers Fund Transgender Experiments on Children

HHS Releases Report on Harms of ‘Transgender’ Medical Interventions for Minors

Doctor Refuses to Publish Major Study Finding Puberty-Blocking Drugs Don’t Help Children

England’s NHS Stops Dispensing Puberty Blockers for Children — Not Safe or Effective

Written by Emily Washburn · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: LGBT, Newsom, transgender

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • Page 10
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 26
  • Go to Next Page »

Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | © 2026 Focus on the Family. All rights reserved.

  • Cookie Policy