• Skip to main content
Daily Citizen
  • Subscribe
  • Categories
    • Culture
    • Life
    • Religious Freedom
    • Sexuality
  • Parenting Resources
    • LGBT Pride
    • Homosexuality
    • Sexuality/Marriage
    • Transgender
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Contact
  • Donate

transgender

Dec 15 2025

Research Supports Why Exposing ‘Trans’ Lies is True Compassion

Strong research data, coming forth over the last few months, has demonstrated that “trans” identity among young people is not the natural thing gender activists wanted us to believe it is. The Daily Citizen has reported on the most recent developments, here, here and here.

Now new data from Washington University professor Ryan Burge strongly affirms this fact. Professor Burge posted his new findings on X and his Substack today:

Among people born between 1995 and 1999, the share who identified as transgender was 7.5% in 2020.

In 2024, that had dropped to 2.3%.

For those born between 2000 and 2004, the share went from 8.5% to 4.1% during the same time period. pic.twitter.com/mOiok5SyOj

— Ryan Burge 📊 (@ryanburge) December 15, 2025

Burge wanted to “replicate and validate” Jean Twenge’s October finding from the nationally representative Cooperative Election Study (CES) survey showing that trans identity was in free fall among young people. Professor Twenge reported that data supports her conclusion: “It turns out identifying as transgender really is in free fall among the young in the U.S. So is identifying as nonbinary.”

Burge asked, “Has there been a noticeable decline in the share of 18 – 22-year-olds who identify as transgender over the last couple of years?” He replies definitively, “The answer is unequivocal: yes.”

In fact, the number of respondents who identified as “transgender” just years ago have fallen by more than half in many categories. In 2020, 2.5% of all U.S. adults said they were transgender. That number crashed to just 1% in 2024. Burge explains, “The sharpest decline is clearly concentrated among the youngest slice of the American electorate – and the share keeps dropping as older respondents are included.”

Burge found “the biggest drop in raw numbers still comes from the younger part of the sample.” Specifically, of those born in the mid- to late-nineties, 7.5% identified as trans in 2020, but in 2024, only 2.3% did, a decline of two-thirds. Of Americans born in the early 2000s, trans identification dropped from 8.5% to 4.1% over those years.

The decline took place among older adults as well.

Of those born in the 1970s, 1.6% said they were transgender in 2020, but by 2024, that number had collapsed to just 0.3%. For those born in the 1980s, trans identity dropped from 4.8% in 2020 to just 0.9% in 2024. Burge comments, “So this isn’t just a phenomenon limited to the very youngest adults — there were significant declines among people in their thirties and forties as well” (emphasis in original).

Abigail Shrier cogently highlighted the “contagion” nature of girls and young women suddenly identifying as trans in her important 2020 book, Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters. The introductory chapter of her book is bluntly entitled, “The Contagion.” Outlets like Psychology Today were negative on her book.

Burge’s data resoundingly affirms her conclusion. He explains that for young women, trans identity “dropped from 6.9% in 2020 to just 0.3% in 2024.” He adds, “And that’s not a typo – out of 3,914 respondents between the ages of 18 and 22, only six identified as both a woman and transgender”(emphasis in original).

Republicans Less Likely to Identify

Burge broke his numbers down according to political affiliation, finding that young Republicans were about half as likely as young Democrats to identify as transgender in 2020, 6.9% to 12% respectively.  The decline among both from 2020 to 2024 was stark. But it was notably stronger for Republicans. In fact, Burge’s data showed it “basically vanished” after 2020. In fact, Burge confesses, “I don’t want to stray too far into hot-take territory, but it seems that around 2021 the Republican Party drew a clear ‘bright line’ on this issue – and when that happened, the idea of trans Republicans all but disappeared”(emphasis in original).

This data point supports the wisdom of Alexander Solzhenitzen’s famous 1974 essay, “Live Not By Lies,” written against communist and Marxist lies. As he was being exiled to the United States, the famous anti-communist novelist told his fellow countrymen to refuse, in every instance, to live by the lies of Marxist ideology. Doing so is “the easiest way for us and the most devastating for the lies.” Solzhenitsyn added, “For when people renounce lies, lies simply cease to exist. Like parasites, they can only survive when attached to a person.”

And this appears to be what happened among conservatives in the United States. When the contagion of transgenderism was called out as false, identification with it among certain groups essentially disappeared.

This is why standing against the lies of transgenderism with full confidence and no apology is the wisest, most compassionate action. We must continue this work for the sake of others who are caught up in the contagion.

Written by Glenn T. Stanton · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: transgender

Dec 15 2025

Florida Sues Medical Groups for Promoting ‘Transgender’ Mutilation of Children

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier filed a complaint against “three medical organizations for promoting child mutilation” for children who reject their sex.

The lawsuit names the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH), the Endocrine Society and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) for causing irreversible harm to confused children by recommending irreversible medical interventions, such as puberty blockers, opposite sex hormones and surgeries.

The organizations are charged with violating Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act and RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization) Act.

Uthmeier posted an announcement of the suit on X, saying:

We believe these organizations failed to disclose the risks, limits and evidence when promoting so-called gender-affirming care for children.
For years, these groups insisted the recommendations were “settled science,” when behind closed doors they knew the evidence was weak. They knew the outcomes uncertain and the risks very real.

The Attorney General excoriated the groups for hiding information from parents and emotionally blackmailing them into allowing their children to be experimented upon:

In fact, some parents were told that if they didn’t put their kids through permanent, life-altering, sick procedures like double mastectomies and castration, that their child would commit suicide.
Not only is that unethical and dangerous medicine, but it is against the law.

The lawsuit details the sordid history of “transgender medicine,” noting that “pediatric gender dysphoria” was rare just ten years ago but has “skyrocketed in recent years,” citing a report of 724,000 children identifying as “transgender” in 2023.

The puberty blockers, opposite-sex hormones and surgeries “are extremely profitable for Defendants and their members,” the suit explains, referencing insurance data showing such interventions were a $4.1 billion industry in 2022 – projected to rise to $8 billion by 2030.

The case against the organizations describes the way the groups built a circular, self-referential façade of evidence for their “standards of care”: Newer versions of WPATH’s recommendations cited older versions as “evidence”; WPATH cited the Endocrine Society’s guidance – then sponsoring updates of those same guidelines; and the American Academy of Pediatrics policies cited both WPATH and the Endocrine Society in their guidance.

But then, the lawsuit explains:

The house of cards collapsed in 2024, however, when internal leaks, litigation discovery, and systematic reviews commissioned by national health agencies exposed Defendants’ “circular” guidelines as an elaborate sham.

Despite this, “Defendants continue to peddle their discredited clinical guidelines as ‘evidence-based standards of care’ to sell memberships,” with health care professionals, hospitals and clinics profiting from these destructive procedures.

The AAP and the Endocrine Society were just as culpable, with both groups adopting WPATH standards for treating minors and the AAP encouraging insurance companies to “offer coverage for health care that is specific to the needs of youth who identify as TGD [Transgender and Gender Diverse], including coverage for . . . surgical gender-affirming interventions.”

In 2022, Florida’s Department of Health examined the evidence for these interventions, finding no scientific support for inflicting these experimental procedures on children.

The state blocked Medicare payments for transgender drugs and surgeries for minors, and the Florida Board of Medicine and Board of Osteopathic Medicine voted to protect children, prohibiting the damaging practices.

WPATH, the AAP and the Endocrine Society pushed back, denouncing the state’s action to safeguard children and submitting amicus briefs in support of parents and minors who challenged Florida’s actions in court.

The most recent WPATH Standards of Care claim:

There is strong evidence demonstrating the benefits in quality of life and well-being of gender-affirming treatments, including endocrine and surgical procedures.

But the state of Florida points to reviews from Finland, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the U.S. that show little evidence for giving children powerful experimental drugs and hormones or mutilating their bodies with surgeries.

In addition, the suit accuses the organizations of being politically and ideologically motivated and using poor methodology to come up with their “standards of care.”

Florida is seeking a fine of $1 million for each organization and $10,000 for each violation of its Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, as well as permanent injunctions against their “misleading advertisements regarding the safety, reversibility, or efficacy of pediatric sex interventions.”

WPATH, the AAP and the Endocrine Society should be held accountable for promoting these devastating, irreversible procedures for children. We pray that Florida will be successful in its pursuit of justice.  

Related articles and resources:

Children’s Hospital Los Angeles Shuts Down Harmful ‘Center for Transyouth’

Doctor Refuses to Publish Major Study Finding Puberty-Blocking Drugs Don’t Help Children

FBI, DOJ Target Those Mutilating Children with ‘Transgender’ Drugs and Surgeries

Florida Protects Children, Bans Experimental ‘Trans’ Procedures on Minors

Focus on the Family: Counseling Consultation & Referrals

Focus on the Family: Transgender Resources

God’s Amazing Grace in a Transgendered Person’s Life

HHS Releases Report on Harms of ‘Transgender’ Medical Interventions for Minors

New Video Equips Parents and Counselors to Help ‘Gender Dysphoric’ Children

Pam Bondi Directs DOJ Attorneys to Investigate Transgender Procedures for Minors

Transgenderism and Minors: What Does the Research Really Show?

U.K.’s Review of Child Gender Policy Reveals Profound Failures That U.S. Still Defends

Written by Jeff Johnston · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: transgender

Dec 12 2025

Maryland School Teaches Sixth Graders About Being ‘Transgender’ and ‘Nonbinary’

In celebration of “Transgender Awareness Week,” Westland Middle School, in Bethesda, Maryland, gave sixth grade students lessons on “transgenderism” and “being nonbinary.”

As reported by Fox News, the 11- and 12-year-old students were inculcated into the irrational, deceptive world of transgender ideology via videos and a 12-slide presentation.  

As reporter Andrew Mark Miller explained for the news outlet:

Multiple slides in the presentation provide information on “what it means” to be transgender and students are then quizzed about what they learned.
In another slide, students are told to discuss questions with their neighbor in class, including, How do people know if they are a ‘girl’ or ‘boy?’”
Slide from Fox News of the sixth grade lesson on “transgenderism.”

Another slide asked students to answer questions such as: “What do I already know about the experiences of transgender people?”; “What do I want to know about the experiences of transgender people?”; and, following the lesson, “What have I learned about the experiences of transgender people?”

The slides included “8 Tips for Being Nonbinary!” a video from a “non-binary producer” named “Laurenzo” who has 889 thousand followers on TikTok and 54 thousand followers on Instagram.

In the video, Laurenzo answered questions such as, “If someone calls you by your wrong pronouns, what do you do?” and “I don’t know which ‘label’ is right for me … Help?”

“Laurenzo” in front of the “nonbinary” flag.

In answering the latter question, Laurenzo described her journey from straight to bisexual to lesbian to nonbinary, saying she always identified as an “androgynous person.”

She encouraged the sixth graders “to create the identity that you feel is your true self on the inside,” rather than embracing their male or female sex.

The activist also referred to her “chosen family” – a term used by some in the LGBT community when they reject their natural family and embrace others who identify as homosexual or transgender as their “real family.” 

Laurenzo goes on to talk about “how to bind properly.” Breast binding, also known as chest binding, is the dangerous practice of using cloth strips, sports bras or special undergarments that compress breast tissue, flattening the breasts in an attempt to look male.

These attempts by females to look masculine come with many risks, as a fact sheet from the American College of Pediatricians (ACPeds) explains. The professional organization notes that 89-97% of individuals who bind their breasts report adverse reactions in online surveys, including:

  • Chest and/or back pain, reported by 75-80%, with 39% describing severe pain and 21% reporting limitation in daily activities.
  • Fractured ribs (3%).
  • Pulmonary problems, such as shortness of breath (47-68%); reduced exercise tolerance and difficulty speaking; pulmonary edema; and restrictive lung disease.
  • Skin problems (78%),including acne, rashes, itching and scarring.

ACPeds concludes:

Since most children and adolescents who feel uncomfortable with their biological sex, will feel comfortable at the end of normal uninterrupted puberty, chest (breast) binding should not be recommended. Those who practice chest binding should be educated about the adverse effects.

Laurenzo notes that binding “restricts your breathing, but she then goes on to tell the sixth graders:

My general advice about binding is make sure you’re being safe about it, don’t be wearing a binder more than eight hours in a day [and] definitely not exercising.

There is nothing “safe” about this practice. Montgomery County Public Schools is promoting a dangerous, false ideology. When young people attempt to change their bodies to mimic the opposite sex, there are multiple, irreparable health risks.  

Humans are made in the image of God – male and female. This isn’t just a biblical, theological issue, it’s also a matter of science. “Gender,” as some sort of internal self-definition, is a false concept.

Westland Middle School is one of the top-ranked middle schools in Maryland – yet it is teaching an unscientific concept as if it were true. In addition, only 68% of students are proficient in reading and 40% are proficient in math – scores which would earn a D and an F, respectively, in most classrooms.

Rather than indoctrination, the school should stick to teaching the basics.

Related articles and resources:

Addressing Gender Identity with Honesty and Compassion

An Essential Primer on Defending the Reality of Male and Female

Counseling Consultation & Referrals

FTC Begins Investigating ‘Gender-Affirming’ Medical Community for Deception, False Advertising

HHS Releases Report on Harms of ‘Transgender’ Medical Interventions for Minors

How the “Trans” and Gender Redefinition Issue Attacks the Family

How to Respond to “Trans” and Gender Ideology? Simple: Live Not by Lies

Resources for families struggling with wrong-sex identification

Transgenderism and Minors: What Does the Research Really Show?

‘Transgender Means Many Different Things’ — And Nothing

What Does it Mean to Be Trans, Anyway?

Written by Jeff Johnston · Categorized: Education · Tagged: education, nonbinary, transgender

Dec 11 2025

Court Upholds Trump Ban on ‘Transgender’ Service Members

A federal appeals court on Tuesday allowed the Trump administration to enforce its prohibition on transgender-identified individuals from serving in the military.

In a 2-1 decision, a panel of judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled a lower court had afforded “insufficient deference” to the secretary of war to enforce strict medical standards on service members.

The decision stays Biden-nominated Judge Ana C. Reyes’s March 18 preliminary injunction that had placed the Pentagon’s policy on ice after several transgender-identifying service members filed a lawsuit to prevent the policy’s enforcement.

Judge Reyes is the “first openly LGBT” person to serve on the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and “is a longtime Democrat Party donor,” The Federalist reports.

Judge Gregory Katsas, a Trump nominee, authored the Court of Appeals’ decision and explained the Hegseth Policy “is likely constitutional because it reflects a considered judgement of military leaders and furthers legitimate military interests.”

“The government identifies several legitimate military interests that the Hegseth Policy advances,” Judge Katsas continued. “Chief among them is military readiness. … Secretary Hegseth had before him evidence that treatments for gender dysphoria would limit deployability and may not be effective. … His predecessors unanimously agreed that these concerns are serious ones.”

In May, the U.S. Supreme Court stayed a separate preliminary injunction in a related case that had prohibited the Pentagon from disqualifying transgender-identified individuals from military service. Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson had dissented from the Court’s decision.

Judge Katsas cited the Supreme Court’s 6-3 ruling as a further reason for staying Judge Reyes’ preliminary injunction.

“The Supreme Court has already held that the government is likely to succeed on its contention that the Hegseth Policy does not violate equal protection,” Judge Katsas wrote.

Judge Neomi Rao, also a nominee of President Trump, joined the Court of Appeals’ majority opinion. Judge Cornelia Pillard, a nominee of former President Barack Obama, dissented.

Just one week after taking office for the second time, President Donald J. Trump signed an executive order, Prioritizing Military Excellence and Readiness, that made it the policy of the U.S. government to “establish high standards for troop readiness, lethality, cohesion, honesty, humility, uniformity, and integrity.”

The order properly explained,

This policy is inconsistent with the medical, surgical, and mental health constraints on individuals with gender dysphoria. This policy is also inconsistent with shifting pronoun usage or use of pronouns that inaccurately reflect an individual’s sex.

The Pentagon then issued a directive on February 26 disqualifying individuals with a current diagnosis, or exhibiting symptoms, of gender dysphoria from military service. The directive also stipulates:

  • All service members will only serve in accordance with their sex.
  • Pronoun usage within the military must reflect service members’ sex.
  • Sleeping, changing and bathing facilities will be designated based on biological sex.
  • The Department of Defense will not pay for transgender medical interventions.

The directive reversed two previous presidential policies, implemented by the Obama and Biden administrations, that had relaxed the military’s policy of prohibiting “individuals with gender dysphoria, a medical condition associated with clinically significant distress,” from serving in the military.

Between 2015 and 2024, the U.S. Department of Defense spent over $52 million providing transgender medical interventions to active-duty service members.

Following the Court of Appeals’ ruling, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth posted a meme depicting his foot kicking “Woke Culture” and “DEI Military” out the front door of the Department of War.

https://t.co/bSGBaFJMZK pic.twitter.com/4hlBipiu8o

— Pete Hegseth (@PeteHegseth) December 10, 2025

“This administration has done a great deal from day one to remove the social justice, politically correct and toxic ideological garbage that had infected our department. To rip out the politics,” Secretary Hegseth told hundreds of our nation’s top military leaders in a speech in September.

“No more identity months, DEI offices, dudes in dresses. No more climate change worship. No more division, distraction or gender delusions. No more debris.”

Now, two of our nation’s highest courts have upheld one of the administration’s initiatives to restore a “warrior ethos” to the military and end the “woke” at the Department of War.

Liberty Counsel founder and chairman Mat Staver issued a statement after the Court of Appeals’ ruling, saying, “The D.C. Court of Appeals ruling affirms that the Equal Protection Clause does not require the armed forces to disregard its legitimate medical standards that are essential for mission success.”

“The ‘Hegseth Policy’ is grounded in objective medical criteria and the natural differences between the sexes to ensure that every servicemember is fully prepared — physically and mentally — to meet the challenges of defending our nation.”

The Daily Citizen will keep you updated of any important developments in this case.

The case isTalbott v. United States.

Related articles and resources:

Hegseth: No More ‘Woke’ At Department of War

Supreme Court Lets Trump’s ‘Transgender Military Ban’ Take Effect

SecDef Hegseth: Military Reinstating 8,700 Wrongly Discharged Servicemembers

Biden-Appointed Judge Blocks Trump Ban on ‘Transgender’ Service Members

Pentagon Ends Paid Travel Expenses and Time Off for Abortions

Photo from Getty Images.

Written by Zachary Mettler · Categorized: Government Updates · Tagged: Military, transgender, Trump

Nov 25 2025

The APA’s 5 Failed Critiques of HHS Report Discrediting Sex-Rejecting Procedures for Kids

JUMP TO…
  • Failure to Read
  • Making Assumptions
  • Cherry Picking
  • Unsupported Conclusions
  • Misapplication of Scientific Norms
  • Why It Matters

The American Psychiatric Association (APA) tried and failed to discredit the Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) report showing sex-rejecting procedures harm minors.

HHS commended the association last week for for peer-reviewing Treatment for Pediatric Gender Dysphoria: Review of Evidence and Best Practices, which the department first published in May. The American Academy of Pediatrics and Endocrine Society refused HHS’ invitation to review, though both support subjecting wrong-sex-identified children to surgical procedures, puberty blockers and [wrong]-sex hormones.

Though the APA agreed to review Treatment for Pediatric Gender Dysphoria, it did not do so carefully or in good faith. Its criticisms rely on half-truths, manipulations and outright falsehoods, demonstrating how little evidence “gender-affirming” organizations have to support procedures they call “evidence-based.”

Below are five of the America Psychiatric Association’s failed critiques of HHS’ Treatment for Pediatric Gender Dysphoria.

Failure to Read

The APA recommended HHS review 16 additional studies for the final version of Treatment for Pediatric Gender Dysphoria.

The original report had already addressed twelve of them.

Two other recommended studies examined the effect of sex-rejecting procedures on the wrong population (adults, not minors). Another did not investigate sex-rejecting procedures at all.  

HHS found only one of the APA’s recommended studies “potentially relevant.” Importantly, it came out after the department published Treatment for Pediatric Gender Dysphoria on May 1, 2025.

In its response to the association’s review, HHS speculates its “unfounded” criticisms “could have resulted from a failure to read core parts of the review.

Making Assumptions

The APA argued Treatment for Pediatric Gender Dysphoria failed to consider the risk of allowing children struggling with wrong-sex identification to go through puberty.

This critique reflects a common lie that sex-rejecting procedures stop wrong-sex-identified children from committing suicide or experiencing other debilitating mental illnesses.

More importantly, it subtly reveals the APA changes its conception and treatment of puberty based on the feelings of the developing child.

The association evidently considers puberty a natural and necessary process only when the child accepts it. Conversely, when puberty causes a child distress, the association considers it a sickness to be stopped and reversed.

HHS correctly recognizes puberty as a natural, necessary part of human life — regardless of the developing person’s feelings about growing up. Treatment for Pediatric Gender Dysphoria investigates the effects of disrupting this natural physical development with wrong-sex hormones, drugs that “block” puberty and sex-rejecting surgeries.

Cherry Picking

Treatment for Pediatric Gender Dysphoria references many findings and conclusions from The 2024 Cass Review — a comprehensive report on transgender medical interventions which prompted the UK to ban puberty blockers and prohibit the administration of wrong-sex hormones to minors outside experimental research.

The APA criticized HHS for cherry picking favorable portions of the Cass Review and ignoring lines like, “For some, the best outcome will be transition…”

Ironically, the association cherry picked this phrase from a larger paragraph, not on the benefit of sex-rejecting procedures, but on the UK National Health Service’s obligation to children struggling with wrong-sex identification:

For some, the best outcome will be transition, whereas others may resolve their distress in other ways. Some may transition and then de/retransition and/or experience regret. The NHS needs to care for all those seeking support.

The APA selected this paragraph out of context to suggest the Cass Review equivocates on the benefits of sex-rejecting procedures. It doesn’t. The review clearly concludes evidence for sex-rejecting procedures is weak and, further, that doctors can’t know whether children will grow out of their wrong-sex identification and regret harming their bodies.

“Any reasonable interpretation of The Cass Review’s statements … must grapple with its findings about lack of evidence for benefit and deep uncertainties about diagnoses,” HHS writes. “Unfortunately, the APA fails to do so.”

Unsupported Conclusions

The APA criticized HHS for obfuscating how it chose and evaluated evidence in Treatment for Pediatric Gender Dysphoria.

Most other peer reviewers praised the report for its transparency and methodological rigor.

HHS highlights a positive peer review from two methodologists at the Belgian Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. The scientists commended the reports’ methodology and described the results as “[written] transparently” and “easy to follow.”  

Misapplication of Scientific Norms

Healthcare “stakeholders” refer to any population or entity impacted by changes to the medical system, including patients.

The APA argued HHS improperly excluded stakeholder perspectives, particularly those of “transgender individuals and their families,” from Treatment for Pediatric Gender Dysphoria.

But scientists don’t need patients’ input to write reliable evidentiary reviews.

HHS suspects the association confused its report with a clinical practice guide, which dictates how doctors should diagnose and treat medical conditions. Clinical practice guides generally require feedback from patients who will be impacted by the recommendations.

Treatment for Pediatric Gender Dysphoria does not weigh in on diagnoses and treatment; it compiles and evaluates all evidence on the effects of sex-rejecting procedures on minors. The perspectives of patients and other stakeholders do not — and should not — affect its scientific conclusions.  

Ironically, HHS notes, the current “gender affirming” clinical practice guides for wrong-sex-identified children score low on stakeholder involvement.

Why It Matters

Treatment for Pediatric Gender Dysphoria suggests the American medical system performed sex-rejecting procedures on wrong-sex-identified children with no evidence of those procedures’ benefits and every evidence of their harms.

HHS gave standard-bearers like the APA the opportunity to respond to this serious implication. They either refused or presented weak, deceptive arguments devoid of evidence.  

That’s unacceptable. Protecting children from sex-rejecting procedures requires illuminating these cop-outs and pursuing justice for families and children harmed by these unconscionable practices.

Additional Articles and Resources

Counseling Consultation & Referrals

Resources for families struggling with wrong-sex identification

HHS Finalizes Report Finding Sex-Rejecting Procedures Harm Minors

HHS Releases Report on Harms of ‘Transgender’ Medical Interventions for Minors

FTC Begins Investigating ‘Gender-Affirming’ Medical Community for Deception, False Advertising

The Shifting Ground of ‘Gender-Affirming Care’

Don’t Fall for the ‘Affirm Them or They Will Die’ Lie

Transgenderism and Minors: What Does the Research Really Show?

UK Bans Puberty Blockers for ‘Transgender’ Minors

U.K.’s Review of Child Gender Policy Reveals Profound Failures That U.S. Still Defends

England’s NHS Stops Dispensing Puberty Blockers for Children — Not Safe or Effective

Addressing Gender Identity with Honesty and Compassion

Newsom Signs Bill Connecting Students to ‘LGBT Hotline’ and Unsafe Chatrooms

Written by Emily Washburn · Categorized: Culture, Sexuality · Tagged: sex, transgender

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 30
  • Go to Next Page »

Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | © 2026 Focus on the Family. All rights reserved.

  • Cookie Policy