• Skip to main content
Daily Citizen
  • Subscribe
  • Categories
    • Culture
    • Life
    • Religious Freedom
    • Sexuality
  • Parenting Resources
    • LGBT Pride
    • Homosexuality
    • Sexuality/Marriage
    • Transgender
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Contact
  • Donate

transgender

May 20 2026

‘Tickle v. Giggle’: Australian ‘Transgender’ Court Case Is No Joke for Women

No, it’s not what you get when you poke the Pillsbury Doughboy in the belly. 

Tickle v. Giggle is the actual name of a legal dispute where an Australian Federal Court ruled against women – and in favor of a biological male who goes by the moniker “Roxanne Tickle.”

The court upheld a lower court decision that Tickle was discriminated against when the women-only networking app “Giggle for Girls” denied him access. 

Tickle v. Giggle has gained international attention as it demonstrates the disastrous results when being female is redefined to include men claiming to be women. In their rulings, Australian courts eradicated the scientific categories of male and female, stripped women of their privacy and safety, erased womanhood, and punished those who refuse to accept transgender ideology.

Sall Grover created Giggle in 2020. She explained in her affidavit to the Federal Court why she designed the female-only app: 

The vision was to create a little corner of the Internet where women from all over the world could have a refuge away from men. It could be for serious reasons, very superficial reasons, or very practical reasons. It would be a place without harassment, “mansplaining,” “d*** pics”, stalking, and aggression, and other male patterned online behaviour. 

She added: 

During development, I would often say, “I want to ensure that women can have access to a female support network in the palm of their hand whenever they need it” and that is essentially what we were creating. 

According to court documents, the conflict between Tickle and Giggle began in February 2021, when Tickle downloaded the app and registered as a female user, which included downloading a photograph of his face. In October, he was blocked from using the app after Giggle software and employees determined he was a male masquerading as a woman. 

Tickle claimed that “trans women” “are morally and legally women.” 

He then filed a complaint with the Australian Human Rights Commission, saying Grover and Giggle for Girls had violated the Sex Discrimination Act of 1984 and accusing both of gender identity discrimination. 

The original Act prohibited discrimination based on sex, marital status, and pregnancy or potential pregnancy. But in 2013, the Act was amended to include the artificially fabricatedcategories of sexual orientation and gender identity, putting those social constructs on a collision course with biological sex – being male or female. 

Grover stalwartly refused to participate in any reconciliation process with the Australian Human Rights Commission or Tickle, which would’ve meant allowing him on the app. So he sued her and Giggle. 

In a ruling as ridiculous as the case’s name, Judge Robert Bromwich said that because Tickle had “a labioplasty and vaginoplasty” – removal of his genitals and inverting his penis to create a faux vagina – his sex changed to “that of a woman.”

Of course, it did not.

In his decision, Bromwich assaulted what we know from science, writing ideologically: 

  • “Sex is not confined to being a biological concept referring to whether a person at birth had male or female physical traits.”
  • Sex is not “confined to being a binary concept, limited to the male or female sex, but rather takes a broader ordinary meaning, informed by its use, including in State and Territory legislation.”
  • “Sex can refer to a person being male, female, or another non-binary status.”
  • Sex “also encompasses the idea that a person’s sex can be changed.”

He is deeply mistaken. Sex is not determined by surgery, legislation, or public usage of the word. 

The judge ruled that Giggle and Grover engaged in “indirect gender identity discrimination against the applicant,” ordering them to pay up to $60,000 AUD in damages and legal fees, about $43,000 in U.S. dollars. 

Tickle had also demanded a published written apology, but Bromwich said any apology would be “insincere,” adding: 

It is plain that any apology given by Ms Grover, and any apology given by her on behalf of Giggle, would be through clenched teeth and utterly devoid of sincerity. She would be doing no more than saying she was sorry, but she would not in fact be sorry at all. She adheres to her sincerely held beliefs.

Grover appealed the ruling to the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia, and on May 15, 2026, the judges upheld Bromwich’s ruling. 

The ruling is a slap in the face to Australian women and basic reason, as it means that being a woman has no real meaning. It means that any Aussie male who claims to be female has access to all women-only activities and spaces. 

To add insult to injury, the court ruling doubled the compensation to Tickle for damages and legal costs. In addition, the court upgraded the offense to direct “gender identity” discrimination. 

Grover has said she will appeal the decision. She wrote about the consequences of the ruling in a post on X, “Men who claim to be women have more rights than actual women in Australia.” 

I am absolutely devastated
Men who claim to be women have more rights than actual women in Australia.
It is women who are being discriminated against, not the men who claim to be us.

But in a sense, nothing has changed: we will all wake up tomorrow & men will still not be women.

— Sall Grover (@salltweets) May 15, 2026

She’s right, male transgenderism trumps women’s rights in Australia – and any place where sex is redefined to include “gender identity.” Let’s hope the High Court of Australia has more sense.

The case is Tickle vs. Giggle. 

Related articles and resources: 

Activist Erin Friday on Protecting Kids and Fighting ‘Gender’ Ideology

Do Not Fall for the ‘Affirm Them or They Will Die’ Lie

ADF International: 

“Sex is not confined to being a biological concept” rules Australian Court

Australian court dismisses appeal to uphold biological reality in ‘What is a woman?’ case

Family First New Zealand: Interview with Sall Grover

HHS Releases Report on Harms of ‘Transgender’ Medical Interventions for Minors

How the “Trans” and Gender Redefinition Issue Attacks the Family

Medicalizing Gender Confusion Makes Things Worse, New Research Confirms

Stella O’Malley: Sall Grover – The Woman Who Refused to Lie

Transgender Ideology is Inherently Destructive

Transgender Ideology is Inherently Destructive, Part 2

Why Christians Can’t Avoid the “Trans” and Gender Redefinition Issue

Yes, Girls Care When Boys Take Their Trophies

Yes, Transgenderism is a False Belief System

Photo courtesy of Sky News Australia and ADF International.

Written by Jeff Johnston · Categorized: Culture, Sexuality · Tagged: transgender, women's rights

May 19 2026

Boys Atop Girls’ Podiums: Where Are the Dads?

We have seen it far too often across the country. But especially in California, just like we did this weekend.

AB Hernandez is infamous in California high school sports, a young man who has been allowed by the California Interscholastic Federation to compete against teenage girls in track and field events. He wins championships, of course. This means girls lose. Last Saturday, he swept first place in the high, long and triple jump girls field events in Moorpark, California. This is the new progressive patriarchy.

Officials further mocked this violation when they made the young woman whom Hernandez stole first place from stand next to him on the winner’s podium. School officials assume it is equitable to let the girl who actually won share the top podium spot with the boy who stole her gold medal. That infuriating travesty looks just like this:

If you have to create a shared podium for the boy competing in the girls’ event, you’ve already admitted you know he isn’t a girl and that his participation is unfair.

At that point, you're just seeking a public humiliation ritual for the girls. pic.twitter.com/Ldneg3xPaW

— Riley Gaines (@Riley_Gaines_) May 17, 2026

This shared-podium rule is the state of California admitting that girls and boys are indeed different and boys are stealing girls’ glory. Their shallow virtue signaling is their admission of guilt.

But the big question is this: Where are the fathers here?

In over 19,000 sports events around the world, male athletes have stolen more than 6,250 first place finishes and 10,700 top three prizes from female athletes. 

These thousands of displaced female athletes have fathers, many of them sitting right in the stands, as they watch their daughters’ hard work taken from them by boys.

This is precisely the time fathers should be standing up, with absolute righteous anger. Any man dutifully sitting through such a scandal is not acting like a man. Every father should be telling school and state officials that no one will take away what their hard-working daughters have rightfully earned. Every dad should let everyone know that his daughter will only compete fairly against other girls and that no boy will steal what is hers. This should happen at the events. And loudly, with great conviction and moral clarity. Men should give words to the injustices happening to their daughters and call other men to stand up in the same way.

Just like the child in the Emperor’s New Suit, all fathers must stand up and speak truth to the lie of transgenderism, for trans ideology is the new male patriarchy. Fathers must explain that what’sgoing on in girls sports is a deceptive fiction, a violation to the dignity, worth and hard work of their daughters.

We men have left this battle to bold women like J.K. Rowling, Riley Gaines, Chloe Cole, Erin Friday, Jennifer Sey, Erin Lee and so many others for far too long. That must now end.

It is time all fathers stand up for their daughters and call on other men to make a strong, principled stand for every girl’s rights and protection.

Ron Nocetti is the head of the California Interscholastic Federation which is allowing this travesty in the Golden State. He is the father of four young athletes, three of them daughters. Nocetti should be called out by all fathers for his flagrant passivity.

Protection is what fathers offer and provide, especially to their girls. No man should look back on this era of cultural insanity and ask, “Why did I cower to trans ideology when girls in my community were being cheated out of their victories by boys?”

I Corinthians 16:13 calls us to “act like men, be strong.” This is expected of all fathers, everywhere. Now is the time to act like men.

Related articles and resources: 

‘Save Girls Sports’ on the November Ballot — Here’s How You Can Help

Where Are the Dads Protecting Their Daughters from Dangerous Male Athletes?

Female Athletes Beg California Interscholastic Federation to Keep Boys Out of Girls Sports and Locker Rooms

Feds Pressure California After Boy Wins in Girls Track and Field Championship

Girls Shouldn’t Apologize for Protesting Boys in Girls Sports

Protect Kids Colorado

#SaveGirlsSports – New Campaign Launched by Family Policy Alliance

Top 5 Moments From Supreme Court Arguments Over Girls Sports

Written by Glenn T. Stanton · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: Girls Sports, transgender

May 15 2026

Texas Children’s Hospital Settles with Feds for Performing Sex-Rejecting Procedures on Minors

Texas Children’s Hospital (TCH) will pay millions of dollars in civil penalties and establish America’s first ever “detransition” clinic to avoid federal prosecution for alleged fraud, the Department of Justice (DOJ) revealed today.

The groundbreaking settlement is the first struck since last April, when the department began investigating federal crimes related to hospitals and doctors performing sex-rejecting procedures on children.

“The Justice Department will use every weapon at its disposal to end the destructive and discredited practice of so-called ‘gender-affirming care’ for children,” Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche wrote in a press release.

“Today’s resolution protects vulnerable children, holds providers accountable and ensures those harmed receive the care they need.”

The settlement, which TCH entered with the DOJ and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, requires the hospital to:

  • Stop performing sex-rejecting surgeries and hormone interventions on minors.
  • Fire and de-credential five doctors who performed sex-rejecting procedures on minors.
  • Pay $10 million in damages and civil penalties to “resolve allegations” that it committed insurance fraud to pay for sex-rejecting procedures.
  • Commit to establish a clinic dedicated to “the provision of medical care to detransitioners.”

TCH will cover all costs of the detransition clinic for the first five years, per Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton.

In exchange, the DOJ will not prosecute TCH for allegedly:

  • Stealing taxpayer money to fund sex-rejecting procedures for minors.
  • Misleading minors and their families about the long-term effects of sex-rejecting procedures.

The hospital cooperated fully with the investigation, according to the DOJ’s press release.

Allegations of fraud began dogging TCH in June 2024, when Vanessa Sivadge, a nurse practitioner in the hospital’s endocrinology program, told investigative journalist Christopher Rufo that some TCH patients paid for sex-rejecting treatments using Texas’ Medicaid program.

Sivadge’s testimony prompted state and federal investigations into the hospital. Representatives Pete Sessions (TX) and Lisa McClain (MI), members of the House Oversight Committee, launched a probe into TCH in July 2024, writing:

We are concerned that medical providers at TCH are falsifying diagnosis codes for patients seeking gender transition care to obtain Medicaid payment for noncovered services.

Investigators expressed specific interest in an incident in which a TCH doctor allegedly diagnosed a female patient with testosterone deficiency and hypergonadism so Medicaid would cover her sex-rejecting testosterone treatments.

TCH fired Sivadge in August 2024 for exposing their fraud, she maintains.

No matter how cooperative the hospital may seem in 2026, Sivadge’s story is just one example of how the hospital’s deceptive conduct and radical commitment to gender ideology has left a path of destruction in its wake.

When Dr. Eithan Haim exposed the hospital for continuing to perform sex-rejecting procedures on minors after telling the public it had stopped, he became the target of a rabid DOJ prosecution based on faulty facts.

For nearly a year, until the suit was dismissed in January 2025, Dr. Haim and his growing family wondered if he would spend the next decade in prison.

In January 2026, Dr. Haim sued TCH, Baylor College of Medicine and their representatives for feeding the DOJ the false information which led to his wrongful prosecution.

After so many years of turmoil, the Daily Citizen asked Dr. Haim how today’s settlement feels.

“It is not possible to communicate what it is like when the federal leviathan is weaponized to destroy your life — not because you committed a crime, but because you upheld one of [medicine’s] most sacred virtues,” he told us, continuing:

I’ve seen this evil up close and lived with that terror every second of every day for years. I’ve also witnessed extraordinary courage, honor and dignity from those who sacrificed alongside me.
I always believed [that sacrifice] would one day be worth it.
Today is that day.

Additional Articles and Resources

House Oversight Committee Investigates Texas Children’s Medicaid Fraud

Nurse Whistleblower Lobbies Texas Senate to Investigate Fraud at Texas Children’s Hospital

Texas Children’s Hospital Embroiled in Fraud Scandal as Haim Case Kicks Off

Whistleblower Dr. Eithan Haim Sues Texas Children’s Hospital Over Malicious Prosecution

Haim Vindicated – DOJ Dismisses Case Against Whistleblower

President Trump Signs Order Protecting Children from Transgender Medical Interventions

HHS Releases Report on Harms of ‘Transgender Medical Interventions for Minors

Written by Emily Washburn · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: detransition, gender, transgender

May 08 2026

California House Passes Bill Mandating Coverage for ‘Transgender’ Mutilation

The California Assembly doubled down on forcing medical coverage for dangerous and disfiguring “transgender” medical mutilation of individuals – including minors – who reject their innate, God-given sex. 

AB 1876 bans discrimination in health care insurance based on a person’s “sex,” along with other characteristics such as race, color, age or disability. It then redefines “sex” in health care plans “to include gender identity, sexual orientation, and related characteristics.” 

The bill sailed through two committees before passing the full Assembly, 56-17. An additional seven members had “No Vote Recorded,” which count for no votes in the legislature. 

California Family Council, a Focus on the Family-allied organization, explained AB 1876 was “framed as a ‘nondiscrimination’ measure,” adding: 

By redefining sex to include gender identity, sexual orientation, and related characteristics, the bill would prohibit insurers from denying or limiting coverage for procedures tied to gender transition if those procedures are covered in other contexts.

That means puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and irreversible surgeries would be treated as protected medical services, making it far more difficult for insurers to question their necessity, especially for minors. The bill also bans categorical exclusions for gender-transition procedures, effectively narrowing insurers’ ability to weigh long-term risks, evolving evidence, or patient age.

Dubbed the “Fair Care for All Act,” Assemblywoman Dawn Addis introduced AB 1876 in the Assembly Judiciary Committee, saying, “I’ll note that this is a priority bill of the LGBT caucus and sponsored by Equality California.” 

California’s LGBT caucus has 14 members, all Democrats, making up 12% of the entire Legislature and 16% of Democrat legislators. Equality California has tremendous influence in the state Legislature. The largest LGBT state advocacy group in the country, it is responsible for helping to propose and pass 205 bills and resolutions in California since its founding in 1999. 

The legislation was also supported by groups like Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California, the ACLU and Reproductive Freedom for All California. Planned Parenthood is the largest suppliers of opposite-sex hormones in the U.S., helping to destroy the reproductive capacity of more than 40,000 individuals in 2023 alone. “Reproductive freedom” evidently includes the “right” to remove healthy organs and mutilate one’s body. 

Addis said the mandate was necessary because of Trump administration actions to protect children from destructive gender ideology. 

Shortly after assuming office, President Donald Trump signed executive orders making it official government policy that there are only two genders: male and female and protecting children from chemical and surgical mutilation. 

These orders led the Department of Justice to target medical professionals and institutions that mutilate children with experimental “transgender” interventions that leave children sterile, sick and permanently damaged.

The president’s actions also led to the Department of Health and Human Services releasing an important report on the paucity of evidence for transgender medical interventions: Treatment for Pediatric Gender Dysphoria Review of Evidence and Best Practices. 

The agency evaluated 17 systematic reviews of chemical and surgical treatments inflicted on youth and found “significant risks – including irreversible harms such as infertility – while finding very weak evidence of benefit.”

But the California Legislature seems bent on promoting these harms – and forcing insurance providers to participate in the damage. 

California Family Council Vice President Greg Burt voiced the pro-family organization’s opposition to AB 1876: 

By treating an insurer’s denial of coverage as unlawful discrimination, AB 1876 removes insurers’ discretion to assess medical necessity, long-term risks, and evolving scientific evidence, particularly when the patient is a minor. 

These interventions carry serious lifelong consequences, including impacts on bone density, fertility, cardiovascular health, and neurological development. Surgical procedures performed on minors are permanent and irreversible.

He added that the bill also “raises serious religious liberty concerns, forcing employers and individuals to subsidize procedures that violate deeply held beliefs.” 

AB 1876 now moves on to the California Senate. 

Related articles and resources: 

For those struggling with transgenderism, and their families, Focus on the Family’s Counseling Department offers help from licensed counselors. To request a conversation with Focus on the Family’s Counseling Department, call 1-855-771-HELP (4357) weekdays from 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. (Mountain Time), or complete our Counseling Consultation Request Form. Please be prepared to leave your contact information for a counselor to return a call to you as soon as possible. The consultation is available at no cost to you due to generous donor support.

California Family Council

California Family Council: CA Bill Mandates Coverage of Sex-Rejecting Procedures for Minors

DOJ Targets Those Mutilating Children with ‘Transgender’ Drugs and Surgeries

HHS Releases Report on Harms of ‘Transgender’ Medical Interventions for Minors

Medicalizing Gender Confusion Makes Things Worse, New Research Confirms

Pam Bondi Directs DOJ Attorneys to Investigate Transgender Procedures for Minors

President Trump Signs Order Protecting Children From Transgender Medical Interventions

President Trump: ‘There are Only Two Genders: Male and Female’

ReFOCUS with Jim Daly: Addressing Gender Identity with Honesty and Compassion

ReFOCUS with Jim Daly: Chloe Cole: Gender Reassignment Surgery Regret

Sixteen States Sue Trump Administration for Protecting Children from ‘Trans’ Procedures

The WPATH Files – Transgender Interventions Are ‘Unethical Medical Experiments’

Written by Jeff Johnston · Categorized: Culture, Sexuality · Tagged: California, transgender

May 01 2026

‘Detransitioner’ Wins Settlement Against Therapists Who Referred Her for Double Mastectomy

Camille Kiefel, a woman who once believed she was “non-binary,” won a settlement against two therapists who referred her for a double mastectomy as a “gender affirming” medical procedure. 

She’s the second young woman in recent months to receive compensation after undergoing disfiguring “transgender” medical interventions. In February, a New York jury awarded Fox Varian $2 million dollars in a malpractice lawsuit against medical professionals who attempted to “transition” her to look like the opposite sex.

Investigative journalist Benjamin Ryan was the first to report the confidential settlement, saying it was reached “just days before the trial was slated to begin.” Kiefel had asked for $3.5 million in her malpractice lawsuit. 

The Women’s Liberation Front (WoLF), a self-described “radical feminist group” which opposes transgender ideology, supported Kiefel in her legal battle as her financial sponsor. The initial malpractice complaint, filed in December 2022, targeted Licensed Clinical Social Worker Amy Ruff and Licensed Professional Counselor Mara Burmeister, along with the two Oregon health care clinics that employed them. 

The lawsuit described some of the difficulties Kiefel struggled with, saying she “experienced severe childhood traumatic events leading to her feeling discomfort and dissociation with her body.” 

In addition, Kiefel “had a history of mental health diagnosis,” including attention deficithyperactivity disorder, complex post-traumatic stress disorder, major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder. These conditions “proved treatment-resistant despite nearly two decades of psychotherapy and prescribed medications for ADHD, depression, and anxiety with a variety of therapists over many years.” 

Kiefel began “identifying” as “non-binary” in 2016, underwent breast removal surgery in 2020 at age 30. In 2022, Kiefel accepted that she was a woman. 

But the damage was done. 

In a Newsweek article, Kiefel described the ridiculous ideology that supports surgery to become “non-binary”: 

And the weird thing, too, about being non-binary, is what do you even transition to? There’s no non-binary sex to transition to.

The suit alleged that “Ruff held one Zoom session with [Kiefel], lasting approximately an hour,” before writing a referral for her to have “chest reduction to relieve gender dysphoria.” The suit said Ruff’s letter had statements she “knew were factually false and/or misleading,” and she did not exercise “reasonable care” in her assessment or even review Kiefel’s medical or mental health records before recommending surgery, the complaint added. 

Kiefel learned “a second assessment letter was required in order for Medicaid to pay for breast removal surgery.” Her lawsuit said, “Burmeister failed to conduct an individualized, comprehensive mental health assessment prior to recommending that Plaintiff undergo double mastectomy surgery.” 

Ruff and Burmeister, according to an amended lawsuit, did not discuss with Kiefel the risks involved with the proposed surgery, including: 

  • Surgery might not alleviate her social, health and mental health problems, and it might even exacerbate them.
  • Surgery could not mute her feminine features to more closely resemble a ‘non-binary’ gender identity.
  • Reproductive dysfunction, through lack of sexual function, and inability to breastfeed.
  • Reclaiming her female identity after surgery might lead to greater anxiety, distress and shame.

Camille Kiefel’s struggles with trauma and mental health issues are typical of adolescents and young adults who embrace transgender ideology. 

Although many will go on to desist from believing they can become the opposite sex – or someother “gender” altogether, this may only occur after they have been irreparably damaged by transgender medical interventions like drugs, hormones and surgeries. 

True compassion means protecting young men and women and helping them embrace biological reality. 

Legal victories can’t undo the irreversible damage caused by these medical interventions, but they may cause mental health and medical professionals to think twice before engaging in such barbarous practices. 

For those struggling with transgenderism, and their families, Focus on the Family’s Counseling Department offers help from licensed counselors. To request a conversation with Focus on the Family’s Counseling Department, call 1-855-771-HELP (4357) weekdays from 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. (Mountain Time), or complete our Counseling Consultation Request Form. Please be prepared to leave your contact information for a counselor to return a call to you as soon as possible. The consultation is available at no cost to you due to generous donor support.

Related articles and resources: 

DOJ Targets Those Mutilating Children with ‘Transgender’ Drugs and Surgeries

Expert in ‘Transitioning’ Children Admits ‘We Were Wrong’ About Puberty Blockers

Focus on the Family: Counseling Consultation & Referrals

Focus on the Family: Transgender Resources

Four Brave Young Women File Lawsuits Alleging Harm from ‘Transgender’ Interventions

Jury Awards $2 Million to Young Woman Who Underwent ‘Transgender’ Surgery at 16

More Hospitals Stop Mutilation of Sexually Confused Children

New Video Equips Parents and Counselors to Help ‘Gender Dysphoric’ Children

ReFOCUS with Jim Daly: Addressing Gender Identity with Honesty and Compassion

ReFOCUS with Jim Daly: Chloe Cole: Gender Reassignment Surgery Regret

Transgenderism and Minors: What Does Research Really Show?

Written by Jeff Johnston · Categorized: Culture, Sexuality · Tagged: LGBT, transgender

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 36
  • Go to Next Page »

Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | © 2026 Focus on the Family. All rights reserved.

  • Cookie Policy