LGBT

‘Everyday Americans’ Honored at Address to Congress

First lady Melania Trump invited “everyday Americans as special guests” to President Trump’s address to a joint session of Congress on Tuesday.

Several guests had ties to family issues that are important to Focus on the Family, such as God’s design of humans as male and female; saving girls sports, serving children in the foster care system; and protecting parents’ rights to direct the educational upbringing of their children.

Attendees included family members of victims of violence, a mom whose parental rights were assailed by her daughter’s school, a young lady who had been a foster child, and a steelworker who, along with his wife, provided “a loving home to dozens of foster children.”

In addition, a few “surprise guests” attended the speech, including Jason Hartley, a young man was just accepted into the U.S. Military Academy at West Point and 13-year-old D.J. Daniel, who was diagnosed with brain cancer at age seven. D.J. was made an honorary law enforcement officer of several police departments; Secret Service Director Sean Curran made him an agent of the U.S. Secret Service during the speech.

Here are three of the “everyday Americans” honored by the president and first lady involved in issues we care about.  

Payton McNabb – Athlete’s story demonstrates why we should respect the distinctions between male and female.  

The Independent Women’s Forum, where Payton serves as an ambassador, described how McNabb was injured by a transgender-identified male in a volleyball game her senior year of high school:

On September 1, 2022, during a volleyball game against a rival North Carolina high school, 17-year-old Payton McNabb received a devastating head and neck injury as the result of a spike by a male athlete who identified as transgender. …

The blow left her unconscious, and “the ball’s impact caused neurological impairments including a concussion, vision problems, and partial paralysis to the right side of her body.”

In a White House video posted on X, McNabb said she still deals with these health issues today.

The president told Payton that because of an executive order protecting girls and women’s sports, “From now on, schools will kick the men off the girls team or they will lose all federal funding.

Jeff Denard – Hardworking father and his wife generously give time and love to children in foster care.

Melania Trump described Denard, saying, “Jeff has spent nearly three decades working at a steel plant owned by Nucor Steel. His good paying, middle class job at the steel plant has allowed Jeff to serve as volunteer firefighter, provide a loving home to dozens of foster children, and organize his fellow steelworkers to respond to natural disasters, including Hurricane Helene.”

In a post on X, Denard said he and his wife, Nicole, have been married for 25 years and have seven children. He explained their work in foster care, saying,

“My wife and I are also ranch managers of the Circle Ranch, out in Danvill, Alabama. We have about 38 children on-site. We have been fostering now for about three years and have had about 41 children through our homes.”

“We are so blessed. God’s been so good to us that we’re able to do this.”

The Circle Ranch defines its purpose:

Our mission is to provide a stable, supportive, and Christ-centered environment for these children and their foster families, as well as to equip and empower them for a successful future. We believe that every child deserves a chance to grow up in a family environment that reflects the love of God.

The ranch also serves as “a hub for other foster, adoptive, or kinship families in North Alabama,” adding, “Our aim is to create a network of support and resources for all the families who are involved in this noble and challenging calling.”

January Littlejohn – Mom’s story exposes threats to parental rights in education.

Almost five years ago, January and Jeffrey Littlejohn filed a lawsuit against the Leon County School Board for violating their parental rights by secretly affirming their daughter, who was only 13 years old at the time, in her gender confusion, as the Daily Citizen reported.

Three staff members met with the girl and developed a “Transgender/Non-Conforming Student Support Plan.” The staff asked the girl how she wanted to be identified, what pronouns to use when speaking about her, whether she wanted to use the girls or boys bathroom, and whether she felt more comfortable rooming with boys or girls on overnight trips – all without her parents’ knowledge or consent.

In a video on X describing what happened to their daughter, Littlejohn explained the damage inflicted on their daughter, saying, “We learned that the school had socially transitioned our daughter, where they asked her questions that would have absolutely impacted her safety and had harmful impacts on her psychological and physical well-being.”

She said that the school’s tactics were designed “to effectively deceive parents like us that these social transition plans ever happen.”

The first lady’s announcement about Littlejohn’s invitation described the harms from hiding information from parents, “The school drove a wedge between January’s daughter and her parents, and deceived January about their covert plan to transition her daughter.”

Related Articles and Resources

‘Equipping Parents For Back-To-School’ – Updated Resource Empowers Parents

Florida Parents Sue School for Helping Teen ‘Transition’ – Without Their Knowledge or Consent

Male and Female Biology Matters

Trump Signs Executive Order Protecting Women’s Sports and Spaces

What’s Your School District’s ‘Transgender’ Policy?

Yet Another Man Steals Women’s Trophies

Foundational Values

Resources: Foster Care and Adoption

Wait No More

The Most Important Truth in Trump’s Joint Speech to Congress Last Night

In his joint address to Congress last night, President Trump said many important things that have massive implications. The most consequential thing for our age is when he declared for America, “Our message to every child in America is that you are perfect exactly the way God made you.”

That was undergirded by this foundational human truth, “I signed an order making it the official policy of the United States government that there are only two genders: male and female.”

To this, he added, America will be “forever ending the lie that any child is trapped in the wrong body.” He noted, “This is a big lie.”

He is correct. You can see this short segment of his speech here:

These statements by President Trump were his most important utterances all evening because they are strong, truthful corrections to demonic lies that have infiltrated so much of our culture and too many of our children today. And they came forcefully and unapologetically from the leader of the free world. That is no small thing.

This is more than a vibe shift. It is a major shift toward the essential truth of the goodness of God, what it means to be human and why the family matters in the world today.


President Trump told the world last night that God’s image in each one of us as male and female is a treasured gift. It is something to be valued and protected in each child. The culture has been telling our children that God plays tricks on them by putting them in the wrong body. Too many youth now believe their feelings are more true than God’s very good design.

President Trump also said it is now the policy of the United States that there are only two sexes, male and female. This is not just some “own-the-libs” angle on an ideological, culture war skirmish. It corrects a very damaging anti-scientific and godless view of what it means to be human. We cannot define humanity nor the human person if we do not know what male and female are.

Likewise, we cannot speak sensibly about the family if we cannot speak truthfully about male and female. This fact is of utmost importance to us here at Focus on the Family because we are a family advocacy organization founded on and defended by a Christian worldview.

Why does this matter?

One of the first facts of creation is that male and female are a part of the very image and likeness of God in creation.

“So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them” (Genesis 1:27).

No other part of God’s vast creation holds this divine distinction. No Christian can miss this truth: Attacks on the nature of male and female are nothing less than attacks on the very image and likeness of God. Every Christian must therefore be passionate about defending the image and likeness of God. They must be passionate about defending the truth and beauty of male and female.

It is very clear. Christians have no real choice but to be fierce defenders of what it means to be woman and man, girl and boy, male and female.

It is the truth, beauty and wonder of male and female that creates each family. Reader, you exist, regardless of your belief system, culture, or worldview, because you are the fruit of a male and female union, hopefully from a married mother and father. This is the first universal truth about humanity that all cultures celebrate. It is what we honor at every birthday celebration.

The confusion this pernicious gender ideology has foisted upon the world challenges each of these beautiful truths. Donald Trump is the first major world leader to surgically attack so many of these deceptively destructive lies, and to do so forcefully.

Feel however you might about his other policies and practices; he is to be praised for his bold, truthful leadership.

Additional Resources

Why Focus on the Family Cares About the Gender Issue?

Yes, Sexuality and Gender Are Undeniable Gospel Issues

New Gallup Poll Shows the Incoherence of ‘LGBTQ+’ Fiction

Here’s What Happens When Good People Don’t Connect Gay and Trans Ideology

What Does it Mean to Be Trans, Anyway?

Why Christians Can’t Avoid the “Trans” and Gender Redefinition Issue

How the “Trans” and Gender Redefinition Issue Attacks the Family

Why the ‘LGBT Person’ and ‘LGBT Community’ Don’t Really Exist

How to Respond to “Trans” and Gender Ideology? Simple: Live Not by Lies

How the Binary in ‘LGBTQ+’ Reveals Its Utter Incoherence

Image from Getty.

‘Transgender’ Employee’s Lawsuit Against Liberty University Moves Forward

A federal court ruled that a sex discrimination lawsuit against Liberty University can move forward. The school fired a transgender-identified employee who violated the university’s Christian beliefs about sex and sexuality.

The former employee, Jonathan Zinski, who now goes by the name Ellenor, believes, “You can be transgender and Christian. I am.”

Zinski started taking female hormones even before he was hired by the Christian school and agreed to Liberty’s doctrinal position which states that “denial of birth sex by self-identification with a different gender” is a sinful act “prohibited by God.”

The American Civil Liberties Union of Virginia and Butler Curwood, PLC filed a lawsuit on behalf of Zinski, alleging the school violated his Title VII employment rights.

ACLU of Virginia Senior Transgender Attorney Wyatt Rolla, who was born female but is transgender-identified, said in a statement:

No one should be fired because of who they are, but Liberty University made it clear that’s exactly why it fired Ellenor. It’s no surprise the judge ruled our case can move forward. Workplace discrimination against transgender people is against the law – no matter your religious beliefs.

Liberty Counsel, a Christian legal aid nonprofit, is representing the school. Founder and Chairman Matt Staver sharply disagreed.

“Liberty University has the right under the First Amendment and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to uphold its sincere Christian religious beliefs and require its employees to do the same. Jonathan Zinski intentionally and deceptively set up Liberty University in an attempt to undermine its religious beliefs and mission.”

Zinski’s lawsuit states he was hired to work at the university’s IT Helpdesk in February 2023. Four months later, Zinski told the school’s Human Resources Department that he “identified as a trans woman, had been undergoing hormone replacement therapy (HRT), and intended to legally change [his] name from Jonathan to Ellenor soon.”

According to Liberty Counsel, when Zinski was first hired, he “agreed to adhere to the university’s doctrinal position regarding the biblical understanding of gender.”

But he was violating that agreement even before working for the school, as Liberty Counsel explained:

When Zinski was hired, he acknowledged and affirmed the doctrinal statement, but then as soon as his 90-day probation period expired, he revealed he had begun taking female hormones four months before he was hired, and that he planned to “identify” as female. Zinski set up this case when he applied to be hired.

Despite the fact that Zinski signed the belief statement while already on opposite sex hormones, the ACLU of Virginia claimed, “Ellenor is a devout Christian who is committed to Liberty’s mission of ‘preaching Christ,’” adding,

“Today she is an active member of her local church, Trinity Episcopal, whose pastor fully supported her transition, even providing gender-affirming clothing.”

In his opinion allowing the case to go forward, U.S. District Judge Norman K. Moon for the Western District Of Virginia relied on the U.S. Supreme Court’s Bostock decision, writing, “Sex is the criterion at issue here. In Bostock v. Clayton Cnty., Ga., the Supreme Court of the United States held that the term ‘sex’ as used in Title VII encompasses sexual orientation and transgender status.”

When Congress passed that act, Americans understood that “sex” meant being male or female – not homosexuality or transgenderism. These identities, based on a person’s thoughts, feelings and behaviors, are now viewed as an intrinsic part of human identity. As Rolla stated, it’s “who they are.”

Judge Moon opined that it didn’t matter what Congress meant when it passed the Civil Rights Act, saying, “Words change with time, thereby placing prior Congresses’ views of the present situation beyond our reach.” 

One wonders if the meaning of other words has “changed with time,” such as those in the Bill of Rights’ First Amendment: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”

While religious non-profit organizations, like Liberty University, typically have a ministerial exemption based on the First Amendment, the judge found “that it does not apply in this case,” adding, “Zinski was not a minister under any formula. The ministerial exception does not provide an affirmative defense to liability at this stage of litigation.”

When the Supreme Court redefined “sex” in Bostock to mean something it had never meant before, Justice Samuel Alito, in his dissent, harshly rebuked the majority opinion at every turn:

The arrogance of this argument is breathtaking. … The Court’s argument is not only arrogant, it is wrong, it fails on its own terms. “Sex,” “sexual orientation,” and “gender identity” are different concepts, as the Court concedes. …
Without strong evidence to the contrary (and there is none here), our job is to ascertain and apply the “ordinary meaning” of the statute. And in 1964, ordinary Americans most certainly would not have understood Title VII to ban discrimination because of sexual orientation or gender identity.

Liberty Counsel said it will appeal the case, arguing “that federal law protects religious institutions to uphold their sincere Christian beliefs and to employ those who are aligned with its religious mission and beliefs.”

Let’s pray they prevail, as Zinski v. Liberty University has important implications for churches, religious schools and ministries. The Daily Citizen will keep you updated as the case moves through higher courts.

Related articles and resources:

The Bostock Slippery Slope: Girls Who Think They’re Boys Must Be Allowed to Use High School Boys’ Restroom, Appeals Court Rules

EEOC Releases Major Guidance Ending Many Workplace Protections for Women

Federal Judge Blocks Administration’s Attempt to Impose Gender Ideology on Employers, Healthcare Providers

Federal Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Attacking Faith-based Schools

New Post-Bostock Lawsuit Would Force Doctors to Perform ‘Gender-Transition’ Surgeries Against Their Medical Judgment

‘Not Only Arrogant, But Wrong’: Justice Alito Slams SCOTUS Majority for Redefining ‘Sex’

President Trump: ‘There are Only Two Genders: Male and Female’

Politicians and Religious Conservatives React to Landmark SCOTUS Ruling on Employment Discrimination

Image from Shutterstock.

Iowa Governor Signs Bill ‘That Safeguards the Rights of Women and Girls’

After contentious hearings and demonstrations at the Iowa Capitol, Governor Kim Reynolds signed a law protecting girls’ and women’s rights.

The new law, Senate File 418, defines “sex” in Iowa statutes as “the state of being either male or female as observed or clinically verified at birth.” The measure also removes “gender identity” from nondiscrimination laws.

As legislators were considering the bill, transgender-identified protestors and their allies flooded the state Capitol, reported the Des Moines Register. “More than 2,000 LGBTQ rights supporters chanted, shouted and jeered in protest as House and Senate lawmakers passed the bill, sending it to Reynolds’ desk.”

The Gazette, a news outlet in Cedar Rapids, posted videos and photos from the protests. Protestors carried signs with the usual transgender slogans, such as “Trans Rights Are Human Rights” and “I’d rather have a TRANS daughter than a DEAD daughter.”

Here you can see some opponents of the bill singing, “We are singing, singing for our lives.”

The bill, of course, doesn’t take the lives or civil rights of transgender-identified people. Gender confused Iowans have all the same rights as other Iowans.

Adding spurious internal or socio-political identities, like “sexual orientation” and “gender identity” (SOGI), to non-discrimination laws harms those who disagree with these sexual ideologies. Such legislation is based on the idea that a person’s identity is defined by sexual attractions, thoughts, feelings and behaviors.

As we’ve previously written in the Daily Citizen, SOGI laws, policies and regulations affect freedom of speech, parental rights, religious freedom, girls sports and the basic privacy, safety and dignity of women and men. 

Something is not a “civil right” if it threatens or strips others of their civil rights, which is what SOGI nondiscrimination laws do.

The Iowa House passed the measure with a vote of 60-36, while the Senate passed the bill with a vote of 33-15.

In a video and press statement about SF 418, Reynolds said, “Today, I am signing into law a bill that safeguards the rights of women and girls.”

“It is common sense to acknowledge the obvious biological differences between men and women. In fact, it is necessary to secure genuine equal protection for women and girls.”

The protections were necessary, the governor said, because the state’s “Civil Rights Code blurred the biological line between the sexes” and “forced Iowa taxpayers to pay for gender reassignment surgeries.”

The bill protects women in sex-segregated spaces and activities, the governor explained, saying:

It is why we have men and women’s bathrooms, but not men and women’s conference rooms; girls’ and boys’ sports, but not girls’ math and boys’ math; separate men and women’s prisons, but not different laws for men and women. It is about the biological differences, and that is all.

It is also why Iowa has enacted laws protecting girls’ sports for girls and women’s private spaces like bathrooms and locker rooms.

She added that all people deserve “respect and dignity, concluding her statement by saying, “What this bill does accomplish is to strengthen protections for women and girls, and I believe that is the right thing to do.”

In addition to defining “sex,” here are some of the other definitions from SF 418 which will be used in state statutes:

  • Female – means an individual who has, had, will have through the course of normal development, or would have but for a developmental anomaly, genetic anomaly, or accident, a reproductive system that at some point produces ova.
  • Male – means an individual who has, had, will have through the course of normal development, or would have but for a developmental anomaly, genetic anomaly, or accident, a reproductive system that at some point produces sperm.
  • “Woman” or “girl” refers to a female.
  • “Man” or “boy” refers to a male.
  • “Gender,” when used alone in reference to males, females, or the natural differences between males and females shall be considered a synonym for sex and shall not be considered a synonym or shorthand expression for gender identity, experienced gender, gender expression, or gender role.
  • The term “equal” does not mean “same” or “identical.”

The bill makes allowances for those with “a medically verifiable diagnosis of disorder or difference of sex development.” It allows for sex-segregated spaces in locker rooms, restrooms, prisons and shelters, and it forbids schools from promoting or instructing kindergarten through sixth grade students about sexual orientation or gender theory.

Related Articles and Resources:

Are Sex and Gender Different Things?

Department of Education Launches Multiple Investigations Into Title IX Violations

Department of Education Office for Civil Rights Dear Colleague Letter

Kansas Legislature Enacts ‘Help Not Harm’ Legislation, Overriding Governor’s Veto

Transgender Resources

Trump Signs Executive Order Protecting Women’s Sports and Spaces

What Are Male and Female in God’s Story?

Why a Trans Woman is a Not a Woman

Image from Shutterstock.

Senate Set to Vote on Bill that Protects Women’s Sports

The Senate is expected to vote Monday on the “Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act,” legislation reintroduced last month by Senator Tommy Tuberville and designed to make permanent President Trump’s executive order banning men from competing in women’s sports.

The House of Representatives passed similar legislation in January; all Republicans voted for the bill, along with Texas Democrats Henry Cuellar and Vicente Gonzalez.

“Common sense should tell us that women and girls shouldn’t be forced to compete in sports or share a school locker room with biological males,” said Senator James Lankford of Oklahoma. “Although the Biden Administration fought to erase biological differences, I want to uphold equal opportunity for the next generation of female athletes.”

Senator Tuberville echoed Senator Lankford, saying, “President Trump ran on the issue of saving women’s sports and won in a landslide.”

He added,

70% of Americans agree — men don’t belong in women’s sports or locker rooms. I have said many times that I think Title IX is one of the best things to come out of Washington. But in the last few years, it has been destroyed. While I’m glad that the Biden administration ultimately rescinded the proposed rule, Congress has to ensure this never happens again. I am welcoming my first granddaughter this spring and won’t stop fighting until her rights to fairly compete are protected. I hope every one of my colleagues will join me in standing up for our daughters, nieces, and granddaughters by voting for this critical bill.

Given the 53 Republican seats in the Senate and 60 votes needed to advance the bill for a final vote, the fate of Monday’s vote remains uncertain.

Regardless of what state you reside in, your senators need to hear from you. Please reach out to them and urge them to vote “yes” on the “Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act,” or S.9.

Opponents of the bill have wrongly suggested the legislation is dangerous and discriminatory. In reality, it helps to ensure the safety of women and rights a major wrong with females being unfairly targeted on various fields of competition. Over 900 women have lost trophies and awards to men pretending to be female.

Thankfully, the American people aren’t falling for the ruse. Wide majorities believe women shouldn’t have to be squaring off against men. It’s common sense. It shouldn’t be controversial.

Many have remarked on the powerful image of President Trump surrounded by girl and women athletes as he signed the executive order that officially (albeit temporarily) rescinded funding from any program that deprived female athletes of fair competition.

It’s tragic that common sense legislation like the “Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act” is necessary. But what will be even more calamitous if an obstructionist minority of Senators refuse to protect our daughters from creeps, con artists and the mentally confused who are scamming girls sports. 

Again, please contact your two senators and ask them to vote “YES” on the “Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act” or S.9.

Image from Getty.