• Skip to main content
Daily Citizen
  • Subscribe
  • Categories
    • Culture
    • Life
    • Religious Freedom
    • Sexuality
  • Parenting Resources
    • LGBT Pride
    • Homosexuality
    • Sexuality/Marriage
    • Transgender
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Contact
  • Donate

LGBT

Jun 03 2026

Rep. Miller Introduces Resolution Declaring June ‘Family Month’ Instead of ‘Pride Month’

A resolution in the U.S. House of Representatives declaring June “Family Month” in place of “Pride Month” is being introduced by Rep. Mary Miller, R-IL.

“The breakdown of the family has caused inestimable damage to our country,” Rep. Miller told the Daily Citizen in an exclusive interview. “We need to get back to our biblical Christian roots. We need to support intact families – a husband and wife committed to each other.”

The resolution declares the natural nuclear family is “the foundation of a healthy society.” It also correctly notes married moms and dads “play a crucial and irreplaceable role in the upbringing of their children” and provide “the best environment for children to thrive.”

Furthermore, the resolution details the harms that flow from the breakdown of the nuclear family and opposes “Pride Month displays and events” in June “that denigrate the nuclear family.”

If passed, the resolution would make it clear the House of Representatives:

  1. Recognizes the benefit of marriage and family to men, women, children and society;
  2. No longer recognizes Pride Month;
  3. Supports the designation of Family Month for the purpose of rededicating our Nation to the importance of this essential unit.
Family Month Resolution of 2026Download

The resolution was introduced in the House for the first time in 2025, where it garnered 21 cosponsors. This year, Rep. Miller is hoping for even more. She expressed confidence the resolution will pass the House and potentially garner bipartisan support.

“Last year I was on an island by myself,” Rep. Miller explained. “This year, we’re seeing governors get on board and issue resolutions for their states.”

Indeed, on April 9, Tennessee Governor Bill Lee signed a joint resolution enacted by the Tennessee Legislature, which sailed with overwhelming majorities, designating June 2026 Nuclear Family Month.

On June 1, Indiana Governor Mike Braun declared it Nuclear Family Month in the Hoosier State too.

“As a father of four and grandfather of seven, I have seen firsthand the impact that loving, committed families can have across multiple generations,” Gov. Braun said. “As we approach America’s 250th anniversary, this proclamation recognizes the important role families play in shaping the future of our state and our country.”

The governors of Alabama, Utah and Arkansas have also recognized June as “Fidelity Month” or “Strong Families Month.”

Rep. Miller explained that since being elected to the House in 2020, her top priority has been to stand up for families.

“From day one, I’ve said the foundation of our country is the family. We need to rebuild the family,” she urged. “Marriage rates have plummeted. Birth rates have plummeted. That’s a real problem we must address.”

Rep. Miller founded the Congressional Family Caucus, a group of House members dedicated to promoting pro-family policies including affordable housing, good taxation policies, eliminating marriage penalties in the tax code, defending women’s sex-segregated spaces and more.

She sees Family Month as a unique opportunity for Christians and churches to recommit to defending the nuclear family.

“I’m hoping that it will grow. I’m hoping that churches will think to use June as a time to really promote the family, perhaps by holding marriage seminars, parenting classes or even family celebrations,” Rep. Miller said.

“It’s not hateful to speak the truth. God has defined what is true,” she shared. “We must inspire people to be bold. Quit being passive. Find opportunities to speak truth about the family.”

To speak with a family help specialist or request resources, please call us at 1-800-A-FAMILY (232-6459).

Related articles and resources:

Defending the Rights of Children

How To Talk To Your Children About Homosexuality

When A Loved One Says “I’m Gay”

How to Talk to Your Children About ‘Transgenderism’

Some Companies Back Away From LGBT Pride – Parents Should Still Be Watchful

Five Things for Christians to Remember During ‘LGBT Pride Month’

Navigating ‘LGBT Pride Month’ – How Should Parents Respond?

Gov. Bill Lee Signs Resolution Declaring June ‘Nuclear Family Month’ in Tennessee

Photo from Getty Images.

Written by Zachary Mettler · Categorized: Government Updates · Tagged: family, LGBT

May 29 2026

Washington Counselor Asks Court to Protect Free Speech

Brian Tingley, a Christian counselor in Washington state, is seeking the restoration of his constitutional rights after the recent U.S. Supreme Court landmark decision protecting counselors’ speech, Chiles v. Salazar.

Tingley is a licensed marriage and family therapist with over 20 years of experience who counsels adult and minor clients. He engages only in talk therapy: listening to clients, asking questions and helping them pursue behavioral changes according to their desires and goals.

As a Christian, Tingley affirms the Bible’s teachings on relationships, sexuality and marriage.

However, Washington state – prohibiting so-called “conversion therapy” – makes it illegal for Tingley to help minor clients leave unwanted homosexuality or embrace their biological sex. Washington requires him – and all counselors – to speak only in a state-approved way, pushing clients towards homosexuality or “transgenderism.”

This kind of speech code, however, is a clear violation of the First Amendment’s free speech clause.

On March 31, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a momentous decision striking down Colorado’s ban on “conversion therapy” as an unconstitutional violation of the First Amendment. Colorado’s law is essentially identical to Washington’s.

“While the First Amendment protects many and varied forms of expression, the spoken word is perhaps the quintessential form of protected speech,” Justice Gorsuch wrote for the Court’s majority in Chiles v. Salazar. “And that is exactly the kind of expression in which Ms. Chiles seeks to engage.” So too with Brian Tingley.

Justice Gorsuch added, “The First Amendment stands as a shield against any effort to enforce orthodoxy in thought or speech in this country.”

As a result of the Court’s decision in Chiles, Tingley – who had previously challenged Washington’s law in court but lost – is asking a lower court to reconsider his case. He is being represented by attorneys with Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF).

“Washington’s law bans voluntary conversations based on the state’s ideological crusade to impose gender ideology and to reject common sense,” said ADF Senior Counsel Hal Frampton, director of the Center for Conscience Initiatives. “This is censorship pure and simple, and it violates the First Amendment — as affirmed recently in an 8-1 Supreme Court decision.”

Frampton added,

We are urging the district court to finally allow justice to prevail for Brian, protect his “inalienable right to think and speak freely,” and free him to provide excellent counseling to families and young people who seek his counseling.

Tingley isn’t the only counselor looking for his First Amendment rights to be restored in the wake of Chiles.

In May, the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of Terri Koschnick and Joy Buchman, licensed counselors who are challenging the Badger State’s law prohibiting counselors from helping minor clients with unwanted same-sex attraction and sexual identity confusion.

Hopefully, counselors nationwide will soon – thanks to Chiles – be free to help all individuals seeking to live according to a biblical sexual ethic. The Daily Citizen will keep you updated on important developments.

The case is Tingley v. Brown.

If you or someone you know is struggling with homosexuality or transgenderism, Focus on the Family offers a one-time complimentary consultation with our ministry’s professionally trained counseling staff. The consultation is free due to generous donor support.

To reach Focus on the Family’s counseling service by phone, call 1-800-A-Family (232-6459) weekdays 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. (Mountain Time). Please be prepared to leave your contact information for a counselor or chaplain to return a call to you as soon as possible. Alternatively, you can fill out our Counseling Consultation Request Form.

We also offer local referrals for licensed counselors who align with the mission and values of Focus on the Family.

Related articles and resources:

The Supreme Court’s ‘Conversion Therapy’ Ruling: Four Truths You Should Know

Supreme Court Smacks Down Colorado’s ‘Conversion Therapy’ Ban in 8-1 Decision

Supreme Court Declines to Hear Counseling Censorship Case

Judge Dismisses Therapist’s Lawsuit Over Ban on Counseling for Same-Sex Attraction, Gender Identity

Christian Counselor Sues for Right to Talk to Minors About Same-Sex Attraction, Gender Identity Issues

Is Therapy to Leave Homosexuality Damaging? New Review Says, ‘No Proof of Harm’

Therapy Bans Threaten Religious Freedom, Free Speech and Parental Rights

Why We Support Therapy for Unwanted Homosexuality

Photo from Alliance Defending Freedom.

Written by Zachary Mettler · Categorized: Government Updates · Tagged: Counseling, LGBT, supreme court

May 28 2026

Christian Lifeguard in California Suspended After Refusing to Fly Pride Flag

Captain Jeffrey Little has served as a lifeguard with the Los Angeles Country Fire Department for over 20 years in an exemplary career. Yet, this evangelical Christian father is being represented by the Thomas More Society for refusing to raise a gay pride flag on his lifeguard station in June. He asserts his request for a religious exemption was granted, then revoked, and that he has been retaliated against by his superiors as a result. Thomas More Society contends that when Little’s division chief hand-delivered the disciplinary paperwork, “He told Captain Little to his face: ‘Your religious beliefs don’t matter.’” 

On May 25, 2023, the L.A. County Fire Department issued a memorandum requiring the rainbow pride flag to be flown at all department facilities, which includes all lifeguard stands. The official directive required captains and site supervisors to “[e]nsure flags are received and flown throughout the month of June” in celebration of “pride month.”

Last year, the Los Angeles Times reported Capt. Little received a “partial” concession, exempting him from the requirement to raise an unofficial flag that violates his own faith and personal convictions about marriage and sexuality. In his lawsuit against the county, Little argues the policy was in “direct conflict” with his “traditional Christian beliefs regarding the moral illicitness of same-sex activity, the immutability of sex regardless of gender identity, and the view that all people are children of God regardless of their skin color.”

Originally, Little asked to work at one of the lifeguard posts without a flagpole that could accommodate the flag. He was denied that possibility.

Little was not alone in his concerns about having to perform his job under a flag that is ideologically offensive to him. Paul Jonna, special counsel for the Thomas More Society who is representing Little, explains, “My office is informed that the Fire Department has received possibly hundreds of additional religious accommodation requests similar in nature to Captain Little’s.”

Last May, L.A. Fire Chief Anthony Marrone understood he would face pushback from employees for having to assent to gender ideology via the rainbow flag, reported the Los Angeles Times. So Marrone issued the following directive to all staff: “Last year we faced challenges with compliance at several Department facilities, I want to be intentional and clear that compliance is not optional.” The edict is given: All county employees must cooperate with gay pride indoctrination.

Fox News reported just days ago that “Little took down several flags and was later placed under investigation and ultimately suspended for 15 days without pay.” 

Fox further explains, “The county says Little was not punished for his religious beliefs but for taking down government-issued Pride flags without authorization and violating department policy.”

Yet, Thomas More’s special counsel explained to Fox News Digital that Little removed the flags believing he was acting in accordance with the accommodation granted by the county. He also understood that a few stations were free not to fly the pride flag because they lacked proper equipment under the county’s circulated policy. Jonna explained other pride flags had been removed from stations by other lifeguards for similar reasons.

Jonna also said Little was being isolated with harsher punishment as other lifeguards “vandalized and desecrated” rainbow flags, yet either did not receive discipline or faced shorter suspensions than Little who went through proper channels requesting his religious accommodation against flying the flag.

Little is suing the county for the uneven treatment he has faced and is seeking a permanent religious exemption from having to perform his life-saving job every June under a political and ideological banner that is offensive to him.

The case is Captain Jeffrey Little v. Los Angeles County.

Written by Glenn T. Stanton · Categorized: Religious Freedom · Tagged: LGBT, Pride Month

May 26 2026

Gender Madness is Embarrassing Reasonable Aussies

The people in charge in Australia are, as a position of official policy, pretending to not know what it means to be human as male or female. This is shameful.

This is the age in which we live, and of course, this problem is not unique to Australia. Too many countries are playing right along with them. But right now, the lovely Land Down Under is facing that global embarrassment.

It caught fire recently with the ridiculously serious Tickle v. Giggle case the Daily Citizen reported on last week. In a travesty, Sally (Sall) Grover is being fined over $20,000 because she does not, according to sitting federal Australian Judge Bromwich, “accept that a person’s sex can be a matter for self-identification.” Sall Grover got into this trouble for kicking a man out of her women-only social media space she founded called Giggle for Girls.

The man now identifies as “Roxy Tickle” and no one is fooled. The Australian Federal Court sided with the man. As the Daily Citizen explained, “Tickle v. Giggle has gained international attention as it demonstrates the disastrous results when being female is redefined to include men claiming to be women.”

In short, the Australian judicial system has sided with gender ideology over reason, biology and scientific clarity. Sex can no longer be truthfully spoken of by Australia’s leaders.

This fact was colorfully demonstrated again just hours ago in testimony before the Australian Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee as Senator Michaelia Cash keenly questioned Dr. Anna Cody, Australia’s Sex Discrimination Commissioner.

Cody’s official governmental responsibility is, as contradictorily explained by the Australian Human Rights Commission, to protect the rights of women and advocate for “LGBTIQA+ rights.” Of course, doing the latter obliterates the former and Cody demonstrated that fact today.

In official Senate testimony, Senator Cash asked Cody about pregnancy protections for “trans women” – that is men who believe they are women. Cody correctly explained, “Clearly, trans women cannot become pregnant.” This is an important revelation because it is an admission by the governmental official tasked with advocating for “trans rights” that “trans women” are not actually women, because women are humans with the potential for pregnancy.

And this is precisely where things got sticky for Cody.

Cash asks Dr. Cody if she is advocating if “trans women can potentially become pregnant, are you?” Cody says, “No” to which Cash responds, “Yep, because they are biological males, so you can’t obviously become pregnant.”

Then Senator Cash leads Cody into this confusing mess:

A lot of people have struggled to believe me when I say that the Australian Human Rights Commission is giving pregnancy protections in law to men who claim to be woman, because it’s so stupid it’s hard to believe anyone would say it.

Enjoy: pic.twitter.com/IveqVhN9KG

— Sall Grover (@salltweets) May 26, 2026

Senator Cash rightly confesses, “I am very confused,” because Cody expressed concern that a “trans woman” could apply for a job and be asked if he intends to become pregnant and might not get the job if he responds, “Yes.” Cody admits and is concerned this would be “unlawful discrimination on the basis of potential pregnancy.”

The senator brilliantly asks, “If they can’t become pregnant, how can you then become potentially pregnant?”

And it just devolves further from there. We must all note that it does so because Senator Cash is operating in biological reality and refuses to join Cody in the make-believe world of gender ideology, which the Australian government officially enacted on August 1, 2013.

This is what gender ideology does. It creates an alternative reality where male and female, boy and girl, man and woman have no objective meaning but rather become whatever gender ideologists say they are in any given situation.

Never, ever join them in this madness! Not even out of a false sense of kindness. Always live in objective reality, that which both Scripture and science hold.

That is precisely what Senator Michaelia Cash did, and the Daily Citizen salutes her.

Related articles and resources: 

‘Tickle v. Giggle’: Australian ‘Transgender’ Court Case Is No Joke for Women

Activist Erin Friday on Protecting Kids and Fighting ‘Gender’ Ideology

Do Not Fall for the ‘Affirm Them or They Will Die’ Lie

ADF International: 

“Sex is not confined to being a biological concept” rules Australian Court

Australian court dismisses appeal to uphold biological reality in ‘What is a woman?’ case

Family First New Zealand: Interview with Sall Grover

HHS Releases Report on Harms of ‘Transgender’ Medical Interventions for Minors

How the “Trans” and Gender Redefinition Issue Attacks the Family

Medicalizing Gender Confusion Makes Things Worse, New Research Confirms

Stella O’Malley: Sall Grover – The Woman Who Refused to Lie

Transgender Ideology is Inherently Destructive

Transgender Ideology is Inherently Destructive, Part 2

Why Christians Can’t Avoid the “Trans” and Gender Redefinition Issue

Yes, Girls Care When Boys Take Their Trophies

Yes, Transgenderism is a False Belief System

Written by Glenn T. Stanton · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: australia, LGBT, transgender

May 14 2026

The SPLC Has Been ‘Poisoning Pupils’ Minds for Years’

A new report from Defending Education shows the Southern Poverty Law Center’s (SPLC) Learning for Justice program contains educational materials to indoctrinate children into leftist and sexualized ideologies.  

“The Southern Poverty Law Center has been poisoning pupils’ minds around the country for years with its toxic curriculum,” Defending Education President Nicole Neily told Fox News Digital. 

Neily explained the SPLC’s effect on education, saying, “Issues such as queer theory, white privilege, and anti-racism have supplanted traditional coursework in history, social studies, and other core classes.”  

The SPLC is infamous for targeting Christian and conservative groups with its “HatewatchBlog” and “Hate Map,” as well as its recent indictment by the Department of Justice for fraud and conspiracy, using donor money to pay leaders of racist groups. 

But many do not know of its efforts to influence children with false and harmful gender ideology and critical race theory. 

The SPLC has been influencing teachers and students for 35 years, introducing its Teaching Tolerance program in 1991. The program was rebranded Learning for Justice in 2021; it promotes identity politics, homosexuality and transgenderism in K-12 classes. 

Defending Education is a national grassroots organization that informs parents about harmful agendas in public schools and promotes “the reestablishment of a quality, non-political education for all students.” 

For their efforts to improve education and protect parental rights, the SPLC labeled Defending Education “extremist” and listed it on its “Hate Map.” 

Defending Education’s exposé, “SPLC Curriculum in K-12,” explains the variety of ways SPLC materials have infiltrated our education system: 

The organization’s website and documents can be found on school district webpages, in teacher professional development and trainings, classroom lessons, district-wide curriculums, Social Emotional Learning (SEL), social justice standards, and district antiracism and equity policies and resources.

In its research, Defending Education found 42 states, 189 school districts and 30 state government agencies promote the SPLC’s website and teaching materials. But this list “is not exhaustive,” Defending Education said, adding: 

Unfortunately, the true scope of Learning for Justice’s impact on schools and districts is difficult to fully capture due to a lack of public access to curriculums, lessons, and textbooks. Additionally, because of the potential integration of the Social Justice Standards into several popular SEL curriculums, it is hard to track down all districts using the SEL programming that includes those standards.

The SPLC’s extremist education program has influenced many educators, as Family Research Council (FRC) reported in “The SPLC’s Radical Learning for Justice Program,” published in 2021: 

The SPLC delivered 900,000 copies of their Teaching Tolerance magazine in 2019 alone. The group’s magazine has been in circulation since 1991. That’s long enough for an entire generation of children influenced by the SPLC agenda to become teachers themselves.

FRC, a conservative, Christian policy organization, was also named a “Hate Group” by the SPLC. That label led to an SPLC supporter entering FRC’s offices in 2012, bent on murdering as many employees there as possible. The building manager stopped the assailant but was shot in the process. 

The report from FRC describes Learning for Justice’s (LFJ) emphasis on LGBT ideology: 

LFJ has many classroom resources on sexuality and gender. Sexual advocacy is a high priority for LFJ – most often without parental notification. Time and again in the LFJ materials, teachers and administrators are reminded NOT to share information with parents that would “out” a student’s sexuality or gender to their parents. … 

Learning for Justice’s “Best Practices for Serving LGBTQ Students” is a school climate guide that has been mailed to approximately 14,000 school districts in the country. 

FRC explains: 

The guide includes information on how to have a “gender-inclusive” school dress code; … suggests integrating “Queer Voices” into the curriculum; provides DO’s and DON’T’s for managing a student who “comes out” to a teacher at school and offers advice for managing objections from family members or anti-LGBTQ legal organizations.

Learning for Justice also created the “Queer America” podcast for educators, “an exploration of the history of sexual identity and gender identity in the United States.” 

Unsurprisingly, the National Education Association (NEA) and the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), also push out SPLC educational resources. 

The NEA has listed SPLC’s Learning for Justice in a variety of educator resources, including “White Supremacy Culture Resources,” “Racial Justice in Education Resources,” and “Bias Free Schools.” 

According to Defending Education, the AFT also “promotes the use of Learning for Justice resources and lessons and has offered presentations to its members on how to integrate the Social Justice Standards into school curriculums and lessons.”

Defending Education lists districts and departments of education that have used or still use Learning for Justice as a teaching resource. The list is not comprehensive, so parents might want to check their school district or department of education’s website to see if the radical program is promoted for use in their child’s school. 

Related articles and resources: 

Cleaning House at the Southern Poverty Law Center

Defending Education: SPLC Curriculum in K-12: Learning for Justice/Teaching ToleranceTracker

DOJ Indicts SPLC for Fraud — Used Donor Money to Fund Racist Groups  

Is ‘Critical Race Theory’ Being Taught in Public Schools? CRT Deniers Claim it Isn’t

Southern Poverty Law Center Finally Names Focus on the Family a Hate Group

Southern Poverty Law Center Publishes ‘Year in Hate and Extremism’ – Continues to Target Christian Groups

SPLC Continues to Label Conservative Christian Organizations as ‘Hate Groups’

What’s Your School District’s ‘Transgender’ Policy?

If you’re concerned about what your child is being taught in school, check out this updated, free resource from Focus on the Family and Family Policy Alliance: Equipping Parents for Back-to-School.

Written by Jeff Johnston · Categorized: Culture, Education · Tagged: LGBT, parenting

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 34
  • Go to Next Page »

Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | © 2026 Focus on the Family. All rights reserved.

  • Cookie Policy