• Skip to main content
Daily Citizen
  • Subscribe
  • Categories
    • Culture
    • Life
    • Religious Freedom
    • Sexuality
  • Parenting Resources
    • LGBT Pride
    • Homosexuality
    • Sexuality/Marriage
    • Transgender
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Contact
  • Donate

LGBT

May 28 2026

Christian Lifeguard in California Suspended After Refusing to Fly Pride Flag

Captain Jeffrey Little has served as a lifeguard with the Los Angeles Country Fire Department for over 20 years in an exemplary career. Yet, this evangelical Christian father is being represented by the Thomas More Society for refusing to raise a gay pride flag on his lifeguard station in June. He asserts his request for a religious exemption was granted, then revoked, and that he has been retaliated against by his superiors as a result. Thomas More Society contends that when Little’s division chief hand-delivered the disciplinary paperwork, “He told Captain Little to his face: ‘Your religious beliefs don’t matter.’” 

On May 25, 2023, the L.A. County Fire Department issued a memorandum requiring the rainbow pride flag to be flown at all department facilities, which includes all lifeguard stands. The official directive required captains and site supervisors to “[e]nsure flags are received and flown throughout the month of June” in celebration of “pride month.”

Last year, the Los Angeles Times reported Capt. Little received a “partial” concession, exempting him from the requirement to raise an unofficial flag that violates his own faith and personal convictions about marriage and sexuality. In his lawsuit against the county, Little argues the policy was in “direct conflict” with his “traditional Christian beliefs regarding the moral illicitness of same-sex activity, the immutability of sex regardless of gender identity, and the view that all people are children of God regardless of their skin color.”

Originally, Little asked to work at one of the lifeguard posts without a flagpole that could accommodate the flag. He was denied that possibility.

Little was not alone in his concerns about having to perform his job under a flag that is ideologically offensive to him. Paul Jonna, special counsel for the Thomas More Society who is representing Little, explains, “My office is informed that the Fire Department has received possibly hundreds of additional religious accommodation requests similar in nature to Captain Little’s.”

Last May, L.A. Fire Chief Anthony Marrone understood he would face pushback from employees for having to assent to gender ideology via the rainbow flag, reported the Los Angeles Times. So Marrone issued the following directive to all staff: “Last year we faced challenges with compliance at several Department facilities, I want to be intentional and clear that compliance is not optional.” The edict is given: All county employees must cooperate with gay pride indoctrination.

Fox News reported just days ago that “Little took down several flags and was later placed under investigation and ultimately suspended for 15 days without pay.” 

Fox further explains, “The county says Little was not punished for his religious beliefs but for taking down government-issued Pride flags without authorization and violating department policy.”

Yet, Thomas More’s special counsel explained to Fox News Digital that Little removed the flags believing he was acting in accordance with the accommodation granted by the county. He also understood that a few stations were free not to fly the pride flag because they lacked proper equipment under the county’s circulated policy. Jonna explained other pride flags had been removed from stations by other lifeguards for similar reasons.

Jonna also said Little was being isolated with harsher punishment as other lifeguards “vandalized and desecrated” rainbow flags, yet either did not receive discipline or faced shorter suspensions than Little who went through proper channels requesting his religious accommodation against flying the flag.

Little is suing the county for the uneven treatment he has faced and is seeking a permanent religious exemption from having to perform his life-saving job every June under a political and ideological banner that is offensive to him.

The case is Captain Jeffrey Little v. Los Angeles County.

Written by Glenn T. Stanton · Categorized: Religious Freedom · Tagged: LGBT, Pride Month

May 26 2026

Gender Madness is Embarrassing Reasonable Aussies

The people in charge in Australia are, as a position of official policy, pretending to not know what it means to be human as male or female. This is shameful.

This is the age in which we live, and of course, this problem is not unique to Australia. Too many countries are playing right along with them. But right now, the lovely Land Down Under is facing that global embarrassment.

It caught fire recently with the ridiculously serious Tickle v. Giggle case the Daily Citizen reported on last week. In a travesty, Sally (Sall) Grover is being fined over $20,000 because she does not, according to sitting federal Australian Judge Bromwich, “accept that a person’s sex can be a matter for self-identification.” Sall Grover got into this trouble for kicking a man out of her women-only social media space she founded called Giggle for Girls.

The man now identifies as “Roxy Tickle” and no one is fooled. The Australian Federal Court sided with the man. As the Daily Citizen explained, “Tickle v. Giggle has gained international attention as it demonstrates the disastrous results when being female is redefined to include men claiming to be women.”

In short, the Australian judicial system has sided with gender ideology over reason, biology and scientific clarity. Sex can no longer be truthfully spoken of by Australia’s leaders.

This fact was colorfully demonstrated again just hours ago in testimony before the Australian Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee as Senator Michaelia Cash keenly questioned Dr. Anna Cody, Australia’s Sex Discrimination Commissioner.

Cody’s official governmental responsibility is, as contradictorily explained by the Australian Human Rights Commission, to protect the rights of women and advocate for “LGBTIQA+ rights.” Of course, doing the latter obliterates the former and Cody demonstrated that fact today.

In official Senate testimony, Senator Cash asked Cody about pregnancy protections for “trans women” – that is men who believe they are women. Cody correctly explained, “Clearly, trans women cannot become pregnant.” This is an important revelation because it is an admission by the governmental official tasked with advocating for “trans rights” that “trans women” are not actually women, because women are humans with the potential for pregnancy.

And this is precisely where things got sticky for Cody.

Cash asks Dr. Cody if she is advocating if “trans women can potentially become pregnant, are you?” Cody says, “No” to which Cash responds, “Yep, because they are biological males, so you can’t obviously become pregnant.”

Then Senator Cash leads Cody into this confusing mess:

A lot of people have struggled to believe me when I say that the Australian Human Rights Commission is giving pregnancy protections in law to men who claim to be woman, because it’s so stupid it’s hard to believe anyone would say it.

Enjoy: pic.twitter.com/IveqVhN9KG

— Sall Grover (@salltweets) May 26, 2026

Senator Cash rightly confesses, “I am very confused,” because Cody expressed concern that a “trans woman” could apply for a job and be asked if he intends to become pregnant and might not get the job if he responds, “Yes.” Cody admits and is concerned this would be “unlawful discrimination on the basis of potential pregnancy.”

The senator brilliantly asks, “If they can’t become pregnant, how can you then become potentially pregnant?”

And it just devolves further from there. We must all note that it does so because Senator Cash is operating in biological reality and refuses to join Cody in the make-believe world of gender ideology, which the Australian government officially enacted on August 1, 2013.

This is what gender ideology does. It creates an alternative reality where male and female, boy and girl, man and woman have no objective meaning but rather become whatever gender ideologists say they are in any given situation.

Never, ever join them in this madness! Not even out of a false sense of kindness. Always live in objective reality, that which both Scripture and science hold.

That is precisely what Senator Michaelia Cash did, and the Daily Citizen salutes her.

Related articles and resources: 

‘Tickle v. Giggle’: Australian ‘Transgender’ Court Case Is No Joke for Women

Activist Erin Friday on Protecting Kids and Fighting ‘Gender’ Ideology

Do Not Fall for the ‘Affirm Them or They Will Die’ Lie

ADF International: 

“Sex is not confined to being a biological concept” rules Australian Court

Australian court dismisses appeal to uphold biological reality in ‘What is a woman?’ case

Family First New Zealand: Interview with Sall Grover

HHS Releases Report on Harms of ‘Transgender’ Medical Interventions for Minors

How the “Trans” and Gender Redefinition Issue Attacks the Family

Medicalizing Gender Confusion Makes Things Worse, New Research Confirms

Stella O’Malley: Sall Grover – The Woman Who Refused to Lie

Transgender Ideology is Inherently Destructive

Transgender Ideology is Inherently Destructive, Part 2

Why Christians Can’t Avoid the “Trans” and Gender Redefinition Issue

Yes, Girls Care When Boys Take Their Trophies

Yes, Transgenderism is a False Belief System

Written by Glenn T. Stanton · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: australia, LGBT, transgender

May 14 2026

The SPLC Has Been ‘Poisoning Pupils’ Minds for Years’

A new report from Defending Education shows the Southern Poverty Law Center’s (SPLC) Learning for Justice program contains educational materials to indoctrinate children into leftist and sexualized ideologies.  

“The Southern Poverty Law Center has been poisoning pupils’ minds around the country for years with its toxic curriculum,” Defending Education President Nicole Neily told Fox News Digital. 

Neily explained the SPLC’s effect on education, saying, “Issues such as queer theory, white privilege, and anti-racism have supplanted traditional coursework in history, social studies, and other core classes.”  

The SPLC is infamous for targeting Christian and conservative groups with its “HatewatchBlog” and “Hate Map,” as well as its recent indictment by the Department of Justice for fraud and conspiracy, using donor money to pay leaders of racist groups. 

But many do not know of its efforts to influence children with false and harmful gender ideology and critical race theory. 

The SPLC has been influencing teachers and students for 35 years, introducing its Teaching Tolerance program in 1991. The program was rebranded Learning for Justice in 2021; it promotes identity politics, homosexuality and transgenderism in K-12 classes. 

Defending Education is a national grassroots organization that informs parents about harmful agendas in public schools and promotes “the reestablishment of a quality, non-political education for all students.” 

For their efforts to improve education and protect parental rights, the SPLC labeled Defending Education “extremist” and listed it on its “Hate Map.” 

Defending Education’s exposé, “SPLC Curriculum in K-12,” explains the variety of ways SPLC materials have infiltrated our education system: 

The organization’s website and documents can be found on school district webpages, in teacher professional development and trainings, classroom lessons, district-wide curriculums, Social Emotional Learning (SEL), social justice standards, and district antiracism and equity policies and resources.

In its research, Defending Education found 42 states, 189 school districts and 30 state government agencies promote the SPLC’s website and teaching materials. But this list “is not exhaustive,” Defending Education said, adding: 

Unfortunately, the true scope of Learning for Justice’s impact on schools and districts is difficult to fully capture due to a lack of public access to curriculums, lessons, and textbooks. Additionally, because of the potential integration of the Social Justice Standards into several popular SEL curriculums, it is hard to track down all districts using the SEL programming that includes those standards.

The SPLC’s extremist education program has influenced many educators, as Family Research Council (FRC) reported in “The SPLC’s Radical Learning for Justice Program,” published in 2021: 

The SPLC delivered 900,000 copies of their Teaching Tolerance magazine in 2019 alone. The group’s magazine has been in circulation since 1991. That’s long enough for an entire generation of children influenced by the SPLC agenda to become teachers themselves.

FRC, a conservative, Christian policy organization, was also named a “Hate Group” by the SPLC. That label led to an SPLC supporter entering FRC’s offices in 2012, bent on murdering as many employees there as possible. The building manager stopped the assailant but was shot in the process. 

The report from FRC describes Learning for Justice’s (LFJ) emphasis on LGBT ideology: 

LFJ has many classroom resources on sexuality and gender. Sexual advocacy is a high priority for LFJ – most often without parental notification. Time and again in the LFJ materials, teachers and administrators are reminded NOT to share information with parents that would “out” a student’s sexuality or gender to their parents. … 

Learning for Justice’s “Best Practices for Serving LGBTQ Students” is a school climate guide that has been mailed to approximately 14,000 school districts in the country. 

FRC explains: 

The guide includes information on how to have a “gender-inclusive” school dress code; … suggests integrating “Queer Voices” into the curriculum; provides DO’s and DON’T’s for managing a student who “comes out” to a teacher at school and offers advice for managing objections from family members or anti-LGBTQ legal organizations.

Learning for Justice also created the “Queer America” podcast for educators, “an exploration of the history of sexual identity and gender identity in the United States.” 

Unsurprisingly, the National Education Association (NEA) and the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), also push out SPLC educational resources. 

The NEA has listed SPLC’s Learning for Justice in a variety of educator resources, including “White Supremacy Culture Resources,” “Racial Justice in Education Resources,” and “Bias Free Schools.” 

According to Defending Education, the AFT also “promotes the use of Learning for Justice resources and lessons and has offered presentations to its members on how to integrate the Social Justice Standards into school curriculums and lessons.”

Defending Education lists districts and departments of education that have used or still use Learning for Justice as a teaching resource. The list is not comprehensive, so parents might want to check their school district or department of education’s website to see if the radical program is promoted for use in their child’s school. 

Related articles and resources: 

Cleaning House at the Southern Poverty Law Center

Defending Education: SPLC Curriculum in K-12: Learning for Justice/Teaching ToleranceTracker

DOJ Indicts SPLC for Fraud — Used Donor Money to Fund Racist Groups  

Is ‘Critical Race Theory’ Being Taught in Public Schools? CRT Deniers Claim it Isn’t

Southern Poverty Law Center Finally Names Focus on the Family a Hate Group

Southern Poverty Law Center Publishes ‘Year in Hate and Extremism’ – Continues to Target Christian Groups

SPLC Continues to Label Conservative Christian Organizations as ‘Hate Groups’

What’s Your School District’s ‘Transgender’ Policy?

If you’re concerned about what your child is being taught in school, check out this updated, free resource from Focus on the Family and Family Policy Alliance: Equipping Parents for Back-to-School.

Written by Jeff Johnston · Categorized: Culture, Education · Tagged: LGBT, parenting

May 05 2026

DOJ Investigates Illinois School Districts for Violating Parental Rights With LGBT Content

The Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division announced it was investigating whether Illinois schools are teaching students “sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) content” – and whether they are notifying parents of their right to opt their children out of this instruction. 

According to a press release, the DOJ will be investigating 36 school districts across the state. The Civil Rights Division added: 

The investigation will also assess whether the Illinois School Districts limit access to single-sex intimate spaces (such as bathrooms and locker rooms) and girls sports teams based on biological sex.

Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon detailed the need for the investigation, saying: 

This Department of Justice is determined to put an end to local school authorities keeping parents in the dark about how sexuality and gender ideology are being pushed in classrooms. 

Supreme Court precedent leaves no doubt: parents have the fundamental right and primary authority to direct the care, upbringing, and education of their children. This includes exempting their children from ideological instruction that contradicts their values or decisions about their children’s health and best interests.

The DOJ statement said Illinois schools might be violating Title IX requirements as well as two recent Supreme Court decisions that affirm parental rights: Mahmoud v. Taylor (June 2025) and Mirabelli v. Bonta (March 2026). The department noted Illinois schools receive “hundreds of thousands of dollars of taxpayer funding.”

Title IX is a federal civil rights law that prohibits sex discrimination in education programs and activities receiving federal financial assistance. It was intended to provide equal opportunities for girls and women in education, but schools have violated the law by allowing boys into girls sports, restrooms and locker rooms. 

Mahmoud v. Taylor involved a case where young children in Maryland were required to read LGBT books without their parents’ knowledge or consent. In a 6-3 ruling, the Court held schools can’t force children to participate in LGBT classroom material without offering parents the right to opt out based on sincerely held religious beliefs.

In Mirabelli, the Court ruled against California policies that required schools to hide information about a child’s sexual identity confusion. Pointing to previous decisions, the Court made clear: 

The right protected by these precedents includes the right not to be shut out of participation in decisions regarding their children’s mental health. 

Because of Illinois state agency requirements and state laws, it’s most likely that all these districts are violating Title IX and the two Supreme Court decisions. 

The Illinois High School Association, for example, has allowed “transgender athletes” – boys who claim to be girls – to play in girls sports since 2011. The state’s Human Rights Commission ruled in 2019 that public schools must allow “transgender” students access to the restrooms and locker rooms that matched their “gender identity.” 

The Illinois Board of Education issued “best practices” for “Supporting Transgender, Nonbinary and Gender Nonconforming Students” that follow that directive. The guidance also tells schools to follow a student’s lead with name and pronoun changes, including whether or not to tell parents. 

As far as classroom instruction, Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker signed SB 246 into law in 2019, requiring public schools to teach “the roles and contributions of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people in the history of this country and this state.” 

The law directed schools to teach students “LGBT” history by eighth grade, and students must“demonstrate evidence of having a comprehensive knowledge thereof” in order to graduate from eighth grade. 

This may be difficult for Illinois students to demonstrate when just over half are proficient in reading – and that achievement came only after the state lowered test standards. But it seems teaching gay and transgender ideology is more important than basic skills.

Since teaching about L-, G-, B- or T-identified people is a state-wide history curriculum mandate, it’s unlikely that any Illinois schools notify parents about this subject matter.  

Six other states also mandate inclusion of LGBT ideology in social studies: California, Colorado, Illinois, Nevada, New Jersey, Oregon and Washington.

If your child’s school or school district has violated your parental rights, you can file a complaint with the Education Department’s Office of Civil Rights.

America First Legal released an updated parental opt-out templatefollowing the recent Supreme Court decisions in Mahmoud and Mirabelli. 

Related articles and resources: 

Back to School with LGBT Social Studies

Barrett v. Kagan: Key Takeaways From Supreme Court Ruling on ‘Transgender’ School Policies

Exclusive Interview: Colorado Parents Expose ‘Gender Cult’ at Public School in New Documentary

Montgomery County Must Pay $1.5 Million to Religious Parents After Supreme Court Ruling

Supreme Court Affirms Parents’ Rights Over California’s ‘Transgender’ School Policies

Supreme Court Defends Religious Freedom, Parental Rights Over ‘LGBT’ Curriculum

Transgender Resources

What’s Your School District’s ‘Transgender’ Policy?

If you’re concerned about what your child is being taught in school, check out this updated, free resource from Focus on the Family and Family Policy Alliance: Equipping Parents for Back-to-School.

We want parents to feel confident and equipped to manage issues affecting public – and private and online – schooling. The FREE downloadable resourcehelps you be aware of what’s going on in your child’s classroom and offers guidance for how to advocate for your child in the school year ahead.

Written by Jeff Johnston · Categorized: Culture, Education · Tagged: LGBT, parenting

May 01 2026

‘Detransitioner’ Wins Settlement Against Therapists Who Referred Her for Double Mastectomy

Camille Kiefel, a woman who once believed she was “non-binary,” won a settlement against two therapists who referred her for a double mastectomy as a “gender affirming” medical procedure. 

She’s the second young woman in recent months to receive compensation after undergoing disfiguring “transgender” medical interventions. In February, a New York jury awarded Fox Varian $2 million dollars in a malpractice lawsuit against medical professionals who attempted to “transition” her to look like the opposite sex.

Investigative journalist Benjamin Ryan was the first to report the confidential settlement, saying it was reached “just days before the trial was slated to begin.” Kiefel had asked for $3.5 million in her malpractice lawsuit. 

The Women’s Liberation Front (WoLF), a self-described “radical feminist group” which opposes transgender ideology, supported Kiefel in her legal battle as her financial sponsor. The initial malpractice complaint, filed in December 2022, targeted Licensed Clinical Social Worker Amy Ruff and Licensed Professional Counselor Mara Burmeister, along with the two Oregon health care clinics that employed them. 

The lawsuit described some of the difficulties Kiefel struggled with, saying she “experienced severe childhood traumatic events leading to her feeling discomfort and dissociation with her body.” 

In addition, Kiefel “had a history of mental health diagnosis,” including attention deficithyperactivity disorder, complex post-traumatic stress disorder, major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder. These conditions “proved treatment-resistant despite nearly two decades of psychotherapy and prescribed medications for ADHD, depression, and anxiety with a variety of therapists over many years.” 

Kiefel began “identifying” as “non-binary” in 2016, underwent breast removal surgery in 2020 at age 30. In 2022, Kiefel accepted that she was a woman. 

But the damage was done. 

In a Newsweek article, Kiefel described the ridiculous ideology that supports surgery to become “non-binary”: 

And the weird thing, too, about being non-binary, is what do you even transition to? There’s no non-binary sex to transition to.

The suit alleged that “Ruff held one Zoom session with [Kiefel], lasting approximately an hour,” before writing a referral for her to have “chest reduction to relieve gender dysphoria.” The suit said Ruff’s letter had statements she “knew were factually false and/or misleading,” and she did not exercise “reasonable care” in her assessment or even review Kiefel’s medical or mental health records before recommending surgery, the complaint added. 

Kiefel learned “a second assessment letter was required in order for Medicaid to pay for breast removal surgery.” Her lawsuit said, “Burmeister failed to conduct an individualized, comprehensive mental health assessment prior to recommending that Plaintiff undergo double mastectomy surgery.” 

Ruff and Burmeister, according to an amended lawsuit, did not discuss with Kiefel the risks involved with the proposed surgery, including: 

  • Surgery might not alleviate her social, health and mental health problems, and it might even exacerbate them.
  • Surgery could not mute her feminine features to more closely resemble a ‘non-binary’ gender identity.
  • Reproductive dysfunction, through lack of sexual function, and inability to breastfeed.
  • Reclaiming her female identity after surgery might lead to greater anxiety, distress and shame.

Camille Kiefel’s struggles with trauma and mental health issues are typical of adolescents and young adults who embrace transgender ideology. 

Although many will go on to desist from believing they can become the opposite sex – or someother “gender” altogether, this may only occur after they have been irreparably damaged by transgender medical interventions like drugs, hormones and surgeries. 

True compassion means protecting young men and women and helping them embrace biological reality. 

Legal victories can’t undo the irreversible damage caused by these medical interventions, but they may cause mental health and medical professionals to think twice before engaging in such barbarous practices. 

For those struggling with transgenderism, and their families, Focus on the Family’s Counseling Department offers help from licensed counselors. To request a conversation with Focus on the Family’s Counseling Department, call 1-855-771-HELP (4357) weekdays from 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. (Mountain Time), or complete our Counseling Consultation Request Form. Please be prepared to leave your contact information for a counselor to return a call to you as soon as possible. The consultation is available at no cost to you due to generous donor support.

Related articles and resources: 

DOJ Targets Those Mutilating Children with ‘Transgender’ Drugs and Surgeries

Expert in ‘Transitioning’ Children Admits ‘We Were Wrong’ About Puberty Blockers

Focus on the Family: Counseling Consultation & Referrals

Focus on the Family: Transgender Resources

Four Brave Young Women File Lawsuits Alleging Harm from ‘Transgender’ Interventions

Jury Awards $2 Million to Young Woman Who Underwent ‘Transgender’ Surgery at 16

More Hospitals Stop Mutilation of Sexually Confused Children

New Video Equips Parents and Counselors to Help ‘Gender Dysphoric’ Children

ReFOCUS with Jim Daly: Addressing Gender Identity with Honesty and Compassion

ReFOCUS with Jim Daly: Chloe Cole: Gender Reassignment Surgery Regret

Transgenderism and Minors: What Does Research Really Show?

Written by Jeff Johnston · Categorized: Culture, Sexuality · Tagged: LGBT, transgender

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 33
  • Go to Next Page »

Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | © 2026 Focus on the Family. All rights reserved.

  • Cookie Policy