Trump

Gen Z Women Rejected Pro-Abortion Messaging in 2024, Election Data Shows

Post-election data shows pro-abortion messaging failed to galvanize young women in the 2024 election cycle, suggesting Gen Z women care far less about — or for — pro-abortion policies than political strategists expected.

It’s big news — but pollsters, per usual, are missing the point.

David Shor, head data scientist at a prominent Democrat consulting firm, joined The New York Times’ Ezra Klein last week to break down last year’s decisive presidential election. The two acknowledged young voters became more conservative but, like most analysts, attributed the shift primarily to young men.

It’s true: men aged 18 to 29 moved further right then their female counterparts — about 15 points, according to Tufts University’s Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE).

But Gen Z women also became significantly more conservative. More than 40% of women aged 18 to 29 voted Republican in 2024, compared to just 33% in the 2020 presidential election. The shift spanned races, with white and black women each moving six points to the right and latina women moving 10 points.

This rightward shift is particularly important because, unlike young men, young women were supposed to be a shoo-in for former Vice President Kamala Harris. In a May 2024 piece for The New York Times, two political analysts predicted young women would overwhelmingly support abortion “rights.”

The article, titled “[Abortion] is the Democrats’ Best Shot in 2024. And They’re Spending Like Crazy on It,” reads:

There’s a good chance the [abortion] issue could offset President Biden’s weakness among many young and nonwhite voters, given the strong turnout among women and younger voters in recent years in states where abortion rights were on the ballot.

Pro-abortion candidates leaned hard into this perceived advantage. The Democratic National Committee (DNC) and its allies spent $175 million on pro-abortion TV ads in 2024 — more than 30% of their total ad spending.

Just one day before the election, Politico reported Harris’ pro-abortion media campaign was “helping her close the gap with Trump on handling voters’ No. 1 issue: the economy.”

 “Abortion rights and Trump’s history of misogynistic statements is fueling a historic gender gap,” it further assessed, implying that women would vote on abortion and men on the economy.

These predictions did not come true. Abortion was not a mobilizing issue for American voters, particularly compared to the economy. In one of Shor’s surveys asking voters to rank issues by importance, 79% of respondents ranked the “cost of living, inflation” as more important than abortion.

Abortion paled in comparison to the economy even among Gen Z women, who are frequently portrayed as abortion’s biggest advocates. In the CIRCLE survey, 39% of women aged 18 to 29 identified “the economy and jobs” as their top policy priority.

Only 17% listed “abortion.”

The data is clear: the Democrat party spent big on an issue women, particularly young women, didn’t care about nearly as much as it thought. It effectively reduced an entire voting block to a stereotype — a caricature of an activist who cares about nothing more than having sex with no strings attached

This misunderstanding was so foundational that the party poured money into it until the bitter end. Democrats spent more than $2 million in mid-October on last minute pro-abortion messaging in swing states, even after polls showed women valued economic policy more highly.

But pro-abortion messaging clearly isn’t the silver bullet the Democrat party believed it to be.

Additional Articles and Resources

Harris’ Abortion Issue Bid Fails

Young People on the Pro-Life Movement’s Future

Young Person Talks to Young People at National March for Life

The Progressives Who Want to Take Down Elon Musk and Tesla

Leftist activists are promoting and encouraging protests and attacks on Telsa, the automotive and clean energy company headed by Elon Musk.

Activists plan a “Tesla Takedown,” a “Global Day of Action to stop Musk” on March 29. Anti-capitalist groups, politicians, actors, and transgender-identified activists are just some of those working to bring down Musk and Tesla.

One of the most appalling celebrations of the violence occurred on The Daily Show, as co-host Jordan Klepper showed news video of Tesla cars set on fire at dealerships around the country.

The audience cheered and applauded the destruction, to which Klepper said, “Wow, you guys like petty acts of domestic terrorism.” The audience laughed and cheered again.

Actually, those are felony acts, and one wonders if Klepper and his audience would laugh at the destruction of thousands of dollars of their own property.

Tesla, headquartered in Texas, employs more than 100,000 workers, developing and manufacturing electric vehicles and installing and maintaining energy systems.

Touted as a clean energy company and long supported by progressive climate activists, many leftists have now turned on the company due to Musk’s work with the Trump administration’s Department of Government Efficiency, a temporary agency created by an executive order with the goal of combating federal waste, fraud and abuse.

Here are some of the left-leaning groups and individuals who oppose Musk’s work with DOGE and, apparently, support a bloated, wasteful federal government.

Philly Anti-Capitalist “exists to promote and spread anti-authoritarian events and ideas as well as facilitate communication between anti-authoritarians and anarchists in and around Philadelphia.”

According to Fox News, the group “claimed credit for terrorizing a Philadelphia neighborhood near the University of Pennsylvania during what it called the ‘Summer of Rage’ in 2020.”

Now, the group is giving tips to would-be arsonists, in a blog post titled, “DONT USE MOLOTOVS: Some notes on safely burning Teslas (or other cars),” as Fox News reports,

“The group’s site recommends against using Molotov cocktails, as several radicals across the country have, in favor of more effective devices. It also directs combatants on how much explosive material to use and where to place that material on vehicles in order to cause the most damage.”

“Philly Anti-Capitalist also provides tips on using those devices without getting hurt and quickly enough to escape undetected, and directs would-be arsonists to another site for further details on protecting their anonymity.”

Indivisible is another leftist group trying to stop Musk’s agenda of cutting federal agencies’ abuse and waste. Paul Sperry, a New York Post columnist and senior reporter at RealClear Investigations, warned about Indivisible back in February, saying agitators from the group planned to mob Tesla “dealerships, showrooms, [and] factories.”

More recently, he posted about founders Leah Greenberg and Ezra Levin, saying they had an $11.7 million war chest which included $7.26 million from billionaire George Soros, the far left donor to many radical causes.

Sperry also stated that Indivisible was paying protestors “$1,500 in ‘reimbursement’ cash” for participating in Tesla protests.

The nonprofit Action Network “trains and educates progressives on how to use technology to organize for change.” Action Network just announced that it is joining forces with MoveOn (formerly MoveOn.org), which also received funds from Soros.

Action Network lists the individual locations of the global Tesla Takedown protest, saying, “Elon Musk is destroying our democracy, and he’s using the fortune he built at Tesla to do it. We are taking action at Tesla to stop Musk’s illegal coup.”

The group gives no specifics about the alleged “illegal coup.” Nor does it explain how cutting federal waste destroys democracy or how Musk is using his fortune to do so. The group simply engages in empty sloganeering, as it urges those who used to support the clean energy company, “Sell your Teslas, dump your stock, join the picket lines.”

Politicians, Actors and Flight Attendants

Conservative Christian and social media influencer “Insurrection Barbie” recently posted that she sat in on an Indivisible call as the group discussed plans for the big protest day.

She noted that Texas Representative Jasmine Crockett was on the call, saying “March 29, it’s my birthday. And all I want to see happen on my birthday is Elon Musk taken down.”

Crockett, who advocates for abortion and “the LGBTQIA+ community,” stated,

“We are fighting for our country, we are fighting for our democracy, we are fighting for our freedoms. And when I say “fighting,” I am saying that figuratively. Obviously, everything that I’m promoting is nonviolent.”

Crockett did not explain how Tesla and Musk are threatening democracy, but she said elected officials weren’t listening to the American people and thanked the protestors for their work.

According to Insurrection Barbie, “Other prominent organizations involved and mentioned in the call” included:  Planet Over Profit, New Republic 50501, John Cusack Civil Liberties Defense Center, Association of Flight Attendants, Troublemakers [and] Joan Donovan – original organizer of this entire project.”

The Association of Flight Attendants? Ironically, as reported by the Daily Citizen, while it works to “fight for our freedoms,” the organization is embroiled in a lawsuit for refusing to support its members’ religious freedom and free speech.

Back in 2018, conservative radio show host, author and Old Testament scholar Dennis Prager wrote an essay titled, “Whatever the Left Touches It Ruins.” He argues that leftists – who prefer socialism and communism to capitalism and want to “disrupt and dismantle” the West – have wrecked or poisoned art, education, sports, religion and more.  

Rather than building something, as Musk, Tesla and its employees have done, radical activist are trying to destroy a company that creates, innovates and employs thousands of individuals – many of whom have families to support.

Rather than burning down businesses, it’d be good, instead, to see all that time, energy and money focused on creating things that are beautiful, useful and good.

Related Articles and Resources:

300 Attacks on Catholic Churches – In Less Than 3 Years; 82 Attacks on Pregnancy Resource Centers – In Less Than a Year

Antifa Assaults Families, Violently Breaks Up Christian Prayer Event in Portland

Antifa’s Violent and Destructive Tactics Used in Portland for Three Months Will Now be Applied in Kenosha, Wisconsin

Attacks on Tesla Escalate

During Violent Weekend, Rioters Desecrated and Set Ablaze Houses of Worship

Over 400 Attacks on Churches in 2023, New Report Finds

President Trump Declares Antifa a Terrorist Organization. Here’s Its Long History of Violence.

Image from Getty.

Attacks on Tesla Escalate

Attacks on Tesla have escalated nationwide, with Tesla dealerships hit with gunfire and Molotov cocktails; drivers threatened, doxed and terrorized; cars vandalized and tires slashed; and charging stations lit on fire.

Social media accounts like TeslaDashcam on X and Cybertruck Owners Only on Facebook are posting videos of individuals damaging cars so they can be identified and charged. Assailants must not realize that Teslas have seven cameras and security features to alert owners of threats, as the company has pointed out.

The violence, which began in January, is directed at Elon Musk, and his mission with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to cut government waste and fraud. The temporary federal agency was created by an executive order from President Donald Trump to modernize “federal technology and software to maximize governmental efficiency and productivity.”

Highlighting the severity of these crimes, Attorney General Pam Bondi released a statement on March 18 about the violence,

The swarm of violent attacks on Tesla property is nothing short of domestic terrorism. The Department of Justice has already charged several perpetrators with that in mind, including in cases that involve charges with five-year mandatory minimum sentences.
We will continue investigations that impose severe consequences on those involved in these attacks, including those operating behind the scenes to coordinate and fund these crimes.

Here is some of the domestic terrorism she’s talking about.

In Salem, Oregon, “Adam Matthew Lansky, 41, has been charged by criminal complaint with illegally possessing an unregistered destructive device,” reports the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Oregon. The DOJ’s office added,

“According to court documents, on January 20, 2025, officers from the Salem Police Department responded to a report of an individual throwing Molotov cocktails at a local car dealership. Later, on February 19, 2025, officers returned to the same dealership after a report of damage from what appeared to be bullets fired into a building and vehicle.”

Journalist and author Andy Ngo, who has written about terrorism by extremist groups, reported that Lansky also goes by the name Allison, and is a “leftist trans activist.”

According to Salem’s Statesman Journal, “The man’s fingerprints were identified on some of the glass bottles used for explosive devices recovered from the scene.”

Another transgender-identified activist, Justin Thomas Nelson, who goes by the name Luce Grace Nelson, “was charged by complaint with one count of malicious destruction of property for a series of incidents at the Tesla dealership in Loveland, Colorado,” the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Colorado reported. 

On January 29, Loveland Police “discovered an incendiary device, commonly referred to as a ‘Molotov cocktail’” next to “a Cyber Truck located at the Tesla dealership.” On February 2, the dealership’s sign was spray painted with the word “NAZI.”

On February 7, more graffiti and incendiary devices were found, and on February 11, “a security guard at the dealership came into contact with a person painting graffiti, which used an expletive, on the front windows of the building.”

Finally, “police confronted Nelson at the dealership,” finding “a container of gasoline plus a box of bottles and wick material” in his car. Although mainstream media outlets reported a “woman” was arrested, Ngo again reported that it was “a leftist man” who “groomed children [online] into transitioning and encouraged them to lie to their families.” 

The DOJ reported another arrest in Charleston, South Carolina, “A third defendant wrote profane messages against President Trump around Tesla charging stations before lighting the charging stations on fire with Molotov cocktails.”

The “hapless anti-Musk activist” evidently “ended up setting himself on fire,” the New York Post reported, adding, “Daniel Clarke-Pounder, 24, burned down three EV chargers in a South Carolina parking lot Friday.”

Clarke-Pounder scrawled “long live the Ukraine” and anti-Trump epithets on the chargers.

The DOJ underscored the seriousness of these offences, saying,

“Each defendant faces serious charges carrying a minimum penalty of five years and up to 20 years in prison.”

“The Department of Justice is committed to ending all acts of violence and arson directed at Tesla properties and otherwise.”

Other Tesla attacks have taken place in Maryland, Massachusetts, Washington, Missouri and Nevada.

In addition to outright attacks and destruction of private property, the Tesla Takedown Action Network is calling for protests at several dealerships on March 21 and 22, with a huge protest at 500 locations scheduled for March 29, targeting 277 Tesla dealers and Supercharger stations.

Related Articles and Resources:

Antifa Launches Coordinated, Violent Protests Following President Biden’s Inauguration

During Violent Weekend, Rioters Desecrated and Set Ablaze Houses of Worship

How Many Children Have the Protests Killed?

Legacy of Anarchy in Protests – From the WTO Riots in 1999 to George Floyd

President Trump Ends Radical DEI Programs, Fires All DEI Personnel

President Trump Signs Executive Actions and Orders – Cabinet Appointments Advance

President Trump Signs Executive Order Dismantling Department of Education

Stephen Miller, Civics Teacher

Image from Getty.

Dept of Ed Reduces Size, Scope; Grows Power to Cut DEI, Racism

Since taking office, the Trump Administration has undertaken significant actions to reduce the size and scope of the U.S. Department of Education including leadership changes, workforce reduction, office closures and policy shifts. New energy is being directed to root out DEI and racism from school programs nationwide.

After years of declining student outcomes and wasted money, many believe a change is not only warranted, but essential.

Leadership Appointment

On March 3, 2025, Linda McMahon was confirmed as the new secretary of education. Secretary McMahon’s primary objective, as outlined and supported by President Trump, is to dismantle the Department of Education.

In an email to agency staff, later shared on the agency’s website, McMahon told employees that the Department of Education is not working as intended and a review is long overdue. She asserted that in her professional experience “disruption leads to innovation and gets results.” She told staff that they must think about their work to overhaul the agency as the “final mission at the department.”

In the email, she very clearly laid out three convictions of the department:

  1. Parents are the primary decision makers in their children’s education. 
  2. Taxpayer-funded education should refocus on meaningful learning in math, reading, science, and history—not divisive DEI programs and gender ideology. 
  3. Postsecondary education should be a path to a well-paying career aligned with workforce needs. 

After spending over one trillion dollars since the department’s formation in 1980, with declining student outcomes, McMahon referred to the agency’s work under her leadership as “one final, unforgettable public service to future generations of students.”

Workforce Reduction

Notably, this month the administration announced plans to reduce federal employees at the U.S. Department of Education by over 1,300 workers.  

This reduction, coupled with nearly 600 employees who accepted voluntary resignation and retirement packages, represents a nearly 50% reduction in the federal workforce at the Department of Education.

Secretary McMahon said that the reduction “reflects the Department of Education’s commitment to efficiency, accountability, and ensuring that resources are directed where they matter most: to students, parents, and teachers.”

The action is consistent with promises Trump made on the campaign trail to decrease the size of the agency.

According to the department’s press release, employees impacted by the reduction will be placed on administrative leave beginning Friday, March 21. They will receive full pay and benefits until June 9, 2025, in addition to “substantial severance pay or retirement benefits.”

Office Closures

Due to the reduction in workforce, seven of the 13 Offices of Civil Rights (OCR) will completely close by June 9, 2025, including offices in Boston, Chicago, Cleveland, Dallas, New York, Philadelphia and San Francisco. OCR offices in Atlanta, Denver, Kansas City, Seattle and Washington, D.C. will remain open. There are about 550 OCR workers employed by the Department of Education. Approximately 243 of the OCR employees received termination letters, a majority of them lawyers.

Policy Shifts

Not only is the Department of Education hyper-focused on decentralizing education and giving more power to states, local education authorities and parents, but it is also committed to rooting out radical ideology and racism from primary, secondary and higher education.

Under Trump’s leadership, the U.S. Department of Education has ceased enforcement of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs that, among other things, allowed men to compete against women in women’s sports.

In February of this year, it created an “end-DEI” portal for the public to submit complaints about DEI programs in schools and warned schools that federal funding could be cut for non-compliance.

In late February, the Department of Education announced an investigation into apparent discrimination in Maine’s schools where males were allowed to compete in female sports. 

This week, the federal government froze $174 million in federal funding headed to the University of Pennsylvania (UPenn) due to its policies which force women to compete against men in sports. UPenn made headlines in 2022, when they allowed a mediocre biological male swimmer, Lia Thomas, to compete against women.

In March, the Department of Education sent letters to 60 colleges and universities warning them of enforcement actions that will be taken against their institutions if they permit antisemitism on campus.

The department also opened investigations into 52 higher education institutions who receive federal funding for alleged violations of federal law that prohibit the use of racial preferences and stereotypes as a factor in “hiring, promotion, compensation, scholarships, prizes, administrative support, sanctions, discipline, and other programs and activities.” 

Legal Challenges

The effort to close offices and reduce the workforce at the U.S. Department of Education has been met with a legal challenge. A coalition of attorneys general from 20 states and the District of Columbia filed a federal lawsuit attempting to block the administration’s efforts. The lawsuit argues that such actions would severely impair its ability to fulfill legally mandated functions.

In response, the Department of Education defended its actions claiming the executive branch has the authority to reorganize, enhance efficiency and reduce redundancy. The department also maintains that all their actions have been done in full compliance with existing federal laws. Finally, the agency argues that the restructure is essential to achieving the administration’s policy objective to decentralize education oversight and give more control to state and local authorities.

Further Executive Action to Dismantle Department of Education

An executive order to dismantle the Department of Education is still expected. A complete abolition of the department would require Congressional action because it was statutorily created by Congress.

At present, there appears to be much work for the Department of Education to do as it enforces federal law and makes sure radical ideology and DEI practices are cut from education programs across the country. In the future, enforcement actions could be carried out by the Department of Justice if an executive order were to limit the work of the Department of Education.

Related Articles and Resources:

Equipping Parents for Back to School 

Celebrate the Real NCAA Women’s 500-Freestyle Swimming Champions

Department of Education Blew $1 Billion on DEI – Here’s Why It Matters

Department of Education: Schools Embracing DEI Will Lose Funding

New Education Secretary Linda McMahon: ‘Send Education to the States’

Image from Getty.

Trump DOJ Drops Case Against Idaho’s Pro-Life Law, Still Faces Legal Challenge

Thankfully, Idaho no longer has to fight the federal government to defend its right to protect mothers and babies from abortion.

This week, the Trump Department of Justice (DOJ) dropped the Biden DOJ’s lawsuit targeting Idaho’s pro-life law. In the self-executing motion filed with the court on Wednesday, the Trump DOJ voluntarily dismissed the case with no further action required by the court.

Background

Following the reversal of Roe v. Wade in 2022, Idaho’s Defense of Life Act went into effect, prohibiting abortion unless it is necessary to save the life of the mother, or in cases of rape or incest.

In August 2022, the Biden DOJ sued the state of Idaho over its pro-life law. 

It argued that the state law conflicted with federal law because the state law only permitted abortion in life-saving situations and not all emergency situations.

Attorneys for the state of Idaho argued that the pro-life law allows doctors to provide care to women experiencing ectopic pregnancies, miscarriages and other life-threatening conditions, which is exactly what the federal law requires.

Many in the pro-life community believe the abortion industry is using the federal law to try to create a loophole for elective abortions in Idaho.

Supreme Court Action

The cases — Moyle v. United States and Idaho v. United States — were argued before the Supreme Court last year.

The question before the Court was whether a federal law, known as the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA), overrode the Idaho law regarding when an abortion can be performed.

As reported by the Daily Citizen, the Court did not decide on the merits of the case but instead dismissed it and sent it back to the lower court for continued consideration. The justices held that dismissal was appropriate because the cases had shifted in theory and arguments.

Future of Idaho’s Pro-Life Law

Idaho’s pro-life law still faces a legal challenge from St. Luke’s hospital system. St. Luke’s filed a lawsuit against the state in anticipation of the Trump DOJ dropping the case.

The hospital system, like Biden’s DOJ, is claiming that women in medical emergencies won’t be able to get an abortion to save their lives.

The district court judge granted the hospital’s request for a temporary restraining order (TRO) to allow for emergency abortions in the state.

So, for now, the TRO will remain in place and allow for emergency abortions in Idaho pending further litigation.

The Daily Citizen will continue to follow this case and provide additional updates.

Image from Getty.