• Skip to main content
Daily Citizen
  • Subscribe
  • Categories
    • Culture
    • Life
    • Religious Freedom
    • Sexuality
  • Parenting Resources
    • LGBT Pride
    • Homosexuality
    • Sexuality/Marriage
    • Transgender
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Contact
  • Donate

LGBT

Aug 19 2025

Poetic Justice: Virginia school district loses federal funding day after bogus suspension.

The Department of Education (DoEd) put five Northern Virginia school districts on “reimbursement payment status” Tuesday pending full termination of their federal funding.

The decisive edict follow the districts’ continued violations of Title IX, which prohibits sex discrimination in federally funded educational programs and institutions.

Alexandria City, Arlington, Fairfax County, Loudoun County and Prince William County Public Schools allow students to use bathrooms, locker rooms and other sex-segregated facilities consistent with their subjective “gender identity,” rather than their biological sex.

Late last month, DoEd’s Office of Civil Rights found these policies violate Title IX. It ordered the districts to segregate bathrooms, locker rooms and sports by biological sex — or risk forfeiting a combined $50 million in annual federal funding.

None of the districts complied. Loudoun County Public Schools (LCPS), per usual, actually made a show of failing to comply.

Last week, the school board formally voted to refuse DoEd’s order. Yesterday, it suspended two high school boys for expressing discomfort with a girl in their locker room.

Of LCPS’ laundry list of wrongs, its failure to protect single-sex sports and spaces are some of the most egregious.

In 2021, shortly after LCPS passed its policy equating “gender identity” and “sex,” a “gender fluid” boy in a skirt sexually assaulted a fifteen-year-old girl in the girl’s bathroom..

Subsequently, the Daily Citizen writes:

LCPS’ Superintendent and Board dragged the [assaulted] girl’s father out of a board meeting, tried to cover up the incident and transferred the boy to another school — where he assaulted a second girl.

Then, in May, a female student filmed two boys in the boys’ locker room asking, “Why is there a girl in the boy’s locker room?”

Though the female had violated school policy by filming in the locker room, it was the boys, not her, who faced punishment.

On Monday, the district concluded the boys had committed sexual harassment and sex-based discrimination by asking why a girl had violated their privacy. They will serve a ten-day suspension and establish an additional “corrective action” plan with administrators upon their return.

Though both boys were sanctioned, only one will serve his unjust punishment. The other moved away from Virginia entirely, taking refuge in North Dakota, after district investigator Christopher Moy indicated he could choose to drop cases if the subjects left the district.  

But Moy didn’t drop the investigation. Instead, he informed the family if their son ever re-enrolled in Loudoun County, he would first have to serve his suspension.

Now, the high school junior’s school record includes accusations of sex discrimination and sexual harassment — just in time to start applying for colleges.

The Daily Citizen asked Victoria Cobb, President of the Focus on the Family-allied Family Foundation, how LCPS could come to such an unjust conclusion.  

“LCPS is targeting these boys, plain and simple,” she said. “Punishing boys who complain that a biological girl is in their changing area is a top-down effort to normalize unacceptable privacy invasions by the opposite gender.”

Family Foundation’ legal affiliate, Founding Freedoms Law Center, represents the boys and their families. Cobb says they plan to hold LCPS accountable for their radical policies:

To allow this punishment to stand is to allow a school system to force children to bow to a woke ideology that defies reality, science and God’s created order.

Cobb and the Family Foundation are far from the only ones to question the validity of LCPS’ “investigation.” In June, Virginia Attorney General Jason Miyares released a report finding:

LCPS is utilizing an unlawful, discriminatory and retaliatory Title IX investigation to silence students’ sincerely held religious objections to [LCPS policies equating sex and “gender identity.”]

Miyares referred the report to DoEd for further investigation.

Now, the writing is on the wall for LCPS and its compatriots. DoEd has “commenced administrative proceedings seeking suspension or termination of federal financial assistance to [the districts].”

In the meantime, the districts will get no federal money up front. Instead, while on “reimbursement status,” they will have to foot their own bills and submit them for federal reimbursement.

“States and school districts cannot openly violate federal law while simultaneously receiving federal funding with no additional security,” U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon explained in a press release.

“The Northern Virginia School Divisions that are choosing to abide by woke gender ideology in place of federal law must now prove they are using every single federal dollar for a legal purpose.”

The Daily Citizen heartily praises DoEd for its unflinching enforcement Title IX. As Craig Trainor, Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights at DoEd, said in July:

It’s time for Northern Virginia’s experiment with radical gender ideology and unlawful discrimination to come to an end.

Additional Articles and Resources

Loudoun County Schools Defy Education Department Over Multiple Title IX Violations

DoEd Finds Northern Virginia School Districts Violated Title IX

Irate Parents Excoriate Loudoun County Schools Superintendent and Board Over Sexual Abuse Coverup

Virginia School District Ignores Parents’ Opposition, Implements ‘Gender Identity’ Lessons

‘Equipping Parents For Back-To-School’ – Updated Resource Empowers Parents

Department of Education Launches Multiple Investigations Into Title IX Violations

Department of Education: Schools Embracing DEI Will Lose Funding

Department of Justice Launches Title IX Task Force to Protect Women’s Sports

New Education Secretary Linda McMahon: ‘Send Education to the States’

Trump Signs Executive Order Protecting Women’s Sports and Spaces

What’s Your School District’s ‘Transgender’ Policy?

Written by Emily Washburn · Categorized: Education · Tagged: education, LGBT, transgender

Aug 19 2025

It’s Good the Left Fears the Overturning of Gay ‘Marriage’

When USA Today publishes an opinion piece citing “horrifying” fear that the U.S. Supreme Court could overturn Obergefell, and Left-leaning Slate urges this “sudden panic” doesn’t go far enough, that’s when the pro-family movement knows it’s winning.

This fear stems from Liberty Council filing a petition for writ of certiorari (a request for the Court to hear the case) on behalf of Kim Davis, the former Kentucky county clerk who was jailed in 2015 for refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, due to her religious beliefs. U.S. law allows any citizen the right to file a petition for a writ of cert. to our land’s highest court after a lower court has ruled against them. The Supreme Court is highly selective in agreeing to hear such petitions. Davis petition asks the Supreme Court to review the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit’s rejection of her religious freedom case and to also overturn their 2015 Obergefell decision.

It is an open question whether the current Court will take up Davis’ request. Yet, on August 7, the U.S. Supreme Court did direct the two individuals who sued Davis to file a response to her petition. This is not insignificant. As veteran Supreme Court watcher Amy Howe notes, “The court essentially took Davis’ case out of the group of cases facing virtually automatic denial … into the group of cases that could theoretically be granted.” She adds, “Although we don’t know whether Davis has the votes, it remains possible” due to current Court makeup.

Yet, USA Today confesses, “The entire LGBTQ+ community [has] reason to be fearful – even if the case is unlikely to be heard by the court.” After listing a number of factors they assume serve as protections against Obergefell being overturned, the editorialist laments, “It doesn’t change the fact that the very notion of this right being overturned is a reminder to the LGBTQ+ community that our rights are dependent upon the whims of politicians and judges, and could easily disappear.” Of course, that’s because the Supreme Court created such a “right” out of whole cloth in the first place.

Slate warns no one should assume “gay rights are safe at this Supreme Court.” They lament, “Far from it: They are under active attack, albeit in a subtler way.” Advocates for same-sex marriage are admitting the momentum is against them and that is good for the pro-family movement.

This is what happens when activists get a narrow, heavily contested decision that many justices felt was clearly outside the Supreme Court’s purview. It is very good that gay activists and their faithful allies in the elite press recognize the vulnerability of their fragile victory in Obergefell.

In his strong dissent to the majority’s slim 5-4 Obergefell ruling, Chief Justice John Roberts stated, “This Court is not a legislature.”

Whether same-sex marriage is a good idea should be of no concern to us. Under the Constitution, judges have power to say what the law is, not what it should be. The people who ratified the Constitution authorized courts to exercise “neither force nor will but merely judgment” The Federalist No. 78, p. 465.  

He added, “Although the policy arguments for extending marriage to same-sex couples may be compelling, the legal arguments for requiring such an extension are not.” He further noted, “For those who believe in a government of laws, not of men, the majority’s approach is deeply disheartening.” He then asserted, “The fundamental right to marry does not include a right to make a State change its definition of marriage.”

For that is precisely what the majority did in Obergefell. They redefined marriage based on bad law. It was never about so-called “marriage equality.” The Court redefined the fundamental pre-law institution of marriage, which until the last few milliseconds of human history, has always been considered, across diverse cultures, belief systems and religions, to be a union joining the two essential halves of humanity: male and female. They had no right or authority to do so.

There are very compelling reasons to object to same-sex marriage. The majority in Obergefell freely admitted, “Many who deem same-sex marriage to be wrong reach that conclusion based on decent and honorable religious or philosophical premises, and neither they nor their beliefs are disparaged here.”

But we are disparaged in countless other places. Even still, we must remain resolute.

Even those who argued most passionately for the redefinition of marriage have not taken to their new creation. Gallup has tracked the percentage of “LGBT adults” entering same-sex marriages for a decade. They reported 8 percent of same-sex identified adults were in “gay marriages” in 2015, the first year it was legalized. Gallup recently reported that number currently sits at 8 percent. The highest that number ever got since Obergefell was 10%.

Clearly, same-sex marriage was not the great, essential need activists regularly told us it was when so few are making use of its legal status.

Obergefell should be struck down and overturned. That is what should happen when an activist Court plays the role of the legislature, as it did in Obergefell and Roe v. Wade. And Focus on the Family will advocate and work hard for that day. Pro-family advocates should never yield in their work to defend natural marriage.

We are winning! When our opponents are telling us precisely that, we should listen.

Image from Shutterstock.

Written by Glenn T. Stanton · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: LGBT, Obergefell

Aug 14 2025

Loudoun County Schools Defy Education Department Over Multiple Title IX Violations

The Loudoun County School Board voted to defy a U.S. Department of Education order to stop violating Title IX, the federal law prohibiting sex-based discrimination in educational programs that receive federal funds.

As a result, the school district could lose almost $46 million in federal funding, LoudounNow reported.

The U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) found that five Northern Virginia school districts violated Title IX by allowing “students to access intimate, sex-segregated facilities based on the students’ wholly subjective ‘gender identity,’” as the Daily Citizen reported just two weeks ago.

But the Loudoun County School Board chose to pursue woke ideology and violate students’ rights rather than comply with the federal law and the OCR’s demands.

The districts’ Title IX violations began in 2021 when the board, over the objections of many parents, voted 7-2 to pass Policy 8040, “Rights of Transgender and Gender-Expansive Students.”

The policy was implemented after the state’s education department published “Model Policies for the Treatment of Transgender Students in Virginia’s Public Schools,” which required that schools allow students to participate in sports and access locker rooms and restrooms “in a manner consistent with their gender identity.”

Schools were also mandated to “incorporate regular education about transgender students into staff professional development and training.” It was considered “verbal harassment” for teachers and other students to intentionally use names and pronouns not consistent with a student’s “gender identity.”

The state guidelines trampled on parental rights, stating, “If a student is not ready or able to safely share with their family about their gender identity, this should be respected. There are no regulations requiring school staff to notify a parent or guardian of a student’s request to affirm their gender identity.”

Loudoun’s Policy 8040 followed those guidelines. They’ve been a disaster for the district, teachers, parents and students.  

Shortly after the policy was implemented, the district lost a lawsuit to Tanner Cross, a teacher who was suspended for opposing it at a school board meeting. Cross had said,

“I love all of my students, but I will never lie to them regardless of the consequences. I’m a teacher, but I serve God first and I will not affirm that a biological boy can be a girl and vice versa because it’s against my religion. It’s lying to a child, it’s abuse to a child, and it’s sinning against our God.”

Even worse, the policy opened girls restrooms to boys who claimed to be female. A skirt-wearing “gender fluid” boy then sexually assaulted a 15-year-old girl in the girls restroom at Loudoun’s Stone Bridge High School.

Loudoun County Schools Superintendent and Board dragged the girl’s father out of a board meeting, tried to cover up the incident and transferred the boy to another school – where he assaulted a second girl.

Also at Stone Bridge, a female student, identifying as transgender, recorded boys in a male locker room questioning her presence, with “one student expressing that he felt ‘uncomfortable’ about the situation,” Fox News reported.

Even though it is against the law to record in a locker room, the boys were investigated “for allegedly violating Policy 8040.”

The district’s transgender policy also violates new guidance from the Virginia Department of Education, which rescinded the 2021 transgender guidance and replaced it with “Model Policies on Ensuring Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for All Students and Parents in Virginia’s Public Schools.”

The new guidelines call for schools to respect parental rights and the safety and privacy of all students.

Despite a free-speech lawsuit, parental opposition, sexual assaults, invasion of students’ privacy by members of the opposite sex, violating state guidance, and now the threat of losing federal funding, the Loudoun County School Board stubbornly clings to Policy 8040.

At some point, you would think common sense and concern for the welfare of all students would prevail.

As the Department of Education’s Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights Craig Trainor said when charges were brought against the district,

“It’s time for Northern Virginia’s experiment with radical gender ideology and unlawful discrimination to come to an end. OCR’s investigation definitively shows that these five Virginia school districts have been trampling on the rights of students in the service of an extreme political ideology.”

Related Articles and Resources

Department of Education Launches Multiple Investigations Into Title IX Violations

Department of Education: Schools Embracing DEI Will Lose Funding

Department of Justice Launches Title IX Task Force to Protect Women’s Sports

DoEd Finds Northern Virginia School Districts Violated Title IX

‘Equipping Parents For Back-To-School’ – Updated Resource Empowers Parents

Irate Parents Excoriate Loudoun County Schools Superintendent and Board Over Sexual Abuse Coverup

New Education Secretary Linda McMahon: ‘Send Education to the States’

Trump Signs Executive Order Protecting Women’s Sports and Spaces

Virginia School District Ignores Parents’ Opposition, Implements ‘Gender Identity’ Lessons

What’s Your School District’s ‘Transgender’ Policy?

Written by Jeff Johnston · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: Girls Sports, LGBT, Loudoun, Title IX

Aug 13 2025

Court Upholds Arkansas Ban on Harmful ‘Transgender’ Procedures for Children

A federal appellate court upheld an Arkansas law protecting children from experimental and destructive “transgender” medical procedures.

Arkansas was the first state to pass a law shielding minors with sexual identity confusion from harmful puberty blockers, opposite-sex hormones and surgeries used to make them look more like the opposite sex, enacting the “Save Adolescents From Experimentation Act” (SAFE Act) in 2021.

After several court battles over the law, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit ruled in favor of SAFE Act on Tuesday, overturning a lower court’s decision blocking it from taking effect. 

The SAFE Act also prohibits public funds from going to organizations that provide these procedures for minors, bans insurance companies from providing coverage for them, and allows those harmed by these procedures to file lawsuits against providers.

The Arkansas Family Council, a Focus on the Family-allied organization, applauded the decision from the 8th Circuit. In a press release, Family Council President Jerry Cox stated:

“This is amazing news. The SAFE Act is a good law that protects children from puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and sex-change surgeries. It has been blocked in court for the past four years.”

“Now the State of Arkansas can finally enforce this good law protecting children. That’s something to celebrate.”

Federal Court Says Arkansas Can Enforce the SAFE Acthttps://t.co/3qjFkD1ZKx#Arkansas #ARnews #ARpx #ARleg pic.twitter.com/t3Q0VsEo07

— Family Council (@FamilyCouncil) August 12, 2025

Cox explained that other countries have found that such medical interventions don’t work and are harmful, saying, “Over the past four years, public health experts in the U.S., the U.K., Sweden, Finland and other nations have found that science simply does not support performing these procedures on kids.”

The family policy council president added,

The SAFE Act is common sense legislation that protects children. That’s why the Arkansas Legislature voted overwhelmingly to pass it in 2021. That’s why more than half the states in America have passed similar laws since then. And that’s why the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a similar law in Tennessee earlier this year. Most people agree it is not right to perform [such] procedures on kids.

Shortly after the SAFE Act was passed, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) sued the state to allow disfiguring, body-damaging transgender procedures to continue. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of four families and two doctors.

In 2023, after an eight-day hearing, U.S. District Judge James “Jay” Moody struck down the Act. Judge Moody was nominated to the court by former President Barack Obama.

Arkansas’ attorney general and the State Medical Board appealed the decision, and the 8th Circuit ruled in their favor, reversing Judge Moody’s decision and citing the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision upholding a similar law in Tennessee.

The 8th Circuit stated in its opinion:

Arkansas has a “compelling interest” in protecting the physical and psychological health of minors. …

By prohibiting healthcare professionals from referring “any” minors to “any healthcare professional for gender transition procedures,” the Act prohibits the procedures that the state deems unsafe for minors.

Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin commended the decision, stating in an X post, “I applaud the court’s decision and am pleased that children in Arkansas will be protected from experimental procedures.”

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has reversed the injunction in Brandt v. Griffin, which means the SAFE Act, which bans gender transition procedures for minors, can be enforced once the mandate issues.

I applaud the court’s decision and am pleased that children… pic.twitter.com/W3fgqIwRxV

— Attorney General Tim Griffin (@AGTimGriffin) August 12, 2025

Chemical and surgical mutilation of minors through transgender medical procedures are now banned in 25 states.

The Daily Citizen is thankful for the court’s decision to allow Arkansas’ sensible SAFE Act to take effect.

The case is Brandt v. Rutledge.

To speak with a family help specialist or request resources, please call us at 1-800-A-FAMILY (232-6459).

Related Articles and Resources:

ACLU Sues Arkansas Over Law Protecting Gender-Confused Children

Arkansas Can’t Protect Children from Harmful ‘Sex-Change’ Procedures, Court Rules

Arkansas Legislature Overrides Veto to Protect Gender-Confused Children from Experimental ‘Sex Change’ Procedures

Arkansas Passes Bill to Ban Puberty Blockers, Sex-Change Surgeries for Minors

Family Policy Alliance Launches ‘Help Not Harm’ Campaign to ‘Stop Transgender Experiments on Our Children!’

Federal Judge Strikes Down Arkansas Law Protecting Children From Destructive ‘Transgender’ Medical Interventions

Judge Blocks Arkansas Law Prohibiting Experimental ‘Gender Transition’ Treatments on Minors

Justice Barrett Crucially Explains Why ‘Transgenderism’ is Not a Special Class

Resource for Parents: “Responding to the Transgender Issue”

Seventeen State Attorneys General Support Arkansas Law Banning Use of Puberty Blockers

Focus on the Family: Transgender Resources

US Supreme Court Upholds Tennessee Law Protecting Kids From Transgender Mutilation

Image from Shutterstock.

Written by Jeff Johnston · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: LGBT, transgender

Aug 05 2025

World Athletics Announces Testing Protocols to Keep Men Out of Women’s Athletics

World Athletics approved new testing protocols to keep men from entering women’s athletic competitions. The test keeps anyone who has experienced male puberty from participating in female events.

The new rule, announced in a press release, states, “All athletes wishing to compete in the female category at the World Championships are required to undergo a once-in-a-lifetime test for the SRY gene.”

The SRY gene is found on the Y chromosome. It “provides instructions for making a protein called the sex-determining region Y protein” which is “involved in male-typical sex development.”

The regulations call for a simple “cheek swab or blood test, whichever is more convenient.” The new regulations go into effect on September 1.

World Athletics is the international governing body for “the sport of athletics,” which includes track and field, cross country, race walking and road running events. The organization establishes rules and regulations for these sports, manages world records, organizes world championships and manages the Olympic program for athletics.

The announcement said the test is “extremely accurate, and the risk of a false negative or positive is extremely unlikely.” Individuals who test positive for the SRY gene will be advised to undergo “further medical assessment” to determine if they have undergone male puberty.

As a result, males who claim to be female will not be able to enter women’s track and field events at the 2028 Summer Olympics in Los Angeles.

World Athletics President Sebastian Coe commented on the new rule, saying,

The philosophy that we hold dear in World Athletics is the protection and the promotion of the integrity of women’s sport. It is really important in a sport that is permanently trying to attract more women that they enter a sport believing there is no biological glass ceiling. The test to confirm biological sex is a very important step in ensuring this is the case.

Coe won gold medals in the men’s 1,500 meter races in the 1980 Moscow and 1984 Los Angeles Olympics. He won silver medals in the men’s 800 meter races those same years.

In response to the announcement about protecting women’s sports, The Paradox Team, which produces “science-based educational media,” highlighted a helpful animated video they created to explain the issues involved in testing for the SRY gene: “Sex Screening in Sports: How it Works.”

Zachry Elliot, founder and editor-in-chief of The Paradox Team, posted the video on X in response to World Athletics announcement.

BREAKING: @WorldAthletics has approved new regulations for sex screening that will require SRY gene testing in the female category.

Check out our animated video to see how the process will work 🎥@FondOfBeetles, @BrowngaGreg, @runthinkwrite, @Scienceofsport pic.twitter.com/kvtbtcVU2o

— Zachary Elliott (@zaelefty) July 30, 2025

The video first explains that “males have significant performance advantages compared to females of equal height, weight, and age,” including “larger skeletal structures, greater muscle mass with stronger muscles capable of producing force more rapidly, stronger tendons and ligaments, larger hearts and lungs and a higher oxygen-carrying capacity.”

The video goes on to describe development of these differences in male bodies, “These advantages arise from a combination of testes, high testosterone production, and a functional androgen receptor response that drives physical changes in the male’s body throughout childhood and puberty, a process called androgenization.”

Because of the athletic benefits from androgens, all who wish to compete in women’s sports should be screened before they are allowed to do so. According to The Paradox Institute, the cheek swab test is inexpensive; “simple, fast and non-invasive”; and “is highly predictive of male development, accurately classifying over 99.99% of individuals as either male or female.”

Despite critics who complain that keeping males out of girls and women’s sports means intrusive “genital checks,” a simple cheek swab or blood test is all that is needed to resolve the issue for almost all individuals.

The Paradox Team acknowledges that in very rare instances, “developmental disorders may cause discrepancies between the screen result and an individual’s actual development.” There are a very few XY women – with extremely rare developmental anomalies – who never experienced male levels of testosterone. Because these athletes would test positive for the SRY gene, they would undergo further medical examination to determine the nature of their developmental anomaly and whether this disqualifies them from competing in women’s sports.

The video explains that two rare disorders of sexual development (DSD) may produce an SRY positive result for these women. The first infrequently occurring DSD is 46:XY Swyer Syndrome, where the individual has the SRY gene, but a mutation results in the failure to develop male testes, so the person is not exposed to male hormones and develops internal and external female genitalia.

Despite the presence of the Y gene, the individual has developed as female.

A second rare DSD occurs when an XY individual has Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome (CAIS), where a “mutation in the androgen receptor gene blocks their body’s ability to respond to testosterone.” Such individuals develop “female-typical external anatomy and never undergo male physiological development,” as their bodies do not respond to male hormones.

While a women with CAIS has XY chromosomes, the developmental anomaly means she has not gone through male puberty and has developed as a female.

Finally, there is another DSD called 46:XY 5-Alpha Reductase Deficiency (5-ARD), which is quite different from the two previous disorders.

In most males, some of the body’s testosterone is converted by the 5-ARD enzyme into the male sex hormone dihydrotestosterone (DHT). Both testosterone and DHT play a role in male sexual development.

But as “Sex Screening in Sports: How it Works” explains, a deficiency in DHT leads to cases where “the male’s external genitalia are underdeveloped or even female-like.”

At puberty, these males – who may have appeared to be female up until that point – suddenly begin male physical development as their testes produce testosterone. As the video makes clear, “Since they experience testosterone-driven male development, they do have the male performance advantage.”

The Paradox Team explains, “The key distinction is whether an athlete has experienced testosterone-driven male development (as in the case of XY 5-ARD) or has not (as in the cases of Swyer Syndrome and CAIS).”

The team also explains why these cheek swab tests are necessary, saying, “With no official sex screening in place since 1996, male athletes with XY 5-ARD have competed and won medals in women’s Olympic events due to their testosterone-driven male development.”

As Daily Citizen has previously reported, male athletes Imane Khelif and Lu Yu-Ting  won Olympic medals in boxing, robbing women of opportunities. Other athletes with 5-ARD have won Olympic medals, especially in track events.

It’s good news that World Athletics is now protecting women’s athletics from male athletes who have distinct advantages in sports. With the rise of transgenderism in recent years, a number of other sports groups have taken steps to protect girls and women’s sports.

But there is still a long way to go, and we encourage more sports governing bodies to follow suit.

Related Articles and Resources

Department of Justice Launches Title IX Task Force to Protect Women’s Sports

International Swimming Federation (Mostly) Protects Women’s Aquatic Sports From Male Athletes

Male and Female Biology Matters

Nebraska Becomes 26th State to Protect Girls and Women’s Sports

Olympic Women’s Boxing Champ is Officially a Man

Trump Signs Executive Order Protecting Women’s Sports and Spaces

Two Men Win Olympic Gold for Battering Women World Rugby Finds Men and Women are Different: Announces New Guidelines Protecting Elite Women Players

Image from Getty.

Written by Jeff Johnston · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: LGBT, Women's Sports

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 26
  • Go to Next Page »

Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | © 2026 Focus on the Family. All rights reserved.

  • Cookie Policy