• Skip to main content
Daily Citizen
  • Subscribe
  • Categories
    • Culture
    • Life
    • Religious Freedom
    • Sexuality
  • Parenting Resources
    • LGBT Pride
    • Homosexuality
    • Sexuality/Marriage
    • Transgender
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Contact
  • Donate

Random

Jan 30 2025

Vice President Vance and a Call for Good Public Theology

Some people say we shouldn’t bog down the simple love of Christ with theology. But such people fail to appreciate that they refute themselves because even the lovely childhood sing-along, “Jesus loves me, this I know, for the Bible tells me so” is a theological statement. It is actually a profound theological statement. We are all theologians if we spend any time thinking about God.

It is also good and praiseworthy when our national leaders employ good theology in their public work.

Vice President J.D. Vance did exactly this yesterday in an evening news interview. In addressing the politics of immigration, he referred to “a very Christian concept” of love where first “you love your family, then you love your neighbor, and then you love your community, and then you love your fellow citizens in your own country … and then, after that, you can focus and prioritize the rest of the world.”

Here’s his explanation of this very big and foundational idea:

Public theology matters. I love that the sitting Vice President is invoking the Ordo Amoris.

pic.twitter.com/fQE7YHO2K2

— Andrew T. Walker (@andrewtwalk) January 30, 2025

Vance is correct. He is speaking of an ancient Christian teaching stretching all the way back to St. Augustine in the early 400s, and far beyond that in scripture.

In Augustine’s massive City of God, a book that explains how humanity lives in one of two cities, the City of God or the City of Man as in our “race we have distributed into two parts, the one consisting of those who live according to man, the other of those who live according to God” (Book 15:1).

Specifically, Vance was referring to the Augustinian tenet of Ordo Amoris, which is Latin for the proper ordering of the loves. To love is essential for all Christians, but to have our loves properly ordered is even more important.

In fact, Augustine says “it is a brief but true definition of virtue to say it is the order of love” that guides our ethics best (Book 15:22). C.S. Lewis in The Abolition of Man tells us, “St. Augustine defines virtue as ordo amoris, the ordinate condition of the affections in which every object is accorded that kind and degree of love which is appropriate to it.”

This beautiful truth is simply building on what Christ taught us all the Law and Prophets depend upon.

When our Lord was asked which was the greatest commandment in the Law, He answered, “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.” He added, “This is the great and first commandment.”

Jesus then orders that love superior to the next important: “And a second is like it: You shall love your neighbor as yourself.”

Love God first. Love others as you love yourself, second. Sin is rooted in our failure to keep this ordo amoris, is it not?

We cannot miss that there is a God-ordained order to these human loves.

We are to love our family first, before all others. Then, from that love, and God’s divine love within us, we are to love our neighbors closest to us, the ones we see every day and share a life with. We are then to love our community and city. Then our nation. For these are the people that we can love most effectively because we share a common life with them. From there, we are to love to the ends of the earth. These ordered loves exist in concentric circles based on our closest and most meaningful relationships and radiate out.

This is how love is most effectual and this truth is understood in the Principle of Subsidiarity. This is a Christian theory of public policy that those closest to a community problem have the greatest interest in those affected and are thus, more likely to answer that need better and more efficiently.

The Acton Institute says this of Subsidiarity, “This principle is a bulwark of limited government and personal freedom. It conflicts with the passion for centralization and bureaucracy characteristic of the Welfare State.”

This aligns with God’s ordering of creation. The family was the first institution God established to provide for the growth and provision of humanity and the proper ordering of the larger society. It is in family that we first learn to love God and then love our first neighbors, who are our parents, siblings and extended family. Out of that love, we learn to love our most immediate neighbors and be concerned for their well-being. From there, we extend our love to the larger village, and then that of our fellow countrymen. Beyond that, we care for those of the world.

Love indeed has a proper starting place and love and compassion which does not first consider those closest to us is a disordered love. That is what Vance was telling us we must all keep in mind in practicing legal immigration and protecting the borders of our nation. These are love of neighbor issues and it is refreshing to see a national leader speak intelligently from orthodox Christian theology.

Additional Articles and Resources

Trump’s Border Czar Explains Child Trafficking Under Biden Administration

American Immigration System Loses Contact with Tens of Thousands of Migrant Children

Nonbinary Nonsense: HHS Proposes Rule Making It Harder to Care for Migrant Children

Laken Riley Murdered After Killer Took Taxpayer-Funded Flight

Laken Riley Act Passes Senate

Laken Riley Act Introduced in Senate

Illegal Immigrant to Appear in Court for Death of Texas Teen, Illustrates Violent Trend

Illegal Immigrant Arrested in Murder of Maryland Mom

Talking to Your Kids About Illegal Immigration

Written by Glenn T. Stanton · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: Evangelism, Random

Jan 27 2025

Remembering the Holocaust and the Reality of Evil

Eighty years ago today, on January 27, 1945, Soviet forces overran a section of German-occupied Poland. The Nazis had been on the run for a couple of years by this point near the end of World War II, so it was not the retreat that shocked the Soviets.

In the neighborhood of Auschwitz-Birkenau, the Soviets discovered 600 corpses and 7000 live, emaciated prisoners. It was only the beginning of the discovery of the horrors of the Holocaust, a word now used as a synonym for evil. 

In 12 years of Nazi power, and particularly after the 1942 start of the “Final Solution,” some six million Jews, along with five million Slavs, Roma, dissidents and other prisoners were worked, shot, or gassed to death. The bulk were taken from modern day Poland, Belarus and Ukraine, but Hitler’s odious apparatus netted victims from across Europe, sometimes with complicity of local governments. The Nazis claimed that the Jews were being resettled in newly conquered areas of the USSR, but they were instead systematically executed. Those who could work were worked to death. Those who couldn’t work, including children and the elderly, were killed with all the industrial genius of the German nation. 

What should be a source of shock for today is the increasing number of young Americans who doubt that the Holocaust, one of the most well-attested events in all history, even happened. The records are there, as were a number of eyewitnesses. The Nazis said they were going to do it, and Germans today admit they did. This evil happened.  

This is why Holocaust Remembrance Day is important to note and observe, especially with the next generation. It is a historical marker that forces us to face the reality and potential of evil. Especially in a culture like ours, which too often caricatures evil, we must not downplay the potential of humanity to commit evils after the Fall.   

My generation owes much to films that taught us about the Holocaust, such as Schindler’s List or Life is Beautiful.  Schools once assigned books such as The Diary of Anne Frank, Man’s Search for Meaning, or Eyewitness Auschwitz, in which a narrator describes three years working in the crematorium. The Holocaust Museums in Washington, D.C. and Jerusalem are especially invaluable tools for bolstering our cultural memories.   

It is a profound and dangerous mistake to deny this evil or to assume it is a matter of the past, as if our “enlightened age” is incapable of doing what our ancestors did. Moral evolution is a pernicious and dangerous lie. Future generations must know the truth of the human condition, lest they too are deluded by moral and technological hubris.   

After all, the Holocaust was not the work of the oppressed seeking to redress sins of the past. Nor can it be explained as the work of barbarians or uneducated bigots lashing out against all who were different. Germany was arguably the most scientifically advanced and best-educated nation in the world at that time.    

The unnerving HBO movie Conspiracy portrays how military, legal, and political German leaders gathered at the Wannsee Conference on January 20, 1942. There, they set in motion a plan to rid the world of Jews. Most of the men at that meeting were caught and killed or died before the end of the war, but their actions endure as among the vilest archetypes of human depravity. 

The Holocaust perpetrated by the Nazi regime is the most well-known horror of a horror-filled twentieth century. At Auschwitz, Buchenwald, and Bergen-Belsen, the world confronts the realities of evil in this world and the human condition. Whatever it takes, we must never forget. 

Image from Getty.

Written by John Stonestreet · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: Random

Jan 24 2025

Watch This Perfect Response to Gender Ideology

Pierre Poilievre, a current Canadian MP and soon-to-be Prime Minister, gave the world the perfect response to the gender madness being forced upon all of us.

He was recently asked by a Toronto reporter if he would follow President Trump’s lead in having the government recognize only two sexes. The reporter had no idea what he was stepping into.

Poilievre calmly and kindly responded, “Well, I don’t know. Do you have any other genders you’d like to name?”

Poilievre confidently continued, “Well, I am not aware of any other genders than men and women. If you have any others you want me to consider, you can tell me right now.”

Of course, the reporter could not because there are no others. You can see the brilliant exchange below:

Bring home common sense: https://t.co/Mlman55m8q pic.twitter.com/fykUMF2kgx

— Pierre Poilievre (@PierrePoilievre) January 22, 2025

Strong, common-sense leaders who are not afraid to dismantle nonsense in such a manner are the order of the day. We need more leaders to stand up.

Remember: If we can’t speak sensibly about male and female, we can’t speak sensibly about the family.

Related articles and resources:

What Does it Mean to Be Trans, Anyway?

Yes, Transgenderism is a False Belief System

The Embarrassing Crack-Up of the LGBT Project

Do Not Fall for the ‘Affirm Them or They Will Die’ Lie

How to Defeat Gender Ideology, Protect Children and End ‘Trans America’

New Research Confirms Previous Findings: Most Gender Confused Kids Desist

The Shifting Ground of ‘Gender-Affirming Care’

How the “Trans” and Gender Redefinition Issue Attacks the Family

How to Respond to “Trans” and Gender Ideology? Simple: Live Not by Lies

Are Sex and Gender Different Things?

No, Trans Rights Are Certainly NOT Human Rights

Image from Shutterstock.

Written by Glenn T. Stanton · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: LGBT, Random, transgender

Jan 15 2025

Harvard Evolutionary Biologist Brilliantly Explains Necessity of Monogamous Marriage

In a large and important research-based book, Harvard evolutionary biologist and anthropologist Joseph Henrich explains how Christianity helped shape the benefits of Western civilization by promoting and enforcing monogamous marriage.

This book carries a very curious title: The WEIRDest People in the World: How the West Became Psychologically Peculiar and Particularly Prosperous (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2020). It answers the question: how did people who are Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich and Democratic come to change the world so profoundly?

He could have added another R for Religious, which is, specially, Christian.

In his nearly 700-page tome, Professor Henrich explains how “Christianity drove the spread of a particular package of social norms and beliefs that dramatically altered marriage, family, inheritance, and ownership in parts of Europe over centuries.” These were all connected and set up a sociological system for how people lived their lives together, in family and society. This led to the betterment of society for most. It was literally world-changing and largely built on the social promotion of monogamous marriage. Henrich continues,

This grassroots transformation of family life initiated a set of psychological changes that spurred new forms of urbanization and fueled interpersonal commerce while driving the proliferation of voluntary organizations, from merchant guilds and charter towns to universities and transregional monastic orders, that were governed by new … norms and laws.

Essentially, this was the creation of a new form of society, one that led to and created the good life that multiple billions of people enjoy and benefit from today, and have down through several centuries.

Henrich states, “In many ways, marriage represents the keystone institution for most – though not all – societies and may be the most primeval of human institutions” as it “permits males and females to team up to rear offspring” which is the driver of all civilizational growth. He adds, “By anchoring on these pair-bonding instincts, marriage norms can dramatically expand family networks in a couple of interrelated ways.”

Years ago, Henrich wrote an important scholarly paper for the journal Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society explaining how marriage through “normative monogamy reduces crime rates, including rape, murder, assault, robbery and fraud, as well as decreasing personal abuses.”

In the book, he explains that “getting married cuts a man’s chances of committing a crime by half, both for property crimes like burglary, theft, and robbery and for violent crimes like assault and battery.” He adds, “Across all crime, marriage cuts the rate by 35 percent.” He continues, “If guys had a ‘good’ marriage, they were even less likely to commit a crime.” He reminds us that this means marriage itself has a positive influence on men because the comparisons were with the men themselves, pre- and post-wedding.

Marital monogamy provides essential social benefits by democratizing sexuality in uniting one man to one woman and vice versa through marriage. This clarifies paternity and paternal investment in children and the children’s mother. In WEIRD, Henrich asserts, “By firming up links between children and their fathers, as well as between spouses, marriage creates in-laws. …The effect of marriage bonds on kinship ties are big.”

Marriage builds stronger, longer-lasting social connections and efficient distributions of wealth and trade within communities and across generations.

Henrich goes onto help us appreciate that “marriage norms also regulate who can marriage and reproduce with whom, which subtly structures society in ways most people don’t realize.” He explains this happens predominantly by creating “sexual and marriage taboos” that have transformed society in very beneficial ways. These taboos and sexual norms settle men down and get them to focus on one woman and their common children, as well as the resultant extended kinship bonds that union creates. It also protects women from being collected and used as one of multiple wives. Afterall, the wife in a monogamous marriage is a much more powerful player and familial and community leader than her peers in polygamous harems.  This fact again focuses paternal investment more sharply and beneficially toward the offspring the man has with her as his one wife.

All of this makes men, women, children and society better. And it stems from the Christian norm of sexuality and marriage.

Related Articles and Resources

Why You Should Care About the Growing Positive Power of Marriage

Family Scholars Explain the Current Marriage Paradox in America

New Research Shows Married Families Matter More Than Ever

Important New Book Explains Why Marriage Still Matters

Why Marriage Really Matters – 3 Focus on the Family Reports

Reclaiming the Truth About Marriage

Research Update: The Compelling Health Benefits of Marriage

Important New Research on How Married Parents Improve Child Well-Being

New Research: Marriage Still Provides Major Happiness Premium

Cohabitation Still Harmful – Even as Stigma Disappears

Don’t Believe the Modern Myth. Marriage Remains Good for Women

Don’t Believe the Modern Myth. Marriage Remains Good for Men.

Yes, Married Mothers Really Are Happier Than Unmarried and Childless Women

Married Mothers and Fathers Are Happiest According to Gold-Standard General Social Survey

Married Fatherhood Makes Men Better

Marriage and the Public Good: A New Manifesto of Policy Proposals

Image from Shutterstock.

Written by Glenn T. Stanton · Categorized: Marriage · Tagged: Random

Jan 08 2025

The Rising Belief in Miracles

According to a recent report from statistician Ryan Burge, the belief in miracles has risen in recent years among the college-educated, the group most correlated with materialistic beliefs. In 1991, just 45% of Americans with a bachelor’s degree said they “definitely believe” in miracles. However, according to the U.S. government’s General Social Survey, that number climbed to 63% by 2018. The change was even more dramatic among those with graduate-level degrees. In 1991, a mere 30% of those with at least a master’s degree believed in miracles. By 2018, that number had jumped to 61%. 

Apparently, education is no longer the de-supernaturalizing influence it once was. In fact, those with higher education are as likely to believe in miracles as those without higher education. However, these surprising numbers are part of the larger story of Western secular society. 

The standard prediction about the West has been that the growth and expansion of technology would continue to make us more secular, and that more secular would mean less belief in God and the supernatural. But, the percentage of atheists and agnostics in America has hardly budged, even among the group Burge refers to as the “non-religious.” Even the so-called “Great de-Churching” has not been a mass conversion to atheism, but rather an explosion of what sociologists call “nones,” people with no religion in particular.  

Making sense of this apparent contradiction requires rethinking what it means to be “secular.” For example, just as rejecting religion is not the same as rejecting the supernatural, so an increased openness to the supernatural should not be equated with religious revival. New York Times columnist Ross Douthat suggested that the softening toward “signs and wonders” among college-educated Americans may simply reflect “the general resilience of supernaturalism.” This is not the same thing as embracing faith, Christian or otherwise. Put differently, there is such a thing as a secular spirituality, and that may be what we are seeing today.  

In the middle of the twentieth century, the eminent sociologist Peter Berger proposed the “secularization thesis.” He speculated that as societies advanced into the modern, scientific age, religion would lose its grip on people. In its place would be a secularism that, among other things, was marked by a rejection of anything supernatural.  

Decades later, Berger renounced this thesis, recognizing the resilience of religion. For example, the world had become more religious, not less. Christianity is projected to number 2.7 billion or 33.8% of the world’s population soon, while atheism and the non-religious are declining as a percentage of world population.  

In this sense, the West is an outlier. However, it’s not clear that Berger’s self-rejected thesis was wrong. More than 25 years ago, another observer argued that the form of secularism overtaking our society wasn’t Dawkins-style materialism. Rather, it was the tendency to think about the world and to live not as if God does not exist, but as if He were largely irrelevant. In his book The Way of the Modern World, Dr. Craig Gay suggested that our modern, consumeristic and, yes, secular world elevated convenience, control, and choice above all other values. Thus, we may still “believe” in God and want spirituality, but our approach mimics shopping or eating at a buffet, in which we pick and choose what we like rather than relying on the authority of Scriptures, traditions, or creeds.  

In this view, the West is as deeply secular about spirituality as about technology, politics, or anything else. An example is the disturbing video that recently went viral which portrayed white-collar Americans on an ayahuasca retreat in Central America. Spiritual tourism is big business, and these tourists, sitting in the dirt violently vomiting from hallucinogenic drugs while local guides wiped their chins, were willing to pay for their manufactured “miracle.”  

The growth of spiritual secularism, or secular spiritualism, does not disprove the secularization thesis, but it does reframe it. To be clear, the understanding of spirituality that has emerged in the West is as far from Christian as the non-spirituality that was predicted. The mixing and matching approach suits customers who believe they are in charge, and that the right techniques will give them the convenience, control, and choice Gay described, even beyond the physical world.  

Some, including higher profile former secularists, are by God’s grace finding the One who is the Truth and actually in charge of the universe. Others are finding themselves, in this increasingly popular marketplace of secular spirituality, deep in pagan darkness, subjected to forces they can’t possibly understand, let alone command. Which is why the increased openness to miracles among educated Americans is mixed news.   

Secular spirituality is far from revival. Christians know of these other forces capable of counterfeit “miracles” but that lead away from the Way, the Truth, and the Life. This should cause us to cry out for mercy for those who are being deceived.

Written by John Stonestreet · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: Random

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 14
  • Page 15
  • Page 16
  • Page 17
  • Go to Next Page »

Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | © 2025 Focus on the Family. All rights reserved.

  • Cookie Policy