• Skip to main content
Daily Citizen
  • Subscribe
  • Categories
    • Culture
    • Life
    • Religious Freedom
    • Sexuality
  • Parenting Resources
    • LGBT Pride
    • Homosexuality
    • Sexuality/Marriage
    • Transgender
  • About
    • Contributors
    • Contact
  • Donate

LGBT

Mar 05 2025

The Most Important Truth in Trump’s Joint Speech to Congress Last Night

In his joint address to Congress last night, President Trump said many important things that have massive implications. The most consequential thing for our age is when he declared for America, “Our message to every child in America is that you are perfect exactly the way God made you.”

That was undergirded by this foundational human truth, “I signed an order making it the official policy of the United States government that there are only two genders: male and female.”

To this, he added, America will be “forever ending the lie that any child is trapped in the wrong body.” He noted, “This is a big lie.”

He is correct. You can see this short segment of his speech here:

These statements by President Trump were his most important utterances all evening because they are strong, truthful corrections to demonic lies that have infiltrated so much of our culture and too many of our children today. And they came forcefully and unapologetically from the leader of the free world. That is no small thing.

This is more than a vibe shift. It is a major shift toward the essential truth of the goodness of God, what it means to be human and why the family matters in the world today.


President Trump told the world last night that God’s image in each one of us as male and female is a treasured gift. It is something to be valued and protected in each child. The culture has been telling our children that God plays tricks on them by putting them in the wrong body. Too many youth now believe their feelings are more true than God’s very good design.

President Trump also said it is now the policy of the United States that there are only two sexes, male and female. This is not just some “own-the-libs” angle on an ideological, culture war skirmish. It corrects a very damaging anti-scientific and godless view of what it means to be human. We cannot define humanity nor the human person if we do not know what male and female are.

Likewise, we cannot speak sensibly about the family if we cannot speak truthfully about male and female. This fact is of utmost importance to us here at Focus on the Family because we are a family advocacy organization founded on and defended by a Christian worldview.

Why does this matter?

One of the first facts of creation is that male and female are a part of the very image and likeness of God in creation.

“So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them” (Genesis 1:27).

No other part of God’s vast creation holds this divine distinction. No Christian can miss this truth: Attacks on the nature of male and female are nothing less than attacks on the very image and likeness of God. Every Christian must therefore be passionate about defending the image and likeness of God. They must be passionate about defending the truth and beauty of male and female.

It is very clear. Christians have no real choice but to be fierce defenders of what it means to be woman and man, girl and boy, male and female.

It is the truth, beauty and wonder of male and female that creates each family. Reader, you exist, regardless of your belief system, culture, or worldview, because you are the fruit of a male and female union, hopefully from a married mother and father. This is the first universal truth about humanity that all cultures celebrate. It is what we honor at every birthday celebration.

The confusion this pernicious gender ideology has foisted upon the world challenges each of these beautiful truths. Donald Trump is the first major world leader to surgically attack so many of these deceptively destructive lies, and to do so forcefully.

Feel however you might about his other policies and practices; he is to be praised for his bold, truthful leadership.

Additional Resources

Why Focus on the Family Cares About the Gender Issue?

Yes, Sexuality and Gender Are Undeniable Gospel Issues

New Gallup Poll Shows the Incoherence of ‘LGBTQ+’ Fiction

Here’s What Happens When Good People Don’t Connect Gay and Trans Ideology

What Does it Mean to Be Trans, Anyway?

Why Christians Can’t Avoid the “Trans” and Gender Redefinition Issue

How the “Trans” and Gender Redefinition Issue Attacks the Family

Why the ‘LGBT Person’ and ‘LGBT Community’ Don’t Really Exist

How to Respond to “Trans” and Gender Ideology? Simple: Live Not by Lies

How the Binary in ‘LGBTQ+’ Reveals Its Utter Incoherence

Image from Getty.

Written by Glenn T. Stanton · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: LGBT, transgender

Mar 05 2025

‘Transgender’ Employee’s Lawsuit Against Liberty University Moves Forward

A federal court ruled that a sex discrimination lawsuit against Liberty University can move forward. The school fired a transgender-identified employee who violated the university’s Christian beliefs about sex and sexuality.

The former employee, Jonathan Zinski, who now goes by the name Ellenor, believes, “You can be transgender and Christian. I am.”

Zinski started taking female hormones even before he was hired by the Christian school and agreed to Liberty’s doctrinal position which states that “denial of birth sex by self-identification with a different gender” is a sinful act “prohibited by God.”

The American Civil Liberties Union of Virginia and Butler Curwood, PLC filed a lawsuit on behalf of Zinski, alleging the school violated his Title VII employment rights.

ACLU of Virginia Senior Transgender Attorney Wyatt Rolla, who was born female but is transgender-identified, said in a statement:

No one should be fired because of who they are, but Liberty University made it clear that’s exactly why it fired Ellenor. It’s no surprise the judge ruled our case can move forward. Workplace discrimination against transgender people is against the law – no matter your religious beliefs.

Liberty Counsel, a Christian legal aid nonprofit, is representing the school. Founder and Chairman Matt Staver sharply disagreed.

“Liberty University has the right under the First Amendment and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to uphold its sincere Christian religious beliefs and require its employees to do the same. Jonathan Zinski intentionally and deceptively set up Liberty University in an attempt to undermine its religious beliefs and mission.”

Zinski’s lawsuit states he was hired to work at the university’s IT Helpdesk in February 2023. Four months later, Zinski told the school’s Human Resources Department that he “identified as a trans woman, had been undergoing hormone replacement therapy (HRT), and intended to legally change [his] name from Jonathan to Ellenor soon.”

According to Liberty Counsel, when Zinski was first hired, he “agreed to adhere to the university’s doctrinal position regarding the biblical understanding of gender.”

But he was violating that agreement even before working for the school, as Liberty Counsel explained:

When Zinski was hired, he acknowledged and affirmed the doctrinal statement, but then as soon as his 90-day probation period expired, he revealed he had begun taking female hormones four months before he was hired, and that he planned to “identify” as female. Zinski set up this case when he applied to be hired.

Despite the fact that Zinski signed the belief statement while already on opposite sex hormones, the ACLU of Virginia claimed, “Ellenor is a devout Christian who is committed to Liberty’s mission of ‘preaching Christ,’” adding,

“Today she is an active member of her local church, Trinity Episcopal, whose pastor fully supported her transition, even providing gender-affirming clothing.”

In his opinion allowing the case to go forward, U.S. District Judge Norman K. Moon for the Western District Of Virginia relied on the U.S. Supreme Court’s Bostock decision, writing, “Sex is the criterion at issue here. In Bostock v. Clayton Cnty., Ga., the Supreme Court of the United States held that the term ‘sex’ as used in Title VII encompasses sexual orientation and transgender status.”

When Congress passed that act, Americans understood that “sex” meant being male or female – not homosexuality or transgenderism. These identities, based on a person’s thoughts, feelings and behaviors, are now viewed as an intrinsic part of human identity. As Rolla stated, it’s “who they are.”

Judge Moon opined that it didn’t matter what Congress meant when it passed the Civil Rights Act, saying, “Words change with time, thereby placing prior Congresses’ views of the present situation beyond our reach.” 

One wonders if the meaning of other words has “changed with time,” such as those in the Bill of Rights’ First Amendment: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”

While religious non-profit organizations, like Liberty University, typically have a ministerial exemption based on the First Amendment, the judge found “that it does not apply in this case,” adding, “Zinski was not a minister under any formula. The ministerial exception does not provide an affirmative defense to liability at this stage of litigation.”

When the Supreme Court redefined “sex” in Bostock to mean something it had never meant before, Justice Samuel Alito, in his dissent, harshly rebuked the majority opinion at every turn:

The arrogance of this argument is breathtaking. … The Court’s argument is not only arrogant, it is wrong, it fails on its own terms. “Sex,” “sexual orientation,” and “gender identity” are different concepts, as the Court concedes. …
Without strong evidence to the contrary (and there is none here), our job is to ascertain and apply the “ordinary meaning” of the statute. And in 1964, ordinary Americans most certainly would not have understood Title VII to ban discrimination because of sexual orientation or gender identity.

Liberty Counsel said it will appeal the case, arguing “that federal law protects religious institutions to uphold their sincere Christian beliefs and to employ those who are aligned with its religious mission and beliefs.”

Let’s pray they prevail, as Zinski v. Liberty University has important implications for churches, religious schools and ministries. The Daily Citizen will keep you updated as the case moves through higher courts.

Related articles and resources:

The Bostock Slippery Slope: Girls Who Think They’re Boys Must Be Allowed to Use High School Boys’ Restroom, Appeals Court Rules

EEOC Releases Major Guidance Ending Many Workplace Protections for Women

Federal Judge Blocks Administration’s Attempt to Impose Gender Ideology on Employers, Healthcare Providers

Federal Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Attacking Faith-based Schools

New Post-Bostock Lawsuit Would Force Doctors to Perform ‘Gender-Transition’ Surgeries Against Their Medical Judgment

‘Not Only Arrogant, But Wrong’: Justice Alito Slams SCOTUS Majority for Redefining ‘Sex’

President Trump: ‘There are Only Two Genders: Male and Female’

Politicians and Religious Conservatives React to Landmark SCOTUS Ruling on Employment Discrimination

Image from Shutterstock.

Written by Jeff Johnston · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: LGBT, transgender

Mar 03 2025

Iowa Governor Signs Bill ‘That Safeguards the Rights of Women and Girls’

After contentious hearings and demonstrations at the Iowa Capitol, Governor Kim Reynolds signed a law protecting girls’ and women’s rights.

The new law, Senate File 418, defines “sex” in Iowa statutes as “the state of being either male or female as observed or clinically verified at birth.” The measure also removes “gender identity” from nondiscrimination laws.

As legislators were considering the bill, transgender-identified protestors and their allies flooded the state Capitol, reported the Des Moines Register. “More than 2,000 LGBTQ rights supporters chanted, shouted and jeered in protest as House and Senate lawmakers passed the bill, sending it to Reynolds’ desk.”

The Gazette, a news outlet in Cedar Rapids, posted videos and photos from the protests. Protestors carried signs with the usual transgender slogans, such as “Trans Rights Are Human Rights” and “I’d rather have a TRANS daughter than a DEAD daughter.”

Here you can see some opponents of the bill singing, “We are singing, singing for our lives.”

Demonstrators sing "We are trans, bi, queer, together and we are singing, singing for our lives" at the Iowa Capitol as Republican state lawmakers prepare to debate, and presumably pass, legislation that would remove gender identity from the Iowa Civil Rights Act. pic.twitter.com/pq99tWR3z8

— The Gazette (@gazettedotcom) February 27, 2025

The bill, of course, doesn’t take the lives or civil rights of transgender-identified people. Gender confused Iowans have all the same rights as other Iowans.

Adding spurious internal or socio-political identities, like “sexual orientation” and “gender identity” (SOGI), to non-discrimination laws harms those who disagree with these sexual ideologies. Such legislation is based on the idea that a person’s identity is defined by sexual attractions, thoughts, feelings and behaviors.

As we’ve previously written in the Daily Citizen, SOGI laws, policies and regulations affect freedom of speech, parental rights, religious freedom, girls sports and the basic privacy, safety and dignity of women and men. 

Something is not a “civil right” if it threatens or strips others of their civil rights, which is what SOGI nondiscrimination laws do.

The Iowa House passed the measure with a vote of 60-36, while the Senate passed the bill with a vote of 33-15.

In a video and press statement about SF 418, Reynolds said, “Today, I am signing into law a bill that safeguards the rights of women and girls.”

“It is common sense to acknowledge the obvious biological differences between men and women. In fact, it is necessary to secure genuine equal protection for women and girls.”

Today, I signed into law a bill that safeguards the rights of women and girls. pic.twitter.com/bjEEsAW6aR

— Gov. Kim Reynolds (@IAGovernor) February 28, 2025

The protections were necessary, the governor said, because the state’s “Civil Rights Code blurred the biological line between the sexes” and “forced Iowa taxpayers to pay for gender reassignment surgeries.”

The bill protects women in sex-segregated spaces and activities, the governor explained, saying:

It is why we have men and women’s bathrooms, but not men and women’s conference rooms; girls’ and boys’ sports, but not girls’ math and boys’ math; separate men and women’s prisons, but not different laws for men and women. It is about the biological differences, and that is all.

It is also why Iowa has enacted laws protecting girls’ sports for girls and women’s private spaces like bathrooms and locker rooms.

She added that all people deserve “respect and dignity, concluding her statement by saying, “What this bill does accomplish is to strengthen protections for women and girls, and I believe that is the right thing to do.”

In addition to defining “sex,” here are some of the other definitions from SF 418 which will be used in state statutes:

  • Female – means an individual who has, had, will have through the course of normal development, or would have but for a developmental anomaly, genetic anomaly, or accident, a reproductive system that at some point produces ova.
  • Male – means an individual who has, had, will have through the course of normal development, or would have but for a developmental anomaly, genetic anomaly, or accident, a reproductive system that at some point produces sperm.
  • “Woman” or “girl” refers to a female.
  • “Man” or “boy” refers to a male.
  • “Gender,” when used alone in reference to males, females, or the natural differences between males and females shall be considered a synonym for sex and shall not be considered a synonym or shorthand expression for gender identity, experienced gender, gender expression, or gender role.
  • The term “equal” does not mean “same” or “identical.”

The bill makes allowances for those with “a medically verifiable diagnosis of disorder or difference of sex development.” It allows for sex-segregated spaces in locker rooms, restrooms, prisons and shelters, and it forbids schools from promoting or instructing kindergarten through sixth grade students about sexual orientation or gender theory.

Related Articles and Resources:

Are Sex and Gender Different Things?

Department of Education Launches Multiple Investigations Into Title IX Violations

Department of Education Office for Civil Rights Dear Colleague Letter

Kansas Legislature Enacts ‘Help Not Harm’ Legislation, Overriding Governor’s Veto

Transgender Resources

Trump Signs Executive Order Protecting Women’s Sports and Spaces

What Are Male and Female in God’s Story?

Why a Trans Woman is a Not a Woman

Image from Shutterstock.

Written by Jeff Johnston · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: Girls Sports, LGBT

Feb 28 2025

Senate Set to Vote on Bill that Protects Women’s Sports

The Senate is expected to vote Monday on the “Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act,” legislation reintroduced last month by Senator Tommy Tuberville and designed to make permanent President Trump’s executive order banning men from competing in women’s sports.

The House of Representatives passed similar legislation in January; all Republicans voted for the bill, along with Texas Democrats Henry Cuellar and Vicente Gonzalez.

“Common sense should tell us that women and girls shouldn’t be forced to compete in sports or share a school locker room with biological males,” said Senator James Lankford of Oklahoma. “Although the Biden Administration fought to erase biological differences, I want to uphold equal opportunity for the next generation of female athletes.”

Senator Tuberville echoed Senator Lankford, saying, “President Trump ran on the issue of saving women’s sports and won in a landslide.”

He added,

70% of Americans agree — men don’t belong in women’s sports or locker rooms. I have said many times that I think Title IX is one of the best things to come out of Washington. But in the last few years, it has been destroyed. While I’m glad that the Biden administration ultimately rescinded the proposed rule, Congress has to ensure this never happens again. I am welcoming my first granddaughter this spring and won’t stop fighting until her rights to fairly compete are protected. I hope every one of my colleagues will join me in standing up for our daughters, nieces, and granddaughters by voting for this critical bill.

Given the 53 Republican seats in the Senate and 60 votes needed to advance the bill for a final vote, the fate of Monday’s vote remains uncertain.

Regardless of what state you reside in, your senators need to hear from you. Please reach out to them and urge them to vote “yes” on the “Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act,” or S.9.

Opponents of the bill have wrongly suggested the legislation is dangerous and discriminatory. In reality, it helps to ensure the safety of women and rights a major wrong with females being unfairly targeted on various fields of competition. Over 900 women have lost trophies and awards to men pretending to be female.

Thankfully, the American people aren’t falling for the ruse. Wide majorities believe women shouldn’t have to be squaring off against men. It’s common sense. It shouldn’t be controversial.

Many have remarked on the powerful image of President Trump surrounded by girl and women athletes as he signed the executive order that officially (albeit temporarily) rescinded funding from any program that deprived female athletes of fair competition.

It’s tragic that common sense legislation like the “Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act” is necessary. But what will be even more calamitous if an obstructionist minority of Senators refuse to protect our daughters from creeps, con artists and the mentally confused who are scamming girls sports. 

Again, please contact your two senators and ask them to vote “YES” on the “Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act” or S.9.

Image from Getty.

Written by Paul Batura · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: Girls Sports, LGBT, Paul

Feb 25 2025

New Gallup Poll Shows the Incoherence of ‘LGBTQ+’ Fiction

The Gallup polling group does an annual U.S. survey tracking how much of the population identifies as “LGBTQ+”. They released their most recent findings late last week, and this new data further demonstrates how incoherent this meaningless alphabet soup really is.

In 2023, 7.2% of Americans said these letters identified them in some way. In 2024, that number climbed slightly to 7.6%. This year, that number jumped to an even more unreasonable 9.3%. It is unreasonable because the whole idea that “LGBTQ+” represents anything objectively true and real — something that anyone actually is — is a myth.

Gallup reports this new 9.3 percentage apex has nearly doubled since 2020 and is much higher than 3.5% in 2012, the first year Gallup started polling these amorphous identities. Nearly all this growth has taken place among the younger generation, demonstrating this is more social/ideological contagion, rather than something that exists in nature.

What Does “LGBTQ+” Even Mean?

It is not unfair to question what this collection of letters even means.

Gallup explains they asked people if they “identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender or something other than heterosexual.” We must be mindful of the fact that increasing numbers of young people believe its unfashionable to identify as heterosexual, regardless of their actual sexual desires or behaviors. We are naive if we assume someone saying they are “LBGTQ+” means they are attracted to the same-sex or identify as some “other gender.” When asked to identify which of the letters (or the undefined +) they identify with, the majority of this elastic group said they were either bisexual (5.2%) while 5% declined to give an identity at all. This is very telling.

Only 2% said they were “gay,” 1.4% identified at “lesbian” and just 1.3% said they were “transgender.” Fewer than 1% said they were some other identity like pansexual, asexual or queer.

It has been documented that respondents don’t always mean what we might think they mean when they identify as non-heterosexual. Eric Kaufmann, a Canadian professor of politics at the University of Buckingham in England, found in his 2022 research that “LGBT identification was running at twice the rate of LGBT sexual behavior” [emphasis added].

Kaufmann adds, “The majority of the increase in LGBT identity can be traced to how those who only engage in heterosexual behavior describe themselves.” In effect, young people are increasingly using the imprecise “LGBTQ+” identity for reasons beyond what their actual behavior is.

Kaufmann concludes, “Overall, the data suggest that while there has been an increase in same-sex behavior in recent years, sociopolitical factors likely explain most of the rise in LGBT identity.”

Leftist commentator and comedian Bill Maher famously skewered the incoherence of this exploding “LGBTQ+” identity among our youth.

Maher wryly notes that “if we follow this trajectory, we will all be gay in 2054!” Of course, that is no more true than it is that nearly 10 percent of Americans are gay, lesbian or trans. Young people are increasingly identifying with this mish-mash alphabet soup because its trendy and it challenges norms, something nearly every generation of young people has been eager to do to express their so-called independence.

Research published in 2023 in The Journal of Sex Research explains researching adolescent sexual identity is confusing because, they find, “sexual orientation is multidimensional and fluid.” The categories are increasingly meaningless. So much so, that “for many gender diverse adolescents, common questions about sexuality, sexual behavior, and sexual orientation were simply impossible to answer.” Findings “showed multiple developmental patterns, but overall, many adolescents were ‘fluid’ in the sexual identity label and romantic attraction they reported …”

That is what happen when we tell our youth they can literally define their own realities.

Does “LGBTQ+” Even Exist?

Douglas Murray, a British public intellectual who identifies as homosexual, explains in his very important book, The Madness of Crowds, that LGBTQ+ is an absurd fiction.

LGBT is now one of the groupings which mainstream politicians routinely speak about – and to – as if they actually exist like a racial or religious community. It is a form of absurdity. For even on its own terms this composition is wildly unsustainable and contradictory.

Why?

Murray is very clear. “Gay men and gay women have almost nothing in common. … Neither have very much use for each other, and almost none meet in any ‘communal’ spaces.” He adds, “Gay men and gay women, meanwhile, have a famous amount of suspicion towards people who claim to be ‘bisexual.’”

He is not done.

“And there is tremendous dispute over whether the T’s are the same thing as everybody else, or an insult to them” and “Queers want to be recognized as fundamentally different to everyone else, and to use that difference to tear down the kind of order that gays are working to get into.”

No, “LGBTQ+” does not exist as a meaningful, coherent category. That is precisely why polling like this from Gallup and other such organizations only tells us how many young people don’t want to be affiliated as mainstream and are all too happy to confuse pollsters with completely made up categories.

Additional Resources

How the Binary in ‘LGBTQ+’ Reveals Its Utter Incoherence

Why Christians Can’t Avoid the “Trans” and Gender Redefinition Issue

How the “Trans” and Gender Redefinition Issue Attacks the Family

Why the ‘LGBT Person’ and ‘LGBT Community’ Don’t Really Exist

How to Respond to “Trans” and Gender Ideology? Simple: Live Not by Lies

Are Sex and Gender Different Things?

No GLAAD, Gender Ideology is NOT ‘Settled Science.’ It’s the Opposite

Why Focus on the Family Cares About the Gender Issue?

Yes, Sexuality and Gender Are Undeniable Gospel Issues

Image from Shutterstock

Written by Glenn T. Stanton · Categorized: Culture · Tagged: LGBT, transgender

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 18
  • Page 19
  • Page 20
  • Page 21
  • Page 22
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 29
  • Go to Next Page »

Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | Privacy Policy and Terms of Use | © 2026 Focus on the Family. All rights reserved.

  • Cookie Policy