LGBT

The fight to defend parental rights and the innocence of children is one of the defining cultural battles of our generation. Colorado’s Lee family deserves our deepest gratitude and respect for standing up — not just for their own family — but for parents and children across the nation.

As reported by the Daily Citizen, Erin and Jonathan Lee appealed their case to the U.S. Supreme Court, alleging that Colorado school district policies and practices on “gender identity” intentionally excluded them as parents from critical decisions involving their daughter. They charge such policies violate their constitutional rights as parents to control the upbringing and care of their children.

Recently, the Supreme Court decided not to take up the Lee family’s case. In a short statement, Justice Samuel Alito made it clear that this wasn’t because the issue isn’t important. Instead, the Court felt this particular case wasn’t the right one for them to rule on at this time.

Justice Alito also pointed out that the case raises very serious questions about parental rights.

“The troubling – and tragic – allegations in this case underscore the ‘great and growing national importance’ of the question that these parent petitioners present.”

In other words, this isn’t the end of the fight. In fact, momentum seems to be growing.

The Lee family’s courage and determination have paved the way for future legal battles on this issue. Defending the innocence of our children and our role as parents is always a cause worth defending. Thank you, Lee family.

Two Remaining Parental Rights Cases

The Supreme Court, however, is still considering two similar parental rights cases it might take up this term.

One case that could provide that opportunity is Foote v. Ludlow School Committee. In this matter, parents allege that a Massachusetts school district secretly facilitated a social “gender transition” for their daughter at school, including using a new name and pronouns without their knowledge and holding private counseling sessions behind their backs.

A petition asking the Supreme Court to hear the Foote case was filed on July 18. Since then, 21 states joined in urging the Court to take it up, recognizing its national significance for parental rights. The case is still pending before the Court as it decides whether to grant review.

Another key case is Littlejohn v. School Board of Leon County. Florida parents say their school district created a so-called gender transition plan for their child and excluded them from the process entirely. The parents filed a petition asking the Supreme Court to hear their case on September 3, 2025.On October 6, 21 states announced their support for the Littlejohns’ petition. The case is set to be considered at a Court conference on November 7, 2025.

If the Court agrees to take up Foote or Littlejohn, it could set a landmark precedent affirming parents’ right to be fully informed and involved in major decisions about their children.

These cases — the Lee case, the Foote case, and the Littlejohn case — represent a growing legal and cultural battle over one of the most critical questions of our time: Do parents have the right to be fully informed and involved in major decisions affecting their children?

Let’s remember these cases in our prayers and ask the Lord to defend families, protect children and uphold the rights of parents across this nation.

Related Articles and Resources

Focus on the Family exists to help families, and that includes help navigating the issues of homosexuality and transgenderism. Focus offers a free, one-time counseling consultation with a licensed or pastoral counselor. To request a counseling consultation, call 1-855-771-HELP (4357) or fill out our Counseling Consultation Request Form.

Erin and Jon have a documentary, Art Club, telling their story. Watch online for free.

To learn more about Erin’s advocacy for children and parents, visit her account on X or her website.

‘Art Club’ Documentary — One Family’s Escape from Gender Ideology, and the Bigger Trend Sweeping the Nation

Exclusive Interview: Colorado Parents Expose ‘Gender Cult’ at Public School in New Documentary

Focus on the Family Urges Congressional Leaders to Respect Parental Rights

Homosexuality Resources

Transgender Resources

Understanding Homosexuality

Image from Shutterstock.

We have all been heavily pressured over the last ten years to fully accept and never question the lie that anyone can be male or female. One need only make the claim and we are all expected to play along. We are deemed unkind if we don’t.

Of course, this is madness.

New research, previously reported by Daily Citizen, has indicated that the “trans” fad is dying. A lie will always reveal itself and that seems to be what is happening with trans ideology.

On October 14, University of Buckingham (UK) social scientist Eric Kaufmann posted new data that went wildly viral. He claimed it showed “trans identification is in free fall among the young.”

He also stated, “Non-conforming sexual identity [queer, questioning] is also in sharp decline” adding, “Gay and lesbian are stable while heterosexuality has rebounded by around 10 points since 2023.” This data is presented in his full report entitled, “The Decline of Trans and Queer Identity among Young Americans” from which his X thread was based upon.

This would indicate that the shine is falling from “trans” and “queer” identity.

But others contested these findings, saying there were methodological problems with Kaufmann’s data and conclusion, doing so here, here, and here. Professor Kaufmann responded to these critics on X and on his Centre for Heterodox Social Science Substack. It all delves into deep research methodology weeds that most of us can easily get lost in. However, two of the critical scholars made concessions from the exchange.

Another notable research scholar, Jean Twenge of San Diego State University, took great interest in Kaufamann’s original claims and the academic challenges brought by these few critics. She wondered if there might be better, nationally representative data sets that answer and bridge the methodological questions being debated. She wrote two very revealing articles on what she found.

Professor Twenge asks in her October 16 article, “So has transgender identification declined among the population of young adults as a whole?” She concludes, “The short answer: Maybe.” She explains that The Household Pulse survey conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau included a question about identifying as “transgender” is in its nationally representative surveys between 2021 and 2024.

Among 18- to 22-year-olds, identifying as trans increased 58% between 2021 and 2023, “then it bobbled a bit” she explains, going down and then up in 2023 and the first half of 2024 before declining significantly in the second half of 2024 to nearly 2021 levels of 2%. Twenge observes, “It appears identifying as transgender peaked in early 2024 among younger adults even at the population level.” But she also admits, “It’s hard to say if the late 2024 decline is a blip or the start of a longer trend.”

She explained that we need 2025 Census data to confirm this decline. But we don’t have that data from the Census Household Pulse survey that was fielded in February 2025. “Why don’t we have it?” she asks. Her answer: “I assume this occurred because of the Trump administration’s directive to federal agencies that there are only two sexes, male and female, and that gender identity is not to be measured or recognized.”

Twenge concludes this first analysis saying, “That is deeply unfortunate, because without that data, we’re in the dark.” But Twenge didn’t remain in the dark for long.

She soon posted a second article on October 20 entitled, “Trans identification really is in free fall: New data” presenting analysis from an additional nationally representative data set she discovered. This is from the Cooperative Election Study (CES) conducted each fall by YouGov polling and Tufts University. It shows that use of both “transgender” and “nonbinary” identification by 18- to 22-year-olds have both dropped substantially.

From this data, she concludes, “It turns out identifying as transgender really is in free fall among the young in the U.S. So is identifying as nonbinary. In other words, Kaufmann was right (with what some consider the wrong data, but still right).”

She adds, “For now … it looks like the peak of trans identification is in the past.”

This is a very hopeful sign, showing that being “trans” is certainly not something that exists in nature. It is a psychic phenomenon that has captured a generation, and thankfully seems to be losing its deceptive grip.

Image from Shutterstock.

Dozens of students and parents participated in a walkout at an Oregon high school last week to protest school policy allowing boys to use girls bathrooms and locker rooms.

The student-led event took place at Roseburg High School on October 8. Boys and girls alike left their seventh period class to join a crowd of supportive adults outside. They lined the street outside the school, waving signs proclaiming girls’ right to privacy.

“Honk to support our girls privacy,” one sign read.

“This all ends when enough of us say no,” proclaimed another bright orange marker.

Shannon Miller helped her daughter, Kyleigh, organize the walkout after Roseberg allowed a transgender-identified boy to change in the locker room.

Shannon told journalist Rick Dancer she met with the high school’s principle after learning two boys had been using the girls bathroom and locker rooms. The administration agreed to ask both male students if they would be willing to use the school’s private changing stalls and gender-neutral bathrooms.

One student agreed. The other continued using girls facilities.

The school told Shannon nothing else could be done because Oregon law prohibits discrimination based on gender identity in public schools. The administration suggested Kyleigh and other young women uncomfortable with boys in their bathrooms and locker rooms use the private facilities instead.

Multiple students say the private bathrooms are located in an auxiliary building and require a teacher to unlock the doors.

Roseburg High’s argument about upholding Oregon law is a cop-out.

True, the Oregon Department of Education (ODE) claims state antidiscrimination law protects students’ “right” to use bathrooms and locker rooms consistent with their subjective gender identity, rather than their biological sex. It warns preemptively ordering transgender-identified students to change in a private area could be considered discrimination.

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, one of the most left-leaning appellate courts in the country, affirmed ODE’s interpretation of Oregon law in 2020.

But policies and verdicts like these defy federal guidance on Title IX, which requires federally funded educational programs to segregate sports, bathrooms and locker rooms by sex. The federal government is working to withhold federal education funding from Oregon and several other states with laws that contradict Title IX.

Less than two weeks ago, the U.S. Departments of Education and Health and Human Services ordered Minnesota to revise policies allowing boys to compete in girls sports in public schools, noting, “To the extent state law conflicts with Title IX, federal law preempts state law.”

The Department of Education launched an investigation into ODE for Title IX violations in July.

Shannon and Kyleigh Miller say Roseburg High’s position proves women have fewer rights in Oregon than transgender-identified men.

“[The school] is telling me the state law says that those who identify as the other gender have essentially more rights than Kyleigh … and every other girl in Oregon — or boy, if this was flip-flopped,” Shannon told Dancer.

“I take that to mean these transgender-identified students’ right to be comfortable and to feel safe and to have privacy is more important than the rest of the students’ at Roseburg High.”

Students at the walkout seemed similarly fed-up with the school’s inaction.

“We just want to create a safe environment for all of us,” one student told a reporter. “When [boys] come into the [girls locker room] … it creates a dangerous place for us [girls], because there’s no one in those bathrooms making sure we are going to be safe.”

Locker rooms had similarly lax supervision, another student claimed.

The students demonstrated enormous courage to stand up for themselves in a school, district and state that routinely labels girls with expectations of privacy “transphobic,” “bigoted” or “discriminatory.”

Their participation is even more impressive given the school allegedly tried to quash the walkout. Students say the administration threatened to cancel homecoming and hand out detentions and suspensions.

Video of an administrative meeting following the walkout shows an adult reading written remarks from a student who wished to stay anonymous for fear of retaliation.

“[Admin at Roseburg] made it pretty clear they felt the need to scare children today about the walkout,” the adult commented.

The anonymous student’s story is at once ridiculous and heartbreakingly familiar. She doesn’t want to wear her nice school clothes to weight training, but she also doesn’t want to change out in front of a boy.

“Why do grown adults keep putting young girls in one of the most awkward, uncomfortable, unbearable situations?” she asks in the letter, concluding:

The brave students who participated in the Roseburg High walkout deserve the highest praise for taking a risk in service of what is right. Advocates for biological reality everywhere should be taking notes.

Additional Articles and Resources

California Students battle to Protect Girls’ Private Spaces in Schools

Yes, Girls Care When Boys Take Their Trophies

Minnesota Allowed Boys to Compete on Six Girls Teams, Federal Investigation

Transgender Ideology is Inherently Destructive

Transgender Ideology is Inherently Destructive, Part 2